₦airaland Forum

Maximus69:
It's OK Sir!

brocab:
And it sucks even more-when one chooses to become a JW-knowing he or she will never become satisfied in knowledge they retrieve learning about the Watchtowers cultist literature..

rabzy:
Don't transfer your needs on others. We are very well taken care of spiritually and it is attestable by all impartial observers.
Our literature's and books are available online without charge in over 500 languages, pls do tell me which other cult exposes themselves like that.

rabzy:
Don't transfer your needs on others. We are very well taken care of spiritually and it is attestable by all impartial observers.
Our literature's and books are available online without charge in over 500 languages, pls do tell me which other cult exposes themselves like that.

Maximus69:
I decided to ignore him since he's not making any sense with his posts, all he wants is for JWs to admit that we are worshiping the same God as he does, as long as we are saying "NO" to that he is desperately looking for ways to curse the blessed people of JEHOVAH!

brocab:
You are mistaken-we all know, we don't worship the same God-your god doesn't line up with any bible-let alone the NWT bible.
It's not cursing-it's common sense why I won't agree with your literature, it's false hope!
Nothing good could come out from it-none of you read your bibles-because it doesn't make sense-this is why you try to understand the KJ's, but then, the KJ's is confusing for you too..

brocab:
We already have cults giving out literature that doesn't concern God that's flooding the net-your's is just another cult giving out cartoon magazines that doesn't supply any support to anybody other then the Watchtower-
Your magazines maybe free but your bibles are expensive, which of course none of you have them-because none of you could understand them.
This gives the world a good reason why none of you could understand the KJ's-and in good reason-your magazines are full of dreams and wonders of false hopes.

brocab:
You are mistaken-we all know, we don't worship the same God-your god doesn't line up with any bible-let alone the NWT bible.
It's not cursing-it's common sense why I won't agree with your literature, it's false hope!
Nothing good could come out from it-none of you read your bibles-because it doesn't make sense-this is why you try to understand the KJ's, but then, the KJ's is confusing for you too..

rabzy:
None of us read our Bible?..I have read the Bible cover to cover...verse 1 to the end and not just me millions of JWs,...it is one of our first spiritual goals.
What you don't know is that we have printed and distributed tens of millions of KJV to people

brocab:
And it sucks even more-when one chooses to become a JW-knowing he or she will never become satisfied in knowledge they retrieve learning about the Watchtowers cultist literature..

TATIME:
What he meant is 'you're not reading the Bible with their holy ghost!'

rabzy:
None of us read our Bible?..I have read the Bible cover to cover...verse 1 to the end and not just me millions of JWs,...it is one of our first spiritual goals.
What you don't know is that we have printed and distributed tens of millions of KJV to people

TATIME:
What he meant is 'you're not reading the Bible with their holy ghost!'

TATIME:
What he meant is 'you're not reading the Bible with their holy ghost!'

brocab:
Even after all that you still "VERBALLY" deny-the Watchtower had anything to do with John 1:1, but kept this verse in tact to prove-the Word of God still stands it's ground..
{John1:1} In the beginning WAS the Word, and the Word WAS with God, and the Word WAS God.
So be proud JW-that the Watchtower did have enough sense not to remove the truth from the KJ's.

rabzy:
None of us read our Bible?..I have read the Bible cover to cover...verse 1 to the end and not just me millions of JWs,...it is one of our first spiritual goals.
What you don't know is that we have printed and distributed tens of millions of KJV to people

Maximus69:
Of course Isaiah prophesied that the Messiah "will be called Mighty God" so Jesus served that purpose during the time he walked the earth just as Moses also served as God at a point in time! Exodus 7:1

Clearly the Word WAS God just as Moses WAS God, but the one who IS and who WAS and who is coming is JEHOVAH the ALMIGHTY GOD! Revelations 1:8

brocab:
Your argument is now with the Watchtower, they did leave John 1:1 in tact-until your bible was discovered by writer Charles Russell.. the founder of the Watchtower-a 33 degree Mason, Russell decided to create his own god from a misquote he believes Jesus is not the Son of God, but Michael the archangel who few down to earth to become the man Jesus to save the world from destruction that's coming....

Janosky:
Brocab can Continue to DECEIVE himself.

Brocab screen the PROOF saying Jesus Christ practiced "monotheistic Christianity" whereas Brocab is super glued to the Triune FRAUD.

That screenshot is eternal PROOF of Brocab HYPOCRISY

Maximus69:
So are you saying Michael is not the son of God?

brocab:
I am a son-but I don't claim the authority the Father gave to His Son Jesus Christ-you have given all the authority to a messenger, Michael is an angel he is used as God's messenger..
This is what I mean-the Watchtower printed the KJ's bible on your press-and still you all deny the scriptures exist.
{Hebrews 1:5-6}
For to which of the angels did God ever say: “You are My Son; today I have become Your Father”? Or again: “I will be His Father, and He will be My Son”? And again, when God brings His firstborn into the world, He says: “Let all God’s angels worship Him.”…
Angels don't worship other angels-they don't rebuke each other..
{Jude 9} can explain that clearly: ""Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
Michael was talking to Satan..

