₦airaland Forum

kelechiug:
the bank will give you one...and the other will be sent to your email... Then you print it

I mean the one done online

The QWERTY layout was devised and created in the early 1870s by Christopher Latham Sholes, a newspaper editor and printer who lived in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In October 1867, Sholes filed a patent application for his early writing machine he developed with the assistance of his friends Carlos Glidden and Samuel W. Soulé. The first model constructed by Sholes used a piano-like keyboard with two rows of characters arranged alphabetically as follows:

3 5 7 9 N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 2 4 6 8 . A B C D E F G H I J K L M

The construction of the "Type Writer" had two flaws that made the product susceptible to jams. Firstly, characters were mounted on metal arms or type bars, which would clash and jam if neighboring arms were pressed at the same time or in rapid succession. Secondly, its printing point was located beneath the paper carriage, invisible to the operator, a so-called "up-stroke" design. Consequently, jams were especially serious, because the typist could only discover the mishap by raising the carriage to inspect what had been typed. The solution was to place commonly used letter-pairs (like "th" or "st" so that their typebars were not neighboring, avoiding jams. [citation needed] Contrary to popular belief, the QWERTY layout was not designed to slow the typist down, but rather to speed up typing by preventing jams. Indeed, there is evidence that, aside from the issue of jamming, placing often-used keys farther apart increases typing speed, because it encourages alternation between the hands. There is another origin story in the Smithsonian that the qwerty keyboard was made for telegraph operators and has this layout to make it easy for the telegraph operator to work. (On the other hand, in the German keyboard the Z has been moved between the T and the U to help type the frequent bigraphs TZ and ZU in that language.) Almost every word in the English language contains at least one vowel letter, but on the QWERTY keyboard only the vowel letter "A" is located on the home row, which requires the typist's fingers to leave the home row for most words.

Properties

Alternating hands while typing is a desirable trait in a keyboard design. While one hand types a letter, the other hand can prepare to type the next letter, making the process faster and more efficient. However, when a string of letters is typed with the same hand, the chances of stuttering [clarification needed] are increased and a rhythm can be broken, thus decreasing speed and increasing errors and fatigue. In the QWERTY layout many more words can be spelled using only the left hand than the right hand. In fact, thousands of English words can be spelled using only the left hand, while only a couple of hundred words can be typed using only the right hand (the three most frequent letters in the English language, ETA, are all typed with the left hand). In addition, more typing strokes are done with the left hand in the QWERTY layout. This is helpful for left-handed people but to the disadvantage of right-handed people.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/QWERTY?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C2279033909

Bayino and Khan1993 how did you guys get the receipt?

cassyrooy:
U don use password with CAPITAL P? Use 'Password' for password.


The mail went through yesterday.

I Don try all case possible.. lower middle upper.. the thing no gree work.

But I called their helpline last night and I was told to wait till Thursday.

You na baba nw. My able pastor.

cassyrooy:
ok, same here.

lol, i go wait na, maybe na my G-wagon him want take call me

Lol.. Guy I no fit login with my mail.. Na just incorrect and not recognized the thing dey talk since. How your own?

cassyrooy:
Well Brethrens, i'm yet to recieve His call/text.

How are you guys doing?

So your waiting for it

M okay. APPLICATION HUSTLE.. You?

cassyrooy:
Okay, great course.

God bless us All.

I see the future of a pastor in you.

Thoughtful.. Nice post.

Viewing this topic: itsurgirlella(f),ThePunStar,kumpharm(f),Praisseyand 2 guest(s)

PrinceCEE:
U think



I run mine on contract basis.... So no qualms!

Hmm.. Having me as a roommate means I'm gonna be always glued to you everywhere you go So qualms dey Bro!

PrinceCEE:
If we coincidentally become roommate, then she'll ve a fair doze of my 'busy body'

Lol.. It's "do me, do you" babe no go vex

cassyrooy:
We are Hallmates Pr0ton.


Zik things my brother.

Jesu! Wonderful.. We go brag for same room

Cassyrooy what's your hall?

Got same hall as PrinceCEE's

Bboy1015:
Also, try and start getting reference letter for accomodation process, I guess 2.
When applying 4 room, u will be asked to provide the details of 3 referees. The name, address, email and phone number of the referee.

