₦airaland Forum

butterflyl1on:
Facepalm or asspalm all you want . You were the one who said that atheists can believe in the supernatural but yet disbelieve in God who is also of a supernatural so quietly provide a list of supernatural things atheists can believe in and yet disbelieve in the existence of God who is also of the supernatural.

Rather than do this honestly and proudly you Bob and weave and your latest is now a facepalm?

Pity yourself and grow some sense will you? A simple list is all I ask or is that one hard again?

Hey johnydon22, stop insulting a person with a far superior intellect than yours. You are not playing fair as usual. Butterflyl1on is doing his damnedest to engage constructively, you and your primitive troop mess it all up. You have no conscience, what about the innocent Nairaland readers that strain to follow sensible dialogue?

johnydon22:
You waste your time trying to engage the guy or the other one butterfly..

A little dose of attention they run wild with mind blowing nonsense that you begin to wonder.

Its nothing short of insanity really.

When ever you get such quotes, simply ignore and continue with people who actually understands what the hell you are talking about..

I agree, you want Themonk to only engage with persons that agree with the crap he is spewing to unwary truth seekers. You are the same so you work hard to make others narrow minded. Stop behaving like a stuckup whiner. Get real dude.

Oh, Chose a real subject and engage the esteemed Butterfly1on if you dare.

johnydon22:
Lol.. You have not seen the worst of it yet...

I agree, tell him.

themonk:
Seriously, I decided not to engage religious people in any argument whatsoever some time ago because i find it difficult to reason with them but then when i saw "sciencewatch" as his moniker, i thought he might be a lover of science

Dont argue ! Arguments bring about complaining, We have not even started and now you quickly resort to complaining. Dont be a whinner Sir. Fight the good fight. Life is short.

johnydon22:
It doesn't take lunacy to win an argument, you just wear the other person out...

The antidote is: Ignore and talk with reasonable people.

The clamor for attention doesn't need to be fed..

I agree with you on the pity part, especially the butterfly guy who once created numerous alternate monikers to like his own posts.

You havent seen anything yet..

Themonk reminds me alot of you johnydon22, you want others to blindly accept what you say.
Just a little digging and you guys panic and run to your prophet Richard Dawkins.

themonk:
Seriously, I decided not to engage religious people in any argument whatsoever some time ago because i find it difficult to reason with them but then when i saw "sciencewatch" as his moniker, i thought he might be a lover of science and that i could reason with him a little, maybe teach him something and learn from him too. the first time he quoted me, he sounded hostile and i was like let me just calm down and explain to him he might understand but now i am so disappointed. . He just aims to win the argument and not to learn a thing, its sad. I pity him.

I am learning from you. You say, " the Agnostic Atheist dude dont know if God exist, but believes that he dont, based on "evidence." Which is just another fancy name for Atheist.

The Agnostic theist dude, dont know if God exists but believe he does based on "facts" they have seen. This is a confused believer.

It seems like many Low-level Atheists here, you have your nose too far up your ass, Sir.

themonk:
You cannot be reasoned with.
I made this as simple as possible for you to understand, all you do is call you fellow religious keypad warriors to engage me in an online brawl over something that doesnt pay me. Bro, if comprehension is your problem try and solve it, but if you wish to use irrational arguments to provide a psychological consolation to your brain which by its inability to reason defends itself from logical arguments, i can't go down the mud with you bro. Have fun.

AAaaaaah. one huge misunderstanding on you part Sir. There was no irrational argument only a kindly request for you to clarify your confusing position. Themonk, Why so overly sensitive ?

JackBizzle:
If the pool is empty, what was there to touch? See how daft you are?

Keep introducing strawmen. Focusing on the water.

If even it is empty, are the bricks/tiles invisible? Do invisible bricks make sense?

