₦airaland Forum

Kay 17: Its necessary for you to be direct and state your points clearly. What is the connection btw homosexuality and bestiality??

What is the connection between homosexuals and blacks, women, palestines, jews, dalits?

dayokanu: You asked him repeatedly for instances where people have been attacked for being GAYY

In NIGERIA!

In Ogbomosho!

Kay 17: I'm sorry, but I can't connect the dots btw necrophilics, bestiality and incest with homosexuality?!!

But you can connect it with blacks, women, palestines, jews, dalits etc?

Joker!

dayokanu: Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney today apologized for bullying and attacking a guy in High school on suspicion that the guy is GAYYY

Sho! Wetin you want make I do with that?

Kay 17: The common ground between homosexuals, slaves, blacks and women has the failure to recognize then as humans and appreciate the necessary rights resulting from just being humans.

What rubbish!

It is also easy for me to say:

The common ground between necrophilics, beastials, incestors, slaves, blacks and women has the failure to recognize then as humans and appreciate the necessary rights resulting from just being humans.

naijababe: Will make no difference whatsoever, it is sex education. It won't turn a straight child to g.ay or vice versa

No 1, I am not one of those in favour of sex education for kids pre-puberty. And even those post-puberty, I am only for the biological teaching, not sex education.

No 2, in most cases, it is just not sex education. It is indoctrination. It is promotion as a positive alternative. Not a neutral teaching. I abhor that for my child and I would not want to have my child miss education if I have to pull him/her out of the classes.

No 3, I would not wish my child to experiment with such disgust. Which is more likely if it taught as a positive as I said it would.

naijababe: Explain to me again how it's negative cos I sure don't get your point here, besides it already plastered on my TV and it still makes no difference to me

Watching men on TV kissing makes me retch and brings some bile to my throat. I will prefer I don't face that without having to restrict my TV viewing. I would rather restrict what is on my TV.

Secondly, it is also one of the promotional tools. Have you ever seen a Western programme where homosexuality is not shown in a positive light?

naijababe: Ask people who grew up in care, they'd kill to be raised and nurtured in stable and loving homes even if by g.ay parents

I disagree. Majority will kill to be raised in normal homes.

Secondly, you are missing the part of Kids that are allowed to be procreated into unnatural family units. What a hypocrisy by countries that claim to operate "in the best interest of the child". How is it in the best interest of the child to be created unnaturally and/or raised in unnatural families?

naijababe: Same way I can be sacked for being racist, sexist or ridiculing other religious views different from mine, ask Glenn Hoddle or Ron Atkinson, they both have first hand experience

I don't compare deviancy and perversion to natural things.

What next? Necrophilics and bestials will be comparing themselves to blacks or women's rights?

naijababe: I don't give a rat's ars/e if it happens in Nigeria and we can pretend all we want, it's not going anywhere especially in a pretentious and sanctimonious society like Nigeria, the earlier we all come to terms with it the better.

You don't give a rat's arse:

When it goes to your kid's school curricullum and teachers are forced to teach it in only bright terms, when it is plastered on your TV and other media as positive, when innocent children without being given choices are placed or allowed to be procreated in unnatural family units, when you can be sacked from your job for not approving of it, when you face calumny from the press for not supporting it then you would know it has something to do with policy?

Because that was my question, in case you misread it.

naijababe: Tell me which of the scenarios described in your post is not the case now?!

Not in Nigeria.

That is why I said: we should not give it an inch.

But lackadaisical attitudes and opinions like yours will not help. If majority of people have your attitude in Nigeria, we will have all that soon.

Are those things you are comfortable with in your society?

Henry40: I'm tired! This argument is starting to look shapeless to me.

Thanks for your time!!

I'm out!!!

I wish you were not tired and you could answer my "and so".

manny4life: You have not started yet, the master of all fuctards argues foolishly...


Talk about much of a skill at cutting and dicing people intellectually? Coming from someone who took to heels and cannot define homosexuality....


Define Homosexuality .... Master of all fucktards

person, ani ko shut up!

naijababe: +1,two consenting adults doing whatever to themselves in their bedroom! What that has to do with policy is simply beyond me

When it goes to your kid's school curricullum and teachers are forced to teach it in only bright terms, when it is plastered on your TV and other media as positive, when innocent children without being given choices are placed or allowed to be procreated in unnatural family units, when you can be sacked from your job for not approving of it, when you face calumny from the press for not supporting it then you would know it has something to do with policy.

dayokanu: So are the below normal and natural

Slaughtering animals

Polygamy

Flogging children

Religion which includes worshipping Trees and stones

All actions!

Naturality are impulses and desires.

Wanting to eat food is natural.

Desiring or being attracted to multiple partners is natural.

Anger is natural.

Desire for transcendental control when you lack control is natural when facing danger.

You need to understand the difference between naturality and activity. What you listed are activities that are some form of manifestation of naturality. Such manifestations are choices.

Henry40: How is it different? Firstly, Walking around nude is no different from using sexual profanities on live radio for the same reason --- it's insanely raw and sexually suggestive!!!

