₦airaland Forum

Ikio:
maybe u don't knw U.S/WEST WAR TECH ARE THE BEST EXPECIALLY IN SHOOTING DOWN MISSILES, even thaad are far better than russian s-400, arrow-2 and 3 u.s helped israel to build it.SM-6,SM-3 ARE D BEST IN D WORLD are too good Electronic warfare .u.s don't test missiles alot again they just have 2 types of ICBM.

Lol... Again big lol... Lol again..
Ok lets even check the official capability of S-400 and THAAD.

The S-400 is capable of hitting targets at a height of up to 300 kilometers (186 miles). Its second distinctive feature is fire-and-forget capability. Its missiles are fitted with a homing device which can lock on a target and destroy it. Unlike US systems THAAD, the S-400 does not need to track the target.

S-400 is the only missile complex in the world capable of hitting targets located beyond the horizon. (HONESTLY THAAD NO GET THIS LEVEL)


What is THAAD range ? 200km ? (Another trick the bully always use to sell junk, they will tell you it's classified lol, mad people)

Meanwhile lets check the existing ones and how it has managed to shoot down anything.. Pariot is actually not patriotic one bit. It could not shoot down outdated soviet built Squad missiles. The one fired recently from Yemeni was unable to intercept it. Even though the saudi wahabist and jihadist warlord claimed Patriot shut down one Squad missile..

In a theoretical combat Israeli Arrow was built specifically to track and shoot down NATO most feared missile, Isklander.. The simple truth is, that can never happen because Isklander is just too smart a missile to be tracked and intercepted.

If we are talking of big boys making missiles or anti-air missile dont ever mention Israel. You need to grow up to understand the big boys making missiles, Russia is number 1 when it comes to making missiles. (Anything ur brainwashed U.s makes, Russia already made it times 4 of that k.. Just check the father of all bombs compared to your brainwashed Mother of all bombs. Very good example) You want another good example ?

Even the SM-6 designed to shoot down cruise missile cannot be compared to S-300vm (Russian made to shoot down cruise missiles)

Evidence1000:
So we still have people like this in the world of civilization today? This might be one of the reasons why Christ is yet to come.

Which propaganda christ ?? You mean European (Isese) civilization to come to them ? Have they told you they are not doing good and happy with what they have at the moment? Pls they dont need a paper fiction Christ. The one that came to Nigeria, how many ppl has it help ? Is there 24/7 light, 24/7/365 days internet access (Not the rubbish data they lobbied for to continue enslaving you) good roads, Health care, Social security to mention a few ? Is Gas running 24/7/365 days in your homes ? This is what the real owner of the Christ ideology has in their homes but at the helms of your own stupidity at maximum level for shortchanging your own Isese to there..

Same thing applies to all industries and even the petro-dollar economy speaks volume of how enslaved you are as a country economically to theirs.. Is there a way out ?

vantage001:
Really?
So if the US fires 100 Nukes and 73 goes through, you will still call that a super system?
Have you checked the success rate of the iron dome?

Another Ode talk, this is why i dont like talking to kids on here. The Russian s-300 and s-400 systems while they do have anti cruise missile capability, are not made specifically for that. What is made specifically for firing down cruise missile flying at low orbit is S-300Vm and there was no report of any missile being fired from it. While U.S also has this a specific system design t also intercept Cruise missiles. Comparing Iron dome to s-300Vm ? Are you insane ? Iron Dome that is only shooting down hamas Rockets.. Unguided Rockets, is this one ok at all ? Just like firing stone, and shooting it down. You know where it will land.

Aphrygian:
you better leave the guy, the guy does not no that the s400 is a liability when it comes to detecting and firing at low flying objects which the tomawhack missiles are. Thats why usa didnt use jets to deliver the missiles because that area is covered by the s400.

S-300VM built to shoot down Cruise missile can detect and shoot Tomawhack down but that would escalate the war more in Syria ok. Russia in Syria as it is now is not there to escalate it's there to kill the Terrorist the west is also trying to kill (So when they change it, cos that tomawhack provocation will also meet the right one the same way Turkey met the right answer after shooting down SU-24. Now let me answer the next copy and paste from you.

Aphrygian:
However, President Trump gave the Russians advanced notice of the attack before the 1,450kg missiles struck the air strip.
Russia deployed the advanced air defence systems after a Turkish F-16 shot down a Russian Sukhoi-24 bomber in November 2015 after it encroached Turkish airspace.
Following last night's devastating attack, Russian politicians claimed their service personnel were being kept save by the S-400 and the older S-300 air defence systems.
Viktor Ozerov of the Russian upper house defence and security committee told Sputnik: 'Regardless of today's US attack on the Syrian air force air base, our air base [in Latakia] and logistics centre in Tartus are secured from the sea and from the air by S-300 and S-400 systems.
The Russian Defence Ministry claimed it may improve protection of Syrian airbases following the attacks.
According to The Aviationist , the Tomahawks flew straight through the 'Missile Engagement Zone' covered by Putin's 11,000mph Growler missiles.
Syrian sources suggested only some 30 of the Tomahawks failed to hit their targets, but the US insists all the weapons were successful.
Russian military sources claim their advanced air defence systems can protect against incoming missiles and aircraft - including stealth jets - however, they have not been tested against US equipment.
Andrei Kortunov, director of the Russian International Affairs Council told the Interfax News Agency: 'The risks of a direct military confrontation of Russia and the U.S. have risen significantly. Whether or not it could lead to WW III depends on how responsible the leaders are.'this is from daily mail.

Yes, this is actually true in BOLD above (Rest fake news as usual from the Propaganda west at large). Let me explain to you what that means. It simply means Russia in the event of further provocation from the west, it will transfer more powerful Anti-Air defense system to Syria. The same way Russia Used Turkey shooting down SU-24 as the reason to arm Russian forces in Syria with all the defense systems you have in Syria now protecting Russian forces for now.. When SU-24 was being shut down, there was no S-400 and SU-35 armed with Air to Air missile in Syria until Turkey decided to up the War.. In the History of SU-35, it has never been shut down. Just to tell you, Turkey will never dare SU-34 with its outdated F-15/F-16


Now the same thing Russia is suggesting is, they will now start arming Syria with those Anti-missile systems if U.S want to continue. It just makes super sense since U.S(its illegal and uninvited coalition of 76 countries) is not fighting Russia directly in Syria but fighting Assad. Now it will also make super sense and at the right time for the same Russia to say. We will be transferring these missiles to Syria to protect itself but Russians wont be firing those missiles. Ok (That would mean Russia started 3rd world war ok.)

