vivavik:
I'm wondering why you keep stating points objectively without bias as against the women, most men in naija will argue and not agree to these points you've made.

Sure a man is behind this monikers?

I am a man, both my parents were born in Nigeria, I wasn't born nor raised in Ngeria, I wasn't educated in Nigeria, I have traveled the world over and over and lived in different environments and culture for the past 20+ yrs, so I would say that I do have a "broader" mindset and/or way of understanding of world issues, which may not be the same as a person born/raised/educated in Nigeria.

WORDWORLD:
IN SUMMARY, THE BLAME IS ON GUYS WHO CHOOSE TO TREAT WOMEN LIKE A QUEEN. GIVING THEM A LIFE STYLE THEY WORK NOT FOR

I HAVE SAID IT MANY TIMES, THE ONLY WAY A MAN CAN BE HAPPY AND FREE IN A RELATIONSHIP IS BY BEING AS HEARTLESS AND AS SELFISH AS CAN BE, GENEROSITY IS CRIME IN A RELATIONSHIP ACCORDING TO LAW.

WISE UP 'FOOLISHMEN !

Exactly... These men knew the law before being with these women... They should have protected their wealth instead of focusing on love entirely. You can love someone and still be financially careful. Any man knows that whether a year or 20, chances are over will go sour.

bukatyne:


His village people won.

Considering there is no caveat that he stops paying if the woman enters another relationship.

Bros 0 - Village People 1

Let him wait for next round.

Exactly lol!Dude his rich anyways so he better have the bitches money!

How i wish these laws can be used in Nigeria.
Men will stop lying all sorts of lies just to waste a lady's time because all he wants is sex for some months or years and later dump her with films excuse.

By the time men starts loosing half of their hard earned monies to exes and baby mamas ,they won't even smile at women anymore.

All the make believe script just to have sex will end.

Nigerian men are very lucky, these laws doesn't apply here.

All of una go behave! And start opening up like a canary to any woman una fancy and wish to waste her precious time on lies.

MrBrownJay1:


I can already picture the dude bringing marriage contract for her to sign before marriage (aka prenup) and she refusing to get married with a prenup..... How much more proof does a man need to confirm that the woman wanted some of his wealth?!?!

Well!it only proves that the “world gold digger”is not an exclusive preserve of our African women...and women of all races do date or marry for money,power and fame more often that not lol...it only behove a man to use his sixth sense on these matters of the heart and the flesh!Qed!

Ademoore07:
If that be the case, the best thing to do is to marry a black or foreigner. If i were the guy, i will just relocate to another country.

They are places where law actually works
He will be arrested if he run away

Iceyjayzz:
Lol look at this hungry girl, if I show you what's on my cashapp account, you will faint, am not sure if your family can ever see that kind of money on their lives.

Lmao show me.
I’ll show you mine

Not by mouth
Not by calling someone broke online
I like evidence like in court

Please blur your name out and show me your cash app acct and let me show you ONE of my BANK Accts.

I am waiting man
If I am not **times richer than your rude a**hole
Lemme see why
The people who call others broke online are the broken ones
Penniless!
You are penniless and I am happy to show you!!

Carlyboi:
Well!it only proves that the “world gold digger”is not an exclusive preserve of our African women...and women of all races do date or marry for money,power and fame more often that not lol...it only behove a man to use his sixth sense on these matters of the heart and the flesh!Qed!

Oh yeah, there are goldiggers everywhere, and more often in poor countries, but that doesn't mean that rich countries don't have lazy women focused on money. In this Kim K and BS tv reality era where many women want bling bling lifestyle but can't afford it, women are proudly indulging in this goldigging lifestyle.

As I have said all along, only the dude should be blamed here.

Iceyjayzz:
Yes. all of you hungry and lazy girls.

People like you just make a little money and start feeling like kings insulting and looking down on others cause you think you’ve arrived

You disgusts me!

MrBrownJay1:


I am a man, both my parents were born in Nigeria, I wasn't born nor raised in Ngeria, I wasn't educated in Nigeria, I have traveled the world over and over and lived in different environments and culture for the past 20+ yrs, so I would say that I do have a "broader" mindset and/or way of understanding of world issues, which may not be the same as a person born/raised/educated in Nigeria.

Don't worry, just wait until it hits u, then we will review your broader mindset.
Just like Mike Tyson said "every boxer has a plan, until they enter the ring and get punched in the face".

That was how that Twitter doctor was supporting rape victims irrespective of circumstances until that girl came for his blokos....
He's got a disciplinary hearing with GMC soon and God help him and his medical licence.

