₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
The problem with most people is the way they wish to keep sacred matters, they just want it to taken lightly with no restraint but when they discover that some are devoted exclusively to sacred services they try to figure out if it's due to selfish gain just as Satan accused Job {Job 1:9} to them there's no normal human that should take God seriously.
So when they notice those truly devoted without selfish reasons they begin looking for ways to discredit your Godly devotion trying to make you feel it's unnecessary.
So asking them about their own religion is like putting them on the hot seat, how do you expect them to respond to such a question when all what they're trying to tell you is the exact opposite of what you're doing?

Since the fuel issue business has been really tough o, almost all our gain is used to by fuel now just imagine diesel is sold now at 750 per liter!
The modern day slavery is becoming intensely hot nowadays.

cornelboy:
Go lock up somewhere Baba.

My point still stand.


Learn to face discussion.
What JWs are doing today, no groups can do them.

Go lock up somewhere Baba.

My point still stand.

Learn to face discussion.

What JWs are doing today, no groups can do them

tctrills:
You religion is your personal info? Actually, Facebook doesn't force or insist you tell your religion

Facebook has space where you put your religion. Religion is not something secret or personal info. It's your choice to tell and your insistence makes you come out like a perv. I have been on forums for over 10 years now, you are the only person that insists on knowing others' religions for a public discussion.
I have never met anyone with such strange behavior and trust me, I have met lots of strange people online but you are taking this to new heights.
I have discussed with 100s of people including those that didn't like me very much but you are the only one who insists on knowing my religion. This is making me view you in a negative light.
You have become pushy and intolerant and it's totally uncalled for.

Janosky:
John 14:28, John 17:7,How can Jesus Christ grasp "equality" he says he doesn't have?

Phillipians 2:6, Mounce Greek interlinear screenshot proven the GIBBERISH in all the Trinitarian doctored versions quoted by Emusan.

cornelboy:
Emusan's claim:



My reply;

"His believe is nothing. He's bound for destruction. He's doomed!"

Your response;



Pls Emusan, what did you mean by this your above statement?

a). Is my belief nothing because I am a JW?
b). Is Satan a JW, that's why we both have the same believe?
c). Did your god told you that I hold the same belief with Satan? Or how did you know?
d). Are you directing that to all Christians or what?
Pls kindly explain what you really meant to me.

I replied:

"Well my belief ain't like Satan belief. Despite the fact that he was with Jehovah in heaven, he went ahead to rebel and sin against Him.
I believe in Jehovah and His son Jesus Christ and the promise of eternal life."

Your response:



a). Which source did you get your information from?
b). Do Satan really believe in the Bible of just your assumption?
c). Are you emphasizing that I personally believe the Bible just the same way Satan did?
d). Do all Christians believe in the Bible like Satan do? If yes, are they bound for destruction too?
e). Do you believe in the Bible differently from Satan?

Pls simply answer these questions. I'll appreciate it

achorladey:
The whole idea for they seeking the religious of others is to go down the part of they have always been insult, labels, name call, shame that religious denominations just like their founding fathers did


See the below from their publications

Paul obviously was aware of some Greek teachings, and he used such knowledge to give a most effective witness. (Acts 17:28) Similarly, Jehovah’s Witnesses are not ignorant of others’ beliefs. They have gained considerable basic knowledge of the doctrinal beliefs of religions common in their area. Consideration to such teachings has been given in the book What Has Religion Done for Mankind? as well as numerous articles in The Watchtower and Awake! Such information on various religions is presented in the context of its contrast with accurate Biblical teachings............


Since they have the basic knowledge and more about the common religions in their area, why are they asking the name of church of others here. Do they now lack these knowledge?


I said earlier they don't believe their is any good in the religion of others

See this again from the same publication


Many people who believe that ‘there is good in all religions’ might consider it narrow-minded to think otherwise. (Contrast Jesus’ view expressed at Matthew 7:13, 14, 21-23.) The Greek philosophers in ancient Athens encouraged such an “open-minded” attitude and enjoyed “telling something or listening to something new.” (Acts 17:18-21) But when the apostle Paul appeared before them, it was not to swap philosophies or ideas. He used the occasion to present what he knew to be the truth, whether he was considered narrow-minded or not.

In reality they don't believe their is good in all religion and Paul believed that too .

