Kipaji:
"Having sex and doing wild things are very much common"... Yep that is true, with one man and one woman. But certain practices are not that widespread.

Kipaji:
I'm not instagram so I can't check that page unless I log in. But I can see some of their posts on sweetagram.
It is true that many women out there, even innocent-looking ones, did some of the filthiest things imaginable. My point was that people want to say that this concerns almost every single woman and that's where the exaggeration is. No woman (expect maybe some virgins) is pure yet that doesn't mean that they have had porn-level experiences. It's there but it's not that much common.

Kipaji:


I don't understand pidgin man... Sorry, I can't get you.

Having a party

89 percent of the 4,175 Americans surveyed by social psychologist Justin Lehmiller, Ph.D., for his book Tell Me What You Want admitted to fantasizing about having a party with other people (those in relationships did say that one of those people would ideally be their partner).

...That could be why around 57 percent of women actually fantasize about having sex with more than three people at a time, according to the Journal of Sexual Medicine.

Kipaji:


This illustrate the concept of betatization of the married/engaged/committed man. To calm her competition anxiety and ensure the continued exclusive engagement of the man, the woman is ready to prevent the man from increasing his SMV (and sometimes incite its decrease -- "I prefer dad bods darling, I don't care about six packs". The problem is, once the man becomes not attractive enough to appeal to other women, he may not be attractive enough to appeal to his own wife/girlfriend. But now, she may be reluctant to ask him to get fit/better looking/etc because it will make her look/feel bad. again. So, she start looking elsewhere for the man that appeal her sexually. Since she is not looking for commitment from that man, she has no problem/anxiety seeing other women gawking at him. As a matter of fact, if she can, she may even help this other guy increase his SMV by buying him new clothes, accessories, gym membership, giving him money here and there. This other guy is the alpha bleeps while her man is the beta bucks (who may have been once an alpha bleeps).

Guys, would you say that my analysis above is accurate?

JESHAL:
I went to a Christian boarding school, a girl I had a fling too then in SS2, she went to a Christian University and is getting married today, when I chat her up mehn, the sexual tension, let me not talk much, I'm cutting contact with her for good because I have a no policy on married women but guys I'm telling you virgin or nothing

Martinez39s:


With women, there is nothing like sex styles and kinks for hoès/bad chicks/prostitutes/ slay queens and sex styles and kinks for good girls. Such distinction and classification don't exist with females, they only exist in the minds of naive men due to society upbringing. With females it is either they enjoy it or not, shikena!

Kipaji:
That's the thing. If you look at sex workers, yes, extreme practices are very common. But, if you look at the average girl you would meet in your neighborhood, though it happens, group sex and other porn-level practices are not that common. What about "sucking d!cks and doing what the average blue pill guy (or even a redpiller who is yet to see the dark/wild side) considers wild and naughty"? Well, I agree they are indeed "very much common".

"with women, there is nothing like sex styles and kinks for hoès/bad chicks/prostitutes/ slay queens and sex styles and kinks for good girls. Such distinction and classification don't exist with females, they only exist in the minds of naive men due to society upbringing. With females it is either they enjoy it or not, shikena!"

Kipaji:
Yes, virgins are undoubtedly the better choice. I never questioned that. As a matter of fact, sometimes I wonder how it can even be a debate. It's crazy. There are women out there who try to convince men that there's no advantage choosing a virgin over a non-virgin. Mostly it is to comfort themselves, rationalize their past, prevent blue-pilled simp of realizing the truth, and make them feel better. That's another reason why women must not be taken seriously in these matters.

AlphaAlex:
Lol you obviously don’t know Women , how are you going to know the hoe though?

Martinez39s:
Though we can end up agreeing to disagree, but it is good that we air our views and compare notes and experiences.

That being said, I will like you to note that the way women and the conventional male mind look at sex are different. Men are the ones that associate morality and ethics with sex and they project this on women due to ignorance.

To women, sex and having their fun is just like drinking water from a tap and there are no shame, morality or ethics females associate with sex; it is strictly enjoyment. Being the solipsistic, emotional and self-centered gender in the intersexual dynamics, they follow their emotions and "wonderful" experiences which they like when it comes to sex, especially when they think they won't get caught.

