Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,162,173 members, 7,849,622 topics. Date: Tuesday, 04 June 2024 at 06:17 AM

Search

 

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (of 9 pages)

Travel / Re: Any Nigerian In Kigali, Rwanda? by Sheyimann: 11:58am On Oct 07, 2023
nwadikeokey11:
I asked him a question but he has ran away. Rwanda isn't Nigeria where he can just do anyhow he likes, that's why Nigerians prefer Uganda and Kenya for Rwanda. In those two other countries u cud do any how and just bribe ur way out if u are caught, but dare that in Rwanda and u will be sorry. I had encountered their police when I was there and I deliberately acted very unruly just to see for myself how they would react and to my surprise, they acted in the way that can only be better compared, or even better than their counterparts in the western world. I wasn't into business when I was there but most Nigerians I met there that were in business never complain of any of those things that fellow said here. Rwanda, or Kigali is the type of city I would like to live in if I choose to settle in any other African country apart from Nigeria. I like a country that is well organized, in fact living in Rwanda is like living in a house or compound where the landlord and his family also resides, every tenant in that compound would be forced on their own to behave because of the presence of the landlord, unlike when u live in a compound where it is only the tenants and no landlord, everybody will behave as they pleases, no one to correct another. I love Kigali and how disciplined the people are and whoever that is not comfortable with that can go to where he or she will be allowed to break the laws of the land and do watever they pleases with impunity. Do any how in Rwanda and u will see anyhow, period.


We are quick to stick out accusative hands at somebody else but forget that here in Nigeria we have hundreds of Kagame running out country to the ground , Nigerian government is is draped in democracy but the workings of the government is like an authoritarian regime , just a facade to deceive Nigerians .

At least give Kagame the benefit of the doubt to see if he’ll go down as a power hugging leader who would mess up what he has built already because of clinging forever to power or if he’ll go the honorable path eventually .

The Singapore, China and the Dubai and UAE e.t.c created their own system and their own world without following the western blueprint , why must we forever linger on this democracy democracy with little or no end result , Africa needs tough hands , the Europeans and westerners had a couple of such leaders too in the past , I don’t mean Tinubu kind of leaders though

1 Like

Religion / Re: How Many Souls Escaped The 'Hell' Fire Of Sodom And Gomorrah? by Padipadi: 3:37pm On Oct 01, 2023
kingxsamz:


So if robbers come to your house, you'll beg them to rape your wife and daughters so they don't hurt you? 😂😂😂
I v been observing you and other rats that invaded this thread. If indeed you have common sense, you ll realize Lot made sacrifices that people still make today. When robbers visit your home, you won't only offer your wife, but give them your yansh as jara incase your wife toto no sweet the robbers!

ChopDeMoney:
What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah was a volcanic eruption. Narratives was introduced to appeal and threaten moral, spiritual and political defaulters.
Really?
How come it was predicted before it happened? How come the site till present day is different from other volcano sites that has same remains.
pendragonbladgo:
The evil people commit in this generation is 200% more than the evil ever committed....

But the God is blind and Heaven is closed!

Angels no more function and the unexisted Holy spirit are unstrike.

I wonder what make Christian God abandon them, after all the promises white Jesus gave them!!!

No God, no Heavens no Hell....

If no life before creation, that means no life after death!
No worry. You go experience God soon, baby troll.
DrAda:



Very valid question
It's common sense naa!
They were all destroyed cos they had no obedient parent or guardian to save them. Moreover, other babies to populate the world were in other cities aside Sodom and Gomorrah. Punishment of destruction was for S&G only,not the entire world at that time cos S&G was the focus of sin at that time.
Smartguyboy:


What are you still doing on earth if Heaven is real?
If you v plans to kill the person, do so else you are a bastard! The question should be thrown to you this sufferhead inside Nigeria!
wirinet:
Biblical stories particularly old testament are too violent for an atheist/humanist like me. I cannot fathom how a supposedly benign being kills millions of his children violently in order to sooth his ego.
To God, 2+2 = 4. Obey and find mercy. Disobey or do anyhow and get judgement. Liken God to your present boss at work that has the power to punish you if you erred.
Janosky:

NT Gospels: Mark 9:43

γέενναν (geennan)
Noun - accusative Feminine Singular
Strong's 1067: Of Hebrew origin; valley of Hinnom; ge-henna, a valley of Jerusalem, used as a name for the place of everlasting punishment."

