₦airaland Forum

begoniaa:
[color=dodgerblue]His thoughts are not the Universe's thoughts nor Laws of Nature.
Someone that doesn't believe in God wants to be making absolute moral judgments? Very funny.

The bolded is true. If love happens between a woman who is a virgin, and a guy that isn't, it's not bad. But selfish reasons, hypocrisy and social realities would play out in most cases.

Why is a non-virgin *insisting* they want a virgin? These things aren't hard and all those unnecessary shalaye up there is because those guys want to eat their cakes and have it. If a woman who is also virgin chooses you, finds you befitting... fine.

(All these words sound yucky to me somehow. Virgins, non-virgins, as if people are pieces of meat and have...mtcheew.)
[/color]

A non virgin can insist he wants a virgin. Same way a virgin girl or any girl for that matter can insist on getting anything she wants in the opposite sex whether she deserves it or not.

Firstly, I'd say do whatever rocks y'all boats cos there are really no manuals to these things tbvh..

I like your analogy, begoniaa.. I couldn't help but laugh when I read some comments here.. This, for example "a woman thats not a virgin should not be wifed up except she is ashamed of her past and tells her man the truth of her wh0redom" lol how did you know she's not a virgin, I'm guessing your answer is cos she doesn't have an hymen.. Those are basically our societal & cultural beliefs, these are what we were/are made to believe but it's not entirely true cos not all virgins have hymen, yeah some are born without it while in some others, due to strenous activities/exercises their hymen tears open.. And cos a woman loses her virginity or has no hymen doesn't make her a wh0re..Christ! I do not know how y'all come up with thisss.. Yes, a virgin is said to have had great moral control over his/her sexual libido esp in recent times when sexual entanglements have become the order of the day, we should also know that it doesn't alwaysss have to be penetrative se.x with the opposite or same sex as the case may be plus there are sexual toys/objects used solely for pleasure, anyway that's by the way.. Haha imagine tying virginity to loyalty, nwanne putaba.. That you married her a virgin doesn't exclusively mean she won't cheat on you and vice versa, inukwam a virgin is more valuable cos she kept her pride til marriage and so she's less likely to commit paternity fraud lmaooo a partner that wants to cheat will do so whether you met him/her a virgin, be guided.. There are no manuals to these things, it's not a virginity issue at all, this is not 1900 forgossake.. You fit marry virgin wey go later wan explore, carry better shame enter your house, you fit marry virgin wey go jus dey for you and only you, you fit still marry non-virgin wey go leave you go meet her sugarboys, you fit still marry non-virgin wey go dey loyal to you, forget age bracket, it goes vice versa too, individuals differ.. Las Las just make sure you get yourself a good partner, one that knows the true meaning of love and what it entails, one who is peace-loving and one who will advise, encourage and support you every step of the way.. Shalom!

RisenPhoenix1:
9) Men cannot commit 'maternity fraud'. It is a biological impossibility for a man to bring an illegitimate child into a family and pretend that the child is the woman's when it isn't. Women on the other hand, are not only capable of doing so, but in fact, have been consistently shown to have done so quite regularly in the past.



8--) Oh yes they are true and universal. You can pretend to quash them, and grant yourself victories all you like. I'm not here for points from logically challenged individuals; which is why I don't engage with most females on NL (there are admittedly, a few reasonable ones). In any case, I consider my unwillingness to engage with illogical or insulting behaviour to be quite reasonable, since it often proves to be unproductive and a lowering of certain standards I hold dear.

5) And my first account wasn't busted (whatever that means). I deactivated because I was working on a new personal project and did not want distractions, just like I am likely to deactivate this account before the end of this year (when people likely will start to crow about victories and hustings all you like). And to show you that it is not due to 'bustings' that I sometimes need to deactivate, I might as well inform you that I will probably always use the monicker RisenPhoenix in one form or the other as long as these are available for use, as I did before. But again as usual, I will end with my gracious assertion that you are free to believe whatever makes you feel good.



