₦airaland Forum

Dedeity:
This ediot still dey ? Tinubu said he read accounting but his records show he studied business admin. Then again, he said he graduated from govt college in 1970 where as the school was established in 1974. Tinubu forged his certificate but you mentally unstable agbado urchins won't agree. Spit on your cone head

Mitsurugi:
But he submitted a forged document.

oteneaaron:
STAY FOCUSED ON THE MAIN ISSUE.

The main issue is this - TINUNBU SUBMITTED A FORGED CERTIFICATE TO INEC.

THE CONSTITUTION IS CLEAR!

TINUBU MUST BE DISQUALIFIED.

oteneaaron:
You can confirm the details for your self bro.

Please take some time off your busy schedule and read through the 218 pages of the Deposition for yourself.

Here is the link to the uncertified copy ==> https://www.scribd.com/document/675520235/Atiku-Abubakar-vs-CSU-Legal-Deposition-UNCERTIFIED-COPY

It is called uncertified copy because it still has some grammatical errors, remember this is a direct transcript of the Deposition.

The certified copy will be out soon where it will be easier to read and the grammatical errors would have been fixed.

The main point is that the Registrar of Chicago State University clearly stated under oath that they can't authenticate the certificate Tinubu submitted to INEC.

If they can't authenticate it, then it means the certificate Tinubu submitted to INEC was FORGED.

oteneaaron:
In case you missed it, here are some key takeaways from this article by Daily Post Nigeria:

ValarDoharis:
Elections should be determined by the electorates and not five judges.

This is why it is extremely important for INEC to conduct credible and transparent elections

mrvitalis:
Using a post I made in 2017 to hold me in 2023 is foolishness.... I made several post in my defense of APC

But as I grew observed I learned by my mistakes

I never supported obi based on his lifestyle but based on his policy simple... His policy was exactly what we needed

Simply
This is the last time I would respond to this topic

azpekuliar:
They have 14 days but the PEPT was eager to dismiss petitions because they were filed after the official time prescribed by the law. If the CTC or whatever documents being asked for are not released in a timely manner how then can they put forward their case before the Supreme court. I read someone say then they should use what they have, then the same court will dismiss their petition due to insufficient evidence or tardiness. Nobody is fooled though.

helinues:


The petitioners didn't only loose at PEPT but was also fined..

APM: N 13, 675, 890. 00

LP: N 47, 910, 431. 87

PDP: N 23, 391,001. 45

https://www.nairaland.com/7819034/why-pept-may-fine-peter

garfield1:
My brother,you hardly show face online.is it work?

OldBeer:
Useless agbadorians have taken over this thread.

Please Obidients let's come out and protest wherever we are. For those in Lagos, our meeting point is the new train station. We need more people to join us.
Come out in your numbers and fight for your country.
Leave this thread for those useless people.

HarryGleb:
Our judiciary is for the highest bidder and unfortunately, Obi no de give shishi.

Offpointng:
But why are Ipobs happy on Coup happenings in Africa and wishing same on Nigeria??

Oh they think they'll live much better under a Military rule?? A sect of people who cheer a domestic terrorism called "Sit at home" who in turn became a Nemesis to affect their well being can mean nothing to be but a Foolish people

South East will Suffer more under a Northern Military Rule - FFK

Offpointng:
But why are Ipobs happy on Coup happenings in Africa and wishing same on Nigeria??

Oh they think they'll live much better under a Military rule?? A sect of people who cheer a domestic terrorism called "Sit at home" who in turn became a Nemesis to affect their well being can mean nothing to be but a Foolish people
This isn't about IPOB o. Some African leaders no try at all.

South East will Suffer more under a Northern Military Rule - FFK

Throwback:
Wale Edun's portfolio was a no-brainer.



What was Kema Chikwe's qualification?

Same for Prof. Babalola Aborishade, and Femi Fani-Kayode who were all Aviation Ministers during Obasanjo's 8yrs regime?

What was the relevant qualification of Stella Oduah who was Aviation Minister during the regime of Jonathan?

Fejoku:
IPOB has said we aren't responsible for this fraudulent and wanton attacks on our people under the guise of an unnecessary sit at home yet our haters will come on nairaland to accuse us forcing it. Our people know the truth and will always stand by us. The state actors were sent to cause mayhem so their online minions will escalate and lay the blame on IPOB. They have failed though as our people trust us and know that we will never attack them.
Shame on all of you.

nairalanda1:
Since 2016, NNPC has been selling fuel to the market at a price lower than that of the cost of bringing it into the country.

The market then sells it at a price above the NNPC sale price, which is fixed by government

Government then pays NNPC to compensate it for the losses it sustains selling fuel to market below import cost/landing cost

That is what Mele Kyari means.

Modifed

By Jupiter's beard, Nigerians are deliberately dense, or just misunderstanding

I am not defending Buhari or Tinubu or exusing anything....I am just telling you how the system worked from 2016 onward people.

Seriously it is not that hard

It does not make Buhari a wise man...infact Buhari was doing the wrong thing by keeping subsidy in the first place, which is why we have issues now. And it was Tinubu who put him there.

If you have nothing sensible to say, don't quote me, keep the eff off.

plaindealer:
This is how you define and qualify the term Hit the ground running.

This is one of the many outcomes of serious planning and preparation.