Still provide referees after reference letters.. Why are they so insecure Who can the referees be? Anyone?

kelechiug:
proton ....how market

Aje nwa

blackblizy17:
who has noticed that anyone can log into our admissions.ui.edu.ng page just by putting the person's jamb reg number and any alphabet as password

I can't log in at all here..

Image123:
Who stated otherwise?

You brought it up being a straw-man trick for me thinking I'd say Jan does exist and so does God. But you weren't smart enough as the trick was used against you, loser.

Tell me, the peace you have or had that i have not had. Millions of people will continue to attest forever that they found peace in and with God, after they realized all have sinned and repented of their sins.

There is no sense there.

Image123:
Okay, so if it happens to everybody, then it is not a problem? Your friend the OP said it was IMAGINARY, let's remember that too.

If ever at all it's gonna be a problem it'd not be more than a natural one; a normality of life. Every living thing struggles for survival and this has evolved different relationships among living things of which parasitism is one, which you tag evil. Parasitism is not evil, but rather a way of life.

Again dummy, he said it was imaginary in relation to the eventual claim of the reality of original sin.

No one can disprove their existence either. You have yet to disprove it.

I have. It's you not wanting to drop your belief that's making you go dim wit and blind to see the flaws in it and how satisfactory I have disproved their existence with biology and geology.

Carbon dating and co is largely guesswork and agreed assumption. Don't be deceived.

It's very wrong to use "largely" as to guess work, that is, if ever there is. Radiometric dating is analysed and calculated, not guessed. As to assumptions, its assumptions are more reasonable and verifiable when compared to the outrageous claim (and ridiculous assumption) of the earth created in six days, in a day specifically, land, when the existence of strata and sediments make it an implausibility.

At least, thank God you know that there is something ABOVE the natural. We call it miracle.

Bonehead! I never agreed there was anything above the natural. I was playing along with your
stupidd notion of accessing the supernatural through illusion and delusion so you could understand how you've been for long sounding like an idi0t with too low brain for comprehension as even provably shown in that post ^^^. Play stupidd again...

Perhaps. however, the world of the supernatural exists and is attested to by many learned people over thousands of years and generations, races and tribes, languages and states.

How can you access something above natural?? It's not possible. Your senses recognize some things in the natural world and do not have the ability to recognize anything beyond the natural because they do not exist. The only attestation you and those mor0ns are making lies on the power of imagination, efficiently powered by delusion and hallucination, the brain can produce. And imaginations are imaginations. They are not real.

The fallacy here is the folly of atheism.

... for not believing a ridiculous and incredible story? You are the one apparently out of your senses here.

Who or what makes this determination or rule on what can be compared and what cannot be? You are comparing breeze, powerful light and food to morality, but i should obey a certain rule that cannot compare the concept and definition of morality?

I expect this comprehension of morality should be a problem for people without common sense. And it's sadden that you've shown ample evidence for being one of these people. So I think this is how it's gonna be. You are not fortunate to grasp the concept of morality and it's your intentional problem.

Crimes and acts have been changing everywhere, are you on this planet? Are you aware gay marriage used to be a crime but no longer a crime in some places for instance?

Does the acceptance of the practice of fornication in nonreligious society makes it a no-longer-immoral/sinful practice in the Bible? Is fornication naturally immoral? No. You believe it is because the Bible says so. This an intervention of religion making its own rules, for those who choose to follow.

Gay is a crime for those who say it is. It's not for those who say it's not. It's moral because it doesn't affect your fvcked life.

So if something is natural, it is not a real problem? Where do you get these silly ideas?

It is not. I'll say it a thousand times if you want.

This doesn't show or prove that being human is a crime or a sin. i am human and i am not a sin or a crime.

It does. They point to your nature being sinful - all humanity is sinful.

i beg you to show me where the Bible makes claim of any couple who ate an apple.

What about the verses I quoted for you??

You have a belief that there is no God, no hell, no heaven.

Anything you call it as long as it doesn't beget worship, ritual and those stuff that differentiate it from being religious.

Because i need it, and so do every other human being.

This is a statement that doesn't go beyond text - a fallacy.

You say IF. If that happened, it will be relevant, except you don't even know the meaning of the word.

Oh GOD! Don't tell me you are this worse in English language. I'd love to see your explanation for saying that.

Image123:
Oh yeah, and this is not january 2016, tell me another joke.