That judgement was a scam and u know it. The lady just opened pension on top the guys head for nothing.
Do u know how many men will be stuck with spousal support if they are forced to account for every relationship with the opposite sex. That's sufficient to bankrupt 99% of men.

Well this is a lesson to all simps like Latner- once a simp for women, u are forever enslaved. The guy even paid off her mortgage while they were dating. Yet it wasn't even considered.

The western nations should continue their stupidity and their pathway to self destruct. He go soon clear for their eyes.
Moral decadence, weak family values n dysfunctional society are the initial symptoms of an empire in decline.

MrBrownJay1:


He didn't spend on her, he changed her life entirely, thus because they were common law husband and wife, she can now claim to be accustomed to such lifestyle, and desire to continue living like that. If the man was broke and she was the only one working and taking care of the dude, then the man could sue and ask for the exact same spousal support.



The marriage refusal is irrelevant since the man kept being with her this whole time, and whether they are married or not, the law is the same.



Not at all....even if the woman did absolutely NOTHING, she is still entitled to spousal support in order to continue living the lifestyle she has been made accustomed to by this man. You are confusing spousal support with a settlement to get half of what a husband made during marriage. Different ball game. She doesn't want half of what he made during their union, she just wants to be able to continue living the lifestyle she is accustomed to (thanks to this man)



I think it is fair as everyone knows the law... And any fool who thinks it is ok to have a lazy spouse at home while using money to put them in a certain lifestyle, while that spouse does absolutely nothing, shouldn't/cannot drop them at the snap of their fingers. Stay in your lane instead of trying to change desperate people's lives



Simple common sense would fix such issue....have your woman WORK, Have her contribute to whatever lifestyle you guys are into, have her PAY for such lifestyle, if you are rich and bring some poor woman to your life then within 6 months you have to make a life decision: keep her around and possibly have to pay her spousal support OR get rid of her (or have no paper trail that would link your life to hers)

I don’t agree with this. Just because someone changed your life out of his goodwill/good heart doesn’t mean you’re entitled to his money. It doesn’t make sense.

Reference:
They refuse God's laws that guarantees equity, peace and prosperity in favour of the laws of men that lifts one up and puts down the other. They should enjoy the mess of a society they conjure for themselves.

wtf is exactly gods law??

[i][/i]

Iceyjayzz:
This is complete bullshyt


how will I pay my ex such amount, when we are not even married or have kids together, this is stupidity at it's highest order.

Niggee, over there to make sure your money is in your wallet you gotta make sure you keep your dick in your pants. That's their simple rule

MrBrownJay1:


. You can't expect a woman (mother of your kids) who was accustomed to flying helicopter to suddenly ride keke na?

..i don't really understand ur question.. does it mean she is physically deformed? doesn't she have hands? can't she work for the money so she can continue living that lavish lifestyle?.. guy are u sure u are with ur senses

Jullima:

Watch as they avoid your unbiased post as a plague and continue to delude themselves “western laws favour women” the same laws some men use to get money from their richer female companion.

No need to cry you already know what the laws are, you cannot use a woman to raise your children, use as a companion get her used to a certain lifestyle and discard her like a piece of rubbish when you’re done. If you think no woman deserves your hard earned sweat then don’t bring them into your life and lavish them with gifts, simple. It’s a choice, you can go your own way.

How about she using him to raise her own kids?
And if you read the post, you would notice that there was no indication of who ended the relationship (you had a set of preconceptions which the post did not validate, read it again), and what do you mean by getting used to a lifestyle at the expense of someone else.

The post you quoted mentioned just a few women as comparison to cases of millions of men so I think that it is statistically insignificant.

Whatever the case, I think those laws are counterproductive; it contributed to men losing interest in marriage and will now probably force them to put a time limit on relationships in due time. It has contributed to the breakdown of the basic family structure with very well documented adverse results (which is interesting because if you want to make things so nice for a woman at the same time seriously increasing the chances of adversely affecting 2 maybe 3 or 4 children, then common sense dictates that you stop wanting to make things so nice for 1 person)

All of these are good for Africans though because in due time, these countries will have a small population of youngsters who can work because people are getting married and bearing children less ergo they will need immigrants. So we won't complain (we should though when any attempt is made to bring these laws into our clime)

I think that in time they will rework these laws to make marriage more attractive for men and divorce less attractive for women (marriages get into trouble when the woman is unhappy...the man can bull through as usual).