This man is on track to be the best president in the history of Nigeria.

fergie001:
The sack of all Labour Party Candidates in Abia and Kano States by a Federal High Court sitting in Kano, is on the hot burner.

The Originating Summons was filed by Mr. Ibrahim Haruna Ibrahim against the Labour Party (LP) and the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC. It allegedly borders on the failure of the 1st defendant (LP) to submit her membership register to the 2nd defendant (INEC) 30 days prior to the Primaries of the Party.

Section 77(3) of the Electoral Act reads: Each political party shall make such register available to the Commission not later than 30 days before the date fixed for the party primaries, congresses or Convention.

With Otti as a case study, the Abia Gov-Elect resigned from the APC on May 28 and won the Party Primary conducted on June 09, 2022.

However, I believe this judgement was delivered per incuriam.

Elections have been won and lost not only in Abia State but all over the Country, hence it is only through the elections petition tribunal that reliefs (if any) can be sought as of now.

It is trite law that jurisdiction is the life-blood and existence of any suit. No matter how finely delivered, the suit becomes null and void if the Court has no jurisdiction. Lokpobiri v. Ogola per Onnoghen JSC (as he then was).

The Court does not determine the membership of a Political Party. The Party determines her members.

Mr Haruna, the plaintiff, had deposed his OS on 11th May, 2023 well over one month after the election for a suit whose cause of action was June 2022. It is clearly statute-barred, divesting the court of jurisdiction to have entertained same. He ought to have come under Section 285 of the 1999 CFRN and filed 14 days after the course of action for it to be heard.

It is clear that the Federal High Court (Pre-Election) Practice 2022, Nos 3 & 4 were obviously not judiciously followed by the court.

The question that comes to my mind is:
- does the plaintiff even possess the locus to file this suit?

Section 84(14) of the Electoral Act reads:
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Act or rules of a political party, an aspirant who complains that any of the provisions of this Act and the guidelines of a political party have not been complied with in the selection or nomination of a candidate of a political party for election, may apply to the Federal High Court for redress.

Was Mr Haruna a candidate of the Labour Party in Abia State? The certain answer is NO. He had no locus, no business with the issues having not participated in the Primaries of the Party in that State.

Again, what comes to my mind is that relevant and interested parties were not joined.

Whilst non-joinder does not necessarily invalidate the proceedings of Court, the absence of a proper or necessary party before the Court renders the entire suit an exercise in futility, as a Court cannot validly make an order or decision which will affect a stranger to the suit, who was never heard nor given an opportunity to defend himself. (Katami v. Katami 2018) per Oho JCA

The proper thing was for the Judge to have allowed a window for necessary parties to be properly joined thereof, at worse.

The plaintiff did not bring himself to show cause why he should be taken seriously neither had he shown the injury he will suffer in Abia State if his suit isn't adjudicated upon.

Again, Can Section 77(3) of the Electoral Act override the Constitutional eligibility requirements of these Candidates in Abia and/or Kano?

Still on the disqualifications issue in APM v. Mr. Peter Obi: The Appeal Court per Anthony Ugochukwu Ogakwu JCA, held that Mr Peter Obi cannot be disqualified by Section 77(3) supra having satisfied the conditions of Sections 131 and 137 of the 1999 CFRN.

Sections 131 and 137 are direct and copious to Sections 177 and 182 (for Governors).

The plaintiff's apparent lack of locus standi should have deprived the trial court of the jurisdiction to grant the relief sought by the plaintiff in his OS.

When the plaintiff has been found not to have the standing to sue, the question whether other issues in the case had been properly decided or not does not arise. The position of the law is to dismiss same (Maxi Okwu & Anor v. INEC & Ors) per Okoro JSC

Interestingly, Justice M N Yunusa contradicted himself when he held that:

"... the candidates that participated in the Abia election are not parties before the court, he lacks the jurisdiction to make an order on the issuance of certificate of return."

Then again

“....That the failure of the 1st Defendant (Labour Party) to submit its register of members in Kano state and Abia state is in crass breach of the provisions of section 77(3) of the Electoral Act, 2022 and the purported primary elections of the 1st defendant is invalid, null and void and of no effect,”

Whilst Justice Yunusa invalidated the Primaries that produced Otti, he had neither restrained nor asked INEC to withdraw the Certificate of Returns issued to the Gov-Elect/NASS Candidates. In lay terms, he made no consequential orders.

This should normally not stop the inauguration for NASS Candidates and/or Otti, however, it has to be vacated or appealed as the judgement is valid and subsisting.

It is wholesomely clear that this suit have no scintilla of merit and will not survive the scrutiny of higher Courts.

youngsahito:
Why are some people happy over this high court judgement, don't we want our democracy to produce more political party to fight the corrupt APC and PDP. I'm so ashamed for the thinking of 9ja youth this time around yet we complained about anything those greedy politicians present to us.
Labour party is not only for Obi so let's support the new party for the development of democracy in Nigeria.

danijesus:
Tinubu is not our president

Angrygoat:
The way dem go take beat am ehn, na cripple him go turn to

Rayban25:
But OP learn to say the full details.

He turned himself in

post=123141151:
Another Terrible News, Coming From RIVERS

Proudly Brought To You By

Feintline:
He shows up to support her now that she is making a name with her God given craft.

But when they were to vote, you chased them out, caused injury and destruction because they look like ibo

This is disgraceful and disgusting pretense and hypocrisy.