₦airaland Forum

Macelliot:
I wish China takes over World power...

China is indeed going to be the next global power and will definitely be a better super power than the intrusive and destabilising influence the US has become all over the world. China is about reviving the old silk road which will open up trade between europe, asia and some parts of africa. The economic action this century will be played out mainly in euroasia and among co-operating countries of the BRICS and SCO. It has established the AIIB as a rival to the blood sucking IMF and world bank demons.

Emyemyberry:
I pray that china and russia will never compromise with the U.S,but will grow stronger,to act as a check on the u.s till i go old die comot 4 earth

The US is increasingly being isolated in the emerging new world where peace, economic cooperation and integration reign supreme. China and Russia are the promoter of this trend. The US dollar is bound to collapse very soon as China and Russia have agreed to make trade settlements in their local currencies. China sees no reason why it should subsidise the aggression of the US by investing in her bonds (china has 1.3 trillion USD worth of this) and is creating newer alternatives.

Make una comment now.All the booking of space nor go buy una land for here oo.

menesheh:

Can't stop laughing b/c of this copy and paste article. What's Christianity contributing to America.

Nothing!!!

You are entitled to your opinion.

Russia is on the brink of a nuclear war with the US after several provocative acts from the US and its puppets the members of NATO. The US from all indication is going down real fast and needs a war with either China or Russia to sustain the money gulping Millitary Industrial complex and the globalist elites.