You MUMU follow follow your mentors to TWIST Gehenna, the valley of Hinnom @ Mark 9:43, una TWIST am to hellfire.


Jnr Ozuo pro max DECEIVING HIMSELF.


grin grin grin grin
You look like one mad boy here roaming around cos he's hunted by the name of God, YAHWEH!
Ifyken2:

And something you should observe is that dtruthspeaker is using style to ignore lot daughters raping their own father.
The person already explained. Don't be unfortunate!
Now that you kukuma know what the scripture said but decided to be unfortunate by whining people here, let me handle you like a street rat that you are.
Say anymore rubbish and see yourself being roasted!
Whether you are atheist, muslim, traditionalist, animist or whatever, your type of cane is available!
Do anyhow and see bottles on ya head!
Religion / Re: How Many Souls Escaped The 'Hell' Fire Of Sodom And Gomorrah? by Janosky: 10:28pm On Sep 24, 2023
jesusjnr2020:
You mean the hell doctrine of Christ which you have rejected to your own destruction?

Mark 9:43-44 (KJV)

And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:
Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.




The quote that exposed your mischief? It's your false beliefs that should be thrashed instead.
NT Gospels: Mark 9:43

γέενναν (geennan)
Noun - accusative Feminine Singular
Strong's 1067: Of Hebrew origin; valley of Hinnom; ge-henna, a valley of Jerusalem, used as a name for the place of everlasting punishment."

You MUMU follow follow your mentors to TWIST Gehenna, the valley of Hinnom @ Mark 9:43, una TWIST am to hellfire.


Jnr Ozuo pro max DECEIVING HIMSELF.


grin grin grin grin

Romance / How To Make Him Smile Again After A Fight by davidkingsley59(m): 11:57am On Jul 02, 2023
SO, YOU’VE HAD A NASTY ARGUMENT, AND NOW YOU’RE STARING AT YOUR CEILING, WONDERING HOW DO YOU MAKE HIM TALK TO YOU AFTER A FIGHT?
Your mind probably obsesses over the question: “Should I text him first after a fight?” Making up after a fight has always been a delicate thing to do, and it will be for as long as people get into relationships.

So, how do you make him talk to you after a fight, especially when some arguments are especially toxic, some less so, but in any case, they leave us in a bad place. Men especially tend to go radio silence on women in these situations.

In this article, I’ll give the answer to your burning question – “How do you make him talk to you after a fight?” by discussing various ways to de-escalate the situation.

1. MAKE UP AFTER A FIGHT, THE OLD FASHIONED WAY
How do you make him talk to you after a fight? The old-fashioned way.

There’s a common rule on how to make up after a fight, and it’s the old-fashioned way. The elements you’re working with here are – an apology and affection.

It may sound simple, and it is, in a way, but you need to be mindful about those things and not do them routinely. In other words, the apology needs to be sincere and affection genuine, coming from the place of your deepest love and care.

When it comes to what to say to your boyfriend after a fight, you should think in terms of rational thinking.

Most men are logical and rational beings, so try to avoid too much vague talk about your feelings and devotion.

In other words – be precise about what you did wrong and what you expect to happen in the future. Otherwise, you might only make him angrier.

2. USE TECHNOLOGY FOR ROMANCE
How do you make him talk to you after a fight?

Using technology for romance is a good idea.

In all probability, your mind keeps going back to what to text your boyfriend after a fight. We’re all accustomed to using technology for our relationships, but be careful; it can make more damage than good if you’re not careful.

Text is a tool that will give you time not to react impulsively, so use it. There are a few things to text your boyfriend after a fight and a few not to.

First, as with a live conversation, open with a sincere apology.

Explain why you reacted in a way you did, but avoid the accusative talk. Never trash-talk in messages, never yell or swear.

Don’t continue your fight. Just explain yourself. Then, offer a solution, a true compromise. Finally, ask for a live meeting.

Technology is handy, but there’s no topping in-person making up.