Same way, vise versa.. If Russian fired a missile and U.S decided to shoot it down, it would mean the same thing and the start of real 3rd world war. So get this simple terrain of war kid and grow up already.

The use of Tribe is highly derogatory and should not be used or otherwise be banned in 2017 already. It's just like saying Yoruba is a Tribe?? That is completely wrong for whatsoever reason, be it geopolitical reason or just being unspeakable about the race. The Yoruba is a race, an Ethnic group. So please stop using that demonic word Tribe even against any group you know little or nothing about its history.

I just give u a very good example of this derogatory terms used by the foolish European thieves. "There are many 'tribes' in Native America..."

Oh really ?? But those ones who relocated to the America cannot be regarded as tribes abi.. Therefore they defined tribe as a group of backward barbaric people who goes against the European kind of (Isese) Civilization or ideology.

Well, the good news here is those who did that live more peacefully than the later. They dont get to worry about most things that we are worried about today. They may be backward in some aspect but they surely are doing good and pretty much better than what the modern day has turned to.. A pure threat to everything that lives on earth.

Aphrygian:
i just laff at zohariel every time he dishes out his propangada on weapons that has not been tested in real war situations.Lols

I dont like how ppl reason like dummies.. In Ukraine, Torka U was fired by the craze in Kiev and it was shut down/intercepted. Everything has been tested and that was Ukraine for you ok. The Obama did test everything and honestly what they will get is in Syria is Donbass 2.0. where nothing flies and Syrian Arab army continues to make huge advances. The simple truth again is Americunt soldiers cannot fight without air-cover.

Imagine a system capable of shooting down Oka and Torcka U ballistic missile. Speed of Tochka U 1.8 km/s (1.1 mi/s; Mach 5.3)

What is the speed of that junk jet again ? Continue guessing is idea to sell another junk jet.

I just checked he date of the post self. Has the U.s managed to get any head as to hw mr capable Russia is ?? The answer is big yes and no. Russia does not make noise, they just get the job done. This is not propaganda, it not hear say. Russian systems (I dont know which one did but i am sure that system in Syria as we speak) intercepted Tochka U 1.8 km/s (1.1 mi/s; Mach 5.3) in Ukraine.

Aphrygian:
[s] Online after the us attack on the airport and the isreali airstrikes syrians were asking what the work of the s400 is. [/s]

Another dumb post. There was no single report even in your dumb propaganda media about any S-400 missiles being fired to intercept the outdated tomahawk missiles. By the way out of 59 fired, only 22 managed to get to the Airfield. Where did the rest go ?

59 Cruise missile is a huge attack that would set everything in the airfield there burning.. Is that the damage a 59 missiles would do ??
Shake head for the bully. Very empty indeed..

Meanwhile any system that can alter 59-22= 37 missiles is a super system... Again super system by any standard.

The Neocon-zionist-salafist-takfiri-mujadeen-bokoharam Empire was not invited in the first place to bomb anything in Syria. They are close to that era where nothing flies in Syria. Donbass 2.0

Op - It's the illegal coalition airplane of 67 countries lead by the U.S. Not just U.S airplanes alone.

Maduro will crush these globalist protesters. Using the same tactics (Colour revolution) everywhere else cannot work in Vene.. Vene is like Nigeria.. When it gets to this moment in Naija na Army dem go use...

Jokul:
Smh scully you get time!.

I get time once in a while @Jokul . It's good to school some very uninformed mofos. Just once in a while. The nonentities above have not added any value to this post or anything educative or informative except acting like the crook they always do. I really dont have time answering less Educated mofos and mostly kids on Foreign Affairs category.

Ppl/mofos that needs their brains to be removed and repackaged !

kelvine:
Even religion/belief is a function​ of choice, I chose what has been working for me not what tradition demands​.
I am happy with your choice for you.
For me Jesus is my choice.

let me tell you your short history or that of the Yoruba (very similar to other African Nations too being invaded by European troopers) . If not for the fall of Oyo empire, which is only a century ago, the majority in Yorubaland would be followers of IFa. The Fulani terrorist backed by the brits was used to weaken Oyo empire. Oyo as at the time could not protect the tradition of the ppl of Oyo so it became British protectorate state ( a puppet state) and that gave the missionaries the green-light to brainwash the poeople of oyo against their tradition.

What you call religion today is the tradition of a particular region. Tradition is the culture left over by your great grand father, your ancestors. The throne of Ooni of ife is only and should only be a custodian of Ifa but not that of a mere Anglican british state. ok

This is why you are suffering and still continue to suffer. because you have leaders who do not have your direct interest first.

kelvine:
I rather be dethroned than renounce Jesus.
God bless Ooni for his faith in Jesus.

A foreign jesus ? white smelly pigs' ideology ?? What happened to your own roots ? Some people want Nigeria to move forward ? Have you ever been out of Nigeria before to see other people's tradition and how they are managing themselves and promoting their tradition and everything theirs? ? Trust me if we were living during the days of Greek empire, you would surely change that name jesus for zeus.

https://ooduarere.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ooni_OF_IFE_abormination-532x330.jpg
According to OBK, (a social media critic and activist) he feels the Ooni of ife is not worth the throne he's sitting on and has this to say about the recent fracas between the Oba of lagos and the personality siting in the throne of Ooni Ile ife. See what he has to say bellow.

"Don’t defend Ooni for being disrespected by another fellow King. This Ooni, believes Jesus, a Jew that was nailed to a cross by Pharisees and their Roman invaders and conqueror, was his spiritual ancestor. Why sit on a spiritual throne of your ancestors, your royal highness doesn’t embrace in faith and in fate?"