7) So substitute 'THEREFORE' instead of 'BECAUSE'. My English isn't perfect and I never said it was. I make mistakes when writing sometimes. Hurray for your great victory.



6) No one said anything about a hymen. A female virgin is a woman who has never engaged in any form of sexual activity with a man. She can easily be identified by any well informed man, not by her hymen only (many women still have hymens but filthy minds and extensive practise with other body parts), but by her behaviour and way of thinking (specific details withheld). For example, from mere behaviour, you are easily identifiable as someone who lost her virginity quite early, among other interesting revelations you inadvertently make online.



1) Incorrect. We men are biologically incapable of destroying our uterus (hint: we don't have any). Actually, none of the disadvantages I listed are applicable to men. Not even ex issues. Men don't have those either, and even if they did, it doesn't matter because it is irrelevant whether a man is chaste.



2) I never said that virgins cannot cheat after marriage. However, they are probably less likely to do so, having proven that they are capable of restraining their sexual desires for the period before marriage; whether due to principles or a superior moral standard than those who lose it indiscriminately (often for a shawarma sandwich and a coke).

3) Also, a man is highly unlikely to leave a child with a woman who is not his mother to take care of, especially if she's unwilling. Women have been known to torture or kill step children on a whim. They are that cold blooded. Women on the other hand, deceive their unsuspecting husbands into paying for a child not his own. There is a world of difference between the two. Men can have extra marital affairs but cannot 'cheat' sexually. Because no cheating is involved.


4) Women are never true in any way. They are perpetually given to pretence; an evolutionary trait that still serves them well. It is not about emotion, only about the concept of being scammed by being made to raise and nurture children not his own; very common; as statistics show. And yes, I know that women are never to be trusted as your first statement here points out.

I hope I explained my points sufficiently to more logical readers. I know that you are not likely to understand this, with you having such a strong personal interest in disproving the merits of a man striving to marry a woman as a virgin.

[color=dodgerblue]Sighsssssssssss. Firstly, there's is no chance of you gaslighting me, so get that and get it.
I don't like deviating from points too much.

Number 4) 'Women are never true' and' a virgin allays suspicions of fraud.' Very contradictory.
Again, anybody can do you dirty. The possibility is very high in both sexes, etc. Same as anybody can be faithful to you. Women are not the ONLY bearers of whatever you claim. You think a virgin man is likely to father another child behind his wife's back? Or bring such child into a marriage? These are things men do well and LIE that the child is a brother's son daughter.

My whole stance (on this thread) is on your premise of 'man is free, guiltless and every consequences should rain on the woman or is because of her.' Kapish? Because this is somehow going to be turning into a one-sided analysis of problems women who are sexually active face and I'm not being sucked into that. Won't fall into it.

3) Are you even active on the Family section of this site? Branch out more. Maybe if you weren't following billyonionaires around and read more from relationships and gists and 'keep-me-anonymous' posters, you'll find a substantial amount of cases of men bringing in another child to their wives. Great. Seee. The fact that you have women killing step children IS an actual result of the fact that those children live with them. Men are bringing them in, to unwilling wives.

So another contradiction to your bag. Yippee.

When you swore commitment to someone and go ahead to engage in an emotional or sexual affair, you've cheated. Again, your polygamy tint does not cover all relationships. Be specifying your target and keep it WITHIN their bounds.

2) No ex-problems, no damaged wombs, allays fears of bla bla bla. Virtually, virgins are perfect for everything. You alluded/linked it. If they are not sexually active then they won't face problems that women who are sexually active face. Anybody can commit an emotional fraud. But anyhow, a sexually loose person is a sexually loose person. It speaks of their indiscipline. And people aren't monoliths. Nah. Not usually. Anybody can learn discipline or become exploratory - virgin or not. The likeliness? I don't know. Just don't shame women who aren't virgins while giving a pass to men who aren't. **inserts teary laugh emoji**

Are you baiting me also? Lmaoooo. Think whatever you want about me, dude. Great things have been done by people who aren't virgins, so there. PS: when you finally compile all interesting revelations about me, will you publish and send a copy to me??