Nobody will tell them to when the time comes. Probably they will begin by putting real lawyer judges in these family courts (I read somewhere that many never even studied law)

ENG0701:
Some things I have come to realise about the west
1. The laws favour women in or out of marriage
2. You cannot circumvent spousal responsibilities by not
marrying. Cohabitation is considered as being
married in Canada

I support paying alimony and supporting a spouse after a divorce especially when kids are involved, but ruling like this ends up doing more harm than good in the long run

yep no more long term relationships if you ain't totally convinced of getting married after 1 year then break it off to avoid paying for cohabitation

Carlyboi:



Well!it only proves that the “world gold digger”is not an exclusive preserve of our African women...and women of all races do date or marry for money,power and fame more often that not lol...it only behove a man to use his sixth sense on these matters of the heart and the flesh!Qed!

they are actually in every part of the world actually more common in the west but they operate in a different way they target a rich dude gets lawfully married then divorce then look for the next rich dude

.

kkins25:
wtf is exactly gods law??

Lol ask him
The god’s law that have turned their own land into cannibalism

MrBrownJay1:


Oh yeah, there are goldiggers everywhere, and more often in poor countries, but that doesn't mean that rich countries don't have lazy women focused on money. In this Kim K and BS tv reality era where many women want bling bling lifestyle but can't afford it, women are proudly indulging in this goldigging lifestyle.

As I have said all along, only the dude should be blamed here.

I AGREE WITH YOU A MILLION PERCENT (1000000%) AND I UNDERSTAND YOU VERY CLEARLY NOW. INFACT HIS STUPIDITY IS BOUNDLESS . HE IS A VERY TYPICAL SIMPLETON. TURNED DOWN 1-2-3.....7 TIMES MARRIAGE CONTRACT. WHO DOES THAT Lol?

MrBrownJay1:


I can already picture the dude bringing marriage contract for her to sign before marriage (aka prenup) and she refusing to get married with a prenup..... How much more proof does a man need to confirm that the woman wanted some of his wealth?!?!

bigfrancis21:


I don’t agree with this. Just because someone changed your life out of his goodwill/good heart doesn’t mean you’re entitled to his money. It doesn’t make sense.

Of course it makes zero sense, but it is politically correct.

It may be that there was no precedent, in this instance, since the man showed some savvy by trying to get her to sign a prenup. If so then I suppose this may go as far as their highest court.

The man though should have read the writing on the wall when he brought a prenup and she refused several times. He did not unfortunately.

But, like in the case of 1million dollars capital base in Ghana where 20-30 men can come together, register a company and retain their shops as branches/subsidiaries, this can be remedied. Never marry without a prenup under any circumstance, never date for more than 2 years 11 months and 29 days.

In time, these laws more than anything else, will help couples understand that the concept of marriage originally had nothing to do with love. Maybe then they will learn to be good partners and act nearly always, only for the benefit of their children.

Jullima:

Watch as they avoid your unbiased post as a plague and continue to delude themselves “western laws favour women” the same laws some men use to get money from their richer female companion.

No need to cry you already know what the laws are, you cannot use a woman to raise your children, use as a companion get her used to a certain lifestyle and discard her like a piece of rubbish when you’re done. If you think no woman deserves your hard earned sweat then don’t bring them into your life and lavish them with gifts, simple. It’s a choice, you can go your own way.

bla bla bla bla blah

jornwhite:



There is a saying, there can never be two captains on a ship, when you put that into logical reasoning its make absolute sense as to why someone must lead while the other follow. its fundamentals of life, even animals av alpha,i.e a leader coincidentally males.
Don't get me wrong, i only sited religious belief as to why men feel they are sole providers.
I see you as someone pushing for fairness buh unfortunately life no balance, its either you control someone or someone controls you.
when two or more people co exist, submission is sacrosanct for peace to reign, most of us submit to our parent does it mean we are slaves.

While you believe there can only be one captain on a ship, why can't the captain be the woman then? She calls dibbs on it
The role of captain depends on a lot of things including experience, result oriented, consistency, courage, hard work and perseverance etc. Many qualities that are not gender based at all.
Anyway, let's not digress the post.