Ooni ! Why do you expect other kings to hand over their respect to you and honor you like Odudwa ? Charity should begin at home in Ile Ife not in Lagos (Eko Ile).
Respect the throne your father sat on. By sitting on it today without second guessing the spiritual credibility of those who once fought, preserved and died to defend it for you today.

“Jesus is your father?” You made that statement sometime ago. Jesus in Ile Ife? Jesus father was Joseph, not Oduduwa. His mother was Maria. What is the relationship with Israel or Jews? Decolonize yourself Ooni, by reading more. Until you take back that statement publicly, every other King will continue to disrespect your crown.
This is not a curse. You are reaping what you have sown. Kabiyesi O!

Obk !

Ikio:
It is more sane for u.s to have nukes than N.korea.Come daht why i said i don't read and understand rubbish N.K leader is a dictator holding weapons of mass destruction, is region is unstable becos of him,N.K have being sanctioned for years now becos of nukes, citizens of N.korea are poor because of the sanction.

I shake head for you. NK has light more than Nigeria that is not sanctioned for some time now. Which country do you think is better off ? NK or Nigeria ? The region is unstable ? Lol, there is cia fake book,cnn propaganda and all the western media crookie media lies in your dead brain cells..

Again how many terrorists are shooting anyone in South korea or North Korea ? How old are you ?

Update from the Empire itself, of what recently happened in Syria and one of many of what Russia is capable of doing with its powerful jammer(s), continue reading bellow. Beware of Propaganda from the western news media (Always telling half truth baked with lies and deceit)

Russians forcing RAF to abort missions in Syria by ‘hacking into’ their systems
https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/78/590x/RAF-russia-hacking-syria-bombing-754236.jpg

RUSSIAN electronic units are forcing RAF bomber crews to abort missions over Syria by hacking into their systems, sources revealed last night.
It is thought the attacks may be aimed at causing aircrews to hit wrong targets, leading to collateral damage in a bid to undermine Britain’s mission.

The news emerges as Russian premier Vladimir Putin stands accused of using increasingly sophisticated technology to launch cyber attacks in the US.

At least three sorties, two involving RAF Tornadoes, the other a Typhoon, were hacked over the last few weeks.
In two cases, the attacks were successfully intercepted by RAF weapons aircrew. However, both missions had to be aborted to void the possibility of bombs landing on incorrect targets.

In another case, a bomber was hit 30 seconds after it had already accurately dropped its payload, rendering the attack useless.

The incidents were witnessed by the crews of nearby Awacs surveillance aircraft.

Russia doesn’t care about collateral damage in Syria.
Air Commodore Dai Whittingham

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/78/590x/secondary/Russia-hacking-789496.jpg

Last night experts suggested that the attacks were disrupting the way RAF bombers were receiving GPS coordinates for targets on the ground, a “known vulnerability” which Russia is capitalizing on with what US Gen Ben Hodges recently described as an “eye watering” array of electronic jamming and disruption equipment.

These include the 1RL257 Krasukha-4 ground-based electronic warfare system,, photographed at Syria’s Hmeymim airbase last year.

Though ostensibly designed to provide Russian troops and bases with a shield against electronic warfare attacks, the mobile unit has the ability to launch long-range attacks of its own.

Russia is using Syria as a real-time testbed to trial sophisticated electronic warfare equipment capable of hacking into Nato systems.


“It is entirely feasible that Russia has targeted Tornadoes and Typhoons in this way,” said air defence expert Justin Bronk, of the Royal United Services Institute think-tank.

“The Russians are well aware that they simply cannot match Western precision-guided munition technology, and they cannot match us one-to-one.

“But Russia also knows that Britain’s ability to deliver guided munitions depends on access to GPS in the target area and good communications, so they have developed equipment to jam and interrupt both. They are very, very good at this.”

The RAF uses two type of targeting system, laser and GPS. While Laser is more difficult to jam, GPS is often preferred.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/78/590x/secondary/Russian-hacking-raf-789497.jpg

“GPS coordinates come from Combined Air and Space Operation Centre in Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, where they are checked off against a list of known red flag targets such as schools, and hospitals. It’s much easier to do this if GPS is being used to guide munitions, rather than laser,” he added.

When pilots are given new targets mid-flight, the GPS coordinates are transmitted by Awacs or River Joint reconnaissance aircraft. It is these signals that are being disrupted.

Moscow has already shown it is willing to use this technology in the Ukraine, where troops found phones and radios jammed for hours at a time. It has also targetted at least three UAV surveillance drones belonging to the Organization for Security and Cooperation, which were rendered blind and forced to return to base, as well as US drones.


“It entirely plausible that RAF aircraft have been targeted in this way, possibly because they wanted to see what they could do, or possibly to cause collateral damage,” said Air Commodore Dai Whittigham, who formerly commanded E-3D AWACS squadron.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/78/590x/secondary/russia-raf-jammingn-789693.jpg
Russia is clearly unconcerned about causing collateral damage by using this jamming tactic

“The problem with GPS is that the signal is very weak –it comes from a satellite in space – so it is considerably easier to hack or jam.

“If you interfere with the aiming system of an aircraft you have to be comfortable with the knowledge that it may cause unintended damage. We have seen that Russia doesn’t care about collateral damage in Syria.

“Crews are all trained to deal with electronic interference, as these cases have shown, though, of course, the missions were still aborted. In one way, then, they were successful.

“But fundamentally it shows that the UK is being responsible in taking no chances that ordnance is going to be dropped in the wrong place.”

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/754236/russia-raf-bombers-syria-hacking-missions-military-army

unclezuma:
Count how many US Allies and NATO members are sharing the Black Sea with Russia and how many has had "incidents" with Russia.
This is not even an exhaustive list.

Please let's end this back and forth I'm off to work.

lol.. You said U.S Allies. Again i like to be very straight. I call them U.S permanent puppets, check my signature to understand wella. Yes, U.S permanent puppets but not U.S..

There is huge difference between U.S.A and its puppets.. Ok.

The fact remains U.S traveled thousands of miles from its own territory to another big power's territory and Russia did not bow to any of such provocative act. The Iranians too would not bow.

I think there is even a treaty limiting countries that are not in the black-sea to over stay in the black sea but that is not even the issue here. The issue is the timing of the provocative act perpetrated by the U.S

unclezuma:
Asking where the black sea shows you actually don't understand what buzzing means.