1) I obviously cited difference of physiology. You allude to yourself being objective, go take on the assignment of the effect what being promiscuous does to a man. That you repeat your beliefs don't make them true. Go spend some time in real life and get your head outta e-files and PDF copies. Tomorrow, you'll bring up jealous exes and stalker women to castigate violent women who fk shxt up in a man's life. Anywhere belle face, as usual. It is very relevant that a man is chaste, don't kid yourself. Who knows if you are, too? You're prolly celibate and come online to advise other men on being a real man and whatnot. And if it's not relevant for a man, it's not relevant for a woman also, alaye.

6) "A male virgin is a man who has never engaged in any form of sexual activity with a woman. He can easily be identified by any well informed person/woman, not by his unused dick only (many men still haven't had penetrative sex but have filthy minds and engage in extensive practise with other body parts), but by his behaviour and way of thinking (specific details withheld)." A male's virginity is valid and can be known as you've explained with your words. It's the entire thing I was communicating when I brought up the hymen.

7) Good of you to admit. Next time, chose your words and try to communicate your points clearly. YOU KNOW there's no "slipping" with me, right? So even if you use 'therefore,' there is still something off with the statement. Value of virginity is one thing. Its "prove-ability" is another. Virginity is the state of never having had sex, so the benefits that comes with that is enjoyed. If it is true and real, you enjoy the benefit. So enjoying the benefits of virginity as a guy/woman is A PROOF itself. Kapish, Non-English speaker? A guy's virginity is important and there are ways to ascertain it. Meet with and befriend virgin men, I'm sure there's a lot you can glean from them about their decision to be virgins.

5) I believe () with your former monicker, you had some argument and you deactivated right after you were called out on some inconsistencies. I can't remember how exactly it happened on some thread, but okayyy, things will always unravel with time. In time.

8--) Nope. They are not. They are simply lies you believe, cos if they are not, why do people disagree with you? You're not the only intelligent person and you don't even get to decide who is. I don't pretend to quash, I quash, lmaoo. Your hypocrisy shines through, though. Insulting people's sensibilities and thinking. Look in a mirror. As long as you're not being challenged, you don't consider people unreasonable. Anything you say sha, if it's nonsense, I'll quote you if I chose and you're free to ignore because of whatever and I'll point it out - you choosing what/who to engage (and as a front) because you can't defend anything anymore.

9) Different names, different things. Refer to my previous responses on how men cheat on their wives and lie to them their child belongs to a relation.

Non-virgin men are guilty, if not worse than womem are, of committing atrocious crimes and fraud against women they are in relationships with. Passing on STDs is one. Fact is, consequences of pre-marital sex are brought about by men as well.

I randomly numbered because... I can. If you can sort through it, all well and good. I wrote and assigned numbers so they can correlate with what I'm responding to.[/color]

needanswer:
A non virgin can insist he wants a virgin. Same way a virgin girl or any girl for that matter can insist on getting anything she wants in the opposite sex whether she deserves it or not.

[color=dodgerblue]okay.[/color]

[quote author=begoniaa post=99547543][/quote]We're going round in circles here. I take it that comprehension is not your forte. I'll answer briefly for the last time and then I'm out. I'm also ignoring all ad hominem attacks and concentrating on your many misconceptions and deliberate misrepresentations.

First you don't seem to understand that men have no need to be sexually exclusive to their spouses. All your rant seems to revolve around the false belief that men and women are equal when it comes to extra marital sex. That is wrong. As I have explained earlier, when a man is having extra marital affairs, he is not 'cheating' on his wife as there never was any implication of exclusivity in the marital contract where he is concerned. Women marry men to secure their financial position not to secure their lineage as men do. This is why polygamy is not, and never was, regarded as cheating. If you still don't understand that, I cannot help you more than this.

