Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,270 members, 7,811,779 topics. Date: Sunday, 28 April 2024 at 07:29 PM

Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania - Foreign Affairs (7) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania (20684 Views)

At Least 3 Dead In Snowy Pileup Of Dozens Of Vehicles In Pennsylvania, Usa(Pics) / Pence Hits Breaking Point With Trump In Blessing Biden's Win / Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Trump Campaign's Appeal, Affirms Biden's Win (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by shidof(m): 11:34am On Dec 09, 2020
Bigchristo:
stop wasting your time writing full episodes,Trump has lost the election it’s so difficult for him and the republicans to concede defeats he is only trying to make gullible people like you to believe his illegal claims about electoral fraud, he doesn’t have any tangible evidence to backup this claim that’s why his entire lawsuit are being tossed out of court room
you're quoting the wrong guy, they've eyes but they don't use to see. He was a among the people that believe Atiku had evidence to win in 2019 post election matter

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 11:39am On Dec 09, 2020
feeloscar:
It changes NOTHING.
it changes everything. they don't recognised dementia biden as the president elect.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 11:41am On Dec 09, 2020
Buliwyf:


Trump will be swear in. See English. Illiterate idiot. You are the one always posting on all threads and you are talking about me jumping from one thread to another lol. Shame on you. I am sure you are IPOB too. It's very clear from your stupidity and bad English. You can't even spell "dying" well. You know the rule of law in America, right? Have you even left Nigeria before?

I will be here to mock your useless life in January. Last last na otapiapia you go take. Once this new case is ruled null by the Supreme Court you are banking on you will still come here to post some other nonsense until Trump is kicked out in January. I wonder what you will do with your life by then since you have tied it to him.

cheesy cheesy cheesy
Trump will be swear in on January 20,2021. you are very clueless frustrated and depressed clown for playing tribal cards here. so clueless as his dementia electoral fraudster Joe biden .
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by demmymoney(m): 11:48am On Dec 09, 2020
wirinet:

Election fraud is a criminal offense and it needs to be proven beyond all reasonable doubt. The perpetrators will be jailed and their votes will be invalidated.

The courts cannot just invalidate the votes of whole districts or States on a blanket vote cancellation. It can only deal with individual cases or votes.

Well there are clearly a lot of evidences relating to massive election fraud in some stronghold democrat counties
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Buliwyf: 11:52am On Dec 09, 2020
Johnnyessence:
Trump will be swear in on January 20,2021. you are very clueless frustrated and depressed clown for playing tribal cards here. so clueless as his dementia electoral fraudster Joe biden .

Lol. It must suck to badly educated. If you were not the king of morons you would have known that IPOB and Igbos are two different groups so no tribal card in what I said. IPOB is filled with I'll educated morons like you and you have not disputed you are one of them. Dumb moronic goats.

Keep reading nonsense on conspiracy websites online and regurgitating them here trying to sound smart in front of people better than you. January 20 will soon be here and you will be relegated to the slimy hole you belong.

2 Likes

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 12:04pm On Dec 09, 2020
Buliwyf:


Lol. It must suck to badly educated. If you were not the king of morons you would have known that IPOB and Igbos are two different groups so no tribal card in what I said. IPOB is filled with I'll educated morons like you and you have not disputed you are one of them. Dumb moronic goats.

Keep reading nonsense on conspiracy websites online and regurgitating them here trying to sound smart in front of people better than you. January 20 will soon be here and you will be relegated to the slimy hole you belong.
clueless frustrated and depressed clown that doesn't know the rule of law. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. your tribal cards here won't hold any water. January 20,2021 will soon be hear and we all will glue to our TV and see trump swear in for second term.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by grandlexuz(m): 12:04pm On Dec 09, 2020
PureMe01:
smileygrow up boy

It wouldn't take long for you to grow up. In five days from now you become a giant.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Buliwyf: 12:11pm On Dec 09, 2020
demmymoney:


Well there are clearly a lot of evidences relating to massive election fraud in some stronghold democrat counties

Yet you were talking to the other guy about leftist bias. See your own bias in full glare. You were pretending to be neutral before. Now you have shown your leanings. Which fraud did you perceive "clearly" and why aren't you submitting said fraud to Trump's lawyers?
Even Trump's lawyers were not alleging fraud in their court cases. This new lawsuit by the Texas AG is not alleging fraud either. So where is your own clear fraud? Hahahaha.