Washington Is Impotent To Prevent Armageddon”
By Paul Craig RobertsonJune 22, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts — via Zero Hedge June 20, 2015
Paul Craig Roberts, formerly Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy, Associate Editor, Wall Street Journal, Senior Research Fellow, Stanford University, William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
The United States has pursued empire since early in its history, but it was the Soviet collapse in 1991 that enabled Washington to see the entire world as its oyster.
The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in the rise of the neoconservatives to power and influence in the US government. The neoconservatives have interpreted the Soviet collapse as History’s choice of “American democratic capitalism” as the New World Order.
Chosen by History as the exceptional and indispensable country, Washington claims the right and the responsibility to impose its hegemony on the world. Neoconservatives regard their agenda to be too important to be constrained by domestic and international law or by the interests of other countries. Indeed, as the Unipower, Washington is required by the neoconservative doctrine to prevent the rise of other countries that could constrain American power.
Paul Wolfowitz, a leading neoconservative, penned the Wolfowitz Doctrine shortly after the Soviet collapse. This doctrine is the basis of US foreign and military policy.
The doctrine states:
“Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.”
Notice that Washington’s “first objective” is not peace, not prosperity, not human rights, not democracy, not justice. Washington’s “first objective” is world hegemony.Only the very confident so blatantly reveal their agenda.
As a former member of the Cold War Committee on the Present Danger, I can explain what Wolfowitz’s words mean. The “threat posed formerly by the Soviet Union” was the ability of the Soviet Union to block unilateral US action in some parts of the world. The Soviet Union was a constraint on US unilateral action, not everywhere but in some places. Any constraint on Washington is regarded as a threat.
A “hostile power” is a country with an independent foreign policy, such as the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have proclaimed. Iran, Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Argentina, Cuba, and North Korea also proclaim an independent foreign policy.
This is too much independence for Washington to stomach.As Russian President Vladimir Putin recently stated, “Washington doesn’t want partners. Washington wants vassals.”
The Wolfowitz doctrine requires Washington to dispense with or overthrow governments that do not acquiesce to Washington’s will. It is the “first objective.”
The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in Boris Yeltsin becoming president of a dismembered Russia. Washington became accustomed to Yeltsin’s compliance and absorbed itself in its Middle Eastern wars, expecting Vladimir Putin to continue Russia’s vassalage.
However at the 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy,Putin said: “I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today’s world.”
Putin went on to say:
“We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law, and independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?”
When Putin issued this fundamental challenge to US unipower, Washington was preoccupied with its lack of success with its invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Mission was not accomplished.
By 2014 it had come to Washington’s attention that while Washington was blowing up weddings, funerals, village elders, and children’s soccer games in the Middle East, Russia had achieved independence from Washington’s control and presented itself as a formidable challenge to Washington’s uni-power. Putin blocked Obama’s planned invasion of Syria and bombing of Iran.
The unmistakable rise of Russia refocused Washington from the Middle East to Russia’s vulnerabilities.
Ukraine, long a constituent part of Russia and subsequently the Soviet Union, was split off from Russia in the wake of the Soviet collapse by Washington’s maneuvering. In 2004 Washington had tried to capture Ukraine in the Orange Revolution, which failed to deliver Ukraine into Washington’s hands. Consequently, according to neocon Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, Washington spent $5 billion over the following decade developing Ukrainian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that could be called into the streets of Kiev and in developing Ukrainian political leaders willing to represent Washington’s interests.
Washington launched its coup in February 2014 with orchestrated demonstrations that, with the addition of violence, resulted in the overthrow and flight of the elected democratic government of Victor Yanukovych. In other words, Washington destroyed democracy in a new country with a coup before democracy could take root.
Ukrainian democracy meant nothing to Washington. Washington was intent on seizing Ukraine in order to present Russia with a security problem and also to justify sanctions against “Russian aggression” in order to break up Russia’s growing economic and political relationships with Europe. Washington feared that these relationships could undermine Washington’s hold on Europe.