Secondly, if a man has a child with a woman outside the marriage, it is frankly, none of his wife's business as long as she is not forced to care for the child; which few women will voluntarily do anyway. A woman on the other hand, potentially deceives and therefore defrauds a man into financially bringing up a child not his own when she has sex outside. With your penchant for latching into the smallest spelling errors and misuse of prepositions, I am surprised that you find this little difference so difficult to comprehend.

Noteworthy is your first false conclusion that the fact that a woman kills and therefore must have been raising her stepchildren is a contradiction of my statement that women do not raise their husbands' children is a gross misquotation of what I said. I remember that I distinctly pointed out that a man cannot bring an illegitimate child for a woman to being up WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE. Women who do bring up stepchildren almost always do so with full consent pretending to 'love' them, only to torture and sometimes kill them with negligible exceptions. They may initially agree only in order to hook the man into marriage.

In conclusion, men should strive to marry virgin girls who are more likely to show restraint in their sexual lives post marriage as they did pre marriage. Women who choose to lose their virginity at a young age to the security man or the street urchin should not aspire to marry high value men. And high value men should not lower themselves to such depths and spend their wealth and protection in catering for someone who has not only been a dumping ground for all kinds of venereal diseases, been a partaker in various possible perversions ranging from bestiality to homosexuality (even coprophagy or so I've heard) for money, and served as an experimental station for backyard abortion clinics, but someone who is also multiple times more likely to DECEITFULLY foist one or more illegitimate children on her husband's dole. Such women should be left to reflect upon their corrupted status in the rubbish dump of humanity; despite their many strenuous attempts to turn the narrative to present what is corrupt as good and pure.

No disrespect intended.

RisenPhoenix1:
We're going round in circles here. I take it that comprehension is not your forte. I'll answer briefly for the last time and then I'm out. I'm also ignoring all ad hominem attacks and concentrating on your many misconceptions and deliberate misrepresentations.

1) First you don't seem to understand that men have no need to be sexually exclusive to their spouses. All your rant seems to revolve around the false belief that men and women are equal when it comes to extra marital sex. That is wrong. As I have explained earlier, when a man is having extra marital affairs, he is not 'cheating' on his wife as there never was any implication of exclusivity in the marital contract where he is concerned. Women marry men to secure their financial position not to secure their lineage as men do. This is why polygamy is not, and never was, regarded as cheating. If you still don't understand that, I cannot help you more than this.

2) Secondly, if a man has a child with a woman outside the marriage, it is frankly, none of his wife's business as long as she is not forced to care for the child; which few women will voluntarily do anyway. A woman on the other hand, potentially deceives and therefore defrauds a man into financially bringing up a child not his own when she has sex outside. With your penchant for latching into the smallest spelling errors and misuse of prepositions, I am surprised that you find this little difference so difficult to comprehend.

3) Noteworthy is your first false conclusion that the fact that a woman kills and therefore must have been raising her stepchildren is a contradiction of my statement that women do not raise their husbands' children is a gross misquotation of what I said. I remember that I distinctly pointed out that a man cannot bring an illegitimate child for a woman to being up WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE. Women who do bring up stepchildren almost always do so with full consent pretending to 'love' them, only to torture and sometimes kill them with negligible exceptions. They may initially agree only in order to hook the man into marriage.

4) In conclusion, men should strive to marry virgin girls who are more likely to show restraint in their sexual lives post marriage as they did pre marriage. Women who choose to lose their virginity at a young age to the security man or the street urchin should not aspire to marry high value men. And high value men should not lower themselves to such depths and spend their wealth and protection in catering for someone who has not only been a dumping ground for all kinds of venereal diseases, been a partaker in various possible perversions ranging from bestiality to homosexuality (even coprophagy or so I've heard) for money, and served as an experimental station for backyard abortion clinics, but someone who is also multiple times more likely to DECEITFULLY foist one or more illegitimate children on her husband's dole. Such women should be left to reflect upon their corrupted status in the rubbish dump of humanity; despite their many strenuous attempts to turn the narrative to present what is corrupt as good and pure.