Anyone that wants to do anything worthwhile pertaining to religion or worship as it were should be a Jehovah’s witness

cornelboy:
Everything will turn out ok sir.
We use diesel at my work place. We now but black market.

tctrills:
You religion is your personal info? Actually, Facebook doesn't force or insist you tell your religion

Facebook has space where you put your religion. Religion is not something secret or personal info. It's your choice to tell and your insistence makes you come out like a perv. I have been on forums for over 10 years now, you are the only person that insists on knowing others' religions for a public discussion.
I have never met anyone with such strange behavior and trust me, I have met lots of strange people online but you are taking this to new heights.
I have discussed with 100s of people including those that didn't like me very much but you are the only one who insists on knowing my religion. This is making me view you in a negative light.
You have become pushy and intolerant and it's totally uncalled for.

tctrills:
I ask you questions, you continue to rigmarole and now you start to insult. You keep believing what you can't explain. You would never be able to reconcile John 1.1 unless you open your heart and become teachable.

Tctrills, you have proven your allegiance to the Trinity GIBBERISH.
Yet you continue LYING as if you don't espouse Trinity
Read Acts 12:22-23 & John 1:1 Bill Mounce Greek Interlinear /Biblehub screenshots.
Two times Theos is in John 1:1 & Acts12:22-23.
Look at the circle dot, Bil Mounce your Trinity mentor, REMOVED Greek definite article ("ho" from John 1:1.
Did Bill Mounce remove the same article ("ho" from Acts12:23?
No.
What is the reason?
To perpetuate Trinity GIBBERISH.
@ Acts 12:22-23 Bill Mounce gives the full meaning of Greek Theos just as Emphatic Diaglott Bible & NWT John 1:1 did the same at John 1:1.
But, Bill Mounce refused to do same at John 1:1.

tctrills:
I never defended any religion, I talk about gospel principles. You are free to quote me where did I defend trinity? You have become very dishonest. Go through my entire posts and quote me defending trinity if you are not a liar.

Emusan:
Just a single post that is tormenting you like this

This single response from me has answered all your questions.

That's your own palaver, the Koko is that you believe in Bible just the way Satan did. [So to believe in Bible doesn't mean you have the truth

[s]Even a toddler won't find this to understand[/s]

Janosky:
Tctrills," thou shalt not lie".
Proven by your own post on this thread.
Violation of Nairaland Rule 8.

Janosky:
Tctrills, you have proven your allegiance to the Trinity GIBBERISH.
Yet you continue LYING as if you don't espouse Trinity
Read Acts 12:22-23 & John 1:1 Bill Mounce Greek Interlinear /Biblehub screenshots.
Two times Theos is in John 1:1 & Acts12:22-23.
Look at the circle dot, Bil Mounce your Trinity mentor, REMOVED Greek definite article ("ho" from John 1:1.
Did Bill Mounce remove the same article ("ho" from Acts12:23?
No.
What is the reason?
To perpetuate Trinity GIBBERISH.
@ Acts 12:22-23 Bill Mounce gives the full meaning of Greek Theos just as Emphatic Diaglott Bible & NWT John 1:1 did the same at John 1:1.
But, Bill Mounce refused to do same at John 1:1.

Janosky:
Oga, you are a 3 deities worshipping Polytheist.
Una plenty for Religion Section, Nairaland.
Whether you say the officially recognized name on your NL profile or Facebook page, na your own cup of tea.

Emusan:
Lying liar JaNosense, where did Jesus say He doesn't have equality with God?
2:6[/color][/b].

"You would be happy that I am going to the Father, who is greater than I am"

John 20:17
" Jesus replied:" I am ascending to Father and your Father,my God and your God"
Emusan, Jesus Christ is NOT equal to his God.
Emusan are you equal to your God?
Mr LIENUS DECEIVING himself

Emusan:
It's Mounce Greek this time not Jerusalem Bible

The problem you're having is lack of comprehension.

Even both Mounce Greek and other translations I provided are saying the same thing but you're too dull to grasp it

John 14:28 & John 20:17, does Jesus Christ lack comprehension?
No, NEVER !!

Emusan is qualified to give Satan tutorial on LYING

Emusan:
CEV, OJB are doctored this time because they didn't dance to your tune

The same way Mounce Greek will become a doctored or laywer by you later [right][/right]
.

Emusan:
Here is the verse again in other translations

CEV: Christ was truly God. But he did not try to remain equal with God.

ERV: He was like God in every way, but he did not think that his being equal with God was something to use for his own benefit.

EHV: Though he was by nature God, he did not consider equality with God as a prize to be displayed,

GW: Although he was in the form of God and equal with God, he did not take advantage of this equality

MSG: He had equal status with God but didn’t think so much of himself that he had to cling to the advantages of that status no matter what.

NIRV: In his very nature he was God. Jesus was equal with God. But Jesus didn’t take advantage of that fact.