Invade is actually a strong word.
You only buzz what you intend to attack or deter; please refrain from insulting my intelligence with your reference to a geopolitical matter; the only individual I'd accept a professional opinion from with reference to electronic warfare and countermeasures is Tdayof.

It only takes a crazy and irrational mind to do what they do, that's their MO and I'll not be dragged into a geopolitical argument.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/full-list-of-incidents-involving-russian-military-and-nato-since-march-2014-9851309.html%3Famp

Please read the above and be enlightened.

You used the word 'Provocative' here which is more tied to geopolitics. There is one thing i like each time i analyse anything. I always love someone saying the truth without being biased. A warship harmed with tomahawk cruise missile and Aegis traveled thousands of miles to the shorelines of Russian Crimean peninsular just at the time the Crimeans voted to reunite with their Parent country and the Russians decided to defend the crimeans fate. What could be more provocative than what the U.S did as at the time, was it coincidence ?

Was it trying to flex its muscles ? Oh no the truth is, U.S was more provocative here and I like how tdayof even explained it above.
Invading is wrong word abi, but Russian provocative action/Buzzing is the right word/?

Please i don't like to deal with hypocrites! You travel thousand of miles to another country's backyard with armed to the teeth warship.. That is invading. Now invading here now depends on how you use it. The warship was not given any chance to even fire a missile so this kind of invading is without much Ado. And im very right with Invading another foreign country's territory. Same thing happened in Iranian water when it arrested American invaders and one of them turns out to be crying. You would surely call what Iran did Provocative too but American going to other ppl's waters is surely not provocative ?? Right

unclezuma:
That 2014 incident is a funny Russian propaganda. It's just discipline and rules of engagement that prevent US Warships from turning these provocative attitude into a full-scale war.

No aircraft can carry deploy an ECM capable of neutralising an battleship with collateral damage to its own systems.

RT and Fox at their best, good post BTW.

I disagree with that part you said 'collateral damage to its own systems.'.. Well, it all depends on the design pretty much possible to have more powerful countermeasure so as not to have 'collateral damage to its own systems'...

Did you say provocative attitude ? Who is the Provocateur here ? U.S invading black sea ? In all the countries in the Black sea U.S is not among any one of them. Do you know where the black sea is ?

https://ooduarere.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Khibiny.png
The Russian Electronic Warfare Troops celebrate a holiday. 113 years ago, during the Russo-Japanese War, the first operation in world history was undertaken to suppress the enemy’s communication channels with the help of radio interference.
Our REW troops can detect and neutralize any target from a ship's system and a radar, to a satellite. Alexander Minakov saw the troops' work, which don't need ammunition for victory. This usual suitcase is one of the latest developments of specialists in electronic warfare. A small jamming device with a poetic name Lesochek suppresses radio control channels with explosive devices.


Now, this is the most effective complex for protection against radio-controlled landmines. Military conflicts of recent decades in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, and Syria very clearly showed what happens to countries that don’t have an effective electronic warfare system. Russia has such a system. Its main task is to cover command posts, anti-aircraft defenses, troops, as well as important industrial, administrative and political facilities. For this, complexes have been developed that suppress spy satellites, ground-based radars, and AWACS-type aircraft systems.


Russian specialists managed to make an incredible breakthrough. This became clear after the episode that occurred in the Black Sea exactly three years ago. Back then, the Russian front-line bomber Sukhoi Su-24 flew several times around the American destroyer Donald Cook, equipped with the most modern air defense system Aegis. This is how one of the crew members of the destroyer described these events in social networks. We watched the Russian on our locator until he reached the kill zone, to then "shoot him down." But when he entered the damned zone, mysticism began. Our locators were the first to go out, and then the whole Aegis went out. The pride of our fleet became our shame! The US military didn’t know that the Russian aircraft was equipped with the latest electronic warfare complex Khibiny.

**SideBar: I love that name Khibiny. In Yoruba, it sounds like 'Ki Binu' i.e 'it doesn't get mad' - For real, it does't get mad, super highly defensive and offensive weapon. Defensive, in the sense that it will block the ability of an enemy vehicle/weapon/radar to see or calculate the location of the Lord's fire. Offensive, it allows the Lord's carrier(SU-34) of this beautiful Khibiny complex to fire and destroy the threat coming from the enemy vehicle.


As soon as the pilot realized that he had been spotted, he switched on the equipment, and powerful radio-electronic waves deactivated the whole ship's systems. This is the Murmansk complex, which controls the space in the short-wave range within a 5,000 kilometer radius. It’s at these frequencies that communication is conducted between the NATO headquarters in Europe. Electronic warfare is in non-stop mode.
Now, a reconnaissance plane has approached the Russian border and is conducting radar reconnaissance of our territory. The operator, seeing this source, conducts an analysis of it from his work station. After this, Sergey Kureshov, the battalion commander, gives the order to send the data to the command post. A signal is received from the control point, and we are able to influence it from here. Russian specialists have already developed complexes that allow them to create, for example, a dome of radio electronic jamming over the area of air defense facilities. This is a kind of an invisibility cap from the enemy’s radar. And now, the Pentagon beats the alarm. Russian electronic weapons completely paralyze the functioning of American electronic equipment installed on missiles, aircraft, and ships.


The development and testing of the newest models of complexes takes place at the Center for Training and Combat Use of REW Troops. Here, there is a unique simulator, which simulates the work of all the complexes. With the help of open sources and other available means, we study the military regulations of a probable enemy and on the basis of this data we model the situation that is relevant at the moment. Experts are sure that in modern wars, electronic warfare is a key element. You don’t need to have expensive weapons to win, powerful radio-electronic jamming is enough.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI4uS307ydk

ollah2:
Schooling you will take the entirely year. Zoharariel and scully95 make una school this guy abeg.

It's not easy @ollah2 as we have too many naive and one way traffic Ikio out there.

Ikio:
becos isil and N.korea are alike
*Both said they will destroy u.s and The world.
*Both threaten to use weapon of mass destruction (a nation that make that threat is not a nation)
*most importantly both are isolated (N.korea can launch nukes into Nigeria and you can ask yourselve what are you goin to do about it? answer is notin) they don't listen to anybody even china can't control them anymore.
*both are isolated dictator.