No disrespect intended.

[color=dodgerblue]There'll be no circles without you attempting to spell out consequences for women while conveniently excluding men. It's not possible. You're at liberty to pull out anytime you want. You make ad hominem attacks, too. ^_^ I'm only responding in kind.

Hope you're LEARNING good? The faster you get that you put your thoughts on a public space and they aren't shielded from scrutiny, especially when they contain FALSE/misleading claims, the better. My comprehension is sound, thank you.

1) I have no need to understand anything, dude. If you're advocating for polygamy, go for it all the way without any biases. There are monogamous relationships, so do well to put those into consideration before giving a "one-size-fits-all" narration or solution to issues. I can as well bring you proofs backing up humans' need and wiring for exclusivity, romance and such. If you CANNOT and will not keep your polygamous ideals and advantages to their spheres, I will contend from a monogamous stance - especially if they are bs-crappy.

Oh, God. Okay. Okay. Fine. Go on all on saying there is no cheating bla bla bla and I maintain: When you swore to commit to ONE woman, in a close relationship, implying faithfulness, you owe it to them. Do you get that you're talking about men and women, as in generalities here, and then saying nothing was implied?? Are you for real?? Who implied that a woman should give or do anything? Quit that with me. Humans created culture. Including cultures around marriages, and because of that any consequences or whatever is NOT natural. Yes, we're equal. Your understanding of that is on you. I'm ranting and you're barking, shey?

Oh, great. Now you're specifying polygamy. You'd do well to always make that distinction so things are clear. Your ideals do not apply in a modern marriage, etc., so there's no point even addressing it.

2) Lmao. And you always call me what? Illogical? Inconsistent? No wahala. I see through you. If you're talking about polygamy, then sure, maybe whatever you say'll apply. Not in a monogamous marriage is what a partner does none of the business of the other, but stay thereeee. Hahaha. Na una kuku dey say women are next to the devil; hell hath no fury like they do and whatever, so keep feeding your wives craaap, mkay? Keeping festering bitter feelings in them and saying they have no business with your philandering ways. Dead body no go tell watin im witness. That you also choose to ignore the instances of a man fathering other children, bringing them in and LIEING that they are his relatives is telling. Why even lie at all, IF HE'S THE PATRIACH and there's no implication of faithfulness?

Just say you have nothing to say. Truss me, you're not insulting my intelligence and you cannot. You and I very well know that even with the penchant you claim I have in all the world. I'm fine with your denial. (PS: Emotions and logic do not always cancel each other in all cases. You can be the most unemotional person ever and still be daft.)

3) A - "...Also, a man is highly unlikely to leave a child with a woman who is not his mother to take care of, especially if she's unwilling."

B - "Noteworthy is your first false conclusion that the fact that a woman kills and therefore must have been raising her stepchildren is a contradiction of my statement that women do not raise their husbands' children is a gross misquotation of what I said.

°
You stay behind your keyboard and TELL ME I made a gross 'misquotation' of your first statement (A)? Wowu. What a brilliant gaslight tactic. I must give you that. Wow. Didn't see that coming. Oh, so now men leave children with a woman who is not their mother in (B) and it's all pretenses and fake, but full consent when in (A) they were visibly unwilling? Ahann. Why you too dey change mouth laidis?? Or you'll want to latch onto the word 'likely/especially' to say you never explicitly said anything? Nawa oh.

4) In conclusion nikan, ko. In furtherance, ni. Yinmu.

Make I help myzelf copy-paste, jare. Hand dey pain me sef.