Sanctions are contrary to Europe’s interests. Nevertheless European governments accommodated Washington’s agenda. The reason was explained to me several decades ago by my Ph.D. dissertation committee chairman who became Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs. I had the opportunity to ask him how Washington managed to have foreign governments act in Washington’s interest rather than in the interest of their own countries. He said, “money.” I said, “you mean foreign aide?” He said, “no, we give the politicians bags full of money. They belong to us. They answer to us.”
Recently, the German journalist Udo Ulfkotte wrote a book, Bought Journalists, in whichhe reported that every significant European journalist functions as a CIA asset.
This does not surprise me. The same is the situation in the US.
As Europe is an appendage of Washington, a collection of vassal states, Europe enables Washington’s pursuit of hegemony even to the extent of being driven into conflict with Russia over a “crisis” that is entirely a propaganda creation of Washington’s.
The media disguises the reality. During the Clinton regime, six mega-media companies were permitted to acquire 90% of the US print, TV, radio, and entertainment media, a concentration that destroyed diversity and independence. Today the media throughout the Western world serves as a Propaganda Ministry for Washington. The Western media is Washington’s Ministry of Truth. Gerald Celente, the trends forecaster, calls the Western media “presstitutes,” a combination of press prostitutes.
In the US Putin and Russia are demonized around the clock.Every broadcast alerts us to “the Russian threat.” Even Putin’s facial expressions are psychologically analyzed. Putin is the New Hitler. Putin has ambitions to recreate the Soviet empire. Putin invaded Ukraine. Putin is going to invade the Baltic states and Poland. Putin is a threat on the level of ebola and the Islamist State. US Russian experts, such as Stephen Cohen, who state the facts are dismissed as “Putin apologists.” Any and every one who takes exception to the anti-Putin, anti-Russian propaganda is branded a “Putin apologist,” just as 9/11 skeptics are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.” In the Western world, the few truth-tellers are demonized along with Putin and Russia.
The world should take note that today, right now, Truth is the most unwelcome presence in the Western world. No one wants to hear it in Washington, London, Tokyo, or in any of the political capitals of Washington’s empire.
The majority of the American population has fallen for the anti-Russian propaganda, just as they fell for “Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Assad’s use of chemical weapons against his own people,” Iranian nukes,” the endless lies about Gaddafi, 9/11, shoe bombers, underwear bombers, shampoo and bottled water bombers. There is always a new lie to keep the fear factor working for Washington’s endless wars and police state measures that enrich the rich and impoverish the poor.
The gullibility of the public has enabled Washington to establish the foundation for a new Cold War or for a preemptive nuclear strike on Russia. Some neoconservatives prefer the latter. They believe nuclear war can be won, and they ask, “What is the purpose of nuclear weapons if they cannot be used?”
China is the other rising power that the Wolfowitz Doctrine requires to be constrained.Washington’s “pivot to Asia” creates new naval and air bases to control China and perpetuate Washington’s hegemony in the South China Sea.
We come to the bottom line. Washington’s position is not negotiable. Washington has no interest in compromising with Russia or China. Washington has no interest in any facts. Washington’s deal is this: “You can be part of our world order as our vassals, but not otherwise.”
European governments and, of course, the lapdog UK government, are complicit in this implicit declaration of war against Russia and China. If it comes to war, Europeans will pay the ultimate price for the treason of their leaders, such as Merkel, Cameron, and Hollande, as Europe will cease to exist.
War with Russia and China is beyond Washington’s capability. However, if the demonized “enemy” does not succumb to the pressure and accept Washington’s leadership, war can be inevitable.Washington has launched an attack. How does Washington back off? Don’t expect any American regime to say, “we made a mistake. Let’s work this out.” Every one of the announced candidates for the American presidency is committed to American hegemony and war.
Washington believes Russia can be isolated from the West and that this isolation will motivate those secularized and westernized elements in Russia, who desire to be part of the West, into more active opposition against Putin. The Saker calls these Russians “Atlanticist integrationists.”
After two decades of Russia being infiltrated by Washington’s NGO Fifth Columns, the Russian government has finally taken action to regulate the hundreds of Western-financed NGOs inside Russia that comprise Washington’ subversion of the Russian government.However, Washington still hopes to use sanctions to cause enough disruption of economic life within Russia to be able to send protesters into the streets. Regime change, as in Ukraine, is one of Washington’s tools. In China the US organized the Hong Kong “student” riots, which Washington hopes will spread into China, and Washington supports the independence of the Muslim population in the Chinese province that borders Kazakhstan.