And so?

Are they harming anybody? So what if it offends you?

Henry40: Secondly, it leads to due inference as to the sanity of those involved, thus leading to the prompt move to get rid of the insane, and probably harmful man, as quick as possible. On the other hand, how harmful, insane or sexually suggestive can two men having a date be?

Are you having a laugh?

So nudists are insane people? If society does not ban it, only insane people would go out [i]n[/i]aked?

So insane people that are capable of harming do not wear clothes?

Are you having a laugh?

Henry40: "When? Where? How?" I won't believe you haven't heard of violence towards h o m o s e x u a l s in Nigeria before. If you'd really like to know if such exists, walk into a school of Higher learning and make some inquiries as to how such people are "dealt" with.

You said you have seen, I asked you "When? Where? How?", you start giving me tory.

Nigga, come on!

manny4life: ^^^

Particularly when you're the master, leader of all fucktards

You are a person!

And you are making your future punishment worse. You know I am skilled at cutting and dicing people intellectually? You are now my future permanent suya stand everytime I see you make your person opinions on NL!

Right now, this is what you should be doing:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj6_98tq4mY&feature=my_favorites&list=FLRUGdBFtrNhxxTkghQ0Qegg

You are roast!

dayokanu: I am not in any position to judge what normal and what is not. What I consider normal is a function of my environment I grew up in.

Like I said earlier in my village its normal and natural to slaughter animals in public glare, try that anywhere in America and you would land in jail.

Its normal for parents to flog children try that somewhere else and you land in jail.

Whats normal or natural is largely a function of the environment you grew up in. Someone who grew up in a mormon colony thinks Polygamy is normal and natural.

What and how you want to raise your kids is your business, I would prefer to raise my kids without them inhaling fumes from automobiles, with them doing frog jump and stool down whenever they err.

Thats what I prefer and I remains that MY PREFERENCE which cannot be forced down anyones throat.

Another thing I would personally prefer is to for everyone to submit their wives and prettiest daughters to me every night

Unfortunately for you, naturality is discernable. It is not a function of environment, it is a function of nature.

And unnatural things are normally banned.

Secondly, there are alot of things that are natural (unlike the unnatural homosexuality) that are actually banned. So it is ridiculous to tell me we are not allowed or it is wrong to ban something unnatural.

manny4life: When a slowpoke is smarter than you, you need to check on you intelligence...

Sifu of all fuctards... Define Homosexuality..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKUoVwr38JQ

You are a person! Accept your faith!

Henry40: First of all, being n u d e on the street is different from having a known-g a y couple walk down the street, free from harassment.

How is it different?

Henry40: Secondly, I've seen g a y guys that have been beaten to near-death conditions before, just for being g a y in their own privacy, and I'm not talking of those that I've heard of. So, how can you say they'll be free from disturbance if they keep it private, when they still get beaten, even after they've kept it private?

When? Where? How?

dayokanu: Who defines what is normal? Slaughtering animals publicly in Nigeria is normal but not in the West.

When 2 adults decide to SHAGGamu themselves behind closed doors, then its no ones business to judge whether its right or wrong

I asked you questions about your opinion:

Are you saying homosexuality is normal? Are you saying it is natural?

When 2 adults decide to bastardise each other in their bedroom, I will not give a toss. Unless they come and want to announce it to me, make me accept it as part of my society or raise my kids with it plastered around my society.

manny4life: Pain me for what... LOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL


On the contrary, I think I'm enjoying your gaffe... [size=16pt]STOP BEATING ABOUT IN CIRCLES AND DEFINE FOR ME WHAT "HOMOSEXUALITY IS".

By the way, you should say it pained you when I called your gaffe out... MY BAD BROTHER [/size]

person, shut up! You are daft.

I don't debate with moorons, I tell them what they are.

manny4life: I'm so laughing hard... Imagine someone who couldn't define what gay is showing me what I am. I think it's the other way around, I called your gaffe OUT IN PUBLIC.


Again, Sifu of all fucktards...

person! E dey pain you?

Let it pain you as much as your stewpidity pained me when I realised I was explaining simple things to a cretin.

Fool.

manny4life: Yeah, you are sifu of all fucktards... lol

Satisfactory? Oh yeah, to you who couldn't define something else other than fucktards...lol. like I said Sifu of all fucktards...

person, then thank me for showing you what you are and then shut up.

manny4life: Exactly! You've shown how intelligent you are and couldn't define "homosexuality"... If a dumb person is way intelligent than you, you intelligence is in big trouble o

You who has been talking, I sure can see all your argument from all side... My friend, keep talking and making a fool of yourself.

You are a person! I have defined that, is that not satisfactory for your self-discovery?

dayokanu: What qualifies as offensive and disgusting acts?

Do you know you slaughtering animals is an offensive act to some people? And is considered a disgusting act to some people if done in public or outside of slaughter houses?

Are you saying homosexuality is normal? Are you saying it is natural?

