MuttleyLaff:
Laughing brains are more absorbent, I've heard said, so budaatum, if you couldnt find the humour, your brain isnt intellectually working fast and absorbent enough.

MuttleyLaff:

Sunday, the 23rd of October 4004 BC
https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/the-world-born-in-4004-bc/

jamesid29:

Sir, I think it might be worth your while to take a course on early church history if you are interested in the truth. Constantine played no part in the compilation of the Bible. Matter of fact, the books of the old testament was already accepted as scripture by Jews and 1st century christains hundreds of yrs b4 Constantine was born.

budaatum:
I do not find humour in ignorance muttley. The only thing found in ignorance is death!

And before you go "humour". The below is plain unfunny ignorance.

MuttleyLaff:
[s][img]https://s0/images/NoStopGRTIt.jpg[/img]
Take a step back budaatum. What appears to you, what you've read, or what you've perceived it to be budaatum, is just part of it all. The remaining other parts of it all, are either hidden from you, aren't visible to you, or you're just plain and outright unfunny ignorant of them.

So budaatum, my dear friend, its better to learn, not to be, in the usual habit of arriving at hasty conclusions. Better not to be judgemental and be launching uncalled for scathing attacks on me, until you're fully aware and know the entire detail about the primordial, Mother Earth and the reason why I pasted Sunday, the 23rd of October 4004 BC against your posted "4 April 4004BC?" comment.[/s]

budaatum:
Go tell it to the person you misled to believe he was not ignorant muttley.

MuttleyLaff:

My comment was addressed to no one other than you,

budaatum:
[img]https://s0/images/BudaatumYada.jpg[/img]

MuttleyLaff:
[s]budaatum, it is a tragedy for you that I am under no obligation, to make sense to you nor especially, when you, in your, typical puerile and jejune behavior, see me as doing "blah, yada, blah, yada, blah, yada"

Smh, lost opportunity to catch a glimpse of the gems in the sea of what budaatum alleged to be endless "blah, yada, blah, yada, blah, yada" Never mind, this is déjà moo for me, because I know I have experienced this your, typical and nauseating "blah, yada, blah, yada, blah, yada" puerile jejune behavior bullshit from you budaatum before and before and before.[/s]

gensteejay:
All these silly threads people create on Nairaland. SMH.

They're a sad reflection of Nigeria's moribund education sector, especially science and technology.

It's a sorry case.

gensteejay:
All these silly threads people create on Nairaland. SMH.

They're a sad reflection of Nigeria's moribund education sector, especially science and technology.

It's a sorry case.

DoctorAlien:


What of the fact that many scientists who got their PhD from the most prestigious institutions around the world actually hold the Bible to be true? Does it reflect the moribund state of education in those countries too?

Or tell me, is education measured by how much evolution is mixed with it?

gensteejay:

Lol. I don't even need to waste my time on this sort of discussion.

You're right; the whole of science is nonsense

and only your own Bible (though you didn't state the correct version out of the many out there) is right.

Away from science, all the histories of civilizations that had existed for at least 10,000 years ago (well documented)

are false and only your Bible that was cobbled together about 2000 years ago is right.

The earth is about 6000 years old.

It's really a sorry case.

DoctorAlien:
So budaatum, tell me, is this one ^^^ among the intellectuals?

DoctorAlien:


Or tell me, is education measured by how much evolution is mixed with it?

budaatum:


Intellect is the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract matters. One studies available information on a subject objectively, as in, without personal bias, preconceived opinions or subjective blindness, before coming to a conclussion on the matter.

The evidence for the age of planet earth being much older than biblical suggestions is rather overwhelming so 'intellectuals' who hold to a young earth, in my own subjective opinion, must lack somewhere on the intellectual scale where this particular subject is concerned.

They sure are not showing much book reading intelligence if they place one book so far above every other book on the subject, so I'd say their intellect, on this subject, is deficient and not completely there.

DoctorAlien:
The above bolded is the most important part of this post of yours. All these things are true only in your opinion and in the opinion of people who hold the same view with you. Very honest of you.

I must comment that you're beginning to show understanding, the first sign of which is honesty.

MuttleyLaff:
We all and each engage our brains, only that you quite a lot misread or misunderstand and also, maybe out of frustration or because of the time of the female's month, I dont know, but you do lose your comport and patience easily

budaatum:

You had a point here. One shouldn't expect a Poetry Phd to know much on the matter if they haven't bothered to learn about it. But nor should they be making out its something they have a clue about. But I guess that's asking for some honesty - an admission of how little one knows. And as they say, flying pigs.

DoctorAlien:


The above bolded is the most important part of this post of yours. All these things are true only in your opinion and in the opinion of people who hold the same view with you. Very honest of you.

I must comment that you're beginning to show understanding, the first sign of which is honesty.

DoctorAlien:


Lol. When I say there are scientists with PhD who hold the Bible to be true, I don't mean PhD in poetry. I mean PhD in those very fields you consider science: Math, physics, biology, chemistry, engineering, medicine, etc.

DoctorAlien:


All these things are true only in your opinion and in the opinion of people who hold the same view with you.

budaatum:

then something is wrong there and we should investigate the institution that awarded you a PhD,

because studying those sciences would hardly have left you time to consider biblical age

as viably possible and you ought to have intellectually abandoned it anyway in light of contradictory evidence.

At best we would perhaps suggest you have a bias and are attempting to use pseudoscience to validate it.

DoctorAlien:
yeah, this is a nice idea. Some of them got their degrees from Harvard. You can start the investigation from Harvard.

exactly what evolutionists are trying to achieve, to infect every field of knowledge with their ideas, and proclaim them very essential to those fields. As though science was not moving on when evolution was not the ruling paradigm. But they have not succeeded. In fact, much to their chagrin, the various fields of knowledge do just fine (I say even better) without evolutionary ideas.

Lol. Just as evolutionists should have abandoned their ideas in the light of contradictory evidence.



Sounds to me like you're describing evolutionists.

budaatum:
This thread is not about evolution Alien, please don't equivocate it with young earthism, they are very cleary distinct.

Show me one single phd in harvard doing young earth if you would please.

DoctorAlien:


They are not doing "young earth". They are doing science. And they have PhD from Harvard. And they believe that the Earth and the universe is young.

Check our Kurt Wise, and Nathaniel Jeanson.

budaatum:

I have checked them both out alien. Kurt Wise is not at Harvard, he studied there under Jay Gould and his thesis was contrary to his later young earth beliefs. This is he: "Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate."

He is saying he will stick to his beliefs regardless of the evidence which is intellectually dishonest in my opinion.

I could not find anything with which to form an objective opinion about nathaniel jeanson, apart from he studied at Harvard and does not appear to be doing science now.