2 Likes

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by demmymoney(m): 12:20pm On Dec 09, 2020
Buliwyf:


Yet you were talking to the other guy about leftist bias. See your own bias in full glare. You were pretending to be neutral before. Now you have shown your leanings. Which fraud did you perceive "clearly" and why aren't you submitting said fraud to Trump's lawyers?
Even Trump's lawyers were not alleging fraud in their court cases. This new lawsuit by the Texas AG is not alleging fraud either. So where is your own clear fraud? Hahahaha.

Did u even bother watching the election fraud hearings in Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania at all
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Buliwyf: 12:31pm On Dec 09, 2020
demmymoney:


Did u even bother watching the election fraud hearings in Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania at all

You saw the clear fraud there? Or people just claiming they saw fraud that were eventually disregarded for lack of merit? Anybody can claim anything especially if they were brought there by one of Trump's people. The question is does the claim equal proof?

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by demmymoney(m): 12:32pm On Dec 09, 2020
Buliwyf:


You saw the clear fraud there? Or people just claiming they saw fraud that were eventually disregarded for lack of merit? Anybody can claim anything especially if they were brought there by one of Trump's people. The question is does the claim equal proof?

Did u watch it yes or no??
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Buliwyf: 12:56pm On Dec 09, 2020
demmymoney:


Did u watch it yes or no??

I am not even going to bother replying this. Because next you will tell me not to watch the mainstream media version and go watch other version you recommend. It's not like you are willing to acknowledge reality any way.

Like I said if you have such clear evidence of fraud, point it to Trump's lawyers so they can use it to win the election. Let me know when Trump wins using your evidence.

2 Likes

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by linearity: 1:13pm On Dec 09, 2020
nelsonoba:


Are you aware that in the constitution, there is no such "safe harbour date" In the constitution, the only date mentioned is the 20th of January. The safe harbour date is just an arbitrary arrangement that has been maintained for some decades, and it is not enshrined in the constitution. Besides, the main case brought before the Supreme Court is still there, and anybody telling you it has been tossed is lying to you.

In addition to that, the case brought by the 10 states led by Texas yesterday is a bigger case than the Pennsylvania one that fake news told you has been tossed.

I guess it is the kids that showed up on the internet today, at least before disputing something online try and research it, so you could understand better.

The safe harbor date is not an “arbitrary arrangement’ it is a federal law passed by Congress .

It states that....any state which have finalized their election results and resolved “any controversy or contest” involving the appointment of the electors by six days before the Electoral College meets, those results should be treated as “conclusive” by Congress when lawmakers tabulates the Electoral College votes and should not be challenged.

Electoral College by US law: 3 US 7 will meet on December 14, 2020. SCOTUS can not change that date. SCOTUS is there not only to ensure the US constitution is followed, they are bounded by US laws and US statues.

If you go back to 2000 in the FL case, one of the reasons SCOTUS rejected A’gore request for the ballot recount was because the recount would extend beyond December 14th.

TX also violated the same principle they are suing the other states for. TX Governor made some last minute changes to how Elections were ran in TX just like they are accusing these states. He that come to equity must come with clean hands. Also, TX have no standing to sue other states on how those states should conduct their Election...Lawmakers and injured parties in those states have already sue to state court and lost, they took it to federal courts they lost.

This TX case is show-game and not worth the paper it is written on, it will be tossed on Friday. Paxton is just trying to do Trump a favor just in case he can get a free get of jail card over his three pending federal fraud cases.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by feeloscar(m): 1:41pm On Dec 09, 2020
Johnnyessence:
it changes everything. they don't recognised dementia biden as the president elect.
Really? Will it stop JB's take over from DT come January?
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by feeloscar(m): 1:50pm On Dec 09, 2020
Johnnyessence:
clueless frustrated and depressed clown that doesn't know the rule of law. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. your tribal cards here won't hold any water. January 20,2021 will soon be hear and we all will glue to our TV and see trump swear in for second term.
Chief, it is 'sworn in' not 'swear in'. Oya, start correcting every sentence begining with this.

