₦airaland Forum

LZAA:
yep u can

Thanks Sir, I'm so grateful.

Good evening everyone.
Pls can I play Pes2015 or Pes2016 on my Laptop which has the following properties:
Processor: Intel Caleron N3060 @1.60GHz (2 CPUs)
Chip Type: Intel (R) HD graphics?
RAM - 2gb
HDD - 500gb
Approx. Total Memory - 1140mb

Good evening everyone.
Pls can I play Pes2015 or Pes2016 on my Laptop which has the following properties:
Processor: Intel Caleron N3060 @1.60GHz (2 CPUs)
Chip Type: Intel (R) HD graphics?
RAM - 2gb
HDD - 500gb
Approx. Total Memory - 1140mb

Good evening everyone.
Pls can I play Pes2015 or Pes2016 on my Laptop which has the following properties:

Processor: Intel Caleron N3060 @1.60GHz (2 CPUs)
Chip Type: Intel (R) HD graphics?
RAM - 2gb
HDD - 500gb
Approx. Total Memory - 1140mb

Name: Kolawole Ridhwan
School: University Of Ilorin
Level: 400Lvl
Department: Mathematics

Thanks a bunch @Purplekayc. I really appreciate your infos.

purplekayc:
obviously , you can't play FIFA/ PES 2017,2018

Hmm. I have the intention of upgrading the RAM but I don't have the money to do so for now. I just need some other games that will work on it pending when I would upgrade the RAM.

Good morning guys. Pls, I need a list of football games that can work on my Lenovo 110-15IBR laptop. It has a 1.6ghz processor, 500gb HDD and 2gb RAM.

Pes, FIFA e.t.c..
I know games like FIFA 18, Pes 2018 might not work because of the the low RAM size. But I want to know the lower versions of those games (in terms of their year of release) that can work on it. Ideas on any other football games aside FIFA and Pes would be appreciated as well.

Thanks.

greatermax77:
PMB is worst than the duo,
PMB truncated Nigerians democratic govt of Shehu Shagari, destroyed the Nigerian Police force fully equipped by Shagari's govt, that resulted in the rot we see today in NPF. All his life, he is full of hate & revengeful, an ethnic/ religious bigot
PMB was repackaged & sold to the gullible youths who refuses to know the history of their immediate environment

I kind of agree with you.

GavelSlam:
Those Atikulating nko?

lol. PDP's Presidential primary election would be tough.


Visit www.mbnaija.com for more news story on youth governance and leadership.

In the last two weeks, the nation has received controversial open letters. Two former heads of state-Olusengun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Babangida have made major intervention on the state of the nation. Their assessments of the current administration were low and they call for a new order of power.

Obasanjo called for a coalition for Nigeria Movement take over which he himself has immediately registered as part of the founding fathers. For how long would the nation be free from the cabal who has held us for ransom for years. OBJ was a president for eight years with the agenda for a third term aborted by good men of the nation. He foisted a sick Umaru Yar’Adua on his party after he left. After his death, he worsened it by handpicking Goodluck Jonathan whose ascension to the presidency condemned Nigeria to five years of cluelessness and record level corruption. Obasanjo has either been in or around the seat of presidency since the return of democracy in 1999. He is a big player to our present predicament. How can this same man proffer another coalition on us.

Ibrahim Babangida once again begins to play his “Maradona” tactic that he is known for. Two letters were attributed to him but he vehemently denied an official open letter published by his media aid, Kassim Afegbua, a former commissioner of information in Edo State with years of experience in the profession. This aside, IBB can never be trusted again. This is a man who has studied the political mood of the nation and has visualized the role the youth are to play in the outcome of the next general elections there by calling for a “new breed” of young leaders in 2019. These are familiar rituals from the same men who have played a role in formation of past and present democratic governments.

IBB organized dishonest political transition and annulled the June 12, 1993 presidential elections. He played a role in the emergence of Sani Abacha as he handed an interim government to the weak Ernest Shonekan who was easily overthrown 83 days later. With Abacha’s death and AbdulSalam Abubakar in power, they plucked OBJ from prison and seized control again in 1999.

Visit www.mbnaija.com for more news story on youth governance and leadership.

