₦airaland Forum

Thank you so much @ smeag0l

I received the money just as you promised.
I strongly believe in a short time by God's grace I'll be organizing things like this. Thanks once more

smeag0l:
But I sent you more than 5k. I mentioned there's an additional 5k for anyone who would get both answers(with the workings) correct.

Alright...I understand now. You have done well

Mrshape don't worry. I'll still do another one next month as I'm thinking of making this a monthly thing. Be sure to be on the look out and also be fast with your solutions. You're a great guy!

Mrshape:
If I tell you say this thing no pain me an na lie.
Mime came in 9:38am
And that shape I solved it here in this forum about 4 days ago after much begging for the solution.
When there is shape question their will be calling Mr everywhere but when it is money involved now.
No one mentioned me for good 12 hours before I knew

Please post the solution you sent in.

Ikennablue:
Thank you so much @ smeag0l

I received the money just as you promised.
I strongly believe in a short time by God's grace I'll be organizing things like this. Thanks once more

smeag0l:
Mrshape don't worry. I'll still do another one next month as I'm thinking of making this a monthly thing. Be sure to be on the look out and also be fast with your solutions. You're a great guy!

Thanks boss.
Look forward to taking part in it.
And may God blessing you for promoting mathematics education you are the the best

smeag0l:
Please post the solution you sent in.

i already did

I love stuffs like this, you won't see so many people doing this

Kudos to all the Genius in the House

I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.

Many of the number solutions here are funny kikiki.
Must especially all who used logarithm and index

DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.

Let me Chen it out

DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.

You made x a constant x us not a constant it is a straight line graph with slop of 1 that is start from the origin a pass the center dividing the rectangular plane into two triangle

Ikennablue:
i already did

Give me some few minutes let me make the plot

DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.

Here is the correct plot.
I don't know if you understand what I saidvand another fault is that you interval is to wide
Maybe you can use rage of values of x as 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,0.4.........
And also you need to plot on a graph of equal dimension

Mrshape:
Here is the correct plot.
I don't know if you understand what I saidvand another fault is that you interval is to wide
Maybe you can use rage of values of x as 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,0.4.........
And also you need to plot on a graph of equal dimension

pls what's the name of this app

DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.

But the disadvantage of that plot is that you can't see more than 4 dp or so.
So you will take it to another plot to see five dp and approximate the sixth.
Or better use Lambert W if you are fortunate it will lead you to omega function that have constant special value (like our special angle in trigonometry you don't need program for such just substitute you will get your exact answer ) otherwise you program it. And get your exact value

yinkacruxzy:
Thanks so much smeag01 I really appreciate your gesture

Na wa for this your comparing power index method.
There is nothing stopping x from been 2^2.
I thought you compare indices in polynomial, and compare coefficients of same variables on both sides.

DesChyko:
I've tried to fault where I got it wrong here aside the other value of x but I couldn't. The mathematical blunder remains elusive.
Please someone help out.

I don't understand. Why did you use only whole numbers to plot your graph?

Squillaci:
Na wa for this your comparing power index method.
There is nothing stopping x from been 2^2.
I thought you compare indices in polynomial, and compare coefficients of same variables on both sides.

Dont mind me,that is what desperation does when you are competing with gurus

Squillaci:
I don't understand. Why did you use only whole numbers to plot your graph?

1. No graph handy.
2. Limited space.
3. x = 2 made me assume.

kolad59:
Boss Mi GBOGBO MSE

I messaged you on Facebook