Ikio please answer the following questions.
1) You said "becos isil and N.korea are alike" - How many proxy forces have NK ever sponsored or how many war has NK ever started or participated in the past 10 years ?
2) How many countries have NK destroyed in the past (0 country) and how many has U.S destroyed or currently destroying ? (can you count pls)
3 Which country has ever used WMD in the history of humankind ? NK or U.S.A ? If a nation that makes that threat is not a nation, what about a Nation that has already used that WMD ?
4) How can NK launch nuke to Nigeria ? Where is Nigeria in this whole scenario ? A nearly re-colonize unstable semi puppet nation to the west ?
You did not even mention all the full time colonized permanent puppet to the west, you are talking of Nigeria ?
5) I dont get it.. WHo is isolated dictator ? Buhari, Trump or Kim Jong-un ?

Please leave NK alone and pray for Nigeria to ever get to the level where NK has got to. *FREEDOM from the empire of evil.

Again schooling u will surely take more than a year..

Mazeltovscotty:
bed bug, lecture me on how Ew could shut down a ship and stop propagating twaddles here. Olodo

Ode, im too busy recently to even type a word or to reply a low life n backward 'nonentity' like you. Pls upgrade a bit, learn the basics 1st. Try to grow up as well. #AnotherOdeOfTheCentury, a bit better than the #OmoAleYooBa

Zoharariel:
We have not bought any reports about Russia's scary e-weapons; we were only ruminating about the following CONFIRMED facts

1.) What frightened the USS Donald Cook So Much At The Black Sea

www.voltairenet.org/article185860.html

2.) How the New Iranian-Russian Technology “Magrav” Checkmate the US Navy

www.stankovuniversallaw.com/2015/03/how-the-new-iranian-russian-technology-magrav-checkmate-the-us-navy/

3.) TOP NATO GENERAL:
RUSSIA BUILDING ANTI-ACCESS BUBBLE OVER SYRIA - General Breedlove

www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Top-NATO-general-Russia-building-anti-access-bubble-over-Syria-419393

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/09/29/top-nato-general-russians-starting-to-build-air-defense-bubble-over-syria/?utm_term=.c41531890692

Don't mind that crook that knows nothing about real shooting warfare and tactical electromagnetic combat complexes. I really don't have time to re-lecture him. He does't understand the difference between jamming and exploding enemy weapon.

Blocking of Russian OPCW Proposal on Idlib Aims to Push for Regime Change

https://cdn5.img.sputniknews.com/images/104966/77/1049667701.jpg

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that the blocking of the Russian proposal at OPCW on investigating the alleged chemical weapon use in Syria’s Idlib province aims to direct attention to the idea of regime change in Syria.

The blocking of the Russian proposal at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) on investigating the alleged chemical weapon use in Syria’s Idlib province aims to direct attention to the idea of regime change in Syria, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said.
"Yesterday, our joint proposal that OPCW experts visit the sites of the suspected chemical weapon use incident in Syria was blocked by western delegations without coherent explanations. This showed the complete incompetence of the positions of our western colleagues who basically prohibit the OPCW from sending their experts to the site of the incident, to the air base from where aircraft loaded with chemical weapons allegedly flew out," Lavrov said on Friday at a joint meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

Lavrov stressed that there has been no response from London or Paris to Russian requests for detailed information on alleged chemical weapon probes taken in Syria.

"I think we are very close to this organization [OPCW] being discredited," Lavrov said, adding that the spread of "false information on the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government is being used to move away from the implementation of resolution 2254 which stipulates a political settlement with the participation of all the Syrian parties and to switch to the long-cherished idea of regime change."

duwaluj:
North Korea has been making these sorts of threats for years. Maybe it's time to take them seriously now, Trump needs to get China to put pressure on these guys. The world goes through the same thing every few years with North Korea, but they are slowly advancing their military capabilities. One day it will be too late to do anything.

What nonsense ? Who should NK beg to tell america to stop regime change in every country and dropping bombs anyhow even in Syria un-invited.. If i were any leader, i would have no choice other than to seek the biggest thing even better than Nukes to defend myself against the aggressor ok.. I dont know how some ppl even reason like one way traffic, Instead of the foolish bully to even seat down and strike a deal with NK. It continues to do what it knows how to do best ? Threaten the use of force.. Oya nah, mad Trump should shoot its test ICBM down and see NK reaction. Something the Bully cannot handle. All the wars it has started has it finish any ?? Dont start what you cant finish.

https://ooduarere.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/north-korea.png
Pyongyang is ready for a comprehensive war if “they” want it, a North Korean politician said.

Pyongyang is ready for a “comprehensive” war and will respond to any provocation by forces hostile to North Korea, the embassy’s plenipotentiary minister Zin Jeong Hep said Tuesday.

“Our army and our people have the will, the readiness and the strength to respond to any provocation from hostile forces. Our army and our people are ready to respond to any aggressive actions by the US and hostile forces. If they want a nuclear war, we can respond with nuclear war, if they want a comprehensive war, we are ready for a comprehensive war,” the official said at a meeting with the leader of the Russian Liberal Democratic Party Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

The statement was made amid an escalation of tensions on the Korean peninsula with the South Korea and US military reporting April 16 that they had witnessed what they believe to be a failed missile test by Pyongyang which followed a number of missile launches and nuclear tests considered to be in violation with the UN Security Council resolution.

On April 14, US media reported that US President Donald Trump might order a strike against North Korea if Pyongyang decided to carry out another nuclear weapon test.

In response, the general staff of the North Korean armed forces threatened to launch a strike against US military bases in Japan and South Korea, as well as the presidential residence in Seoul in the case of US aggression.

https://cdn3.img.sputniknews.com/images/105267/17/1052671774.jpg

Mazeltovscotty:
Op was talking about the laws (Dos and Don'ts) in North korea and not the level of development. You would begin to wonder what some people do with their brains sometimes

Another ode.. What is do and dont ? It's a military state and a pure communist state with laws. Which dos and dont ? Crosscheck that with dos and dont in U.S... You will be surprised NK is more Liberal. Just because U.S do too much propaganda and no alternative media telling u NK's view ok. You should get some fresh brains ok. The level of development in NK is backed by its military. You cannot talk of Development without military and yes, it's a military state.