The problem with a government in the control of an ideology is that ideology and not reason drives the action of the government.As the majority of Western populations lack the interest to search for independent explanations, the populations impose no constraint on governments.
To understand Washington, go online and read the neoconservative documents and position papers. You will see an agenda unconstrained by law, by morality, by compassion, by common sense. You will see an agenda of evil.
Who is Obama’s Assistant Secretary of State for the Ukrainian part of the world? It is the neoconservative Victoria Nuland who organized the Ukrainian coup, who put in office the new puppet government, who is married to the even more extreme neoconservative, Robert Kagan.
Who is Obama’s National Security advisor? It is Susan Rice, a neoconservative.
Who is Obama’s Ambassador to the UN? It is Samantha Power, a neoconservative.
Now we turn to material interests. The neoconservative agenda of world hegemony serves the powerful military/security complex whose one trillion dollar annual budget depends on war, hot or cold.
The agenda of American hegemony serves the interests of Wall Street and the mega-banks.As Washington’s power and influence spreads, so does American financial imperialism. So does the reach of American oil companies and American agribusiness corporations such as Monsanto.
Washington’s hegemony means that US corporations get to loot the rest of the world.
The danger of the neoconservative ideology is that it is in perfect harmony with powerful economic interests.In the US the left-wing has made itself impotent. It believes all the foundational government lies that have given America a police/warfare state incapable of producing alternative leadership. The American left, what little remains, for emotional reasons believes the government’s 9/11 story. The anti-religious left-wing believes the threat posed to free thought by a Christian Russia. The left-wing, convinced that Americans are racists, believes the government’s account of the assassinations of Martin Luther King.
The left-wing accepts the government’s transparent 9/11 fable, because it is emotionally important to the American left that oppressed peoples strike back. For the American left, it is emotionally satisfying that the Middle East, long oppressed and exploited by the French, British and Americans, struck back and humiliated the Unipower in the 9/11 attack.
This emotional need is so powerful for the left that it blinds the left-wing to the improbability of a few Saudi Arabians, who could not fly airplanes, outwitting not merely the FBI, CIA, and NSA, which spies on the entire world, but as well all 16 US intelligence agencies and the intelligence agencies of Washington’s NATO vassal states and Israel’s Mossad, which has infiltrated every terrorist organization, including those created by Washington itself.Somehow these Saudis were able to also outwit NORAD, airport security, causing security to fail four times in one hour on the same day. They were able to prevent for the first time ever the US Air Force from intercepting the hijacked airliners. Air traffic control somehow lost the hijacked airliners on radar. Two airliners crashed, one into the Pennsylvania country side and one into the Pentagon without leaving any debris. The passport of the leader of the attack, Mohammed Atta was reported to be found as the only undamaged element in the debris of the World Trade Center towers. The story of the passport was so preposterous that it had to be changed.
This implausible account did not raise any eyebrows in the tame Western print and TV media.
The right-wing is obsessed with immigration of darker-skinned peoples, and 9/11 has become an argument against immigration. The left-wing awaits the oppressed to strike back against their oppressors. The 9/11 fable survives as it serves the interests of both left and right.
I can tell you for a fact that if American national security had so totally failed as it is represented to have failed by the official explanation of 9/11, the White House, the Congress, the media would have been screaming for an investigation.Heads would have rolled in agencies that permitted such massive failure of the national security state. The embarrassment of a Superpower being so easily attacked and humiliated by a handful of Arabs acting independently of any intelligence agency would have created an uproar demanding accountability.
Instead, the White House resisted any investigation for one year.Under pressure from the 9/11 families who lost family members in the World Trade Center Towers, the White House created a political commission consisting of politicians managed by the White House. The commission sat and listened to the government’s account and wrote it down. This is not an investigation.
In the United States the left-wing is focused on demonizing Ronald Reagan, who had nothing whatsoever to do with any of this..........
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=117450