Openbusiness:
You weren't born to suffer? Wawu ! Well, I wasn't born to please you either. In short, pissing you off is my natural hobby . I really want to bring out the strong black woman in you, so no paragraph for you in this one too . Anyways, per USA / Russia, it's not really fear per say, it's more of the will to dominate and to resist domination or the fear of being dominated. That is to say, if we are to view countries as people, USA and Russia etc attitudinal display are typical characteristics of woke Alpha males or red pill Alphas. They are are exposed or aware of current dynamics of powerful nation building of peace through strength. So they maintain peace for themselves by making the biggest weapons of war to serve as a deterrent to any hostile to not make the mistake of messing around with the peace of their territory and interests. You know like, another basic attribute contributing to this is that a typical Alpha is security conscious. He is the guy that wakes up at 2 am just to do a routine check around the house to ensure things are the way they supposed to be, no breach, no intrusion. Even if he's a billionaire with a military barracks inside his house, he will still be actively involved and following up on things, because that's his natural attitude. He is a very territorial creature by nature and likes to protect and defend his space. But there is still a critical difference Alpha and the red pill Alphas. For example, his generator was on at night, suddenly it goes off around 1 am by itself, despite that there's enough fuel to carry it till morning. A regular Alpha male will stand up and make effort to check like wassup. But a woke Alpha or red pill Alpha will not just stand up to check, he will deploy a protective mechanism as he wants to go out, because he is woke to the fact that current strategy being used by thieves is to tamper with people's generators and turn it off, in order to lure people out to come and check it, then they strike and attack. So the woke Alpha goes out with the mindset of danger could be lurking in the dark and arms or prepares himself before going out and stays sharp, but the regular Alpha will fall into that trap because he ain't woke. So the red pill is always an advantage for everybody that takes it. The red pill ain't just about relationships alone, it's a general concept. The blue pillers are those who prefer to live in a bubble than face reality. The red pill Alpha is the ultimate Alpha. He is the Alpha that won't go extinct because of his personal stupidity or ignorance.

In all you're saying, an Alpha male is naturally an extrovert because an introvert by nature will find it exhausting to live in this pattern of life.. Being an Alpha male is natural, it has to do with your DNA, not trying to be someone you're not..

The Alpha male thing is highly misleading, some persons are becoming arrogant because they want to be seen as an Alpha male.. They should stop viewing the Beta males as second class citizens, quit the stigmatization..

MrBrownJay1:


You do know that a man dating/married to a rich woman would get the same result (aka receive spousal support), right?!



If you live with someone as husband and wife, then why shouldn't you be viewed as husband and wife? Just like a man who has a child with a woman would have all the rights as a married man. Remember, as much as it's mostly women who receive spousal support, that's because the majority of these men let these women stay home being lazy while they went to work and brought the cheddar.... But if a woman earns just as much as you do, then you pay her ONLY the difference ... if you guys have kids and she has full custody. If you have full custody then SHE pays you the difference.



I fully understand these rulings... If a man dates and promised heaven and earth to a woman and put her in a certain lifestyle that she will now claim she is accustomed to, then the fool has to pay her in order for her to remain in such lifestyle you promised her. The catch would be for that fool to 1st, not date good for nothing useless women who don't work (so that she can also contribute to any lifestyle you guys are into) ...and 2nd not become someone's benefactor for so long while you do everything to better her life.

The dude is even lucky, in some country (brazil for example), the minute you tell a woman that you love her and wanna spend the rest of your life with her Bla bla bla, and she has a confirmation (in writing/text/email) of you telling her that, then within 6months of dating she can sue you (and ask for half your shiit) if you dump her.

Did you miss the part where he proposed and she rejected, because she didn't want to sign a document which would have been a prenup. That law makes no sense...... because it then negates the usefulness of marriage and prenup. It can only make sense if there is a document that both can sign to ensure in the case of a break up, he loses nothing. A pre-relationship.

MrBrownJay1:


Yep it equally happens to rich women who marry "poorer" men...go ask Halle Berry who pays $16K in child support monthly to her ex French husband; go ask Mary j Blige paying her ex husband $30K monthly; ask Madonna who had to pay up to $70M to Guy Ritchie; ask J- lo who gave her ex $14m spousal settlement; ask Mel B who had to give her ex $8M spousal settlement; ask Britney Spears who pays her baby daddy $20K in child support, and the dude now wants more, lol!

Apart from Berry, most others are untrue, in some cases, they only paid off to have the child in their custody.

Jullima:

Watch as they avoid your unbiased post as a plague and continue to delude themselves “western laws favour women” the same laws some men use to get money from their richer female companion.

No need to cry you already know what the laws are, you cannot use a woman to raise your children, use as a companion get her used to a certain lifestyle and discard her like a piece of rubbish when you’re done. If you think no woman deserves your hard earned sweat then don’t bring them into your life and lavish them with gifts, simple. It’s a choice, you can go your own way.

western laws favour women.......or why is it that if there is a fight, the man is asked to leave the house? I have no issues with spousal support, but paying support to girlfriends, that is going too far.

