demmymoney:
What you are hearing is PA Supreme Court. The case was not totally dismissed! The emergency injunctive relief was....

Just twelve hours after it was filed, the US Supreme Court has officially put Texas's lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the docket, meaning the case will be heard.

This PA case was denied because much of what was in it was also in the larger case that Texas and 10+ other states filed. So instead of wasting time on the smaller case the larger case will be heard.

The case was put on the Docket at the United States Supreme Court, where Texas will sue a number of states for conducting "Constitutionality Unlawful Elections", and corrupting a Federal Election.

Again, they are not going to rule on the injunction. The case is still pending. In a nut shell, Texas and other states have suits filed against the five problem states. We are better then good.

All these cases are meant to keep YOU, the voters in a state of confusion. Look at the bigger picture, we want a bigger and bolder case, Using entire states holds up better ...And ten other states are joining Texas. The fraud in PA MI WI AZ affects ALL US citizens.

And to clear the air...

We do not want Martial law. If anything, ..insurrection act needs to come forth first!

And....

Thank God that Ted Cruz is in this fight helping President Trump and his TEAM. Rudy will be back soon.

Ladies and gentlemen relax, get the popcorn ready, and get your favorite drinks lined up. You will see the art of the deal by our President and his team, Sidney Powell and Texas. At their best fighting for the American people.

You guys are funny. It’s unlikely that the Supreme Court will even hear the case. Even if they do, they would never upturn an election in different states to favour Trump after he had lost by almost 7 million votes. It is called the United States for a reason. Each state agrees to join the union and are independent. Even the President of the US don’t have power over them.

This election is done! JB will be worn in on the 20th of January as the President of the US - 100% sure

ponziponzi:


You guys are funny. It’s unlikely that the Supreme Court will even hear the case. Even if they do, they would never upturn an election in different states to favour Trump after he had lost by almost 7 million votes. It is called the United States for a reason. Each state agrees to join the union and are independent. Even the President of the US don’t have power over them.

This election is done! JB will be worn in on the 20th of January as the President of the US - 100% sure

Are u sure

Remember the supreme court of the United States is majorly conservative

Oh no what will the nairaland wailers do at this point.

Johnnyessence:


Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election. But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.

This is tne first case of someone deliberately gaslighting themselves.

You, sir, are a fool.

Alito referred the case to the entire court which promptly moved to dismiss the whole shiit because it has no merit. The fact that there's no public dissent tells us the court does not even wish to waste time on trump's frivolity.

The Texas lawsuit is a separate case from the one tossed out, and this too will get kicked out. Texas cannot sue other states, it has suffered no injuries and therefore has no legal standing to sue another state for abiding by its laws.

I seriously hate all these Nigerian posers who act like they're US citizens mouthing off about trump's misadventures.

In as much i am not really bothered. However, one thing i know from logic is that allowing a state to determine how another state interpretes its legal laws sound ridiculous. If SCOTUS allows that, then they are setting a dangerous precedent that will cause future chaos and erodes the independence & sovereignty of each state... If its a suit that involves situation where a third party (SCOTUS) need to come in to decide say for instance land disputes or likely others between two states, its fine but this sounds funny...Its just like Lagos state suing ogun state on how much they set has there budget (appropriation bill)...

linearity:


The case is tossed, stopping the certification was the relief been sort, hence Justice Alito moved the time PA have to response from Wednesday to Tuesday 9am...because Wednesday 8th is the safe habit date.

Any State that certifies her election by the safe harbor date is guaranteed by federal laws to be considered as true and authentic, no questions asked....PA, GA, WI, AZ, etc have all certified their elections, so you can take it to the bank no lawsuit or dispute can undo them period!

On Monday next week Electors will meeting at each state capital in US to cast their electoral college vote for Biden, all these court cases are just side shows and are still ‘on going’ for Trump to keep getting donations.

Correct.

Trump is a certified crook,the past and pending criminal legal suits against him are overwhelming.

The free donation monies are his target.

Johnnyessence:


Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election. But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.

You are dumber than Trump.

demmymoney:


Are u sure

Remember the supreme court of the United States is majorly conservative

That one does not matter or mean they will favour republicans because they are majorly conservatives
They have the law to uphold no matter who it is.They will not rule in favour of Trump or the Gop in this case.

AmazonTopaz:


That one does not matter or mean they will favour republicans because they are majorly conservatives
They have the law to uphold no matter who it is.They will not rule in favour of Trump or the Gop in this case.