US Downfall Traced to Defeat of Christianity
June 23, 2015
"America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." - Alexis de Toqueville
by Richard Evans
(henrymakow.com)
Is America using immoral tacticsto fight unjust wars? I found part of the answer in a remarkable interview with a former US drone operator, Brandon Bryant, on BBC's HARDtalk (above.)
I thought it would be the usual 'gung ho' pep talk about America's great weapons, but the young man impressed me with his honesty, courage and conviction. Brandon says drone warfare represented the most cowardly warfare ever devised. Although he took part in over 1600 kills, he felt sick about it because he could not be sure whether some were even enemy combatants.
He condemned the Presidential order to assassinate US citizen Anwar al-Awlaki who was killed by drone in 2011with another American who was purportedly editor of al-Qaeda's English-language web magazine,Inspire. Bryant felt these assassinations constituted a blatant violation of the US Constitution - which says that US citizens must have a fair trial by their peers even when the charge is treason. Obama simply ordered al-Awiaki and sidekick murdered by drone ten thousands miles away.
Bryant argued, "We're supposed to be the greatest nation in the world, and we do not live up to our own standards".
HOW DID AMERICA LOSE ITS MORAL GROUNDING?
To answer this question, we have to travel back to the 19th century when Alexis de Tocqueville, (1805-1859) the French social philosopher visited America to discover the reasons for our incredible success. He published his observations in his classic two-volume work,Democracy in America (1838). He was especially impressed by America's religious character. Here are some startling excerpts from Tocqueville's great work:
Upon my arrival in the United States the religious aspect of the country was the first thing that struck my attention; and the longer I stayed there, the more I perceived the great political consequences resulting from this new state of things.
In France, I had almost always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom marching in opposite directions. But in America I found they were intimately united and that they reigned in common over the same country.
Religion in America...must be regarded as the foremost of the political institutions of that country; for if it does not impart a taste for freedom, it facilitates the use of it. Indeed, it is in this same point of view that the inhabitants of the United States themselves look upon religious belief.
I do not know whether all Americans have a sincere faith in their religion -- for who can search the human heart? But I am certain that they hold it to be indispensable to the maintenance of republican institutions. This opinion is not peculiar to a class of citizens or a party, but it belongs to the whole nation and to every rank of society.
In the United States, the sovereign authority is religious...there is no country in the world where the Christian religion retains a greater influence over the souls of men than in America, and there can be no greater proof of its utility and of its conformity to human nature than that its influence is powerfully felt over the most enlightened and free nation of the earth.
In the United States, the influence of religion is not confined to the manners, but it extends to the intelligence of the people...
Christianity, therefore, reigns without obstacle, by universal consent...
I sought for the key to the greatness and genius of America in her harbors...; in her fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich mines and vast world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of learning. I sought for it in her democratic Congress and in her matchless Constitution.
Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power.
America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.
The safeguard of morality is religion, and morality is the best security of law as well as the surest pledge of freedom.
The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and of liberty so intimately in their minds, that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other
Christianity is the companion of liberty in all its conflicts -- the cradle of its infancy, and the divine source of its claims.
Tocqueville gives this account of a court case in New York:
While I was in America, a witness, [in a court case], declared that he did not believe in the existence of God or in the immortality of the soul. The judge refused to admit his evidence, on the ground that the witness had destroyed beforehand all confidence of the court in what he was about to say. The newspapers related the fact without any further comment. The New York Spectator of August 23rd, 1831, relates the fact in the following terms:
"The court of common pleas of Chester county (New York), a few days since rejected a witness who declared his disbelief in the existence of God. The presiding judge remarked, that he had not before been aware that there was a man living who did not believe in the existence of God; that this belief constituted the sanction of all testimony in a court of justice: and that he knew of no case in a Christian country, where a witness had been permitted to testify without such belief."
------
First Comment by Tony B
What is missing here is what was intended to be missed by the masons and odd ball deists who were the majority of the "founding fathers."
The U.S. Constitution is, through and through, a masonic, commercial document, never once mentioning God or even religion until the amendments, the first ten of which were grudgingly added to get the thing accepted by the somewhat suspicious people. Even then, the "religion" amendment only allows citizens to believe anything they wish, as the government was to butt out of religion. This insanity puts Christianity on a par with all other religions, including satanism and the religion of atheism (it is a religion), it does NOT make the nation Christian. As a matter of fact, this is exactly how the courts now interpret the amendment.
Always implied but never meant as the people expected, the word "liberty" in that document is heavy with the masonic meaning, which is liberty FROM God and his commandments, not liberty to worship and obey Him. It took a few hundred years for enough Americans to realize this while Christianity was constantly downgraded in the minds of the people until now this nation has the absolutely satanic concepts of mother murder of her unborn and same sex marriages encoded in exceptionally non-Christian law, forced upon any Christians still in existence.
Moreover, distinctly un-Christian government corruption is now the rule, not the exception and the people are treated as "subjects," that is, slaves, while government agents no longer see themselves as servants of the people but as lords or owners of the citizenry.
The U.S. never really was a Christian nation although originally the people in general held mostly Christian concepts, which was its early salvation in the great masonic experiment with republicanism, a humanistic form of governance which eventually leads to hell, as is now obvious to those who can see.
www.henrymakow.com/2015/06/US-Downfall-Traced-to-Loss-of-Christianity.html