What is you problem Sir? Why attack Butterflyl1on's
simple and direct example when you let ButaAtum off the hook for seeing INVISIBLE PAVING at the back of the house. What was worse and extremely funny was when BudaAtum warned Butterflyl1on not to knock his head on the paving at the back of the house. The pool was in front of the house, so is Butterflyl1on so acrobatic that he can dive into a pool infront and knock his head at the back.

Please explain your position Sir.

butterflyl1on:


Too late, I just hit my head on an invisible pavement

LOL very loud. I am rolling off my chair from laughter. Lord have mercy.

themonk:
Agnosticism in itself is a position of knowledge.

Islam, buddism, Christianity are all in itself a position of Knowledge. What are the practical consequences for humanity?

What does Atheism, Agnosticism offer mankind?

themonk:
Agnosticism in itself is a position of knowledge.

If you are then an agnostic atheist, it means you accept you dont know if God exists but you believe he doesnt based on facts you've seen.

If you are an agnostic theist, it means you accept tou dont know if God exists but you believe he does based on facts youve seen.

Get it now?

With respect to you Themonk, This does not make sense. Everything you explained here clearly points to the dudes having beliefs. Vaxx, Butterflyl1on and Kingebukasblog will be able to help you on this simple issue.

You say, " the Agnostic Atheist dude dont know if God exist, but believes that he dont, based on "evidence." Which is just another fancy name for Atheist.

The Agnostic theist dude, dont know if God exists but believe he does based on "facts" they have seen. This is a confused believer.

Lord help me !

themonk:
Agnosticism in itself is a position of knowledge.

If you are then an agnostic atheist, it means you accept you dont know if God exists but you believe he doesnt based on facts you've seen.

If you are an agnostic theist, it means you accept tou dont know if God exists but you believe he does based on facts youve seen.

Get it now?

With respect to you Themonk, This does not make sense. Everything you explained here clearly points to the dudes having beliefs. Vaxx, Butterflyl1on and Kingebukasblog will be able to help you on this simple issue.

You say, " the Agnostic Atheist dude dont know if God exist, but believes that he dont, based on "evidence." Which is just another fancy name for Atheist.

The Agnostic theist dude, dont know if God exists but believe he does based on "facts" they have seen. This is a confused believer.

johnydon22:
You just got quoted twice for the same post by same dude.. More probably incoming..

You don't get the joke yet?

Clue = Madness.

I'll be counting mine..

He admire your unigue intelligence

themonk:
Agnosticism is a position of knowledge while atheism is a position of belief, how hard is it for you to understand?
Infact in reality everybody is agnostic (thats if we dont lie to oursleves) because the existence or non-existence of God is not known but is only either believed or not.

If you say you know God does not exist, you are a liar because evidence can only point you to belief God's non-existence same thing goes for people who say God exists. You cannot know, you can only believe or not believe based on facts you've seen.

All belief are born from a position of knowledge. So are you saying that Agnosticism is a position of knowledge, therefore they believe nothing?

Very strange species indeed.

butterflyl1on:
Dumbbizzle can you show me where ANYONE mentioned that there was WATER IN THE POOL?

all we have said is that there is an invisible pool. Asking the right questions would take you far but assuming dumb things without asking questions only show to everyone the level of your stupidity.

Regarding touching an invisible pool thanks also for calling budaatum a fool since he was the one who asked that I jump into the said invisible pool

I never hinted or suggested that. I am loving how you are slapping yourself and your colleagues and calling them fools. First it was deicide and now it's budaatum.

Good job

Have mercy on Jackbizzle, he was confused by BudAtums version that he saw Paving at the back of the house when there was no house only your INVISIBLE POOL. He ask you to jump in and that may have scared Jack.

JackBizzle:
Only a dumbfuk like you would ask to touch an invisible pool.

Seriously, the moment my friend tells me that he has an invisible pool, he is heading in a bundle to a psychiatric home. Weere.

Has water ever been invisible? Why are you even bothering to ask to touch an invisible pool? Are you daft?