Ikio:
U mean those guys with all the Iran dollar funding and all the training couldn't even defeat isis if not the intervention of russia.U.S.A belongs to the strongest millitary organization (NATO) maybe they should remember that.

lol, who said they could not ? Rewind to whenever they are making huge gains which obviously they were and how Israel turned to ISIS air-cover and even recently the same thing happened. U.S turned to ISIS air-cover where they are also making huge gains. This is not the first time Americunts army is firing at Syrian positions, this is just the first direct officially overt sending of Cruise missile meanwhile out of 59 missiles, only 23 got to the air-field.

Russia (The strategist) saw what was missing and provided the Hesbolar-Iran-Syrian army with Air-cover and see the huge gains so far. The only major state left for the ISIS is Raqqah.

Also rewind to how Hezbolar defeated the ISrealis in 2006 war. WOW, don't lets forget to add that please. Hezbolar is a force to recon with not to talk of Iranian forces or even Russia.. Forget, game is over. Mind you, Hezbolar is not only fighting ISIS. They are fighting a coalition of 78 countries.

Ikio:
U.S.A belongs to the strongest military organization (NATO) maybe they should remember that.

Another lol. Mention just one war the same big for nothing has won over the past 10 years ?? Just one shooting war please ? Take your foolish propaganda elsewhere ok. I can tell you one war Russia won within 3 days. It was even a slap not war.

NATO is a shame and it's just another U.S controlled vassal colony meaning only those in the NATO fear U.S.. NATO is so outdated and cannot even win any war. It's a shame and a Sham.

anonymous6:
"[s]WASHINGTON ― On Thursday night, President Donald Trump authorized the military to launch several dozen cruise missiles from the Mediterranean Sea at a Syrian airfield. The strike was meant to punish Syria’s President Bashar Assad for allegedly using chemical weapons to attack his own citizens.

It was a dramatic reversal, not only from Trump’s own pledges to limit U.S. involvement in Syria but from his predecessor, who for years resisted growing calls to intervene militarily against the Assad regime. President Barack Obama’s decision to refrain from engagement in 2013 was criticized as feckless at the time and is cited now as one of the reasons that Trump was forced to act. But a revisiting of the arguments and calculations that led Obama to make his decision ― from the fear that it would not be a deterrent to the concerns over how the U.S. would respond to future attacks on civilians ― provides an important blueprint for the major hurdles that Trump will now have to confront.

Even if the Assad regime stops using chemical weapons, it will continue to pummel civilians with barrel bombs, predicted Ilan Goldenberg, a former State Department official during the Obama administration. “You’ll see many more pictures of ‘beautiful [Syrian] babies’ [dying] on TV ― specifically to humiliate the United States and show the fecklessness of military action,” he said.

“What will the United States do? Will it get drawn in the way it did in Libya where we started with a civilian protection operation and ended up with a regime change operation?” Goldenberg continued. “This is the biggest danger and I think this was Obama’s biggest concern.”

The Obama administration resisted getting pulled into the Syrian civil war, which began during the Arab Spring protests in 2011. But in August 2013, a sarin gas attack allegedly carried out by the Assad regime killed 1,400 Syrians. It was a humanitarian catastrophe and a clear challenge to Obama’s self-imposed “red line” against the use of chemical weapons, which he laid out the previous year. At first, Obama appeared poised to respond quickly with limited airstrikes ― a variation of what Trump did on Thursday. Three days after the 2013 chemical weapons attack, the U.S. sent armed warships into the eastern Mediterranean Sea and the military drew up attack plans.

But Obama never ordered the military to strike. In the days following the 2013 gas attack, the administration attempted to drum up international and domestic support for a retaliatory response. Obama had hoped for a coordinated response with an ally, but the British Parliament voted down the United Kingdom’s participation. Their vote raised the specter of whether Obama, as well, would allow his government’s legislative branch to have a say. After a 45-minute walk around the South Lawn of the White House with his chief-of-staff, he announced that he would ask for congressional approval ― even as he maintained that he had the authority to order the strike without consulting lawmakers.

By that point, however, it was becoming clearer that the American public, still reeling from drawn-out wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and an ill-fated intervention in Libya, opposed the move. Lawmakers said they were inundated with calls from constituents urging them to vote against military action. After weeks of deliberation, it was unclear if Obama could get enough votes from Congress. By the time all the views within the administration had filtered up to Obama, he had heard passionate cases both for and against intervention, said Perry Cammack, a staffer for then-Secretary of State John Kerry, at the time. And then, in what appeared to be an-off-the-cuff rhetorical remark, Kerry told reporters the only way for Assad to avoid military action was to turn over his chemical weapons stockpile to the international community within a week. “But he isn’t about to do it and it can’t be done,” Kerry said.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov jumped at the narrow opportunity. Five days later ― Washington and Moscow announced a deal in which Syria would do what Kerry had almost jokingly proposed. Obama called off the military strike.
In the years since, even some of Obama’s most strident supporters questioned whether this was the right call. Backing down, they said, damaged U.S. credibility and strengthened Assad’s sense of impunity. But even as the civilian death toll in Syria mounted, Obama maintained that he’d acted prudently. A limited strike would have no practical effect on the Assad regime ― and surviving an attack from the U.S. risked emboldening rather than deterring the dictator, his camp argued. Obama also worried about starting down the slippery slope to deeper involvement in another quagmire in the Middle East.

Whereas Obama has been faulted for overthinking matters to the point of crippling inaction, critics of the current president say his weakness is his apparent lack of interest in planning. “I have no confidence these guys have any plan whatsoever,” Goldenberg said.

Moreover, all of the concerns that made the Obama administration second-guess military action in Syria are still relevant today. If anything, the situation there is messier now than in 2013. The Islamic State militant group controls parts of Syria and Iraq. The U.S. air war against the group depends, in large part on Syria staying out of the way. Meanwhile, Russia has entered the Syrian civil war as a staunch defender of the Assad regime, providing air support to the embattled dictator. The crowded airspace is managed by a fragile deconfliction pact between the U.S. and Russia.