Of course.. January 2016 does not exist. It's a human term for times and seasons.

The realization that nobody is born a sinner brings peace? i believe you meant to spell "piss". Tell me, the peace you have or had that i have not had. Millions of people will continue to attest forever that they found peace in and with God, after they realized all have sinned and repented of their sins.

Tell me, what do you seek for in repentance and prayer to God? Isn't it the same 'not sinful' realization you ignorantly underestimated there?

Image123:
i was actually referring to his remark of an "imaginary PROBLEM", the problem of sin is not imaginary, it is the problem the whole world is experiencing, the wars, the diseases the starvation etc. These are all products of sin(wickedness, selfishness, inability to forgive, lies, greed etc).

I tried showing you how this is a normality of life as it befalls non-human animals too. You made mention of it down there, so I'll attend to it there too.

On your concerns, no one can disprove their existence either.

Someone limited in the knowledge of Mathematics may tell you 2 + 2 is 5. The only way you can accept or disprove this is to work it out to see if it's actually 5. And when you look it up and analyse it you see that it equals 4, and so the 5 he said was wrong. What am trying to say is you can get the actuality of something by analysis, rational thinking and test.

In the case of Adam and Eve, their existence is only put in words without proof to substantiate them. The Bible only tells their story and claims it happened. Again, the only way you can accept or disprove it actually happened is by analysis, rational thinking and test. Here we go..

The Biblical cosmological age is around 6,000 yrs when calculated from the first day of creation to the century we are through calculated years from Adam to his descendants to the ending of the OT and the additional 2016AD inferred from the NT. Then it claims that the earth and human are 6,000 years old. However, there are undeniable radiocarbon dating that estimates the age of the earth alone to a figure far greater than the Biblical age. This is science. Not a trick. It's the same way science tells you that if you inhale too much smoke from combusting engines you'll get a brain damage and a clogging in your blood stream and you believe, it's also the same way it tells you about the age of the earth - no trick, but explanation of fact.

Knowing that, we can reasonably conclude that Genesis and everything in it is a fabrigation, lie and not a reality because it is evidently disproved by science (study of facts)

One more blow... Their existence can't be proven.

The 'joy' of the christian or the 'religious' is the option of the supernatural, miracles.

Those are illusion.. An intentional option to opt in for something above the natural (imagination/assumption)

what dor Scientific blah blah know no such realms.

Of course.. You can't get into a realm that doesn't exist.


Now from here, because the rest of this post in next quote is based on the sin of Adam and Eve and their existence, then the fact that this story can't be proven true and the proof of their non existence can't be disproved renders it a fallacy and need not be argued about!

You are prone to scurvy because of sin, not because of God. It befalls all because man is the crown of creation. The rot is from the top-down, make sense? i said people's predisposition to evil, to cheating, lying, anger, selfishness and other such vices is not mysterious. It is something anyone can observe. You don't need brilliance or genius or esoteric stuff to see it.




How can it be unecessary when it puts in the context and address the core of what the OP is saying and assuming. God is not just a Father so the OP and others should not get things twisted, God is also the Creator, the Judge, the Owner and the Lord of all. Satan is the father of sinners. The Bible is clear on those who are sons/children of God.
Joh 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:






of course BY it, it led to it. They are two sides of a coin. Bring in the two sides of the coin. If you bring in one side, and i bring in one side, don't accuse me of been wrong, i didn't conclude, you did. You will be punished for your sins, not for the sins of some two guys. If it was for some two guys, then i will also be punished, or so the belief goes, right? You will face judgement for your own sins.



The Bible says nothing about any two Unclad couple who ate an apple. Anything wrong with your comprehension?




Good definition. That definitely has weight on morality. God the Father and Creator has a say and more than on the definitions of morality.

i take it you live in a bubble. Our constitutions and laws have no DEFINITION, that is why they keep getting changed and amended. Where is the accuracy in definition when the lower courts can say something different from the so called higher and supreme courts, when the court decisions today are different from that of 20years ago or 10years later. When our house of assemblies are sorry about previous decisions or when two judges using the same references have differing judgements? How can you accurately define morality when crimes with death sentences are no more with such sentences and may be tomorrow, or when each state has their different laws or what used to be criminal is no more more criminal and vice c=versa. Who is the accurate one, the present, the past or the future? Where is the framework and the mark that we are progressing towards(i know your best answers will trend towards making progress etc), so when and how do we know we have gotten there glaringly and apparently? Or do you still think we have gotten there? How do you know, and should there be further adjustments and amendments, how do you react?