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by demmymoney(m): 1:50pm On Dec 09, 2020
Buliwyf:


I am not even going to bother replying this. Because next you will tell me not to watch the mainstream media version and go watch other version you recommend. It's not like you are willing to acknowledge reality any way.

Like I said if you have such clear evidence of fraud, point it to Trump's lawyers so they can use it to win the election. Let me know when Trump wins using your evidence.

Just chill and watch how this Texas lawsuit will b unfolding things

Trump is going to use the Supreme Court to win the election, QUOTE THIS!!!

THATS WHY HE MADE SURE AMY BARRETT WAS SWORN IN AND THANK GOD THAT STUPID ABORTIONIST GINSBURG DIED THIS YEAR

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by hermesprogidy(m): 3:23pm On Dec 09, 2020
Johnnyessence:
newsmax is beaten down foxnews in the media rating. newsmax is doing the needful by broadcasting facts and truths to the general public. check Google on that. stop been deluded here. be well inform.
Sorry.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Buliwyf: 3:28pm On Dec 09, 2020
demmymoney:


Just chill and watch how this Texas lawsuit will b unfolding things

Trump is going to use the Supreme Court to win the election, QUOTE THIS!!!

THATS WHY HE MADE SURE AMY BARRETT WAS SWORN IN AND THANK GOD THAT STUPID ABORTIONIST GINSBURG DIED THIS YEAR

Trump cannot use Supreme Court to win anything. Even the way he has gone about it has shown that was his plan all along. So those guys will decisively reject him.

You have come out fully now but you were forming neutral before. Your name will be added to the list of those who live in lalaland here. Just wait till January.

And how did RBG's pro choice stance affect your life? Did she ask you to abort your own baby by force? Some of you just make ridiculous statements and think it makes sense. You are thanking God someone died. If you can achieve a quarter of what that woman achieved in life, you won't be ranting online about an already decided election.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by linearity: 3:39pm On Dec 09, 2020
demmymoney:


Well there are clearly a lot of evidences relating to massive election fraud in some stronghold democrat counties

Can you please present these evidences, I truly would love to see them and read them.

Do you even know that, it is only on TV and in social media that, the GOP are claiming fraud? Have you taken time to read their court filings and court transcripts? In court they are not claiming any fraud....look at an exchange between a judge and the GOP lawyers in court:

Please research these cases, also google the quotes, they came directly from GOP and Trump lawyers in Court:

In Arizona Maricopa County Case:

“We are not alleging fraud in this lawsuit. We are not alleging anyone stealing the election,Kory Langhofer, a Trump campaign attorney, said at the start of the hearing.

The Judge dismissed the case!


In Pennsylvania Montgomery County, Case:
Below is an exchange between Judge Richard Haaz, a Republican Appointee to the Court and Mr. Goldstein a Republican Lawyer, representing Trump...

THE COURT: I understand. I am asking you a specific question, and I am looking for a specific answer. Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?

GOLDSTEIN: To my knowledge at present, no.

THE COURT: Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector with respect to these 592 ballots?

GOLDSTEIN: To my knowledge at present, no.


The Judge dismissed the case!


In Chatham County, Michigan:
The Trump campaign cited supposed evidence that 53 late ballots may have been predated so they could be counted. Except two witnesses they called acknowledged under oath that they didn’t know whether the ballots were received after the deadline. And two others for the local board of elections testified that they were, in fact, received on time....

The Judge dismissed the case!

The icing on the cake is Trump own personal man, the US Attorney General William Barr, He went against the Department of Justice more 100 years guideline and instructed the DOJ to investigate 'fraud' many career DOJ laywers resigned because of that, because it is against the department's policy to get into politics.....but after that violation and Barr's fraud investigation, he came back with nothing, he said no fraud!

The 'evidence' you may be referring to were online forms that the Republican put up to ask anyone "out there" to report fraud to them...o boy, they got many responses and and "affidavits" from many people and even online bots...this is how it went down in one of the court cases:

Arizona Case:

Judge Daniel Kiley expressed concern about the way that the Trump campaign was gathering evidence.

Judge Daniel Kiley struck from the record hundreds of declarations the Trump campaign had gathered from people who filled out an online form soliciting voter irregularities.