Trump seemed to recognize these complications too ― both during the 2013 debate when he strongly advised the U.S. not to engage in Syria and the presidential campaign when he warned that involvement would precipitate World War III. But in a span of a news cycle, his tune changed this week. During his daily intelligence briefing on the day of the attack, he asked for military options, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told reporters. Two days later, he had settled on an option and ordered the military to move forward. His administration notified foreign allies and congressional leadership after the missiles were launched, minutes before they hit their targets.

The haste with which Trump acted stands in contrast to the weeks of deliberation culminating in a decision not to strike in 2013. Cammack, the former Kerry staffer, described it as “a reflection of the temperaments of the two presidents.”

But it also allowed Trump to avoid a pitfall that ensnared his predecessor. By moving swiftly, the president earned plaudits from lawmakers and pundits ― some of whom swooned over the images that the military had released of the damage to the Syrian airfield. Even those who have accused Trump of being unhinged in the past praised the strikes as a decisive and proportionate response to Assad’s use of chemical weapons. That might be because the U.S. was already regularly dropping bombs in Syria against ISIS, making the public somewhat desensitized to further military action there.

But it also could be because by skipping the deliberative process that the Obama administration so meticulously engaged in, the Trump administration didn’t give the public time to sour on the idea.
And yet, the speed with which Trump flipped positions and ordered military action based on his newfound distaste for the Assad regime risks doing exactly what Obama feared in 2013: sparking a series of unforeseen consequences. It is unclear whether the strikes will have any meaningful impact on the Assad regime. Hours after the U.S. attack, Reuters reported that Syrian warplanes took off from the base hit by American cruise missiles. On Friday and Saturday, Khan Sheikhoun, the opposition-held site of the chemical weapons attack earlier in the week, was hit by more airstrikes.

“I’m worried about whether they did enough of their homework given how quickly decisions were made,” said Eric Pelofsky, a former National Security Council official in the Obama administration. “ What happens if the Assad regime targets our aircraft as they are continuing to prosecute the war on ISIS inside Syrian airspace? Are we prepared to take down their air defenses ― and for the consequences of doing that?” continued Pelofsky, who is now a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Even some who criticized Obama’s inaction worried that Trump’s impulsive decision-making process could backfire. “Horrible as the Khan Sheikhoun attack was, the Assad government has used chemical weapons dozens and dozens of times, and has committed numerous other war crimes,” Kori Schake, a former Bush administration official, wrote Friday. “The indiscipline that has characterized the Trump’s actions may lead him to emotional reactions without corresponding strategy.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obama-2013-syria-trump-strike_us_58e8f930e4b00de14103d8f4[/s]

All these foolish propaganda post. Washingtonpost should do everyone a favour, pls change it to PropagandaPost. Rubbish, who invited Americunts to bomb anything in Syrian Airspace ? If Syrian Government starts shooting all the planes in its territory, which it has every right to do. That will carry us back to Donbass war. This is a tested one in Ukraine and the result is nothing flies over there. So Obama did the right thing cos nothing will fly by the time they get to that stage and when nothing flies. The simple truth is Americunt Soldiers cannot fight without aircover.

Hezbolla warns that the USA have ‘crossed the red line’ and that Hezbollah will respond to any US aggression

If I was the US President, I would take that threat very, very seriously. But then, I am a wimp. Trump is tough guy…


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yt2pD3ZJOcI

zachanalysis:
Ordinarily, I wouldn't have dignify your insultive and very unsportsmanlike comments with a response. But then, looking at it again, I think you need some schooling about the dynamism of power play. FYO, I never argued that the West aren't hypocritic. It is unseemly to want to navigate the course of world politics without getting your hands soiled. That's why it is called diplomacy: the ability to do the nastiest things in the nicest way. [s]Concerning the Crimea incidence you mentioned, let's analyse a scenario. Let's say Israel just forcefully encroach into Nigeria and annexed the entire eastern region because she feels there are cultural connection between them.[/s]

Your argument here lacks total substance, it's baseless and full of emptiness and the simple reason is because you dont know where the map is on the net. Please take your time to check where Crimea is and Russia. Also compare where Isreal is and Nigeria. Ok.

Re-unification and Annexation. There is huge difference between the two. Ok! Again, the Crimean people re-unified with their parent country which is Russia. Go back to the history ok, i dont have time to lecture you. Same thing that happened during the fall of Berlin walls happened to the people of Crimean peninsular. They simply reunited with Russia. A time will also come where Alaska will also re-unite with Russia. Also check the map and history to understand the power play in the past.

Let me also add that a time will also come where the people of the South west Nigeria will reunite with the Yorubas in Benin Republic. OK. You get the logistics now. So it does not make any sense for Israel even though it has tried in the past but it lost what you are trying to say but in another way. That is siding with one side and using that side to suppress the other side.

zachanalysis:
Now, there is nothing wrong with seeking self determination, it is part of the provision of the Atlantic charter which has now been drafted into the UN charter. But there are provisions and guidelines as regards that tense subject. You my friend should tell me of any country that the US and West in general had ' conscripted ' because of poorly defined cultural links.

You see where you are trying to twist it and score a goal. Well, in the past yest U.S annexed a lot of states but today it has changed it to something else, with its use of 5 main area of command which in actual sense it's much bigger threat and empire than even just the old annexation.. I am talking of CENTCOM,AFRICOM,EUCOM,NORTHCOM,PACOM, SOUTHCOM all having the same agenda and strategies as the EUCOM which NATO is under. Turning dozens of countries to a mere vassal state, a colony state. How is that different from annexation in a technical way ? When the future of these countries or states is being decided in Washington ? One thing Nigeria will never agree to even though they already bought Ghana. So when you talk, apply the use of sense.