When you create a law that affects a majority of the people, then that law was made for them

It is like going to Ibadan and saying anybody that speaks yoruba will be jailed. There are some people from other tribes that will speak yoruba and get jailed. But the yorubas that the law was "made for" will be the major victims

eyinjuege:


While you believe there can only be one captain on a ship, why can't the captain be the woman then? She calls dibbs on it
The role of captain depends on a lot of things including experience, result oriented, consistency, courage, hard work and perseverance etc. Many qualities that are not gender based at all.
Anyway, let's not digress the post.

I don't get what you are all about, buh if i am to swing along with ur flow, i would say those qualities you listed are largely deposited in males.
These as nothing to do with fairness, its only appropriate for the head to be before the neck, doesnt matter how much stress the neck goes thru carrying d weight of the head.

Ll

victorian:
How i wish these laws can be used in Nigeria.
Men will stop lying all sorts of lies just to waste a lady's time because all he wants is sex for some months or years and later dump her with films excuse.

By the time men starts loosing half of their hard earned monies to exes and baby mamas ,they won't even smile at women anymore.

All the make believe script just to have sex will end.

Nigerian men are very lucky, these laws doesn't apply here.

All of una go behave! And start opening up like a canary to any woman una fancy and wish to waste her precious time on lies.

YOU ALREADY HAVE POWER TO THE LAW INVESTED IN YOU. THE POWER TO CONTROL SEX IS FULLY IN THE HANDS OF YOU LADIES NOT IN THE HANDS OF MEN .

THE PROBLEM IS YOU LADIES ALWAYS FIND IT WAY TOO DIFFICULT TO KEEP YOUR THIGHS CLOSED. YOU ARE ALWAYS IN A HURRY TO OPEN THEM WIDE I ALWAYS WONDER THE REASON WHY. ONLY A VERY FEW OF YOU CAN KEEP IT CLOSED, HAVING ENOUGH POWER AT YOUR DISPOSAL OVER MEN AS TO WHAT YOU INTEND TO GET FROM HIM

ubunja:
they're a small group.

Most are just hoes. That's why they're still poor with all the sleeping around they're doing.

For a woman to make real money from men,she has to close those legs. As long as she's having sex she'll make peanuts.

SUCH SCARCITY IN WOMEN IS WHAT GAVE BIRTH TO THE VALUE PLACED ON VIRGINITY. A VIRGIN WOMAN. OTHERWISE THERE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN A BIG DEAL ABOUT BEING A VIRGIN EXCEPT THE FACT THAT ONLY A FEW OF YOU WILL NOT OPEN THEIR LEGS WIDE OPEN LIKE PAIR OF BROKEN COMPASSES OVER A MERE TALK BY WE GUYS WHICH YOU INFER TO AS LIES.

WHILE INFACT, IT IS YOU LADIES WHO CHOOSE TO LIE TO YOURSELVES.

MrBrownJay1:


You do know that a man dating/married to a rich woman would get the same result (aka receive spousal support), right?!



If you live with someone as husband and wife, then why shouldn't you be viewed as husband and wife? Just like a man who has a child with a woman would have all the rights as a married man. Remember, as much as it's mostly women who receive spousal support, that's because the majority of these men let these women stay home being lazy while they went to work and brought the cheddar.... But if a woman earns just as much as you do, then you pay her ONLY the difference ... if you guys have kids and she has full custody. If you have full custody then SHE pays you the difference.



I fully understand these rulings... If a man dates and promised heaven and earth to a woman and put her in a certain lifestyle that she will now claim she is accustomed to, then the fool has to pay her in order for her to remain in such lifestyle you promised her. The catch would be for that fool to 1st, not date good for nothing useless women who don't work (so that she can also contribute to any lifestyle you guys are into) ...and 2nd not become someone's benefactor for so long while you do everything to better her life.

The dude is even lucky, in some country (brazil for example), the minute you tell a woman that you love her and wanna spend the rest of your life with her Bla bla bla, and she has a confirmation (in writing/text/email) of you telling her that, then within 6months of dating she can sue you (and ask for half your shiit) if you dump her.

She was working but apparently he wanted her to quit her job so that she could travel with him, big mistake.

Denique:


You just aired my thoughts!
Thumbs up to MrBrown J

Don't be sentimental ma'am, they met the criteria to earn to benefit as a spouse. The criteria to be considered a spouse was not really met in this particular case.

TheRedpillguy:


I love it when you say use a woman to raise your children, then still lavish her with gifts, get her use to a lifestyle. Cus gifts and lifestye is cheap and free.

The man is above that woman in terms of class and she is using him to Finace her life cus she is old and don't have a job. She broke up but still want to ride on his back. Pethertic!

She's a self acclaimed feminist you know. Her version of feminism is strange though.