This is for all people, young and old, magenta and purple, especially to all my ladies out there, and just overlooking the obvious joking undertone for a while, I say this with all honesty and my heart (substitute men/women for where you see people where necessary):

People should strive to marry virgins who are more likely to show restraint in their sexual lives post marriage as they did pre marriage. People(men) who choose to lose their virginity at a young age to their school seniors or the street liquor seller should not aspire to marry high value women/people. And high value people should not lower themselves to such depths and spend their wealth and protection in catering for someone who has not only been a dumping ground for all kinds of venereal diseases, been a partaker in various possible perversions ranging from bestiality to necrophilia (even coprophagy or so I've heard) for money, and served as an experimental station for overidden dicks/saggy balls(or other sexual organs) leading to watery sperm and PE (or such of the likes), but someone who is also multiple times more likely to DECEITFULLY foist one or more illegitimate children on their partner's/wife's dole. Such people(men) should be left to reflect upon their corrupted status in the rubbish dump of humanity; despite their many strenuous attempts to turn the narrative to present what is corrupt as good and pure.

Sharom and bayi-bayi to you, too. No quote me again oh. We shall meet well and we see when we see!

Nonsense and Ingredients. Olodo k*bo k*bo.

Just let me see where you'll coman claim that the modern society ignores men sexual health/issues on this site of Se.un's heirl*om since you've established that sexually active men no dey get venereal diseases and gbogbo e. Men NEVER experience or practice (perverse) sexual acts, amiright?

You sha know me. I'll be there. Make e reash. The second is that men don't have exes issues, ba? Hehehehehehehehehe. Hehehehehehehwhehehehe. I laugh in cockroaches' dialect oh.

S'kay.[/color]

1F30M4:
Firstly, I'd say do whatever rocks y'all boats cos there are really no manuals to these things tbvh..

I like your analogy, begoniaa.. I couldn't help but laugh when I read some comments here.. This, for example "a woman thats not a virgin should not be wifed up except she is ashamed of her past and tells her man the truth of her wh0redom" lol how did you know she's not a virgin, I'm guessing your answer is cos she doesn't have an hymen.. Those are basically our societal & cultural beliefs, these are what we were/are made to believe but it's not entirely true cos not all virgins have hymen, yeah some are born without it while in some others, due to strenous activities/exercises their hymen tears open.. And cos a woman loses her virginity or has no hymen doesn't make her a wh0re..Christ! I do not know how y'all come up with thisss.. Yes, a virgin is said to have had great moral control over his/her sexual libido esp in recent times when sexual entanglements have become the order of the day, we should also know that it doesn't alwaysss have to be penetrative se.x with the opposite or same sex as the case may be plus there are sexual toys/objects used solely for pleasure, anyway that's by the way.. Haha imagine tying virginity to loyalty, nwanne putaba.. That you married her a virgin doesn't exclusively mean she won't cheat on you and vice versa, inukwam a virgin is more valuable cos she kept her pride til marriage and so she's less likely to commit paternity fraud lmaooo a partner that wants to cheat will do so whether you met him/her a virgin, be guided.. There are no manuals to these things, it's not a virginity issue at all, this is not 1900 forgossake.. You fit marry virgin wey go later wan explore, carry better shame enter your house, you fit marry virgin wey go jus dey for you and only you, you fit still marry non-virgin wey go leave you go meet her sugarboys, you fit still marry non-virgin wey go dey loyal to you, forget age bracket, it goes vice versa too, individuals differ.. Las Las just make sure you get yourself a good partner, one that knows the true meaning of love and what it entails, one who is peace-loving and one who will advise, encourage and support you every step of the way.. Shalom!

Not exactly, a higher probability virgins will not explore after marriage than non virgins. Virginity is not just keeping legs close alone, but it requires Mental discipline, Focus & High moral value to achieve. These traits of self discipline, high moral value & decency now aggregate overtime to be part of her/him. It will be quite difficulty to explore after marriage. In summary, Higher % of certainty virgins maintain vow of chastity than non virgins.
If you still a virgin & reading this i can tell you boldly keep it, your partner will hold you in high esteem. If not, still fine, life still go on, it is not the end of life.