Maximus69:
Please all i need is YES or NO

Is Archangel Michael one of God's sons?

brocab:
One of God's sons-but not the Son who has all God's authority giving to Him..

brocab:
Even after all that you still "VERBALLY" deny-the Watchtower had anything to do with John 1:1, but kept this verse in tact to prove-the Word of God still stands it's ground..
{John1:1} In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
So be proud JW-that the Watchtower did have enough sense not to remove the truth from the KJ's...

brocab:
Your argument is now with the Watchtower, they did leave John 1:1 in tact-until your bible was discovered by writer Charles Russell.. the founder of the Watchtower-a 33 degree Mason, Russell decided to create his own god from a misquote he believes Jesus is not the Son of God, but Michael the archangel who few down to earth to become the man Jesus to save the world from destruction that's coming....
Wow-this is a over rated theory..
But we can't deny the truth, now can we?

brocab:
I haven't been answering you-I actually believed you died.. You write like a dead man-someone who doesn't seem to have it together..

brocab:
I am a son-but I don't claim the authority the Father gave to His Son Jesus Christ-you have given all the authority to a messenger, Michael is an angel he is used as God's messenger..
This is what I mean-the Watchtower printed the KJ's bible on your press-and still you all deny the scriptures exist.
{Hebrews 1:5-6}
For to which of the angels did God ever say: “You are My Son; today I have become Your Father”? Or again: “I will be His Father, and He will be My Son”? And again, when God brings His firstborn into the world, He says: “Let all God’s angels worship Him.”…
Angels don't worship other angels-they don't rebuke each other..
{Jude 9} can explain that clearly: ""Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.
Michael was talking to Satan.

Brocab LIED that Jesus is Almighty God now he is TWISTING the same mouth to call Jesus the son of God.
Him Almighty God is a son in heaven, Rev3:5
John 20:17


Jesus is a Messenger & God's son, Luke 9:35 and John 7:16,John15:15 and Angels are God's sons.

Mark8:38. Matt16:27, 2Thess1:7-9, God's son leads other sons of God, can your brain understand?


God did NOT command any angel to worship Jesus, Mattt4:10 according to Jesus Christ.

The Catholic Church,(the foremost Exponent of Trinity) their Bible says God instructs angels to "Pay homage to Jesus" @ Hebrew 1:6.

Brocab claim on Hebrews1:6 is false

brocab:
One of God's sons-but not the Son who has all God's authority giving to Him..
What this means you bow down before an angel-you worship an angel-not of the Son of God Himself..

rabzy:
Jesus needing to receive his authority from God and then later submitting that authority back after using it to accomplish all God wanted shows clearly we are talking of two divine beings, a father and a very loyal and obedient regent...not the same person.

rabzy:
That is a blatant lie...Russel never said and neither did any JW say that Jesus is not the Son of God....what Jesus declared himself the son of God...what he did not do was to say he himself is God the Almighty. Michael the archangel and Jesus are one and the same Son of God...if you dont think Michael is Jesus..fine..but dont use say we ever taught that Jesus is the Son of God or that he is not divine.

1808: "and the Word was a god" – Thomas Belsham The New Testament, in an Improved Version, Upon the Basis of Archbishop Newcome’s New Translation: With a Corrected Text, London.
1822: "and the Word was a god" – The New Testament in Greek and English (A. Kneeland, 1822.)
1829: "and the Word was a god" – The Monotessaron; or, The Gospel History According to the Four Evangelists (J. S. Thompson, 1829)
1863: "and the Word was a god" – A Literal Translation of the New Testament (Herman Heinfetter [Pseudonym of Frederick Parker], 1863)
John L. McKenzie (Catholic Biblical scholar) wrote that ho Theos is God the Father, and adds that John 1:1 should be translated "the word was with the God [=the Father], and the word was a divine being."[43][44]
B. F. Westcott is quoted by C. F. D. Moule (Lady Margaret's Professor of Divinity in the University of Cambridge):

The predicate (God) stands emphatically first, as in 4:24. ‘It is necessarily without the article (theós not ho theós) inasmuch as it describes the nature of the Word and does not identify His Person
Philip B. Harner (Professor Emeritus of Religion at Heidelberg College) says:
Perhaps the clause could be translated, ‘the Word had the same nature as God.” This would be one way of representing John’s thought, which is, as I understand it, that ho logos, no less than ho theos, had the nature of theos.[47]