Mr. Langhofer, the lawyer representing Mr. Trump, said the campaign had removed any declarations it believed unreliable and had put security measures in place to prevent automated bots from filling out the form—including a measure designed to test whether a computer user is human.

COURT:
“How is that a reliable process of gathering evidence?” said Judge Kiley, later adding, “The fact that you can’t disprove what’s asserted doesn’t mean what’s asserted is in fact true.”

Guess what? The case was dismissed!

No lawyer want to jeopardize their license in court, by telling lies....so they only yell fraud! fraud! fraud! on TV and social media; but behind close doors in Court they say something else!

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by linearity: 4:10pm On Dec 09, 2020
It amazes me, what some Nigerians here are writing online and thinking would happen in America....

If you sit back and think these things through, the Nigeria Supreme Court will never even do that!

Can you imagine Bayelsa State, taking Sokoto State to the Nigeria Supreme Court and asking the Supreme to invalidate the Votes for Buhari in Sokoto State, Kano State, Zamfara State & Borno State that:

1. There were wild irregularities, that there were pictures of under age people voting in those States.
2. That Voter registration card distribution in those Northern States were near 100%, but those in Bayelsa State were mere 60%.
3. That some wards in those States did not follow Federal laws in closing polls places by 8pm.
4. That some wards in those States did not allow PDP Election observers.
5. That there were violence in Beyelsa State that hinder lots of voters from voting for Jonathan, giving undue advantage to the Northern States that didn't experience much Election interruptions.
6. That Election reader machine were malfunctioning on a large scale in Bayelsa and switching votes or making it difficult for some voters to cast their votes, but was working smoothly in the Northern States.
7. That many voters in Bayelsa arrived at the poll booths and did not find their names on the polls books, though were allowed to vote with probational ballots, which are inferior because they are counted last.
8. That many warehouses housing Election materials were burnt down before Election day in Bayelsa, not were in tact in these North States.
9. That thugs in Bayelsa State snatched many Election materials and even killed many INEC staff, but nothing of such happened in the Northern States.
e.t.c.....add your own.

Relief Sort from the Supreme Court:
1. As a result of the above, we are not asking the Supreme for a revote in Bayelsa State.
2. We are not asking the Supreme Court to order INEC to ensure all voters who could not vote in Bayelsa be given the opportunity to cast their votes.
3. Rather, we are asking that; All the votes cast in these four Northern States be canceled, invalidated and removed totally from the Election records.
4. That our candidate who lost in these Northern State be declared a winner in these States.
5. That our candidate, who lost Nationally by more than 7 million votes, therefore be declared the winner of the Presidential Election.
6. That INEC be ordered to give our candidate Goodluck Ebere Jonathan a return certificate.

Then Edo State, Delta State, Ebonyi State, Anambra State, Akwa Ibom State, Rivers State, Ekiti State, Taraba State, etc who all voted for PDP and Goodluck Jonathan filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court siding with Bayelsa and asking the Court to invalidate the Election results in those Northern States and award the Election in favor of Mr. Goodluck Jonathan!

Take a wild guess, you think the Nigeria Supreme will say...o boy! 'We hereby invalidate those Election results and award the Election to Jonathan & PDP"?

Yes most people are partisan, which is good....but lets use common sense please.

If you read the court filings and transcripts of these Republican cases, they are not alleging fraud in Court, because the lawyers know they do not have prove and that they will loose their license to practice law.

They are only alleging irregularities and State rules changes that happens in every single election cycle, which they believed made it possible for more Democrats to vote in this Election and disadvantaged Republicans and made them to vote less.

Now it is okay to alleged that, your side because of some rule changes did not vote as much as they would have...but you can't ask the court as a remedy to throw away other people's vote because your side did not vote, that is not a remedy...a proper remedy is for you to ask the court to allow your people to vote just like the other side....but that remedy is moot because the election is over and Trump told his voters not to vote by mail!

5 Likes

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by hermesprogidy(m): 8:04pm On Dec 09, 2020
Texas AG seeking to overturn election results in swing States is being investigated for security fraud. He is only using this ludicrous law suite, which is impossible to get recognition from Trump and get a pardon.