But they have been ruling towards conservative values, check out the rulings in the case against Cuomo restricting religious liberties

They are so going to rule against Biden and swear in Trump by January 20th 2021

Na supreme court of the United States wey go determine this election, I Dan dey talk amh since

Johnnyessence:
electoral frauds evidence is much abundant. you are not current at all. stop watching and reading main stream media.

Do you really live on this planet. It will be a shame if you are in Nigeria. You might end up drinking sniper. I fear for your mental state.

demmymoney:


But they have been ruling towards conservative values, check out the rulings in the case against Cuomo restricting religious liberties

They are so going to rule against Biden and swear in Trump by January 20th 2021

Na supreme court of the United States wey go determine this election, I Dan dey talk amh since

Another Dummy.

demmymoney:


Are u sure

Remember, the supreme court of the United States is majorly conservative.

It doesn't matter. 80% of judges that ruled against Trump in PA are conservative. This is not about being Liberal or Conservative. It's also not a matter of marijuana or abortion; it's about the foundation of democracy that the west has been enjoying and propagating for hundreds of years. They won't dare to unturn the vote of millions of people without any evidence. Even if they have evidence of some irregularities, they can't just throw away millions of votes. It won't happen my brother.

Johnnyessence:


Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election. But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.

Even if the whole 50 states in America joined the lawsuit, that does not guarantee that they will win.
You are making it look like filing a lawsuit is all it takes to guarantee victory. If the lawsuits are frivolous, it will still be thrown out as quickly as they come.
Meanwhile, all the loses that Trump and his team has been accumulating, is it the media that has been dishing it out to them or the law courts?
Please, you guys should leave the media alone. They only reported what happened or wasn’t any case thrown out in Pa?

Bro the election was 100% free and fair but Trump is just a sore looser.......

Johnnyessence:
stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets.

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

Stop watching OANN or Newsmax, those are not different from North Korea/Chinese propaganda media.

In Mike Kelly's case that was refused hearing today, the same response was requested from PA's AG. That doesn't mean they will hear the case.

That Johnnyessence must be a clown.

It is very idiotic and stupid to expect the SCOTUS to transfer power from the people to the Republican legislators to make Trump president by force by force.

The stupidity is aggravated by the fact no fraud is established and the lawsuits are based on very debatable constitutionality.

ponziponzi:


It doesn't matter. 80% of judges that ruled against Trump in PA are conservative. This is not about being Liberal or Conservative. It's also not a matter of marijuana or abortion; it's about the foundation of democracy that the west has been enjoying and propagating for hundreds of years. They won't dare to unturn the vote of millions of people without any evidence. Even if they have evidence of some irregularities, they can't just throw away millions of votes. It won't happen my brother.

Let's watch and see

Neoteny:


This is tne first case of someone deliberately gaslighting themselves.

You, sir, are a fool.

Alito referred the case to the entire court which promptly moved to dismiss the whole shiit because it has no merit. The fact that there's no public dissent tells us the court does not even wish to waste time on trump's frivolity.

The Texas lawsuit is a separate case from the one tossed out, and this too will get kicked out. Texas cannot sue other states, it has suffered no injuries and therefore has no legal standing to sue another state for abiding by its laws.

I seriously hate all these Nigerian posers who act like they're US citizens mouthing off about trump's misadventures.

Thank you Sir

grandlexuz:


Another Dummy.

Ur generation will be dummies

demmymoney:


But they have been ruling towards conservative values, check out the rulings in the case against Cuomo restricting religious liberties

They are so going to rule against Biden and swear in Trump by January 20th 2021

Na supreme court of the United States wey go determine this election, I Dan dey talk amh since

To you Rigging the election is now a conservative value. What a sheep head.

ponziponzi:


Stop watching OANN or Newsmax, those are not different from North Korea/Chinese propaganda media.

In Mike Kelly's case that was refused hearing today, the same response was requested from PA's AG. That doesn't mean they will hear the case.

Don't mind the clown.

We should stop watching main stream media because they are not reflecting the wishes of Trump, Johnyessence and the likes,abi?

That Jonny guy is clearly mad, the case that was thrown out is different from the case that Texas filed

How can another state tell another state how to run an election, same texas that does plenty voter suppression

Johnnyessence:
electoral frauds evidence is much abundant. you are not current at all. stop watching and reading main stream media.