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has pitched its support on former Jigawa State governor, Sule Lamido as it presidential candidate come 2019 general elections dashing the hope of former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar.

This agreement was made after Governors elected on the party platform and party’s National Working Committee led by the national Chairman, Uche Secondus had a closed door meeting to take a stand on the 2019 elections and examine the state of the nation, SaharaReporters reports.

Confirming the reason behind this, a source at the meeting was quoted as saying, “The PDP Governors and NWC after several hours of deliberation collectively agreed to settle for former governor of Jigawa State, Sule Lamido for his consistency since the party was founded. They viewed former Vice President Abubakar Atiku’s moves as desperate and over ambitious. According to them, a true, faithful and loyal party man who has the interest of the party at heart will not turn into a political prostitute as the over-ambitious former Vice President Atiku has done”.

The nation awaits the next move of the former Vice President now that his ambition has once again been hit.
http://www.mbnaija.com/2018/02/05/why-is-the-pdp-is-dumping-atiku-abubakar/

@OP Thanks for the post, May Allah reward you with good.

lol. I think he's just trying to get you informed so that you won't by mistake fall into such a case. Probably, he was thinking you do not know about it.

Ulrich01:
Experienced it now again. Nawa

It just happened again here, Tanke, Ilorin. This is the second time it will occur here now.

They've restored the power here. Tanke, Ilorin.

YoungRichRuler:
This is not a problem with your phone.
You only need to install the usb device on your computer.
Go to device manager, and you will see your phone, right click on it and click on update driver, it will bring options like 'Automatically search for driver' and I want to manually search for driver (This is not the actual terms). Choose manual, then click on MTK USB device. After installation, you will be able to access your files from your computer.
If it doesn't work, I will buy you a bottle of malt

Thanks. I tried what you said but My phone is not showing under "Device Manager". Or do I need to download a USB driver first?

Hardeybohwarley:
Actually at the first instance, your username looks familiar.

Actually, it does not only look familiar, I'm the person on your mind I just noticed your username as well.

Hardeybohwarley:
You should have found it on Facebook. Mtchew.

Lol. Why ask a silly question at first. What do you want to do with "how I got to know about the thread"?

Hardeybohwarley:
How did you get to know this thread. Welcome

I saw it on nairaland..

Wow. This thread is inspiring, Kudos to @UKmigrant. I've learnt a lot so far. I wish you success in your endeavors over there.

PROFESSOR IS-HAQ AKINTOLA

ISHAQ AKINTOLA: Professor of Islamic Eschatology, Muslim Activist, Human Rights Activist, Social Commentator, Advocate of Dialogue. MY PHILOSOPHY: I remain oppressed untill the hungry are fed, the naked clothed,the sick healed and the homeless sheltered... Website: www.ishaqakintola.com ... Twitter: ishaqakintola ... Facebook: facebook.com/ishaqakintola


21st December, 2017
PRESS RELEASE:
MURIC LAUDS HOUSE OF REPS
FOR INTERVENING IN LAW SCHOOL HIJAB BRUHAHA

The House of Representatives yesterday decided to investigate the circumstances leading to the barring of a law graduate of the University of Ilorin, AbdulSalaam Firdaus Amasa, from ‘call to bar’ by the Nigerian Law School. The House reportedly directed its Committee on Justice and Judiciary to look into the matter.


The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) commends honourable members of the House for taking this laudable step. It is timely, germane and altruistic. It is also capable of dousing tension over the issue.

In particular, we doff our hat for the honourable member from Kano, Abubakar Danburam-Nuhu, who raised the historical motion accusing the Law School of infringing on Amasa’s fundamental rights.

Nonetheless, we wish to call the attention of the Committee on Justice and Judiciary which has been saddled with the task of unearthing the truth about this matter to the fact that AbdulSalaam Firdaus Amasa was not the only female Muslim law graduate whose Allah-given fundamental human right was violated on that day and at that event.

All the female Muslim law graduates who wore hijab to the event were forced to remove their hijab but one of them, Aisha Zubair by name, was treated like an ordinary criminal and subjected to public disgrace. She suffered serious psychological trauma which still haunts her to date as a result of being forced to appear ‘half nude’ in public. We must add here that an average female Muslim who is used to wearing hijab is naturally sensitive to being made to appear in public without it. It breaks them down emotionally.