What is doggy to a female? What is sucking d!ck to a female? What is threesòme with two guys and double penetration to a female? Absolutely nothing! As long as she likes it, she knows can take it, and the secret opportunity is there, she has no problem. It is strictly enjoyment. Morals, ethics, upbringing or religion won't stop her from doing with the sharp guy what turns her on, the only that will stop her in such scenario is if she is not interested (ie. turned on) in the style and doesn't have the kink.

With women, there is nothing like sex styles and kinks for hoès/bad chicks/prostitutes/ slay queens and sex styles and kinks for good girls. Such distinction and classification don't exist with females, they only exist in the minds of naive men due to society upbringing. With females it is either they enjoy it or not, shikena!

This is why all girls are sexual freaks to the guys that turn on and apply game. That's why as a married man if your wife is forming holy holy and refuses to give you doggy claiming it is the stuff of hoès and she picks offence, know that you are being scammed because she will giving it to the guy who turns her on and unleashes the inner hoè.

LordAdam16:


Pidgin is our lingua franca. In any case, here is an excerpt. Backed by research.



Nothing further.

-Lord

Kipaji:
Indeed, women show their nature to guys that turn them on; especially if they are in a "safe, secret, non-judgemental" setting.

You said that women do not really attach morality to sex and mostly see it as a fun activity. I agree with that. But I'm really surprised by the treesom part.

Martinez39s:
What is really extreme? What is really porn level? To females, it is subjective in many cases. Either they like it or they don't; most things we men consider extreme, perverted, ungodly and "hoè-like" are not seen the same way by females. Besides, thanks to the ubiquity of porn and the perversive reach of social media, many of our girls know many styles and they have discovered styles/kinks that turn them on and want to try out. Not being a professional prostitute/hook up chick doesn't make a females sexual exploration less "perverted."

As I have said
From the female perspective and psyche, having sex with two guys as seen in heartofcity12's picture isn't extreme.

Don't let outward appearance beguile us or make us think otherwise. As I have said, it is not written on the face. It happens that there are guys in churches or mosques who think the Lord is leading them to a particular female, but they don't know the female is doing sex stuffs that they deem very ungodly. Because they are unaware and they conclude on the outward appearance (her decent dressing, good manners in public, background, outward spiritual devotion etc.), the impression persists. It is not written on the face.

Martinez39s:
I get that you are surprised. However, threesòme, with two guys, is actually not uncommon. It is not an extreme or reprobate stuff as far as females are concerned. If such threesòme surprises you then you are in for more surprises and shock when you start finding out the fantasies and sexual cravings of your average girl, even the one you consider a good girl.

Kipaji:
It's not the act itself that surprises me (not at all), it is how common it is.

Martinez39s:
How you haven't broken up the relationship confounds me. Maybe you still need more red pill knowledge and harsher lessons.

Martinez39s:
▪︎ "Only strong men can overlook a woman's past."

▪︎"It takes a strong and brave man to mend a heart he didn't break and raise a child he didn't birth."

▪︎"If you are not a virgin as a man, you don't have the grounds to seek a virgin and chaste bride."

▪︎"Everyone has a past. Don't judge a girl by her past. (What an oloriburuku)."

▪︎"Nothing wrong in paying bride price for nonvirgins."

▪︎"Nonvirgins have more experience and maturity, so they make a good match."

▪︎"Virgins will cheat because they want to explore later, but nonvirgins have seen it all and will be more faithful."

ExtremeDot:




This happened to my neighbor four years back.
My neighbor even got her the expensive Adidas sneakers she used for her gym sessions.
"My babe is keeping fit and maintaining her shape"

Within a month she dun begin fu#k a professional athlete she met at the gym.

Her close friend secretly leaked the whole thing to him. He did his investigation and caught her red handed.

Breakfast was served.
My neighbor went into depression for a long time. That Bross over invest for that girl head sha, all in the name of having/impressing a "Trophy Girl Friend"

Martinez39s:
Nice post!

I want to add something for the sake of contribution. The reasons pro-marriage redpillers like marrying sexually pure virgins or are advised to marry sexually pure virgins isn't because redpillers think a virgin's female nature is different. Of course we know AWALT is the case even for virgins and females emotionally change easily and rapidly with time. However, virgins are required by pro-marriage redpillers for the following reasons:

(1) sexually pure virgins women are the least "evils" in mate selection and choosing them will prevent you from certain unnecessary headaches that come with a woman's past baggages and embarrassing situations resulting from her sordid sexual past. I can explain further if you want.

