Anduku:

I fully expect this decision to be overturned on appeal

You will wait for a long time for any likelihood of overturned appeal. Stone was found guilty by a jury not a judge. I guess you are still waiting for Paul Manafort decision to be overturned by appeal.

Timbuktuo:


The Dem leadership aren’t stupid, they are simply trying to distract Trump and render his administration useless. It is their brain dead followers who should be regarded as stupid.

One Mitch McConnell (R), a minority leader in 2008, said just after Obama was sworn in as president, said "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president".

Even Trump made sure Obama did have peace with his 'birthers' campaign that Obama isn't a US citizen.

feedthenation:


One Mitch McConnell (R), a minority leader in 2008, said just after Obama was sworn in as president, said "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president".

Even Trump made sure Obama did have peace with his 'birthers' campaign that Obama isn't a US citizen.

So what they never used illegal fisa court crap, they never used bogus impeachment hearings.

Contrary to her opening statement, former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch later admitted under questioning that Obama-Biden officials prepared her to answer questions about Hunter Biden's role on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma during her 2016 confirmation hearing.

feedthenation:


One Mitch McConnell (R), a minority leader in 2008, said just after Obama was sworn in as president, said "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president".

Even Trump made sure Obama did have peace with his 'birthers' campaign that Obama isn't a US citizen.

Imagine being so enlightened that you think wanting a president of the opposite party to have only one term is a groundbreaking piece of information. These left people sef

The most important part of yesterday's hearing was Amb. Yovanovitch’s statement that she has no evidence that Trump received a bribe or that he committed a crime. This is an impeachment hearing. Not a personnel hearing. Not a foreign policy hearing. She saw no crime committed so why was she brought in to testify?

CTPlayer:


Real news LOL. It is over and Trump will win again.

enjoy your sojourn in lalaland, reality will catch up with you soon

CTPlayer:

You have nothing. But Trump or any President should have certainly questioned aid money to Ukraine. Here is how corrupt it was.
Wed 12 Apr 2017 01.00 EDT
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/12/the-money-machine-how-a-high-profile-corruption-investigation-fell-apart

The long read
The money machine: how a high-profile corruption investigation fell apart
After a revolution overthrew Ukraine’s disgraced president, Theresa May promised to help the country’s new leaders recover stolen assets. But the UK’s first case collapsed within a year
by Oliver Bullough

when and where else has trump questioned aid money?

Anyone with any intellectual honesty can see that this hearing is a sham devoid of any semblance of due process. Go ahead Democrats, vote to impeach.

Trump is such a meanie

GalaticHorde:
when and where else has trump questioned aid money?

Do you think anyone cares? Do you think independent voters give a Bleep. Nothing more than what Dems said immediately after the election, we need to impeach him. It isn't illegal to question aid money.

Nothing more than a dog and pony show for public consumption. Dems are total losers.

House Democrats are publicly holding out hope that historic impeachment hearings will persuade a vast majority of the American public that President Donald Trump committed high crimes and misdemeanors — but privately many acknowledge that it's unlikely to happen.

In a private meeting this week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her top lieutenants were skeptical about the prospects of a dramatic shift in opinion even as public impeachment hearings began this week, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. The upshot, the sources said: Democrats need to move forward with impeachment proceedings even if the politics are murky, noting that even during Richard Nixon's presidency most of the public was divided until soon before he was forced to resign........................

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/14/politics/democratic-impeachment-strategy/index.html?no-st=1573903346

AG Bill Barr: "Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call 'The Resistance' and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch."

"...But Burisma wasn’t just under scrutiny in the West. The Ukrainian prosecutor general, Viktor Shokin, also was probing the company’s crookedness. And this is where Hunter Biden’s hubris becomes his father’s biggest political pitfall.

Biden was caught bragging about threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees in 2016 unless the Ukrainian president fired Shokin. The prosecutor resigned in February 2016; the White House announced the loan guarantee and $335 million in U.S. aid in March 2016.

Biden’s Defense Founders
Team Biden explains away his demand for Shokin’s ouster as an effort to replace one corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor with a more credible official. This is the line the media and Biden continue to parrot.

Biden’s defense, however, took a blow on Wednesday. Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah) noted there are “dozens and dozens of countries steeped in corruption.” These nations, Stewart added, are home to hundreds of corrupt government officials. Kent and Taylor agreed.

But here was the crusher: “Can you give me an example any time where the vice president of the United States shows up and demands that a specific prosecutor be fired and gives them a six-hour time limit to do that?” Stewart asked Kent and Taylor. “Are you aware of that happening any other place?’