OJB: Who, though existing in the demut of the mode of being of Elohim [His etzem or essential nature, Yn 1:1-2; 17:5], nevertheless Moshiach did not regard being equal with G-d as a thing to be seized [BERESHIS 3:5] Phil 2:6.

Emusan no just get shame dey lie anyhow!
John 14:28, Jesus Christ have proven that All your Trinitarian distorted version of Philippians 2:6 are spurious & FALSE.

I have a question for Emusan:
Is 1 Corinthians 11:3 in your Bible?
Paul wrote Phillipians 2:6 & 1 Corinthians 11:3.
Paul & Jesus Christ have proven that ALL your quotes of Phillipians 2:6 are in fact DUBIOUS.
Oga, repent

achorladey:
The whole idea for they seeking the religious of others is to go down the part of they have always been insult, labels, name call, shame that religious denominations just like their founding fathers did


See the below from their publications

Paul obviously was aware of some Greek teachings, and he used such knowledge to give a most effective witness. (Acts 17:28) Similarly, Jehovah’s Witnesses are not ignorant of others’ beliefs. They have gained considerable basic knowledge of the doctrinal beliefs of religions common in their area. Consideration to such teachings has been given in the book What Has Religion Done for Mankind? as well as numerous articles in The Watchtower and Awake! Such information on various religions is presented in the context of its contrast with accurate Biblicalteachings............


Since they have the basic knowledge and more about the common religions in their area, why are they asking the name of church of others here. Do they now lack these knowledge[/b]?


I said earlier they don't believe their is any good in the religion of others

See this again from the same publication


Many people who believe that ‘there is good in all religions’ might consider it narrow-minded to think otherwise. (Contrast Jesus’ view expressed at Matthew 7:13, 14, 21-23.) The Greek philosophers in ancient Athens encouraged such an “open-minded” attitude and enjoyed “telling something or listening to something new.” (Acts 17:18-21) But when the apostle Paul appeared before them it was not to [b]swap philosophies or ideas. He used the occasion to present what he knew to be the truth whether he was considered narrow-minded or not.

In reality they don't believe their is good in all religion and Paul believed that too .

[b]
Anyone that wants to do [b]anything worthwhile pertaining to religion or worship as it were should be a [b]Jehovah’s witness

achorladey:
How Jehovah’s witnesses go discuss without innuendos, name calling labels when the discussion does not dance to their tune. The expected outcome is the below.. M
We await more
Playing the victim card as usual . Abeg wetin Jehovah’s witnesses serve me that I need to serve back? You can equally see the bad fruits in other Christian denominations abi dem get good fruit ni? . Na make your body too hot about vengeance. The Bible you carry say vengeance is of the Lord but we know people like and Anthony Morris can't wait for us to go up in flames using the match stick and box as teaching aids to emphase how DESPICABLE APOSTATES will be destroyed.

Empty rants of a WAILER
Achorladey have you never used innuendos, name calling labels & playing the victim card on this public forum in your interactions with JWs when we refused to dance to your tune?

Oga, continue oooo

achorladey:
I laugh at STRICTLY when those Jesus is using cannot guarantee perfect spiritual food. . Your spiritual food is filled and refilled with mistakes and errors over the years. Oga go and read your brochure. To enjoy your self praise

tctrills:
My religion is not in debate here.

tctrills:
What is your point?

Janosky:
Oga, you are a 3 deities worshipping Polytheist.
Whether you put the officially recognized name (Catholic, Pentecostal, RCCG etc) on your NL profile or Facebook page,na your own cup of tea.

Oga, please read my previous response as many times as it takes you to understand it.

Shalom.

tctrills:
Boss let others attempt the question. You seem to have no idea who Jesus Christ is. You are not even sure if he is God or not. You don't seem to have a stand. At one point, you said he is a true God, at another time you say he is not God. Haba. What is the matter?

Oga, you are confused & very desperate to console yourself .
John 20:17, Jesus Christ brought your confusion to an end but you vehemently refused & rejected his evidence.

Shalom.

Janosky:
Oga, you are confused & very desperate to console yourself .
John 20:17, Jesus Christ brought your confusion to an end but you vehemently refused & rejected his evidence.

Shalom.

Janosky:
Oga, you are confused & very desperate to console yourself .
John 20:17, Jesus Christ brought your confusion to an end but you vehemently refused & rejected his evidence.

Shalom.

Janosky:

Anyone that wants to do [b]anything worthwhile pertaining to religion or worship as it were should be a Jehovah’s witness just as Jesus Christ and the disciples were JEHOVAH'S witnesses, John 9:4 & Acts 3:13 & Isaiah 43:10(ASV)

Yes definitely!