3. GIVE HIM SPACE

https://meziesblog.com/how-to-strike-a-conversation-with-your-man-after-a-fight/
Religion / Re: Why Did The Rich Man In Luke 16 Go To Hell? by Ken4Christ: 11:32am On May 08, 2023
mtngloetiartel:
What does the Bible say that helps us to understand what the soul is?Gen. 2:7: “God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul.” (Notice that this does not say that man was given a soul but that he became a soul, a living person.) (The part of the Hebrew word here rendered “soul” is neʹphesh. KJ, AS, and Dy agree with that rendering. RS, JB, NAB read “being.” NE says “creature.” Kx reads “person.”)1 Cor. 15:45: “It is even so written: ‘The first man Adam became a living soul.’ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” (So the Christian Greek Scriptures agree with the Hebrew Scriptures as to what the soul is.) (The Greek word here translated “soul” is the accusative case of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, Dy, JB, NAB, and Kx also read “soul.” RS, NE, and TEV say “being.”)1 Pet. 3:20: “In Noah’s days . . . a few people, that is, eight souls, were carried safely through the water.” (The Greek word here translated “souls” is psy·khaiʹ, the plural form of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, Dy, and Kx also read “souls.” JB and TEV say “people”; RS, NE, and NAB use “persons.”)Gen. 9:5: “Besides that, your blood of your souls [or, “lives”; Hebrew, from neʹphesh] shall I ask back.” (Here the soul is said to have blood.)Josh. 11:11: “They went striking every soul [Hebrew, neʹphesh] that was in it with the edge of the sword.” (The soul is here shown to be something that can be touched by the sword, so these souls could not have been spirits.)
Can the human soul die?Ezek. 18:4: “Look! All the souls—to me they belong. As the soul of the father so likewise the soul of the son—to me they belong. The soul* that is sinning—it itself will die.” (*Hebrew reads “the neʹphesh.” KJ, AS, RS, NE, and Dy render it “the soul.” Some translations say “the man” or “the person.”)Matt. 10:28: “Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul [or, “life”]; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul* and body in Gehenna.” (*Greek has the accusative case of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, RS, NE, TEV, Dy, JB, and NAB all render it “soul.”)Acts 3:23: “Indeed, any soul [Greek, psy·kheʹ] that does not listen to that Prophet will be completely destroyed from among the people.”

If you are a student of English language, you will know that so many words have multiple meaning. So, the usage of the word within the context determines the meaning.

The word soul is used in two ways in the Bible

First, it refers to the total man. For instance, if 5 persons died in an accident, we can say that five souls died.

Second, it is also used to describe that part of man that cannot be seen. It is the intellectual centre of man. It consists of the mind, will and emotion.

This is why a verse describes man as, spirit, soul and body.

And if you do your research, the original Hebrew or Greek word for the two different usage of soul are not the same.

Check my thread where I posted my book on the Total Man, you will get a very clear explanation on this.