Jackie is more of a comedian than a kungfu fighter. Although, his kungfu is not bad too. This what he had to say when being compared with kungfu legend bruce lee: "two person comes,bruce lee fights and he wins, six persons, bruce lee fights and he wins but for me, two persons come, i fight, but six persons come, i run! So i give it to jet li.

smlafolabi:
http://www.synergyguardsnigeria.com/

Your phone number please. Its urgent.

nigerianvenom:
i don't understand how u expect umana to win?
how?

Most people supporting Udom are doing so in anticipation of monetary reward cos he has a huge war chest to woo voters. I've taken time to outline the reasons why UOU has a better chance from the post I made earlier on. I understand a lot of people who made comments are doing so based on ethnic and tribal affiliation and sentiments. My opinion is strictly based on feelers from all corners of the state and as a stakeholder( not connected to either party).

anibestlala:
do believe strongly that aks would be the last state apc can take over, attah and etiebet not withstanding.

I've made my analysis and feel we should wait and allow time to tell if its going to be APC or PDP.

Please go through this link:
www.economist.com/node/7796790
It discusses the 2006 war and broader issues.
And this:
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=113150

The biggest losers in all of these are Christian Zionists who have been made to believe the lie that supporting the satanic, cabbala practicing Israelis is a God ordained instruction. The Jews love playing the victim while being the aggressor in most conflicts. Iran has been built a formidable air defense over the years and together with Hezzbollah have over 150,000 missiles trained on Israel. An attack on Iran will speed up the development of a nuclear weapon anyway. Besides, it has outsourced her nuclear programme to North Korea and even allowed to run a base by the koreans. So Iran is just a day`s flight from its nuclear weapon.
Lastly, Israel is still smarting from the embarrassment it suffered in the hands of hezzbollah in 2006 and would be careful not to allow tension escalate. What the west, saudi arabia and most sunni countries fear is the growing powers and influence of shia iran in the region which they can't stop right now cos they created the atmosphere for Iran to thrive at first.

poiZon:
i dont think u r from akwa ibom, but if u r then u r a political novice.
if buhari lost in katsina then udom will lose in eket senatorial district where udom is from. n for ikot ekpene if osibanjo lost in southwest then i think moses ekpo will lose too cos that is his senatorial district n dont forget akpabio is from thr. the battle will be in uyo senatorial district. also dont forget the next senator reppng uyo is akpabio boy, the current speaker who hails from etinan na akpabio boy, onofiok luke na akpabio, coincidentally comes from d same lg wif umana. n whr dat boyy dey umana na toy!
am being realistic n i give it to udom!

Where I come from, is not what is up for discussion here. And you calling someone you don't know a political novice? Smh.
The factors you listed are to be taken into consideration but I've made my analysis and I am equally on ground to feel the pulse of the people as regards the coming election. Were you aware that campaign stickers of Udom, stuck on vehicles were forcefully removed at Ibom plaza,on tuesday evening when it became certain that Buhari had won, and the owners made to chant the APC- change slogan?
If you read the first post I made, you`d understand that PDP is scared of holding a free and fair elections here, which is very unfortunate. If the election is rigged massively as experienced last saturday then APC will have no choice than to go to court to get back its mandate.

Wisdytech:
am absorbing it

UOU will also split the votes in Ikot ekpene senatorial district mainly populated by the annangs( akpabio`s clan) because the people from Abak LGA(a core annang council area) are aggrieved, and feels the senatorial seat should be theirs (rightly so, too) until Akpabio signified interest and muscled his way to the senate. Hence, they are more likely to vote against PDP since they do not have anything at stake and do not share the same sentiment as Akpabio.
With these underlying factors at play I don't think PDP has a chance against the agents of Change in the state.
When UOU first started his sojourn in APC, a lot of people were skeptical and never gave him a chance but today many oppressed Ibibios, mainly the elites,middle class and the poor now see him as a rallying point against an oppressor(Akpabio).
It will be interesting for you to know that many from Udom`s senatorial district(eket zone) do not even fancy him as a governor cos of the akpabio's link. Also, the majority in that district are ibibios too.

Wisdytech:
So are you trying to tell us that PDP is known as a rigging party?


But come to think of this, Is PDP in Akwa Ibom still active?

It is an open secret that PDP and APC to an extent are are adept at rigging and do so blatantly in areas where they are popular.
PDP`s popularity in Akwa Ibom is at an all time low cos Akpabio is trying to mount a successor, against the will of the majority Ibibios. Even though Udom Emmanuel is an Ibibio, most people see him as an Akpabio puppet and would prefer UOU.
Most PDP top guns like former governor Victor Attah( a respected Ibibio leader) and Don Etiebet(ex minister for petroleum) have openly endorsed UOU. The Oron Nation have been marginalised for too long and have the prospect of producing a deputy governor for the first time under UOU, hence, will vote massively for APC. Udom undermined his himself by picking a deputy from the annang clan. Ibibios are in the majority and will determine who becomes governor. Lastly, the Buhari factor will play a role cos the people would not want to be in opposition to the central government cos AKS has always been in alignment with the government at the centre.