(2) it's a red pill rule to go for the best you can. Why commit to and provide for a used pusśy when you can get a fresh used and pure one? Why commit to and go for an aged used pusśy when you can go for a young unused one?

(3) Why commit to and provide for something that other men have gotten for free without much effort? Why should you be treated treated differently?

(4) It is a red pill rule to get a woman at her best years. If she won't give you her best years or you didn't have her at her best years, don't take her at her decline. Put yourself first, go for the best and have some self-respect. If you are not yet established to marry a particular female at her best years, let her go to who is ready. When you are ready and established later, pick the one that is in her best years and makes a decent human being.

(5) If you will follow tradition to pay bride price for a woman, let her follow tradition to qualify for your bride price by being a young virgin who is sexually pure, among other things. Traditionalism works both ways. Don't partake in the nonsense of paying full price for hòe. Let simps and blue pill men rot in their stupidity.

(6) men must set good standards and not come cheap. Besides, women would go for the best and wouldn't settle if given the option. Why should yours be different? Men setting good standards and not compromising on it will incentivise more females to sit up to meet up (if they can't find their way around it and exploit loopholes). Though they won't change on the inside and will put in more effort to cover up their shenanigans so they can compete to meet men's standard.

Nairalandmonika:

No all men Value the woman who was there for him from the beginning.

While some men do, I have seen real life situation of men abandoning their wife after they become rich.

princekami:
Fellow redpillers I stumbled upon some interesting information regarding Christianity on the Facebook page of one South African Alucks Mahaha. @ Martinez39s I understand you have warned against making religious claims on this thread but I believe you, Cave, Ubunja and every other redpiller here will find this information interesting.
Checkout Alucks Mahaha on Facebook. I am still figuring out how Nairaland works so pardon my mistakes.

Martinez39s:
Nice post!

I want to add something for the sake of contribution. The reasons pro-marriage redpillers like marrying sexually pure virgins or are advised to marry sexually pure virgins isn't because redpillers think a virgin's female nature is different. Of course we know AWALT is the case even for virgins and females emotionally change easily and rapidly with time. However, virgins are required by pro-marriage redpillers for the following reasons:

(1) sexually pure virgins women are the least "evils" in mate selection and choosing them will prevent you from certain unnecessary headaches that come with a woman's past baggages and embarrassing situations resulting from her sordid sexual past. I can explain further if you want.

(2) it's a red pill rule to go for the best you can. Why commit to and provide for a used pusśy when you can get a fresh used and pure one? Why commit to and go for an aged used pusśy when you can go for a young unused one?

(3) Why commit to and provide for something that other men have gotten for free without much effort? Why should you be treated treated differently?

(4) It is a red pill rule to get a woman at her best years. If she won't give you her best years or you didn't have her at her best years, don't take her at her decline. Put yourself first, go for the best and have some self-respect. If you are not yet established to marry a particular female at her best years, let her go to who is ready. When you are ready and established later, pick the one that is in her best years and makes a decent human being.

(5) If you will follow tradition to pay bride price for a woman, let her follow tradition to qualify for your bride price by being a young virgin who is sexually pure, among other things. Traditionalism works both ways. Don't partake in the nonsense of paying full price for hòe. Let simps and blue pill men rot in their stupidity.

(6) men must set good standards and not come cheap. Besides, women would go for the best and wouldn't settle if given the option. Why should yours be different? Men setting good standards and not compromising on it will incentivise more females to sit up to meet up (if they can't find their way around it and exploit loopholes). Though they won't change on the inside and will put in more effort to cover up their shenanigans so they can compete to meet men's standard.

(7) add yours (cc Ubuja, LordAdam, Skeptius, JESAL, CaveAullam , etc)

Nemesis504:
I don't know why the world has a way of hating whatever gives men joy and happiness women masturbate more but nobody says anything but a man does it and it becomes a problem I don't understand it's difficult for some guys to get a girlfriend and you all know how our girls like money a lot and at the end the sex is not guaranteed please allow us masturbate in peace abeg nah masturbate we masturbate we nor kill person

ubunja:
If you come across something interesting on social media it's better you bring screenshots cause of two reasons. One, people are lazy to go back and forth across multiple platforms. Save them the hustle by showing them right there and then what you want them to see. And two, not everyone is on every social media platform. Eg myself I'm not in any way active on Facebook or Twitter and to set up a whole account just to see one post there is just too much of a hustle.