That is nasty to your own friend Sir. I told you earlier that I had just touch an imaginary pool. I am scared now.
I recommend that you develop your imagination, just look at how far your prophet of Atheism Richad Dawkins got by using his imagination. He imagined the all of Christianity will be destroyed by 2015. He imagined that only men will marry men by 2016.

Dawkins got Finland to join in on the imaginary game of allowing women to marry women, Now it is all legal.
So you see old chap, it all starts with imagination.

JackBizzle:
Only a purposeful dumbfuk like you would think of touching an invisible pool.

Only a fool that believes in an invisible God could come up with touching an invisible pool.


Cc hopefullandlord, johnydon22

Jackbizzle please pull yourself together Sir. There are lots of quests watching you.

Let me present another perspective on the esteemed Butterflyl1on;s example for the sake of simplicity. Your insults to Butterflyl1on, did it come from your invisible mind? Did you feel your invisible insult?

To prove you wrong, I just touched an INVISIBLE POOL. Why cant you ? Do you have problems with your invisible imagination?

hopefulLandlord:
the dude started his second reply with the word "Firstly"

My mistake. Thanks.

butterflyl1on:
They would say that it's an evolved deviant and that man was on the verge of an evolutionary branching out towards hermaphroditic tendencies and self pleasure but that they are still searching for the missing links and fossils but have the finished evolved specie in form of this skeleton with an electronic dongle and this discovery was carried out by an atheist anthropologist in the year 2042.

Shew! You will make a good Anthropologist. Yes the electronic Dongle/peniss in the skeletons vaginal region would mislead many a honest scientist Sir. If they found Richard Dawkins publications, they found the missing link

vaxx:
These two point got me nauseating.....my Christmas chicken sir...... i prefer the laps

It is good to hear you are still feasting on yesterdays roast. I apologize for sending Dawkins dirt to your feast.

Enjoy!

butterflyl1on:


Too late, I just hit my head on an invisible pavement

Lol damn loud. Ahahahah, AAaaaaaaaah !

butterflyl1on:
They would say it is a relic of a space rock.

Stay focused Butterflyl1on. You are also speaking for the benefit of accidental creatures of the Evolution Sir. Would Anthropologists not be correct if the published their finding that that skeleton with the electronic Dongle/peniss is a product of the Big Bang and Evolved to that advance state with the help of Atheism.

butterflyl1on:


To see what budaatum is seeing for him especially you need to downgrade a tad bit.

Thanks Butterflyl1on, good advice is always welcome. I will remember to go to the level of the one seeing imaginary bricks and warning you of the dangers.

Watch out for your head, warns BudaAtum!

[quote author=vaxx post=63630540][/quote]I am sorry Sir. I just had to bring these nauseating activities to your attention. I think the world renowned leader of Atheism should apologize to you too.

Richard Dawkins is very proud of what he is offering the world. Can you imagine the future Vaxx? What is a thousand years from now Anthropologist examine a skeleton with an electronic Dongle/peniss inside it? Will the conclude that it is from the species Homo-erectus?
BudaAtum strangely imagined something while debating Butterflyl1on here. I wonder what will those same Anthropologists say if they
found BudaAtums paving but no pool.

hopefulLandlord:
this is a good idea

Firstly, COMPLIMENTS OF THIS AWESOME SEASON SIR.
With all due respect Sir, are you saying BudaAtums recovery is a good idea. Come on. BudaAtum is clearly wrong. There is no paving at the back of the house. He now agrees that he could have been wrong. Which can only be admired. But his idea is wrong. His facts contradict his original perspective of where he positioned himself at Butterflyl1on;s INVISIBLE POOL.

hopefulLandlord:
this is a good idea

Come on. BudaAtum is clearly wrong. There is no paving at the back of the house. He now agrees that he could have been wrong. Which can only be admired. But his idea is wrong. His facts contradict his original perspective of where he positioned himself at Butterflyl1on;s INVISIBLE POOL.

budaatum:
No, I just don't see an invisible pool but seeing whatever may be there. Bit I might be wrong. So dive into you invisible pool and lets see what happens to your head.