3 Likes

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Bigchristo: 8:43pm On Dec 09, 2020
Johnnyessence:
stupid and clueless thinking from a novice buharist.
Mind you I am not a supporter of Buhari at any time I hate bad governance, Trump is almost dragging the US electoral system to be like that of a third world country, if you understand that the world are looking up to them as the chief preacher of democracy but they failed to put their homes in order.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Bigchristo: 8:46pm On Dec 09, 2020
Johnnyessence:
low thinking here. funny reply.
You’re the person with low thinking here, the Americans has decided we both don’t have a say over this issues, so stop believing crap story of electoral fraud from Donald Trump... he is the incumbent president why is he struggling to win an election? Is as a results of bad policy because Obama never struggled to win his re-election think about that.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Valkrie: 9:04pm On Dec 09, 2020
linearity:
It amazes me, what some Nigerians here are writing online and thinking would happen in America....

If you sit back and think these things through, the Nigeria Supreme Court will never even do that!

Can you imagine Bayelsa State, taking Sokoto State to the Nigeria Supreme Court and asking the Supreme to invalidate the Votes for Buhari in Sokoto State, Kano State, Zamfara State & Borno State that:

1. There were wild irregularities, that there were pictures of under age people voting in those States.
2. That Voter registration card distribution in those Northern States were near 100%, but those in Bayelsa State were mere 60%.
3. That some wards in those States did not follow Federal laws in closing polls places by 8pm.
4. That some wards in those States did not allow PDP Election observers.
5. That there were violence in Beyelsa State that hinder lots of voters from voting for Jonathan, giving undue advantage to the Northern States that didn't experience much Election interruptions.
6. That Election reader machine were malfunctioning on a large scale in Bayelsa and switching votes or making it difficult for some voters to cast their votes, but was working smoothly in the Northern States.
7. That many voters in Bayelsa arrived at the poll booths and did not find their names on the polls books, though were allowed to vote with probational ballots, which are inferior because they are counted last.
8. That many warehouses housing Election materials were burnt down before Election day in Bayelsa, not were in tact in these North States.
9. That thugs in Bayelsa State snatched many Election materials and even killed many INEC staff, but nothing of such happened in the Northern States.
e.t.c.....add your own.

Relief Sort from the Supreme Court:
1. As a result of the above, we are not asking the Supreme for a revote in Bayelsa State.
2. We are not asking the Supreme Court to order INEC to ensure all voters who could not vote in Bayelsa be given the opportunity to cast their votes.
3. Rather, we are asking that; All the votes cast in these four Northern States be canceled, invalidated and removed totally from the Election records.
4. That our candidate who lost in these Northern State be declared a winner in these States.
5. That our candidate, who lost Nationally by more than 7 million votes, therefore be declared the winner of the Presidential Election.
6. That INEC be ordered to give our candidate Goodluck Ebere Jonathan a return certificate.

Then Edo State, Delta State, Ebonyi State, Anambra State, Akwa Ibom State, Rivers State, Ekiti State, Taraba State, etc who all voted for PDP and Goodluck Jonathan filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court siding with Bayelsa and asking the Court to invalidate the Election results in those Northern States and award the Election in favor of Mr. Goodluck Jonathan!

Take a wild guess, you think the Nigeria Supreme will say...o boy! 'We hereby invalidate those Election results and award the Election to Jonathan & PDP"?

Yes most people are partisan, which is good....but lets use common sense please.

If you read the court filings and transcripts of these Republican cases, they are not alleging fraud in Court, because the lawyers know they do not have prove and that they will loose their license to practice law.

They are only alleging irregularities and State rules changes that happens in every single election cycle, which they believed made it possible for more Democrats to vote in this Election and disadvantaged Republicans and made them to vote less.

Now it is okay to alleged that, your side because of some rule changes did not vote as much as they would have...but you can't ask the court as a remedy to throw away other people's vote because your side did not vote, that is not a remedy...a proper remedy is for you to ask the court to allow your people to vote just like the other side....but that remedy is moot because the election is over and Trump told his voters not to vote by mail!