zachanalysis:
[s] Russia is making itself looks like that foolish late bloomer who believes the best way to measure up is to do the 'undoables'. Russia's quest to be at par with the West is prompting her to take very questionable steps but unfortunately Putin doesn't have the tact to cover his tracks.[/s] In power politics it is not what you do that really matters it is what the world think of your actions. Take it or leave it, today, Trump is being celebrated because he ordered an assault on the official number one pariah of the world at the moment. In addition, never insult or make use of derogatory terms when you argue with people whether on social media on in real life discussion.Table your opinion logically and maturely. If diplomats use such harsh words on one another when they discuss issues we will all be in the bush today hiding away because of war.

https://ooduarere.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/mili.png
Are you even ok? I wont reply u after this one. Lets even be more realistic and talk about power play. Putin you just mention here is the smartest Politician in the world. Do you think Russia is as foolish as Nigerian semi puppet leaders to the west, that saw Africom surrounding Nigeria with bases, recolonizing the whole of Africa and Nigeria is sleep walking. Let me tell you for Russia, Ukraine, Georgia was the red-line for NATO Encirclement agenda. Just your own self, pls look at the Black sea, the written is just on the wall. Imagine all the countries in black sea is already colonized by NATO with the Exception of Ukraine. Now the same crookie west dragging Ukraine to its sphere of influence after the coup in Kiev would simply mean the Crimean Russia Fleet will have not choice and what that means for Russia's national security is that, in any all out war, the south of Russia would be in grt risk.

Russia re-uniting with Crimean peninsular back and restating its presence in the black sea is just the smartest move that even checkmated the west. Not only that but you now have Donbass and Lugansk so when the same Nazi ukraine tries what hitler did, that war will be fought in Ukrainian land and wont even get to Russian mainland.. I am being even very realistic here. An Enemy is surrounding you and you just want to remain foolish and let that enemy surround you so it can finally force you to surrender? Do you know in a war, once you Encircle your enemy you have won on the ground technically . Now you want the king of Encirclement, Russia to just be sleep walking like Nigeria ?

Russian MoD Suspends Deconfliction Channel With US on Syria Flights From April 8

https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/images/104630/38/1046303887.jpg
The Russian Defense Ministry said that the Russia-US deconfliction mechanism aimed to avoid aerial incidents over Syria will be suspended from April 8.

The ministry said that it had summoned a US military attache in Moscow to confirm the suspension of a memoransum on flight safety in Syria.
Moreover, the Russian Ministry of Defense sent a note on the issue to Washington.

Earlier in the day, the Russian Foreign Ministry said that Moscow has suspended its memorandum of understanding on air safety over Syria with the United States following the deadly US missile attack on the Sha'irat airfield.

The Pentagon said later that the US still wants to keep dialogue with Russia via the deconfliction channnel.

"The Russian Defense Ministry denied US media reports that Russia is allegedly going to keep the 'red line' with Pentagon's representatives in the framework of the memo on the prevention of incidents in Syrian airsrpace," the Russian ministry spokesman, Maj. Gen. Igor Konasenkov responded to media claims.

"A note was sent today to Pentagon through military-diplomatic channels informing about the suspension the 'red line' in the framework of the memorandum," - Konashenkov said in a statement.

The United States launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Syrian military airfield in Ash Sha'irat near Homs late Thursday. US President Donald Trump said the attack was a response to the alleged chemical weapon use in Idlib on Tuesday, which Washington blames on Damascus.

zachanalysis:
Funny that it is bullies who complain more about witch-hunt. Moscow's accusation is very hypocritical and, need I say, self-serving. Putin should have thought of the word 'aggression' when he defiled [s]all sanctity of international law by blatantly ripping apart Ukraine's right to enjoying unhindered control over it's territory when he ordered the annexation of Crimea and dared any country to stop him[/s].

Going back to the same hypocrisy you accused the Russian of. Lets even be very realistic here. Let take Yemeni for example, how is the case in Yemen different from that of Ukraine ? What if Russia now decided to put forward a law to denounce the crooks in Kiev and decided to re-instate Yanokuwich of Ukraine ? (The same way Saudi and the west is trying to hard to do) Would you continue to shut your mouth or just bite the dust ? When it comes to international Politics, be very careful what you say or type cos the highest hypocrisy of the century is in the west.

zachanalysis:
The point is this, if you have taken time to study power relations between Russia and the US, you'll see that both these countries like the world to view their actions from the moral angle. The moral card Russia played when it annexed Crimea was that the people of Crimea which share significant cultural link with her, had to endure painful discrimination from the then pro west government that replaced the unpopular Pro-Russian guy. Washington on its part is hanging its involvement on the need to halt what it believes to be a crime against humanity. When Russia annexed Crimea, the US only goofed and kicked without any tangible action because looking at it logically, she will in the same vein annex any country that can help her halt the incursion of Russia.

Now this is anther hypocrisy that i like to even point out. You used the world Annexed and the Russians who live in Crimea do not call it annexation, they call it Re-unification. They dont care one bit what you think for your information. Now the hypocrisy again is when Western Germany Re-united with the rest, would you call that Annexation or Reunification ? But perhaps your mind is already inclined and propagandized by the western crookie media who decides how you reason or how you think.. So I cannot blame you that much except for a fact that you are not exposed and only rely on what your crookie western media tells you. You do not even verify, even as it is now, no investigative Nigerian media going all out to report the real story...

zachanalysis:
In this Syrian wahala, Russia will only goof and kick because deep down she knows there is no where in hell it could win the moral war in this case. [s]Bottom line, Assad crossed the red line by killing his people with banned weapons[/s]. Every logical person knows this and forget about any military pact Russia has with any country for now. Moscow will be wary of being tagged the friend of a distinguished international pariah-Assad and his murderous regime.

Why are you so gullible and f0olish ? How many times will you foolishly fall for the same crookie pretext ? Do you know what is Pretext ? The same thing used in Yugoslavia, Libya Iraq and Now Syria ? Are you ok? Pls stop pretending you dont know.. Nothing is above the international law and norms and no one should violate the international law... Just another hypocrisy.. Let Russia start bombing U.S institution for killing the African Americans anyhow ? Wont that violate International law and order ?

Yes, power corrupts and having the feeling of total power corrupt totally and this is how most empires eventually fall. They believe the know all or too much and most importantly, believing even in their own propaganda.

Everyday is for the thief but one day is for the owner.. That owner is Syria. The battle line is drawn.