I see some false analogies here that need to be addressed.

Note- any time i mention men or women, it is a vast generalization which is necessary to categorize the majority. There will always be exceptions however it does not take away from the validity of the point being made.
So stop saying "not all women" "not all men" this and that. It is already known that not all (100%) can fall into a category.

That she is a virgin doesnt mean she wont cheat- correct. Behavioural pattern cannot be pre-determined however history, probability, and data has shoen that a non virgin have much higher chance of committing adultry and revel in her wh0redom and even try to justify it to a simp.
You need to understand that she slept around for a reason.
1. She was fooled by feminism. Media and society
2. She enjoyed the attention in her prime
3. She just likes sex
4. Having fun
5. Believed that there was no consequence for her past
6. Her past dont matter. Etc
These are signs of low moral compass and poor thinking faculty at that time. If someone further revels in this then there is lack of accountability on the girl's part and should not be wifed up because she is still a wh0re if she cannot admit that she gave away her body freely.

Not all virgins have hymen or they lost it during horseback riding- this is just an attempt to blur the lines on how to hold a woman accountable for her sleeping around. The hymen is always there. This excuse is plan ridiculous. I really dont know about strenous excercises though so i cant comment here. If sexual activity is done on a young lady before the hymen gets toughned up tgen such a girl may believe she never had a hymen(just a speculation). Not withstanding a vast majority of girls lost their virginity by sleeping with random men in the name of "my body my choice" in their youth. Foolish ideals.

Virginity is tied to loyalty, no matter how you spin it. Its not always 100% but the probablity of a virgin being chaste in today's society is something special. While a girl that is not will always have one excuse or the other in other to try to hide her past.
1. Someone raped me
2. Is it your bhsiness
3. Its my past
4.you are insecure
5. How dare you
6. Are you also a virgin
Women never want to accept responsibility and accountability for their bad choices. You slept around and it was fun. Own it and stop trying to tell men that dont want a very used up wh0re to commit.

1F30M4:
Firstly, I'd say do whatever rocks y'all boats cos there are really no manuals to these things tbvh..

I like your analogy, begoniaa.. I couldn't help but laugh when I read some comments here.. This, for example "a woman thats not a virgin should not be wifed up except she is ashamed of her past and tells her man the truth of her wh0redom" lol how did you know she's not a virgin, I'm guessing your answer is cos she doesn't have an hymen.. Those are basically our societal & cultural beliefs, these are what we were/are made to believe but it's not entirely true cos not all virgins have hymen, yeah some are born without it while in some others, due to strenous activities/exercises their hymen tears open.. And cos a woman loses her virginity or has no hymen doesn't make her a wh0re..Christ! I do not know how y'all come up with thisss.. Yes, a virgin is said to have had great moral control over his/her sexual libido esp in recent times when sexual entanglements have become the order of the day, we should also know that it doesn't alwaysss have to be penetrative se.x with the opposite or same sex as the case may be plus there are sexual toys/objects used solely for pleasure, anyway that's by the way.. Haha imagine tying virginity to loyalty, nwanne putaba.. That you married her a virgin doesn't exclusively mean she won't cheat on you and vice versa, inukwam a virgin is more valuable cos she kept her pride til marriage and so she's less likely to commit paternity fraud lmaooo a partner that wants to cheat will do so whether you met him/her a virgin, be guided.. There are no manuals to these things, it's not a virginity issue at all, this is not 1900 forgossake.. You fit marry virgin wey go later wan explore, carry better shame enter your house, you fit marry virgin wey go jus dey for you and only you, you fit still marry non-virgin wey go leave you go meet her sugarboys, you fit still marry non-virgin wey go dey loyal to you, forget age bracket, it goes vice versa too, individuals differ.. Las Las just make sure you get yourself a good partner, one that knows the true meaning of love and what it entails, one who is peace-loving and one who will advise, encourage and support you every step of the way.. Shalom!

