njokusboy:


No mind her, we wey don check out d checkables know as e be... Those wey wide like river nile, shey na so God create am?
She just dey console herself...
Friction leads to wear and tear...
No elastic object/body remains elastic after prolonged stress...

You dey mind them? Imagine me telling someone my experience and she's arguing with me despite having no different experience. These women make me lose the little faith in women I have left.

crackhaus:

It is flimsy to you, doesn't mean it's supposed to be flimsy to every other person.

As for demanding a lot more from a woman than her sexual history:

Maintain your opinion make I maintain mine. I never said it had to be flimsy to anyone else

There's more to a woman than her sexual history if you don't realize that by now then I'm sorry there is nothing I can do to help

crackhaus:

Are you saying that a vajay can remain tight even after swallowing a lot of d1cks?
I mean, is this what you're trying to sell here...seriously?

I'm not trying to sell anything, I am only saying you people should stop talking like you know everything especially as concerns women, cos you don't.

Timbuktou:



You dey mind them? Imagine me telling someone my experience and she's arguing with me despite having no different experience. These women make me lose the little faith in women I have left.

Seriously though, how does saying things like this make you feel?

freecocoa:
Yea right, like alum is the only way to go, I don't even believe the vagina slacks to the point that it becomes 'no longer sweet' especially from too much sêx like I already said.

I don't even understand this texture talk, how does sêx affect the texture of one's vagina? I seriously want to know, does an originally smooth sirfaced vagina become rough or what excatly?

Okay, let's agree that many steady partners don't use condoms but how does sperm affect anything is what I asked?

I don't have a peenis alright but you don't know that I don't have a girl in my bed as I type.

Why should I be with a jew man? I'm not anywhere near being a jew girl.

You must be a youngin? So just remember these wise words from your lord on the "real vagina monologues";


1: Vaginas come in different sizes naturally. Hence some will seem tight and some loose! So stop concerning yourself with the "too many _cocks spoil the broth theory", although childbirth also plays a minor role in this regard so get ready for a suprise after your baby lands!

2: Guys play an important factor in a woman's
arousal level and also in how tight a woman's vagina will be during sex hence the need for extended _foreplay, so always open your gob and tell your _coitus partner what sort of _foreplay you like so that you can plateau easily!

3: There are exercises that can be done to help
women not only get "tighter vaginas" but also have "better orgasms". They are called "kegel excercises"! Encourage your man(if you have 1) to also do these "unisex excercises!"


As for your 'judaism?' Well, that's for another thread!

bellong:


I want to believe you understood and comprehended before responding to me. And I never asked how you feel about yourself. I believe that is only meant for you not me. Go back to read the genesis of my response to Freecocoa.

It is my concern because you women cry foul when the consequences arise. Secondly, it is a subject of discussion on this thread. Thirdly, it is a FACT not an OPINION. Fourthly, because I care and that makes it my business.


You need not understand, those in the situation do. Ignorance and carelessness are not the only reason people get pregnant. Some believe pregnancy will trap the man to marry them. What is a natural desire that needs mature management?



You need to go back to understand in context.


You seriously should read over what you wrote. I want to believe you understand sarcasm.


This doesn't make any sense as it deviates from the context of my comment.

Thanks

@bold

Another reason why some people here better stop being hypocritical and stop acting like promiscuity has no consequences for men or like they are not responsible for fatherless kids and along with it the problems in society.

Thanks.

freecocoa:
Seriously though, how does saying things like this make you feel?

I'm more interested in how it makes you feel.

funlord:




You must be a youngin? So just remember these wise words from your lord on the "real vagina monologues";


1: Vaginas come in different sizes naturally. Hence some will seem tight and some loose! So stop concerning yourself with the "too many _cocks spoil the broth theory", although childbirth also plays a minor role in this regard so get ready for a suprise after your baby lands!

2: Guys play an important factor in a woman's
arousal level and also in how tight a woman's vagina will be during sex hence the need for extended _foreplay, so always open your gob and tell your coitus partner what sort of _foreplay you like so that you can plateau easily!

3: There are exercises that can be done to help
women not only get "tighter vaginas" but also have "better orgasms". They are called "kegel excercises"! Encourage your man(if you have 1) to also do these "unisex excercises!"


As for your 'judaism?' Well, that's for another thread!

Smh.

Timbuktou:


I'm more interested in how it makes you feel.

Honestly? It just makes me want to pity the women around you but then again, I know your type.

I can see why you chaps enjoy trolling her! She actually thinks my "judaism remark"actually refers to "jewish people from isreal"! Talk about lost in translation..... Lol!

freecocoa:
Honestly? It just makes me want to pity the women around you but then again, I know your type.