Do you even have law and constitution in Nigeria..? oga stop comparing Nigeria and America pls two different system that are million miles apart...!!
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by demmymoney(m): 8:37am On Dec 10, 2020
Buliwyf:


Trump cannot use Supreme Court to win anything. Even the way he has gone about it has shown that was his plan all along. So those guys will decisively reject him.

You have come out fully now but you were forming neutral before. Your name will be added to the list of those who live in lalaland here. Just wait till January.

And how did RBG's pro choice stance affect your life? Did she ask you to abort your own baby by force? Some of you just make ridiculous statements and think it makes sense. You are thanking God someone died. If you can achieve a quarter of what that woman achieved in life, you won't be ranting online about an already decided election.

Let's us watch and see
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by nelsonoba: 8:36pm On Dec 10, 2020
linearity:


[s]I guess it is the kids that showed up on the internet today, at least before disputing something online try and research it, so you could understand better.

The safe harbor date is not an “arbitrary arrangement’ it is a federal law passed by Congress .

It states that....any state which have finalized their election results and resolved “any controversy or contest” involving the appointment of the electors by six days before the Electoral College meets, those results should be treated as “conclusive” by Congress when lawmakers tabulates the Electoral College votes and should not be challenged.

Electoral College by US law: 3 US 7 will meet on December 14, 2020. SCOTUS can not change that date. SCOTUS is there not only to ensure the US constitution is followed, they are bounded by US laws and US statues.

If you go back to 2000 in the FL case, one of the reasons SCOTUS rejected A’gore request for the ballot recount was because the recount would extend beyond December 14th.

TX also violated the same principle they are suing the other states for. TX Governor made some last minute changes to how Elections were ran in TX just like they are accusing these states. He that come to equity must come with clean hands. Also, TX have no standing to sue other states on how those states should conduct their Election...Lawmakers and injured parties in those states have already sue to state court and lost, they took it to federal courts they lost.

This TX case is show-game and not worth the paper it is written on, it will be tossed on Friday. Paxton is just trying to do Trump a favor just in case he can get a free get of jail card over his three pending federal fraud cases.[/s]

I have observed your thought process and I can assure you that you have a huge potential to be wise and highly informed. If only you get rid of CNN and Fake news media, you will achieve that great potential in you.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by feeloscar(m): 3:53pm On Dec 11, 2020
Johnnyessence:
So far, 10 States have joined to support Texas in the litigation
lawsuit against the 4 Swing States. The States include:
Louisiana
Arkansas
Alabama
Florida
Kentucky
Mississippi
South Carolina
South Dakota...etc!
Similar to 15 states in Nigeria, taking Zamfara state to court for implementing sharia law abi?
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 4:21pm On Dec 11, 2020
feeloscar:
Similar to 15 states in Nigeria, taking Zamfara state to court for implementing sharia law abi?
be comparing Nigeria with USA laws.

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by feeloscar(m): 8:09pm On Dec 11, 2020
Johnnyessence:
be comparing Nigeria with USA laws.
If it can not happen in Nigeria, do you think it can happen over there?
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by feeloscar(m): 8:14pm On Dec 11, 2020
nelsonoba:


I have observed your thought process and I can assure you that you have a huge potential to be wise and highly informed. If only you get rid of CNN and Fake news media, you will achieve that great potential in you.
He has quoted to butress his points. What about you?
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 10:09pm On Dec 11, 2020
feeloscar:
If it can not happen in Nigeria, do you think it can happen over there?
lol funny nairalander. So many things doesn't happen in Nigeria why many things happened in USA. They are different with different constitution.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by linearity: 12:43am On Dec 12, 2020
nelsonoba:


I have observed your thought process and I can assure you that you have a huge potential to be wise and highly informed. If only you get rid of CNN and Fake news media, you will achieve that great potential in you.

The Supreme Court just dismissed the Texas case just like I rightly predicted, Mr. Wise One!

“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the Supreme Court’s order reads.

“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”

4 Likes 1 Share

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply)

Falling Boulders Kill 9 Tourists In India Landslide (Pic, Video) / War Unnecessary, But We’re Ready To Defend Ourselves, Niger Junta Tells ECOWAS / Magnitude 5.6 Earthquake Hits West Java Province, Indonesia. 56 Dead, 700 Injure

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 102
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.