In her own words, “My name is Aisha Zubair, i was called to the Nigerian bar on the 12th day of December, 2017 in the morning. Myself and some other sisters were on the queue together to enter the hall, at the entrance, the law school lecturer there demanded for our hijab, she asked that we remove both the hijab and the cap and give it to her. She demanded Same of those wearing ordinary cap too. We begged to go remove it properly in the toilet and she obliged. We were allowed to enter only when we had removed everything from our heads. When i went to my seat,i donned the hijab back on but i was approached about twice to remove the hijab, as other sisters were approached too. When the programme started, i put it back on, tucked it into the collarrete and placed the wig on it. When it was my turn to be called to the stage, I approached the stage with the hijab on, took a bow like everyone else but did not shake the hands of the bencher there. I was given my certificate like everyone else and I proceeded to my seat.


“When I got to my seat, a law school lecturer was waiting there and she started shouting at me and hurling insults at me for daring to wear the hijab in the hall saying I wanted to disgrace them.

“She demanded I remove the hijab and throw it on the floor which I did, then she started to rub the hijab on the floor, then she kicked it around several times before asking a guard to guard the hijab and not allow me retrieve it.

Then she came back with another lecturer to seize the certificate I had just collected from me saying it was order from above for doing what I did. I begged but they didn't listen. After the ceremony, I went to them and after so much pleas I was given back the certificate with a stern warning.”


MURIC takes serious objection to the treatment of Aisha Zubair. It is tyrannical, repressive and horrible. We urge the Committee on Justice and the Judiciary to consider this information during its investigations. The lecturer who traumatized this lady must be fished out and punished according to the law of the land. She has subjected Aisha Zubair to public opprobrium, inflicted emotional injury on her and assaulted her personal dignity. This action violates Section 34 (i) (a) of the 2011 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).


Not only that, she has provoked all Nigerian Muslims by treating the hijab in such a contemptuous manner. It is a hate action capable of igniting a monumental religious crisis whose outcome no one can predict. Only due punishment can satisfy Nigerian Muslims and calm frayed nerves. This law teacher is a disgrace to the law profession, a square peg in a round hole. She must be taught a lesson as a deterrent to many others like her. Nigerians look unto the Committee to save them from religious fanatics who stoke the embers of war. The honourable members cannot afford to disappoint the masses at this point in time.


Finally, we appeal to Nigerians who have been provoked by this ugly incident to exercise patience and wait for the House Committee on Justice and the Judiciary to submit its report. We urge members of the Committee to discharge their duties dispassionately and without fear or favour. Nigerians are waiting.

Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)

Behankey:
Have u been able to do that? Any headway?

The problem is from my phone.. Other phones are connecting with my Laptop via usb cable and I can't connect my phone to other laptops via usb cable.. That was why I came to the conclusion that the problem is from my phone. It seems it cannot be connected to systems via usb cable. I'm currently using Bluetooth, but I'll use Xender if I want to transfer big files.
Thanks a bunch

WaleOsu:
maa sha Allah...thanks brother...my point was of a general view,that it's better to avoid it than going through the stress of checking whether to take it or not...most muslims I know dont to to court,there was a time a land belonging to my dad was sold by someone else,lillahi wa rosul he left it to God and let it go rather than taking it to court even when he had valid documents...If any law is trying to supercede the law laid down by Allah,its better we distance ourselves from such law completely...and if a muslim feels cheated,he/she should leave it to Allah and let him judge...may Allah guide us,and judge us with mercy...thanks brother

JazaakumuLlohu Khairan Sir. May Allah bless you.

Sterope:
Are we talking about the same common law affects you as a resident/citizen of Nigeria or what? There isn't anything wrong in studying common law, you can always choose to specialise in areas that won't contradict your religion. You would be tried by the same law whether you are muslim or not.

The so called laid down rules are unconstitutional and goes against everything a liberal society proclaims. A government funded institution does not possess the power to make rules that harms a part of the society.


[size=8pt][/size]

Yes, you are right ma. It is not haram to study common law.

Praise be to Allaah.