[color=dodgerblue]Don't mind them, na. Let them stay online and be forming armchair philosophers and half-baked redpillers legislating over others' lives. Las' las', if they were getting any virgins, they wouldn't be here crying everyday. Olodos dem. They can't even brag about it, unless bluff, not even say it was the sweetest relationship they've had. Shey all the girls the RisenPhoenix guy have been dating are virgins and he come get bad experience for their hands? Shor.

They shu goan nullify the marriages of people who got married as "non-virgins" and are happy, na.[/color]

ibkonekt:
I see some false analogies here that need to be addressed.

Note- any time i mention men or women, it is a vast generalization which is necessary to categorize the majority. There will always be exceptions however it does not take away from the validity of the point being made.
So stop saying "not all women" "not all men" this and that. It is already known that not all (100%) can fall into a category.

That she is a virgin doesnt mean she wont cheat- correct. Behavioural pattern cannot be pre-determined however history, probability, and data has shoen that a non virgin have much higher chance of committing adultry and revel in her wh0redom and even try to justify it to a simp.
You need to understand that she slept around for a reason.
1. She was fooled by feminism. Media and society
2. She enjoyed the attention in her prime
3. She just likes sex
4. Having fun
5. Believed that there was no consequence for her past
6. Her past dont matter. Etc
These are signs of low moral compass and poor thinking faculty at that time. If someone further revels in this then there is lack of accountability on the girl's part and should not be wifed up because she is still a wh0re if she cannot admit that she gave away her body freely.

Not all virgins have hymen or they lost it during horseback riding- this is just an attempt to blur the lines on how to hold a woman accountable for her sleeping around. The hymen is always there. This excuse is plan ridiculous. I really dont know about strenous excercises though so i cant comment here. If sexual activity is done on a young lady before the hymen gets toughned up tgen such a girl may believe she never had a hymen(just a speculation). Not withstanding a vast majority of girls lost their virginity by sleeping with random men in the name of "my body my choice" in their youth. Foolish ideals.

Virginity is tied to loyalty, no matter how you spin it. Its not always 100% but the probablity of a virgin being chaste in today's society is something special. While a girl that is not will always have one excuse or the other in other to try to hide her past.
1. Someone raped me
2. Is it your bhsiness
3. Its my past
4.you are insecure
5. How dare you
6. Are you also a virgin
Women never want to accept responsibility and accountability for their bad choices. You slept around and it was fun. Own it and stop trying to tell men that dont want a very used up wh0re to commit.

[color=dodgerblue]Pele e. Is that all?

When you tell men to stop being dogs and keep their zips closed, you wee continue to write thesis ontop women having free, wild and fun sex with them.

Bad choices my yansh. Na so your third leg dey control una wey make una dey fight wars and poison your comrades untop pussy and destroying the world, killing tribes because the mistress of a Lord influenced him. Goan ask.

Lee what? Leeemaooo.

Are you a virgin yourself? Then you're a veryyy used up community basin and deflated bag of dick if you're not and have sooooo missed the mark for your destiny/good things/good women.[/color]

begoniaa:
[s]

[color=dodgerblue]Pele e. Is that all?

When you tell men to stop being dogs and keep their zips closed, you wee continue to write thesis ontop women having free, wild and fun sex with them.

Bad choices my yansh. Na so your third leg dey control una wey make una dey fight wars and poison your comrades untop pussy and destroying the world, killing tribes because the mistress of a Lord influenced him. Goan ask.

Lee what? Leeemaooo.

Are you a virgin yourself? Then you're a veryyy used up community basin and deflated bag of dick if you're not and have sooooo missed the mark for your destiny/good things/good women.[/color]

Isaiah 4:1