Johnnyessence:
keep on deceiving yourself why trump winning big in the court of law. update yourself on USA poll and its litigations in the court.
stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets.


SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

Johnnyessence:
that's in your deluded state of mind. funny novice buharist.

Johnnyessence:
The US Supreme Court has just accepted and will hear the
lawsuit that the State of Texas is taking against Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for electoral fraud !!
GREAT DAY !!

Johnnyessence:
electoral frauds evidence is much abundant. you are not current at all. stop watching and reading main stream media.

bluefilm:
Of course, they don't want to expose how DEAD people voted for Biden.

Evil Satanists.

flemsy15:
I used to think US elections were 100 percent transparent and have no need for questioning

Johnnyessence:
SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.
SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

Rebelutionary:

If your senior colleague righteousness89 has left this matter as we say in Nigeria "for God hand", usef go soon learn! Goodmorning o

DarkJeddi:
Bla Bla Bla,Bla..
Another useless petition to be thrown into the Cesspool..

Rebelutionary:

There was a time when the silly line was stop watching CNN and watch fox cos they bought into the Trump B.S but now that they were the first to call some states for Biden, they have all of sudden become Lamestream like how do you folks reason abeg!

nelsonoba:


Get your facts right! The court only rejected the emergency Injunctive bid, to stop certification, not the case itself. Trump's Lawyer clarified that. Besides, Texas and 9 other states have filed a new case with the Supreme Court yesterday to throw out Joe Biden's fraudulent win in Wisconson, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia

Johnnyessence:
stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets created by leftists Democrats party to caused conflicts and confusion in the media.

DarkJeddi:
Lol,
Thursday is tomorrow and you will be back to spine another tales by moonlight after the supreme Court throws out the useless petition..

Johnnyessence:
novice buharist, you read the article at all. keep on living in your deluded state of mind.

ceejayluv:

So you recommend alternative media that's full of crap with no reputation to sustain.

Johnnyessence:
The US Supreme Court has just accepted and will hear the
lawsuit that the State of Texas is taking against Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for electoral fraud !!
GREAT DAY !!

DarkJeddi:
I don't need to read YOUR POST,..
If I need news on the American elections,I know where to go to..
The lame Texas petition is another trash petition,..
Like many trash before,it is going to the shithole..

Johnnyessence:
electoral frauds evidence is much abundant. you are not current at all. stop watching and reading main stream media.

hermesprogidy:

Dream on. So Texas challenges the validity of votes in other States, and you think any sensible Court will let that pass? How about California challenging the validity of votes on Texas and other States Trump won? Don't you see the anarchy that will infold?
Trump is like a fish on land, flailing on its last breath. The whole thing is comical.

Johnnyessence:
watch newsmax, theblazetv and newspaper, thegatewaypundit.com, theepoch times too

Johnnyessence:
The US Supreme Court has just accepted and will hear the
lawsuit that the State of Texas is taking against Pennsylvania,
Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for electoral fraud !!
GREAT DAY !!

Johnnyessence:
so you are part of justice of the USA supreme court. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. rubbish thinking. buharist and zombie are not difficult to identify.

Johnnyessence:
SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.
SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

Texas Wants To Secede From America More Than Any Other State
JUST A WEEK AFTER President Barack Obama was re-elected, a petition by Texans for the right to secede from the rest of the country has garnered some 64,000 signatures, many more than the 25,000 signature threshold needed to get a response from the Obama administration.

The petition was made on the government's "We the People" petitioning web site, along with secession petitions from at least 18 other states.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/11/13/white-house-flooded-with-secession-petitions-after-obama-re-election

Bluntemperor:


Yinmu!
It's better for you to relocate to Trump Mara-lego!
What is bad is bad- condemn it so that we have Peace!

Bigchristo:
stop wasting your time writing full episodes,Trump has lost the election it’s so difficult for him and the republicans to concede defeats he is only trying to make gullible people like you to believe his illegal claims about electoral fraud, he doesn’t have any tangible evidence to backup this claim that’s why his entire lawsuit are being tossed out of court room

Johnnyessence:



SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.



SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

hermesprogidy:

Newsmax! Jesus!!! No wonder you are hopeful Trump will get anything out of this. Sorry.

hermesprogidy:
Sorry. You go dey alright.