It is possible if the government of the day does not truncate the will of the people by conniving with INEC staff,police and media to rig massively as witnessed on 28th of march. Many polling booths with no international observers were deliberately starved of ballot papers and result sheets while PDP agents had a field day.
UOU should win comfortably in Uyo and eket senatorial districts while splitting the votes in ikot ekpene axis with Udom emmanuel.

It is possible if the government of the day does not truncate the will of the people by conniving with INEC staff,police and media to rig massively as witnessed on 28th of march. Many polling booths that had no international observers were deliberately starved of ballot papers and result sheets.
UOU should win comfortably in Uyo and eket senatorial districts while splitting the votes in ikot ekpene axis with Udom emmanuel.

MalcoImX:
But come to think of it:
1. Is Abacha so foolish to have taken such monies to an enemy territory, – Western countries he's been fighting with throughout his regime? Whoever takes his prized possession to a known enemy is a proposition I find difficult to imagine!
2. Why weren't any revelations from the Eastern bloc or the Arab World, where it is expected Abacha would take his money to, since they weren't hostile to him?
3. Ain't we so foolish too to have believed Abacha's enemies that he was the only greatest looter to have emerged since the creation of Nigeria?
4. Didn't Abacha stash billions in Nigerian banks, and why aren't we hearing of it if he did?
5. And how many people know that of all the Heads of State we had, Abacha's father was probably the richest of them all – being an established merchant and industrialist in Kano, even before Abacha's rise to prominence?
6. And lastly, why is there always 'Abacha money' at a time of great political turmoil?

The questions you posed are indeed pertinent to this issue of looted money repatriated from the west. I believe someone, somewhere is trying to make him look badder than he was. Not as if he was a saint anyway but I just can't believe he`d stash money in western countries when he courted china and the arab countries. By my reckoning, I think IBB and OBJ are way more corrupt than the fella.

This interview with sheikh Nabeel, a former jihadist with ties to bin laden and zawahiri is quite revealing.
cannonfire..com/2014/07/the-great-political-mystery-of-our-time.html

diluminati:
as you can see from the above pictures, the supposed "islamic" terorrists dont know where the kabbah is. this is absurd and i dont know of any muslim even at 5 years that does not know where the east of kabbah is?

Nothing about their conducts that portray Islam as a religion. They are inspired by very radical wahabist teachings. Teachings that glorify violence and babaric acts used by the monogolian warlord and conqueror Ghengis Khan to create fear and terror.
You should also know that they were created/ are actively supported by the US and its allies especially Israel to neutralize the growing powers and influence of shia Iran in the middle east. Most importantly, to serve as a reason for the next deployment of US troops to the middle east.

Oga Justi4juse, how much will it cost to land this computer to Uyo, akwa ibom state.
www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004KZJ0UM/ref=mw_dp_mpd?pd=1&qid=1425054934&sr=1-1

Hello guys, I had a discussion with a friend about the benefits of hemp and why its usage is popular among famous artists either living or dead. Late Baba Fela and Bob Marley simply comes to mind in this regard. An article, I came across, further explains why it was criminalized and re-named marijuana(a mexican word). I would like to know what you think about this controversial plant and your experience(s) with it so far .
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=3874

missionmex:
U can only pay tithe from any legitimate venture.

Can you support your assertion by telling us those activities that are legitimate, with relevant bible verses?

Thanks

BlackLeopard:
Lol you're out of your mind and it's nonsensical to even argue with you (just starting with the list of 'sins' you've got going on there) so I'm not going to try.

But I'm going to point out Jesus was a Jewish rabbi before he was told to improve what's wrong by His Heavenly Father.

Do not deny the reality of a core figure of a religion you claim to represent and believe in, it's pretty embarassing to watch (or amusing, depending how one takes it.)

I don't think I want to dispute that with you either, seeing that you`d prefer to play the ostrich and pretend those issue do not exist.
He was a Jewish teacher with a mission quite different and distinct from any other that preceded him. His style and teachings were revolutionary and out of this world and anti- establishment too. Unfortunately, your beloved Jews still live in denial of his first coming and still awaits the arrival of the messiah.
Salvation came to the rest of the world cos the Jews sinned and turned their back on God.