Is the festive season getting the better of you Sir.
You may be telling a white lie here. If there admit that you dont see the INVISIBLE pool, tell us how come you can see whatever else may be there ? I say to you Sir, that it is impossible for you to see the paving at the back of the house in question, when you were trying to observe the esteemed Butterflyl1on's invisible pool in front. Hai kona !

budaatum:
Where's the evidence for the report you promised to get me?

I notice you trolling and happily posting your demands everywhere.
I have no problem with that. Where is your evidence that there is paving at the back of the house? Yet it was very clear that Person A was diving into into the INVISIBLE pool at the front of the house. It is FLAKKA symptoms sir.

budaatum:
Where is the evidence you promised me please?

I have no problem with that. Where is your evidence that there is paving at the back of the house? Yet it was very clear that Person A was diving into into the INVISIBLE pool at the front of the house. It is FLAKKA symptoms sir.

butterflyl1on:
The key word is INVISIBLE!

the moment person A said to person B that there is an INVISIBLE pool at the back of his house, logic should first of all prevail on person B to ask a simple question like " IF THE POOL IS INVISIBLE THEN HOW WERE YOU ABLE TO SEE IT"?

that should have been the logical approach first presented and not an immediate "SHOW ME I WANT TO SEE IT" approach.

Person B showed how dumb he was by not first logically asking for the right parameters to put in place so he too can see this INVISIBLE pool despite knowing that he has NEVER seen anything invisible in his life.

Person A speaking so confidently of what he knows and sees and person B not being able to rationalize it in his mind does not mean person A is lying or being delusional. Perhaps it just might be person B who has not upgraded enough to see what person A sees.

So are you implying that I am not upgraded enough to see what Budaatum saw at the back of the imaginary house - the paving?

butterflyl1on:


He is seeing a non existent paving WHEN THERE IS NONE.

you just killed me here with laughter my bro.

Sorry Sir, I did not mean to make you laugh. BudaAtum is serious about that paving Sir.
I wont say more, he threatened to ban me for speaking the truth about atheism.

vaxx:
Unintelligent and foolish argument posed by atheists that must end before the 2017 Gregorian calender finally comes to an end.

(1) The universe was accidentally created....

(2) There is no scientific proof of the existence of God, therefore no God.......

(3) Life purpose has no meaning


(4) Atheism stand as a better alternative to religion....


(5) Attacking an individual instead of the religion he or she practised.....

(6) Religion is the cause of war.....


We say No to barbaric argument. .


Using this opportunity to wish nairaland Christians a happy Christmas.....

HAPPY CHRISTMAS TO YOU AND THE FAMILY.
I have to respectfully agree that these are barbaric Atheist arguments Vaxx. Your point No 4 highlights the insanity of Atheism.
The "alleged" findings that Atheism is a mental disease suddenly spring to mind. Only a mad man can say, " Atheism provides a better alternative to religion.

Lets examine only one example of what Atheists mean when they say they have something better to offer humanity;

The modern day prophet of Atheism, Richard Dawkins has engineered the bleak future of Finland. Now children under 13yrs can never be taught about God or enter a church, but they encourage Men who lustfully penetrate other men's excrement to now LEGALLY Marry.

Now women can also marry women. Sales of battery operated Dongles/plasic joysticks is projected to be a top seller in Finland because of the modern prophet of Atheism's Satanic influence in this unsuspecting country.

This brief example points to evidence that Atheism is founded on destructive Satanic spiritual forces. Atheism has been pressuring sane humanity to accept Satanic practices as normal, child pornography, anal sex, men marrying men, women marrying women, the destruction of all sacred doctrines and many more.

To avoid tiring the genuine truth seekers here, we can expand all the other powerful points you made above.