Lol!
We should stop listening and watching mainstream media so that we will be ignorant like you lots? Baba no be so.
We are human beings with functioning brain. When we see bullcrap, we know it for what it is and treat it as such, whether it’s coming from mainstream media or not. You making it look like people follow whatever the media say sheepishly. Even Fox News that is pro Trump is not showing this your ‘widespread electoral fraud’ in the just concluded US election. Use your brain bro. Don’t be a pushover.

demmymoney:


Ur generation will be dummies

I am crying and shivering.

fujirice:

Lol!
We should stop listening and watching mainstream media so that we will be ignorant like you lots? Baba no be so.
We are human beings with functioning brain. When we see bullcrap, we know it for what it is and treat it as such, whether it’s coming from mainstream media or not. You making it look like people follow whatever the media say sheepishly. Even Fox News that is pro Trump is not showing this your ‘widespread electoral fraud’ in the just concluded US election. Use your brain bro. Don’t be a pushover.

Wise words..

demmymoney:


But they have been ruling towards conservative values, check out the rulings in the case against Cuomo restricting religious liberties

They are so going to rule against Biden and swear in Trump by January 20th 2021

Na supreme court of the United States wey go determine this election, I Dan dey talk amh since

They will not rule in favour of Trump so stop dreaming
The US supreme court will not stop Biden from being sworn in or challenge the laws of other states that have affirmed Biden's victory

You are dreaming if you think the court will invalidate millions of votes to favour Trump.

grandlexuz:


To you Rigging the election is now a conservative value. What a sheep head.

It was Biden who rigged the election and its ur progressive values. Not conservative jeez

Just relax till January 20th 2021

DarkJeddi:
Keep dreaming..
We are yet to see any evidence presented by Dump and he thinks changing tactics is going to save his orange a,ss?
They have thrown one crap out and they are going to throw another shit olut.

We are talking about constitution here. The state supreme court amending their law with ruling when power lies with the legislators. What we are talking about here is beyond Trump or Republican. It has to deal with the US constitution

AmazonTopaz:

They will not rule in favour of Trump so stop dreaming
The US supreme court will not stop Biden from being sworn in or challenge the laws of other states that have affirmed Biden's victory

Kk

demmymoney:


Let's watch and see

Abi? One thing you don't seem to understand is that the US Supreme Court doesn't have the power to determine an election, only the people do.
If the courts can determine who wins the presidency, why bother to conduct elections. Won't the Republican party just appoint the president as they do in China?

ponziponzi:


Abi? One thing you don't seem to understand is that the US Supreme Court doesn't have the power to determine an election, only the people do.
If the courts can determine who wins the presidency, why bother to conduct elections. Won't the Republican party just appoint the president as they do in China?

Are u telling me that the USA judicial system doesn't allow for cases relating to election fraud and irregularities??

demmymoney:
What you are hearing is PA Supreme Court. The case was not totally dismissed! The emergency injunctive relief was....

Just twelve hours after it was filed, the US Supreme Court has officially put Texas's lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the docket, meaning the case will be heard.

This PA case was denied because much of what was in it was also in the larger case that Texas and 10+ other states filed. So instead of wasting time on the smaller case the larger case will be heard.

The case was put on the Docket at the United States Supreme Court, where Texas will sue a number of states for conducting "Constitutionality Unlawful Elections", and corrupting a Federal Election.

Again, they are not going to rule on the injunction. The case is still pending. In a nut shell, Texas and other states have suits filed against the five problem states. We are better then good.

All these cases are meant to keep YOU, the voters in a state of confusion. Look at the bigger picture, we want a bigger and bolder case, Using entire states holds up better ...And ten other states are joining Texas. The fraud in PA MI WI AZ affects ALL US citizens.

And to clear the air...

We do not want Martial law. If anything, ..insurrection act needs to come forth first!

And....

Thank God that Ted Cruz is in this fight helping President Trump and his TEAM. Rudy will be back soon.

Ladies and gentlemen relax, get the popcorn ready, and get your favorite drinks lined up. You will see the art of the deal by our President and his team, Sidney Powell and Texas. At their best fighting for the American people.

The fact that a case is docketed doesn't mean it will be heard. See an example of a case in 2014/2015, when Nebraska and Oklahoma tried to sue Colorado at the SCOTUS over its legalization of marijuana. The case wasn't heard as it was out of SCOTUS jurisdiction. This case is also similar to what Texas is trying to do.