Janosky:
Empty rants of a WAILER
Achorladey have you never used innuendos, name calling labels & playing the victim card on this public forum in your interactions with JWs when we refused to dance to your tune?

Oga, continue oooo

Achorladey laugh STRICTLY making mockery of your intelligence.
Luke 24:21,25 ,Did the disciples prove their knowledge was perfect ?
1 Samuel 3:20,1 Samuel 16:6, Matthew 26:31-35,56,69-75, who made those errors & mistakes in your own Bible?
1 Corinthians 13:9, did Paul guarantee that his knowledge & writing were perfect?

"1 Corinthians 13:11, Finally brothers and sisters rejoice continue to MEND YOUR WAYS"

" Forward you witnesses of Jehovah & his son, ever strong of heart.

Atheists & 3 deities Polytheists won't stop DECEIVING themselves

Empty rants of a WAILER Achorladey have you never used innuendos, name calling labels & playing the victim card on this public forum in your interactions with JWs when we refused to dance to your tune?

Achorladey laugh STRICTLY making mockery of your intelligence.
Luke 24:21,25 ,Did the disciples prove their knowledge was perfect ?
1 Samuel 3:20,1 Samuel 16:6, Matthew 26:31-35,56,69-75, who made those errors & mistakes in your own Bible? 1 Corinthians 13:9, did Paul guarantee that his knowledge & writing were perfect?

"1 Corinthians 13:11, Finally brothers and sisters rejoice continue to MEND YOUR WAYS"

After boasting about your LIES, insult others about your LIES, Shame, disfellowshipment of members about your LIES, DENY that you LIE, divide people based on your LIES. NAME CALLING [/b]based on you lies What follows......................[b]MEND YOUR WAYS LIKE how shoemaker they mend shoes

" Forward you witnesses of Jehovah & his son, ever strong of heart.

Atheists & 3 deities Polytheists won't stop DECEIVING themselves

tctrills:
Let me also advise, please lets not turn this thread to an insulting contest were we use rude words. We obviously don't agree, you have an answers but I would not insult you for that. Its not your fault. We can still love ourselves if even if you cant answer my questions

achorladey:
This one that one of his brother in Jehovah said nairaland has no rules no go listen to your words. They feed and drink on insult, name calling, tags and labels. They inherited it from their forerunners and religious leaders

Janosky:
Tctrills, you have proven your allegiance to the Trinity GIBBERISH.
Yet you continue LYING as if you don't espouse Trinity
Read Acts 12:22-23 & John 1:1 Bill Mounce Greek Interlinear /Biblehub screenshots.
Two times Theos is in John 1:1 & Acts12:22-23.
Look at the circle dot, Bil Mounce your Trinity mentor, REMOVED Greek definite article ("ho" from John 1:1.
Did Bill Mounce remove the same article ("ho" from Acts12:23?
No.
What is the reason?
To perpetuate Trinity GIBBERISH.
@ Acts 12:22-23 Bill Mounce gives the full meaning of Greek Theos just as Emphatic Diaglott Bible & NWT John 1:1 did the same at John 1:1.
But, Bill Mounce refused to do same at John 1:1.

cornelboy:
The trinity and Mary is the mother of God are Roman Catholics dogmas. They are both unscriptural.

What I'm asking is why Pentecostals/protestants don't believe in the Mary is the mother of God doctrine but believe that Jesus is God (Trinity).

yahwehpickin:
If you say the trinity is a Catholic dogma then you don't read your bible.

yahwehpickin:
Jesus the Christ, has always spoken about his father Jehovah and the Holy Spirit.
We pray to God(father) through Jesus by the Help and guidance of the Holy Spirit.

yahwehpickin:
Elohim is plural

yahwehpickin:
In creation God the Father, the word and the Spirit was present.... They are one but have their different functions.

yahwehpickin:
Romans 8:16
[16]The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:

yahwehpickin:
When it comes to mary, the mother of Jesus... She was a vessel like any other vessel God has used, and you need to look at the lineage from Adam to Abraham to David to Joseph the earthly father of Jesus. God orchestrated the whole thing. ( There were others who paid the price too) So I see Mary as a vessel, a saint one through whom Jesus Christ came as God purposed it.

When Jesus started ministry and he was preaching and the people told him your mother and brethren were here to see him. His reply was

Mark 3:31-35
[31]There came then his brethren and his mother, and, standing without, sent unto him, calling him.
[32]And the multitude sat about him, and they said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee.

[33]And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?

[34]And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!

[35]For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.

So Jesus has many mothers, we are all part of this great family!!!!