Working as a lawyer is not haraam in and of itself, because it is not judging according to something other than that which Allaah has revealed, rather it is acting as a person’s deputy or representative in cases of dispute, which is a permissible kind of deputation or representation. But the lawyer must be careful and make sure of the case before getting involved in it. If it is a claim regarding some right that has been taken away in a wrong manner, then it is permissible for you to argue on his behalf to have his rights restored to him and the wrongdoing stopped. This comes under the heading of cooperating in righteousness and piety. But if the case involves taking away people’s rights and transgressing against them, then it is not permissible for you to act as his representative, because that comes under the heading of cooperating in sin and transgression. Allaah has issued a warning to those who cooperate in this sin, as He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Help you one another in Al‑Birr and At‑Taqwa (virtue, righteousness and piety); but do not help one another in sin and transgression. And fear Allaah. Verily, Allaah is Severe in punishment”
[al-Maa'idah 5:2].
To give you more peace of mind, we will quote fatwas from some of the scholars about this issue:
1 – Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked:
What is the Islamic ruling on working as a lawyer?
He replied:
I do not know of anything wrong with working as a lawyer, because it is acting as a person’s representative in claims and defence, so long as the lawyer seeks to do what is right and does not deliberately tell lies, as applies to all cases of representing or acting on behalf of others.
Fataawa Islamiyyah (3/5050).
2 –Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:
What is your opinion on my working as a lawyer, where I appear before the civil courts in order to defend civil and commercial cases in which there may be riba involved?
He replied:
Undoubtedly there is nothing wrong with one person acting on behalf of another in cases of dispute, but it depends on the type of dispute:
1. If the case is well founded and the representative is basing his case on facts that he knows, and there is no perjury, lying or trickery involved, and he is representing the person in order to present his proof and evidence as to the truth of his claim or to defend him, there is nothing wrong with that.
2. But if the dispute involves some false claim or speaking on behalf of someone who is in the wrong, then this is not permissible. Allaah said to His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning): “so be not a pleader for the treacherous” [al-Nisa’ 4:105] . We all know that if the case is a just one and he does not use any kind of lying or perjury, then there is nothing wrong with that, especially if the person is weak and cannot defend himself or establish his claim to what is his right. Appointing someone who is stronger than him to represent him is permitted in sharee’ah. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “But if the debtor is of poor understanding, or weak, or is unable to dictate for himself, then let his guardian dictate in justice” [al-Baqarah 2:282] . Acting on behalf of a weak person in order to ensure that he gets what is rightfully his or to ward off wrongdoing from him is a good thing. But if it is other than that, i.e., helping a person who is in the wrong or defending wrongdoing or using false evidence, and the deputy or representative knows that the case is basically wrong, such as representing a person with regard to something haraam such as riba, then it is not permissible. It is not permissible for a Muslim to act as a deputy or representative with regard to falsehood or to act as a lawyer in transactions that involve riba, because then he is helping in the consumption of riba and so the curse applies to him.
Al-Muntaqa min Fataawa al-Fawzaan (3/288, 289).
Secondly:
The fact that you live in a country that is not ruled in accordance with that which Allaah has revealed and is rather ruled by man-made laws, does not mean that it is haraam to work as a lawyer if the intention is to attain rights and ward off wrongs. The person who has been wronged is compelled by necessity to refer to these laws in order to attain his rights, otherwise people would wrong one another with impunity and chaos would overtake the society. But if the law gives him more than he is entitled to, then it is haraam for him to take it. He should only take what he is entitled to. If he refers for judgement to these laws in order to attain his rights and ward off wrongdoing, there is no sin on the one who has been wronged or on the lawyer who represents him in a dispute by referring to these laws for judgement. Rather the sin falls on the one who replaced the laws of Allaah with these laws and forced the people to refer to them for judgement. Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) referred to this in his book al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah (p. 185).
Hence we do not advise you to leave this profession, rather we advise you to carry on working in it, and to continue to advance by reading books and studying them, and learning from senior lawyers, for people need trustworthy lawyers who will defend them and restore their rights.
Your aim should always be to support and help those who have been wronged. There are glad tidings for you in the words of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): “Whoever walks with one who has been wronged until he establishes his rights, Allaah will make his feet firm on the Siraat on the Day when feet slip.” Narrated by Ibn Abi’l-Dunya and classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Targheeb .
And Allaah knows best.