How foolishly ignorant! You can't compare the concept of morality with the definitions (whether constant or not) of laws and constitutions. It has been prevailing facts that the breeze makes you feel cool, that bright powerful light seems dangerous to focus your eyes on, that food cures hunger, that a genuine smile is positive, that you feel pain from an injury etc etc These are not necessarily definitions but concepts expressed in words. If the sentence of a particular type of crime has been changing and will continue to change it does not change the act from being a crime. It's still a crime and it is wrong. Morality is all the words you can pull together that collectively points to "An action that decreases individual and social human suffering and betters societal well-being, survival, justice, equality, freedom.."

Morality entire meaning can not be prone to changes than the feeling you get from injuries be prone to a feeling different from pain.

Evidently, he doesn't. He says we are neither fallen or weak. That is the height of delusion. Anyone who sees nothing wrong with the human race needs a lot of help.

I have told you before that he said that in relation to the eventual claim of original sin, not because he doesn't think human race doesn't have a "problem". There is no real problem here. It's natural.

How? Being human is not a crime or a sin.

Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me Psalm 51:5

What is man, that he can be pure? Or he who is born of a woman, that he can be righteous? Job 15:14

The Bible makes no claim of any couple who ate an apple.

I beg you explain this.

Everybody is a believer in context. You BELIEVE there is no God

Believeing (secular) is different from having a belief (religious). The latter are the believers I'm talking about; the religious.

i believe in Jehovah God, many others believe in million other things. Christian believers don't care about angry deities who won't mind their business

Why do you seriously care about repentance and salvation then?

How can my opinion be irrelevant when we have billions of people all over the world and through out all generations seeking for forgiveness from deities? Do you know what you are saying at all?

If billions of people believe that using an umbrella on a cool non-sunny day is ideal, it doesn't change it from being irrelevant.

cassyrooy:
To know your actual fee to be paid according to department follow the link below.

Actually it was for 2014/15 session.

http://portal.ui.edu.ng/2014-2015%20School%20Fee.pdf

For Medicals Screening Informations.

http://portal.ui.edu.ng/assets/Students_Medical_Screening_Information_2014_15.pdf

Medical Form

http://portal.ui.edu.ng/assets/Student_Entrance_Medical_Form.pdf

Lol.. That medical form na die

Will the fees be the same for this session?

Oxytocin:
Hmmm... No credit in chemistry Your choices for a science course, are very limited then, almost all science course, requires chemistry. The dude got no chemistry.

No chem?? Leuma5 I didn't see that. Your chances are limited. Even Geology requires Chemistry.

Sexykaycee Happy Birthday.

leuma5:
i have credit in maths,english,physics,biology,agric,economics,geography,yoruba,wt course can study wit d o level result in UI

Almost any science course.

To those asking to be added to whatsapp groups.. make una chill till after Jamb

So I felt I might find this interesting...

Image123:
What is imaginary here is your imaginations.

He said reality. There is no way you can evidently prove their existence. And scientific discoveries leave no realm for having two probabilities (a) They might have existed. b) they might never have existed) For example, your Y-chromosome, that every living thing descended from paternally, dates back to about 334 thousand years ago; too long for the biblical 6,000 years of human creation.

Homo sapiens have lost the ability to produce their own vitamin C through evolution/mutation, while some other primates like the monkeys can produce this. The lack of vitamin C is a serious problem to us humans as we are prone to this severe disease called scurvy; too illogical of a loving God's creation.

The problem of sin is real. Our world obviously suffers from the consequences of sin. Every human being is naturally predisposed to evil, to cheating, lying, anger, selfishness and other such vices. Anyone who watches a baby grow up can easily observe all these, it's not something mysterious or enigmatic. This is reality and the Bible simply shows the root cause. Many millions in different generations past and present have attested to finding salvation, peace and forgiveness, it is not imaginary at all.

All these befall non human animals too. Does that make them also need a saviour to help them out?

And the coloured words show you're confused yourself. If it isn't mysterious why should a mysterious God intervene to it mysteriously?