Nah, you don't know my type. I'm the best man you could ever date. Fact. . I'm the kind of man women pray for at their Redemption camp pilgrimages. But I also won't shortchange myself with the scraps that litter the streets of Nigeria. Your feelings might be hurt but I'm just being honest.

I'm a gentleman to ladies not bitchès amd sluts.

funlord:


Is that so? Abeg help me ask 'cocoabutter' how come "cossy 'the boobs' orjiakor" is still single then!

It's because she chooses to be - and as soon as she decides it's time to marry, there will be a queue of unbelievably eligible men longer than the great wall of China waiting to propose. But she may well choose to have a few children first, which will see her marriagability skyrocket !


TV

Mindfulness:
Nobody has encouraged women to go about their se.xuality as if it is an Olympic discipline and nobody has encouraged women to have kids out of wedlock so there is no need to twist my words.

What you have done is;
1. Suggest sex is something to be indulged in freely, and without consequence. If so, why not do it to the utmost?
2. Your anecdotes plainly suggested that out of wedlock children in no way impaired a womans marriage options
3. Not to mention that you totally overlooked the pathologies of fragmented families
4. Your "evidence" actually implied, that not only would their chances not be impaired, but they would even secure the most eligible of men
5. Your clear implication was that promiscuity and out of wedlock are good things, or at least not things to be concerned about

Mindfulness:

My message is very clear but I will repeat it again:

It is highly hypocritical to tell people to behave "morally" when you are not able and not willing to behave morally yourself. Therefore, if you are concerned with moral decadence as a result of promiscuity then abstain from promiscuity. It is so simple.

First, that is not your message; your message, is one of promiscuity, out of wedlock births, and feelings based actions. Second my position is simple - and has been repeatedly made, especially to you - NSBM

Mindfulness:
It goes beyond laughing that you will tell women to abstain from something you want to have the freedom to enjoy.

NSBM

Mindfulness:
It goes beyond laughing that you try to control women by telling them that they won't be able to get a good husband if they don't remain virgins till marriage

Me control? Nope, I have repeatedly said, if you want unfettered freedom and sexual liberty, then have it. I reserve the right to point out the pathologies, risks and outcomes this may lead to and advise men to give due consideration to this.

Mindfulness:
when in fact plenty of virgins have suffered in the hands of cruel husbands and plenty of bad girls have married good men.

This is a woefully thin strawman. I am for robust and fulfilling marriages. I do not advise men to marry in order to be cruel. This statement has no bearing whatsoever on what is being discussed here .

Mindfulness:
This, TV01, is the reality. I have provided some anecdotal evidence and I can provide more. We can also take celebrities as examples if you don't believe what I have observed.

The anecdotal evidence you provided is at meaningless - being at best a few outlying examples of which there will always be some. Meaningless and misleading, as you tried to present it as pretty normal - hence my exaggerated response. Your personal observations are not fact, or even unbiased opinion. Present something better - as opposed to near fair tales

Mindfulness:
If you want morality, live morality. Hypocrisy won't get you there and your attempts to control women with fear won't get you there either.

Show me where I have advocated immorality on one hand and morality on the other. The hypocrisy - and endless flip-flopping between threads has been all yours. And I have not tried to control women with fear - I have only ever advised men to be considered in choosing a wife - based in part on how she has availed herself of that liberty.

Mindfulness:
It comes as no surprise that you will not address the hypocrisy your fellow men so proudly present here but that you will quickly jump at any female poster's submission to get your message across.

Which hypocrisy has been presented? And if such hypocrisy is not a direct challenge to my post, why is it incumbent upon me to rebut it? This is a mens thread, and I am but one voice amongst many. I state my piece and men are free to challenge, rebut, or agree or simply have different perspectives. Do I trawl the women' threads pointing out hypocrisy or making challenges?

Mindfulness:
You see nothing wrong with a man saying that it is not his job to promote morality but ok for him to complain about some sort of perceived moral decadence.

This is all in your head. My positions are clear, Undeviating on every thread and over time. If someone does this, feel free to call them out - I am not your, or anyone elses proxy or guardian of the interwebz !


Back so soon? Shouldn't you only just be embarking on a luxurious sojourn in some high priced foreign establishment? Abi you misread the rota !


TV

A40:

Maintain your opinion make I maintain mine. I never said it had to be flimsy to anyone else

There's more to a woman than her sexual history if you don't realize that by now then I'm sorry there is nothing I can do to help

You obviously can't detect sarcasm if it hits you in the face...