If people find slaughtering animals offensive then let them go and change the law.

manny4life: A person knows one, don't he? I mean wouldn't that explain why you know the definition


Leader of all fucktards on NL...

You are a dumb what?

You are a dumb fffucktard!

Shut up!

Henry40: And why can't a couple hold hands and walk down a road? Or is that too "mainstream"?

The same reason why you cannot go out na[i]k[/i]ed on the streets.

Henry40: Are you sure no one will disturb them? You talk like you don't know Nigerians. This new anti- g a y law by the Federal Government has now made it even worse.

How many gays were arrested in Nigeria between 1960 and 2000?

Are you saying there were no gays in Nigeria during that period?

Huh?

They kept it private and they were not disturbed.

dayokanu: If you go nude in public it offend others just like if you practise heterosexual sex in public

Now others are affected by your actions

Oops!

So people have the right to make laws based on their personal beliefs? Based on public offence? So why can't Sagamite object to offensive, disgusting acts being part of his society?

manny4life: LOL... After all your rantings and you could not define "homosexuality" you indeed are an almighty saga of NL ranting. Please, carry on with you gaffe...

You are a person!

That is the definition I am interested in.

dayokanu: Nudism is done in public. No one legislates against nudism done in the confines of your house

Why is nudism legislated against in public?

People have the right to choose what they want to be and you cant deny them their rights based on your own personal beliefs, is it not?

Henry40: I've never said h o m o s e x u a l i t y is not deviant, but it's solely within the realms of 2 adults fully qualified for a Constitutional Right to a Private Life!!!


Check Section 37 of the Nigerian Constitution.


As long as they're not s h a g g i n g themselves in Public, it's their private lives!!

Thank you.

It is deviant, so it should not be normated and put into mainstream.

If it is part of their private lives, they should keep it private and not be coming to ask for acceptance or recognition.

Worse still demand it is infused into school curricullum and nurture my kids for it to be seen as an alternative family structure. Or putting innocent kids into unnatural, deviant family structures.

If they keep it private in their rooms, no one will know, no one will disturb them.

manny4life: [size=16pt]Oops, I guess the ALMIGHTY KNOW IT ALL SAGA, could not define what homosexuality. That was a big gaffe on your part. AGAIN DEFINE HOMOSEXUALITY and quit bickering [/size].

The almighty Saga (the alpha and omega), prefers to call you a person than to engage in any debate with a cretin like you.

dayokanu: if your desires hurt another person then it cant be right

But when its between 2 consenting ppl then i dont see a problem

Jack is f**cking John, Why should sagamite be offended

What I asked you is: Why is nudism banned?

manny4life: Here we have excuses now "when people do not have access to opposite sex"... lol at excuses.

Again, [size=16pt]STOP BICKERING AND DEFINE HOMOSEXUALITY[/size]

Let me know what sexuality that isn't define by the behavior.

Shut the Bleep up! You are a cretin.

You are too stewpid to understand simple contexts. You think I have time to waste with moorons?

Henry40: If you'll compare a p e d o p h i l e to a g a y man, you might as well compare a Serial Killer or Robber to one!!!

Pedophilia is a crime, harmful and hurtful to others, H O M O S E X U A L I T Y IS NOT!!! No harm can come from 2 consenting adults doing whatever they want with their privates!!

Forget the act. Focus on the desire.

If a paedophile is turned on by a child and does nothing about it, you CANNOT arrest him. There is the desire and there is the act. So focus on the desires.

Is paedophilic desire a deviant desire?

[quote author=Tayo-D]@topic,

There is nothing like the right to marry - for gays or heterosexuals. The State as a matter of preference (not constitutional requirement), has decided to give special recognition to the relationship between heterosexuals because it is deemed vital to the sustenance and well-being of the society. Of what good is the union of two same sexes to the State? If the State must recognise homosexual relationships, then it must offer same recognition to other kinds of sexual relationships. If you want to expand the definition of marriage, why stop at just this one?[/quote]Thank you.

Don't mind them.

Will the same Obama agree with Polygamy?

dayokanu: Answer my question, Should we ban all religion since no one was born xtian, Moslem or pagan?

No, tell me why nudism is banned if, according to you, "People have the right to choose what they want to be and you cant deny them their rights based on your own personal beliefs".

dayokanu: People have the right to choose what they want to be and you cant deny them their rights based on your own personal beliefs.

We can as well claim all Hindu, xtians, Moslems (or whatever doesnt agree with your own beliefs) are demons and should be exterminated.

No one was born Xtian, Hindu or Mormon.

So why is nudism banned?

manny4life: [/b]
I will also make you understand yourself...

YES, they are. The behavior defines the sexuality, meanwhile, you talk about "gay" or "homosexuality" YET you haven't defined it in your own terms.

You are a cretin!

You failed even at the first question. You know I can not tolerate ediots, you are not new on this website, you know that.

When people have no access to the opposite s[i]e[/i]x and are sexually frustrated to resort to people of the same s[i]e[/i]x available, that does not mean they are gay.

Foool!