Islamqa.info


cc WaleOsu

uvalued:
Wow I commend muric on this instead of shouting fire and brimstone, they have chosen the high way of reason and diplomacy instead of the rocky road of violence and blood. Kudos muric. Let other northern musli,m learn to put his displeasure in an amicable way like muric. On the hijab issue is it an issue for the bar I don't understand.

Yes, it is.

WaleOsu:
Thank you for this my brother...in cases where a muslim needs a lawyer,I believe he/she can go look for a non-believer lawyer who would take up his/her case for an agreed fee,it doesnt necessarily have to be a muslim lawyer...may Allah lead us to the right path...thank you once again my brother

Aaameen, thanks as well. In a case on the ownership of a land where a Mosque is built or a case between a group of Muslims and a group of Kaafirs, it is a Muslim Lawyer that'll be suitable to be on the Muslims side. There are many cases like that.

WaleOsu:
ofcourse they do,the principles of "their law" wasn't based on the basics of Islam...infact in my opinion,I believe law and constitution were coined by non-believers,so why should muslims believe in this same law and constitution (just my opinion anyway)...my point is that,there are alot of muslims who wanted to study law (my younger sister inclusive,she had to settle for mass communication),but they had to drop it because it doesnt accommodate the teachings of Islam completely...I'm sure she knew that,just as people like my sister had known

May Allah increase you in beneficial knowledge Sir.
Nigeria is a secular country and this is the reason why we Muslims have to recognize her constitution. A Muslim that goes against it would be dealt with as those who ensure the law is in order don't want to know whether you recognize it (the law) or not. As far as you are in this country, the law will get hold of you if you go against it. So in this case, we Nigerian Muslims have to recognize the constitution despite the fact that it was coined by people of other beliefs as you've said. It's not going to be a sin because we are not doing so out of our free will, something great led to it.
Talking about professions that won't allow you to practise the deen as you are supposed to, we have many professions like that but some of them are in a way such that some of us just have to go into them (I.e the professions). E.g Military Officer, Lawyer et all. We'll be made to suffer for it if we don't have some of us that are into these professions. Just imagine a situation where we don't have Muslim lawyers, who will work in our favour if there is a case that has to do with Islam?
In a situation whereby we don't have Muslim soldiers, Muslims will be marginalized by the Military in some situations. There are many ways where the boycott of these professions can cause us to suffer

While there are some that we have to distant ourselves with. E.g Female footballers, bet attendant, pork selling et all.
We won't be affected by distancing ourselves from these types of profession, so it will be haram for us to go into them (I.e the professions).

Your Ustadh is correct, we have to consider Islam before choosing a profession. But the thing is just that, there are some professions that are not in favour of Islam but we can't distant ourselves from them.
Thanks you

Modified: The study of common Law is not haram.

sorextee:
At least I like how u detailed this one.
Although its kinda strange, not accepting xmas gifts and all...

The Muslims in my area, or rather, my Muslim frnds that do come around during Xmas to celebrate with me, are u guys now saying they are not pious Muslims?
I still love my Muslim frnds tho cos we live like families. They aint fanatics like some haters here..

During sallah too, we invade their houses too, to eat and celebrate. That's the LOVE and ONENESS that Jesus said in the Bible.

I dnt know which one Islamic Allah is saying in the Quran sha.

Thanks Sir. It's not every Muslims that know about the permissibility, that's why we are doing a kind of enlightenment as Xmas is drawing closer. Many Muslims always assume its a normal thing. When I was in secondary school, I use to take meats to school for my classmates after Sallah and we use to collect Xmas gifts as well.. I was ignorant about the fact that the latter is not permissible. Your friends might not know about all these, so I can't say they are not pious.

yazach:
I don tell am tired but he be like your friend malvisguy

I even told him that he would never eat Ogun sacrifice food

I guess his moniker is the real problem here Dindondin:

Lol. Understanding is the most important thing here. I really like the moniker Dindondin.. I do hear names like that in my hood (Ajegunle).