Neither answered. “I guess the answer is no,” Stewart said. They also concurred when Stewart suggested that someone should not be shielded from any sort of investigation because they are a candidate for public office. “No one is above the law, sir,” Kent replied...."

https://amgreatness.com/2019/11/14/impea...for-biden/

Amb. Yovanovitch was an anti-corruption champion but not aware other State Dept officials were concerned abt the conflict of interest in VP’s son being paid big money by a Ukrainian energy company?

A new poll finds that more than one out of every three Chicagoans support using some form of bankruptcy to address the city’s mounting debts, which include upward of $150 billion in unfunded pension liability.



Conducted by Ogden & Fry on behalf of the Illinois Opportunity Project, pollsters found 36 percent of respondents favor bankruptcy, compared to 21 percent of those in favor of raising taxes as a way of trying to tackle the deficit. Of the 534 respondents that were randomly selected from a pool of 2020 general election voters earlier this month, 42.7 percent were undecided on the issue.

At a time when at least 20 percent of all Chicagoans live in poverty and almost half of all households earn less than $50,000 annually, pollsters noted that the massive deficit leaves every taxpayer nearly $145,000 in the hole in pension liability alone. Bankruptcy allows a municipality to reduce its debt by restructuring pensions and other debt obligations.

Despite raising taxes on several fronts in recent years, the city still remains tens of billions of dollars underwater. The central question in the three-question survey asked residents if they would “rather the City of Chicago continue to raise taxes, like property taxes, to address the pension crisis, or use bankruptcy to restructure pension benefits to make pension obligations sustainable and affordable?”

https://chicagocitywire.com/stories/...coQCi4.twitter

Bombshell: Schiff’s new double witnesses’ identities leaked.

coluka:
The most important part of yesterday's hearing was Amb. Yovanovitch’s statement that she has no evidence that Trump received a bribe or that he committed a crime. This is an impeachment hearing. Not a personnel hearing. Not a foreign policy hearing. She saw no crime committed so why was she brought in to testify?

Confirmed. The Democrats turned it into a therapy session when speaking to Yovanovitch aka "How did that make you feel?" Hahahaha So it's now all about feelings, emotions etc

How Trump removes ambassadors versus how Obamsky removes them

*cough* *cough*

Please, who is this man? Google says he is the President of the United States of America. Can anyone confirm if Google is telling the truth this time?

PS: And can someone tell me why he is smiling?

CTPlayer:


Do you think anyone cares? Do you think independent voters give a Bleep. Nothing more than what Dems said immediately after the election, we need to impeach him. It isn't illegal to question aid money.

very funny you obviously care enough to run commentary you obviously give more than your fair share of bleeps and sound so salty........I don't know, maybe you re a dependent voter, dependent of republican horseshit

Timbuktuo:


Imagine being so enlightened that you think wanting a president of the opposite party to have only one term is a groundbreaking piece of information. These left people sef

or rather these dumb right peeps

coluka:
The most important part of yesterday's hearing was Amb. Yovanovitch’s statement that she has no evidence that Trump received a bribe or that he committed a crime. This is an impeachment hearing. Not a personnel hearing. Not a foreign policy hearing. She saw no crime committed so why was she brought in to testify?

you conservatives are so dumb as to not know when an accessory witness is cross examined to establish the motive of a crime

Timbuktuo:
Please, who is this man? Google says he is the President of the United States of America. Can anyone confirm if Google is telling the truth this time?

PS: And can someone tell me why he is smiling?

Lol

Timbuktuo:
How Trump removes ambassadors versus how Obamsky removes them

Liberals are screaming "witness intimidation!"
Question 1: Was she a witness?
Question 2: If yes, what did she witness?

GalaticHorde:
you conservatives are so dumb as to not know when an accessory witness is cross examined to establish the motive of a crime

You are worse than dumb, how is she an accessory witness? It's obvious you don't know what an accessory witness is. An accessory witness is a person who aids, abets, or encourages another to commit a crime but does not actually participate in the commission of the crime. how does this so called 'witness' fit the bill?

Timbuktuo:
Bombshell: Schiff’s new double witnesses’ identities leaked.

Lol, Adam Schifflett

Republicans are loosing everywhere,

The Blue Wave of Democrats is still waxing strong.

Gubernatorial election victories in Kentucky & Louisiana as well as Legislative victories in the Virginia House of Delegates as well as Virginia Senate.

40 Congressional Seats,

11 Governorships Seats,

350+ Elected Offices Nationwide since 2018.

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE are definitely speaking. And will AGAIN speak on November 3rd, 2020.

GalaticHorde:
or rather these dumb right peeps

Happy Sunday bros

obixcel:
Liberals are screaming "witness intimidation!"
Question 1: Was she a witness?
Question 2: If yes, what did she witness?

The amount cognitive dissonance on the left is cringey. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. It’s almost like they lose control of their mental faculty the moment Trump is mentioned.