reigncalif1:
Oh see you trying to abuse logic
Impressive

So what of you what is your own theory?

Is there an intelligent designer?

Evolution or creation?

Dtruthspeaker:


My Answer is up there.

reigncalif1:
No ansa again

I see where you are going with this

You are not being straight
Too cunny I guess

Dtruthspeaker:


I told you my answer is up there, so if you are interested in it, then do not let laziness stop you.

reigncalif1:
You think you re smart sorry but you seem cunny not smart that is problem with most of you so am not surprised

Atheist are more straight forward

I dare you to ansa again ........

Dtruthspeaker
post=110990182:


O you children are so annoyingly tempting! If you are too lazy a boy to find it, it is not my problem.

I am not even asking you to be a Lover of God, so please, go have sex with Satan, is it me that will suffer from your stupidity OR YOU?

I do not care if you do not look for my Answer and neither do I care if you find it nor do I care if you become a Satanist, nor do I care if you become a Christian.

I really don't give a fu.vk

If you have anything reasonable to say, I will address it but anything outside that, I don't give a fuq.

LordReed:


Understand it.

HardMirror:
this is the reason it is said that religion is an inhedrence to human progress. Just look at what a supposedly educated person typed. Lol

reigncalif1:

Like I said am not surprised

See how you bring a logical argument to banter lol typical of a Nairaland theists lol �

Have a nice Sunday

LordReed:


Whatever you consider the best evidence you have.

Doing well man, you?

I don't have any evidences to present to you just as there are no evidences that proves that other planets exist.
When we pass away from this earth we will all know whether God exists or not, but as for me I have chosen to believe he does and that Jesus is the only way to him, it is my choice of believe no need for explanation.

hupernikao:



I am good here.

Do you understand theology or the supernatural? They are the basis of clear evidence to give. But if you don't, my explanation will be like one explaining the existence of skyscrapers to a man who hasn't seen more than a bungalow before. He will struggle to believe until he experiences it.


But to help in the simplest way,

The 2nd response on thread is the best answer you should think on.

By ayoncox



Your rebuttal to his post inst strong enough and full of assumptions.

You assumed

1. That anyone can literally look up and identify the Venus. But we know it's not so, even when you can literally see it, it doesn't mean you know what it is, you can as well assumed it's just another star, or stone flying in the air, it takes education of it to know its a planet.

Same, it takes spiritual education to know this is God, even when you literally experience his graciousness everyday, you can always assume it's not God, but coincidence and skills. But proper education will clear that.

2. You likewise assumed, we can go to the space now and see evidence of venus but you forgot to state that this happened overtime in humans existence. It is a process of time.

Men had denied the water body of the earth.
Men had denied the shape of the earth

But all these were healed in process of time.

That spiritual education to know God will get to you and all, it is just a process of time, which can likewise at worst, be resolved in eternity.

That's what ayoncox is expressing to you.

Dtruthspeaker:


Ah, I must dey here!

Nature and Life and Natural Living, In This World!

Things Only come to existence because, Someone, created them!

No thing, can bring itself from non-existence into existence. It is Impossible, in this world.

Oya, validly counter, if you can!

Let's go there!

hupernikao:


Make what you seek clearer.

What evidence do you seek.

Scientific
Theological
Supernatural

You make a proof or evidence in its domain not in any domain.

You cant use equations to prove anger exist. You have to experience it.

You can't use physics to explain that shark exist, you have to find it in its domain.

Just same way you can't use scientific rule to prove existence of love and passion.

What domain do you seek this God of all things, maybe you will find him, when your compass move to the right direction.


Longtime Bro.
I trust you are good.

ayoncox:

I don't have any evidences to present to you just as there are no evidences that proves that other planets exist.
When we pass away from this earth we will all know whether God exists or not, but as for me I have chosen to believe he does and that Jesus is the only way to him, it is my choice of believe no need for explanation.

reigncalif1:
According to my little research about life including science and co , I came to conclusion of two theory
1 Life is too good to have been evoluted from nothing

2 life is not too perfect to have been created.
I don Know if there is a theory out there that support this but I can call it created evolution mean in a way it seems we are created to evolve something like that

because life itself looks so reduculos to be created in the first place for instant
Fate and survival of the fittest which exist among us is not a part of supposed creation because they lack purpose which is creation

Creation= purpose
Evolution=lack of purpose

Why is there fate ... Why did our creator choose survival of the fittest method does it means out creator is more ruthless and partial

How can we evolve from nothing
If ACTUALLY nothing can come outa nothing then evolution is useless

kimco:

Except your God ofcourse...only he can come out of nothing.

reigncalif1:

What are you even saying
Whatever the theory of evolution try to prove came down to nothing

What causes the random reaction ?

Is there another uncaused cause?

Workch:
I think you don't understand the theory of evolution and evolution.
I can educate you if you wish to listen

Workch:
Are you presuming that everything must have a creator and life is too organized not to have been created?

If yes, this is not evidence. You are presenting a philosophical without substance.

BTW, we have myriads of evidence that evolution happened and still happening

ayoncox:

I don't have any evidences to present to you just as there are no evidences that proves that other planets exist.
When we pass away from this earth we will all know whether God exists or not, but as for me I have chosen to believe he does and that Jesus is the only way to him, it is my choice of believe no need for explanation.

reigncalif1:
Evidence of evolution never stated the origin of it . Big bang does according to leed so my question should be how did big bang started

What causes the expansion and explosion?

Is there an uncaused caused? If yes then what Of creation , cause creation Also claim an uncaused cause

All if them are bird of same feather whether creation or evolution or big bang they are all confusion upon confusion

reigncalif1:

Leed has already done so but am not in about whatever evolution try to prove ..

I want to understand the origin of everything which he attributes to big bang though he claims not knowing how it started

Workch:
We don't know the origin of the universe yet. Do you know it?

reigncalif1:
So why do you think evolution is right since you don't know the origin of the universe?


I don't know too but all those theories didn't add up .

Workch:
even after LordReed explained to you, you still don't understand that evolution has nothing to do with origin of life.

Is your skull thick?

reigncalif1:
Did he explain evolution from the stand point of origination and if he can't do that then is still a mere speculation.

reigncalif1:
Did he explain evolution from the stand point of origination and if he can't do that then is still a mere speculation.

LordReed:


Why is it so hard for you accept a simple fact? Evolution does not talk about the origins of life, why must you want to force it to say something about the origins of life? Your lack of satisfaction with its limited scope is not a problem with the theory, it is solely your problem.

Workch:
But I offered to explain it to you, you said LordReed already did and you still make comment like someone who's abjectly ignorant of it.

reigncalif1:
Go on and explain to me if you have different view from lordleed

reigncalif1:
Yeah that's is my problem with evolution.
I actually have problem with it's limited scope , yes for something that try to explain the formation of life should Also try to explain it's origin hence it's still far from the truth.

Is like trying to explain the making of a HOUSE and you started after the THE FOUNDATION HAVE ALREADY Been built by whoever or whatever you can't explain built it ,, so in this senerio you have no business trying to explain how the house was built in the first place