Of course there's more to a woman than her sexual history, this isn't some privileged information you needed to throw at me, hence the gif...

The bone of contention here has been that her sexual history is absolutely one of the things to consider NOT that it's the only thing to consider.




Lord, where do these people come from... Lol..

Timbuktou:


That's what they're saying. Read Carefree's last comment. I asked Free if she had penetrated a kitty and she was beating about the bush.

That girl will type anything to avoid admission of ignorance especially as this here's a topic about a woman's physiology.

There's no way on God's earth that a vajay that has birthed a child will feel the same as one that hasn't.... Same way a vajay that is very sexually active won't feel the same as one that isn't as active or totally inactive.

TV01:

What you have done is;
1. Suggest sex is something to be indulged in freely, and without consequence. If so, why not do it to the utmost?
2. Your anecdotes plainly suggested that out of wedlock children in no way impaired a womans marriage options
3. Not to mention that you totally overlooked the pathologies of fragmented families
4. Your "evidence" actually implied, that not only would their chances not be impaired, but they would even secure the most eligible of men
5. Your clear implication was that promiscuity and out of wedlock are good things, or at least not things to be concerned about


First, that is not your message; your message, is one of promiscuity, out of wedlock births, and feelings based actions. Second my position is simple - and has been repeatedly made, especially to you - NSBM


NSBM


Me control? Nope, I have repeatedly said, if you want unfettered freedom and sexual liberty, then have it. I reserve the right to point out the pathologies, risks and outcomes this may lead to and advise men to give due consideration to this.


This is a woefully thin strawman. I am for robust and fulfilling marriages. I do not advise men to marry in order to be cruel. This statement has no bearing whatsoever on what is being discussed here .


The anecdotal evidence you provided is at meaningless - being at best a few outlying examples of which there will always be some. Meaningless and misleading, as you tried to present it as pretty normal - hence my exaggerated response. Your personal observations are not fact, or even unbiased opinion. Present something better - as opposed to near fair tales


Show me where I have advocated immorality on one hand and morality on the other. The hypocrisy - and endless flip-flopping between threads has been all yours. And I have not tried to control women with fear - I have only ever advised men to be considered in choosing a wife - based in part on how she has availed herself of that liberty.


Which hypocrisy has been presented? And if such hypocrisy is not a direct challenge to my post, why is it incumbent upon me to rebut it? This is a mens thread, and I am but one voice amongst many. I state my piece and men are free to challenge, rebut, or agree or simply have different perspectives. Do I trawl the women' threads pointing out hypocrisy or making challenges?


This is all in your head. My positions are clear, Undeviating on every thread and over time. If someone does this, feel free to call them out - I am not your, or anyone elses proxy or guardian of the interwebz !


Back so soon? Shouldn't you only just be embarking on a luxurious sojourn in some high priced foreign establishment? Abi you misread the rota !


TV

Tell me TV01, what is your problem with me saying that someone who thinks that promiscuity leads to moral decadence, which he is so concerned with, should abstain from premarital s.ex, which would be part of the solution instead of making others responsible for something that he does not want to take responsibility for?

You see no hypocrisy here? No surprise!

freecocoa:
I'm not trying to sell anything, I am only saying you people should stop talking like you know everything especially as concerns women, cos you don't.

Speaking for myself girl, I do not and can not pretend to know everything concerning women...it isn't actually something I actively try to learn or know.

But I did ask a question, and I defer to your subsequent honest answer.
Are you seriously trying to imply that consistent sex or childbirth has no effect on the elasticity of a vag.ina?

Mindfulness:


@bold

Another reason why some people here better stop being hypocritical and stop acting like promiscuity has no consequences for men or like they are not responsible for fatherless kids and along with it the problems in society.

Thanks.

Errrm, I crackhaus hereby proclaim that I'm not responsible for fatherless kid(s) or the problems in society....

I also don't know if anyone else here is...but it's quite okay that you're venting, letting it all out is the first step to healing.

TV01, since you don't believe that my anecdotes are true, let us focus on people we all know, in this context women who have been married multiple times.

Elizabeth Taylor

eight marriages (two to one person)

3 kids and one adopted.

Apart from marriages, she had countless affairs while married.


Joan Collins

five marriages

In 2002 she married a man 32 years younger

She has three kids, two from her second husband and one from her third husband.

Jennifer Lopez

three marriages and two kids


Geena Davis

married for the fourth time with three kids



Gloria Swanson

six marriages




I could go on and on and on.

crackhaus:

Errrm, I crackhaus hereby proclaim that I'm not responsible for fatherless kid(s) or the problems in society....