God is not just the Father, He is the Creator and the Judge. The devil is the father of all liars and sinners, not God. If you do not receive Him, you are not a son or a child of God, don't get it twisted.
Joh 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

This isn't in the subject of the OP. It's not necessary.

You are not been punished for any two people's sins, you will face judgement for your own sins.

Then as one man's trespass led to the condemnation of all men... Rom 5:18

For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners... Rom 5:19

Also, the Bible says nothing about any two naked couple who ate an apple, don't get it twisted.

When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who waswith her, and he ate it. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves. Gen 3:6-7

What is being gotten twisted there?

What is sin?

Anything that puts enmity between a person and God.

Who gives these definitions, do you just pull them out of your nostrils or something? Who determines human morality, is it the courts or the house of assembly or the Constitutions or who? Can i determine morality, can you? Who made your definition more right than mine? Your school, your job, internet or facebook likes?

Well.. You can accurately define morality when the concept of its relation to human life is understood. And it can be understood, glaringly and apparently. You won't still get this untill you dip yourself into a stream and cool your hot head, then start thinking like a normal human.

Again, don't get yourself in a fix/twist. Throwing together all the religioin and ideas that you manage to remember doesn't make them the same or make them disappear. It only makes you look like you don't know what you are saying.

So far your religion has been the most subject.. Are you saying your religion can be dismissed but others should be considered?

We are. Only a person without a sense of morality or conscience would agree otherwise. Can you see the human race? You do not see any faults or problems?

Apparently he does. You just need to cool your hot head and read calmly and clearly. He said that in relation to the eventual claim of the existence of Adam and Eve, God, Judgement and all.

Depends on your definition of humanity. Being human is not a crime or a sin though.

You are biblically confused again.. Haha

Of course. i wonder where you get such a ridiculous idea in the first instance.

Well I showed you this earlier on; about your Bible making such claim.

Of course. Who cares about angry deities who won't mind their business?

Believers.

That's what a few percentage of deluded humans think. Their opinion is largely irrelevant in the big picture.

Actually yours is. Ours can be felt, utilized and observed. Yours is only imagined and therefore irrelevant.

Who justifies this idea? What society binds you? What makes your right to be bound to some society greater than the other man's right to be bound to his God?

Because your God doesn't exist.

Really? What are the advantages of this realization again? What are the disadvantages of failing to realize?

Both are obvious.. The former brings peace, the latter avoids it.

FrancisTony:



Lawd have mercy!
With all those bass voice, I still scared you away.

That is my MTN number.

Gawd saved you I was eating then. I'd have replied you well when you said 'are you out of your mind'

Bhuumhite:
leaving room for them? leaving room for them?
.
,
well,prOton is d winner

Even this won't keep some guys off..

FrancisTony how market?

Olatunji21 hope you're calm now

cassyrooy:
Lol! How can i forget my comrades, it was good to compete with some, and meet some, Pr0ton for example i tot* was one bouncer-looking dude but... Lol. you know the rest.

PrinceCEE:
@the bolded...


though I was used to seeing his pix both on Facebook and whatsapp but I thought that he would be in anyway
than how he's on his dp



Buh as I saw him, I get like twisting him

Surprise.. That's what keeps the world interesting. And we all have our stories too.

PrinceCEE:
Case closed!



U know we've a case...

Yh.. I don't like coming up with excuses everytime that is why I haven't gotten the boldness to call you and explain things. I know I really disappointed.. Abeg no vex

PrinceCEE:
I had planned on opening the 500th page Buh I was all down yesterday and couldn't keep at par with the thread


Pr0ton, well done for stealing it from me...

Surely I'll always do that bro.

PrinceCEE:
who's grappling a girl with u


I don't play no such game


I was just telling him so as not to take what belongs to a feeble.

The feeble aint the only victims of such, let's say you are right about what you painted me as.

U know that u can't put up a fight...

Of course. I can't... can't put up a fight because of a girl, it's crazy too.

And you don't all have to go into a fight to win a girl; you'll end up as a jerk. So change your style this time. And maybe by then you'd get a babe as you've always wanted.

In other words, am not interested in whatsoever

Let's also say you are right about this, even when the truth is glaring.

olatunji21:
Na my sista u wan take play Kite.... behave oo

Haha.. She is your sister but my girlfriend, so I should be the one bothered most, or you think??

I just wanna proudly watch her pull these guys' ego down one by one... and they can finally keep off after the open defeat.