[s]I also don't know if anyone else here is...but it's quite okay that you're venting, letting it all out is the first step to healing.[/s]

I am not the one whining about moral decadence here so please spare me. Even if you have ten baby mamas, I couldn't care less.

crackhaus:

Speaking for myself girl, I do not and can not pretend to know everything concerning women...it isn't actually something I actively try to learn or know.

But I did ask a question, and I defer to your subsequent honest answer.
Are you seriously trying to imply that "consistent sex or childbirth has no effect on the elasticity of a vag.ina?"

Crack! You like to waste your time oh? Did you not see the simple "3 point answer" I gave the young woman regarding your hi -lighted line and her subsequent reply to it? Or maybe your just having fun? Lol.......

crackhaus:

That girl will type anything to avoid admission of ignorance especially as this here's a topic about a woman's physiology.

There's no way on God's earth that a vajay that has birthed a child will feel the same as one that hasn't.... Same way a vajay that is very sexually active won't feel the same as one that isn't as active or totally inactive.

There is no way on God's earth that men with small joysticks will not act like the va.gina is the problem.

Mindfulness:
TV01, since you don't believe that my anecdotes are true, let us focus on people we all know, in this context women who have been married multiple times.

Elizabeth Taylor

eight marriages (two to one person)

3 kids and one adopted.

Apart from marriages, she had countless affairs while married.


Joan Collins

five marriages

In 2002 she married a man 32 years younger

She has three kids, two from her second husband and one from her third husband.

Jennifer Lopez

three marriages and two kids


Geena Davis

married for the fourth time with three kids



Gloria Swanson

six marriages




I could go on and on and on.

Hi, can I ask you two questions?

what is this list of females supposed to prove? why are they the ideal people to prove said point?

it's sunday afternoon So I'm a bit slow, humor me...

Mindfulness:


I am not the one whining about moral decadence here so please spare me. Even if you have ten baby mamas, I couldn't care less.

But your comment about men producing fatherless babies and being the problem in society seemed like you were venting from a personal pain... No?

Mindfulness:


There is no way on God's earth that men with small joysticks will not act like the va.gina is the problem.

Ahhh finally, the carefree I remember is starting to reveal her true nature...I always suspected that this whole I'm-reinvented-and-now-connect-with-God-through-Buddhism-and-I-no-longer-get-dirty-on-NL, was all a big act.

You made a fair point BTW, still doesn't change the fact that a vagi.na that has produced a baby can not feel as tight as one that hasn't or one that isn't very active.
Bite me!

funlord:


Crack! You like to waste your time oh? Did you not see the simple "3 point answer" I gave the young woman regarding your hi -lighted line and her subsequent reply to it? Or maybe your just having fun? Lol.......

That, and much more...

netotse:

Hi, can I ask you two questions?

what is this list of females supposed to prove? why are they the ideal people to prove said point?

it's sunday afternoon So I'm a bit slow, humor me...

They are ideal because those women are very happy people who have learnt to stay happy by connecting with God.

Mindfulness, am I right or am I right?

netotse:

Hi, can I ask you two questions?

what is this list of females supposed to prove? why are they the ideal people to prove said point?

it's sunday afternoon So I'm a bit slow, humor me...

It is supposed to refute the poor line of argumentation on this thread by people who claim that bad girls don't get married and that men are not seriously interested in them. I know that the reality is different. Being "good" is no guarantee that you will get a good spouse and being "bad" is no guarantee that you will not.

crackhaus:

But your comment about men producing fatherless babies and being the problem in society seemed like you were venting from a personal pain... No?

I am still not the one whining about moral decadence and societal problems. I am only having fun picking on the arguments of those who whine about moral decadence but refuse to see how they create the problem they so much complain about.

crackhaus:

[s]Ahhh finally, the carefree I remember is starting to reveal her true nature...I always suspected that this whole I'm-reinvented-and-now-connect-with-God-through-Buddhism-and-I-no-longer-get-dirty-on-NL, was all a big act. [/s]

You made a fair point BTW, still doesn't change the fact that a vagi.na that has produced a baby can not feel as tight as one that hasn't or one that isn't very active.
Bite me!

You are overgeneralizing. It depends on the woman's age and it also depends on the number of kids.

Besides, women can exercises their vagina.s and they should after birth, not only to please their husbands but also to prevent incontinence in the later stages of life.

Always fun ghosting this thread. Y'all keep it up

tollu:
Always fun ghosting this thread. Y'all keep it up

Hey Tollu hope you're good?