It is this second description of soul that does not die. It is eternal just like the spirit of man.
Religion / Re: Why Did The Rich Man In Luke 16 Go To Hell? by Whoknow: 9:39pm On May 07, 2023
mtngloetiartel:
What does the Bible say that helps us to understand what the soul is?Gen. 2:7: “God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul.” (Notice that this does not say that man was given a soul but that he became a soul, a living person.) (The part of the Hebrew word here rendered “soul” is neʹphesh. KJ, AS, and Dy agree with that rendering. RS, JB, NAB read “being.” NE says “creature.” Kx reads “person.”)1 Cor. 15:45: “It is even so written: ‘The first man Adam became a living soul.’ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” (So the Christian Greek Scriptures agree with the Hebrew Scriptures as to what the soul is.) (The Greek word here translated “soul” is the accusative case of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, Dy, JB, NAB, and Kx also read “soul.” RS, NE, and TEV say “being.”)1 Pet. 3:20: “In Noah’s days . . . a few people, that is, eight souls, were carried safely through the water.” (The Greek word here translated “souls” is psy·khaiʹ, the plural form of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, Dy, and Kx also read “souls.” JB and TEV say “people”; RS, NE, and NAB use “persons.”)Gen. 9:5: “Besides that, your blood of your souls [or, “lives”; Hebrew, from neʹphesh] shall I ask back.” (Here the soul is said to have blood.)Josh. 11:11: “They went striking every soul [Hebrew, neʹphesh] that was in it with the edge of the sword.” (The soul is here shown to be something that can be touched by the sword, so these souls could not have been spirits.)
Can the human soul die?Ezek. 18:4: “Look! All the souls—to me they belong. As the soul of the father so likewise the soul of the son—to me they belong. The soul* that is sinning—it itself will die.” (*Hebrew reads “the neʹphesh.” KJ, AS, RS, NE, and Dy render it “the soul.” Some translations say “the man” or “the person.”)Matt. 10:28: “Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul [or, “life”]; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul* and body in Gehenna.” (*Greek has the accusative case of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, RS, NE, TEV, Dy, JB, and NAB all render it “soul.”)Acts 3:23: “Indeed, any soul [Greek, psy·kheʹ] that does not listen to that Prophet will be completely destroyed from among the people.”
God told Adam in the book of Genesis that the day he eat from the tree he asked him not to eat, he shall die but Adam ate from the tree but did not die physically, he rather he died spiritually, when there is physical body there is also spiritual body.
Religion / Re: Why Did The Rich Man In Luke 16 Go To Hell? by mtngloetiartel: 8:47pm On May 07, 2023
What does the Bible say that helps us to understand what the soul is?Gen. 2:7: “God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul.” (Notice that this does not say that man was given a soul but that he became a soul, a living person.) (The part of the Hebrew word here rendered “soul” is neʹphesh. KJ, AS, and Dy agree with that rendering. RS, JB, NAB read “being.” NE says “creature.” Kx reads “person.”)1 Cor. 15:45: “It is even so written: ‘The first man Adam became a living soul.’ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” (So the Christian Greek Scriptures agree with the Hebrew Scriptures as to what the soul is.) (The Greek word here translated “soul” is the accusative case of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, Dy, JB, NAB, and Kx also read “soul.” RS, NE, and TEV say “being.”)1 Pet. 3:20: “In Noah’s days . . . a few people, that is, eight souls, were carried safely through the water.” (The Greek word here translated “souls” is psy·khaiʹ, the plural form of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, Dy, and Kx also read “souls.” JB and TEV say “people”; RS, NE, and NAB use “persons.”)Gen. 9:5: “Besides that, your blood of your souls [or, “lives”; Hebrew, from neʹphesh] shall I ask back.” (Here the soul is said to have blood.)Josh. 11:11: “They went striking every soul [Hebrew, neʹphesh] that was in it with the edge of the sword.” (The soul is here shown to be something that can be touched by the sword, so these souls could not have been spirits.)
Can the human soul die?Ezek. 18:4: “Look! All the souls—to me they belong. As the soul of the father so likewise the soul of the son—to me they belong. The soul* that is sinning—it itself will die.” (*Hebrew reads “the neʹphesh.” KJ, AS, RS, NE, and Dy render it “the soul.” Some translations say “the man” or “the person.”)Matt. 10:28: “Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul [or, “life”]; but rather be in fear of him that can destroy both soul* and body in Gehenna.” (*Greek has the accusative case of psy·kheʹ. KJ, AS, RS, NE, TEV, Dy, JB, and NAB all render it “soul.”)Acts 3:23: “Indeed, any soul [Greek, psy·kheʹ] that does not listen to that Prophet will be completely destroyed from among the people.”
Ken4Christ:


Burning an object that is physical is not the same thing as burning an object that is spiritual or none tangible as far as this physical world is concerned.

So, the physical body can be burnt up but not the soul of a man.

The soul is simply tormented in the flame but it is not burnt up.
Religion / Re: Discover Eckankar by TheManPregnant: 2:43pm On Apr 11, 2023
chieveboy:


This would be taking us to another instance of "defenc/attack".

I responded because you mentioned me earlier. After my response, you went all accusative. Any way Sha...

I maintain a single handle here. Cheers!

Your response seemed like you were trying to defend yourself when it was just a simple conversation. Besides, I mentioned you because I have seen your invitation threads before and attended several services through them.
Religion / Re: Discover Eckankar by chieveboy(m): 2:26pm On Apr 11, 2023
TheManPregnant:


Is BetterChurch your alternate moniker?

This would be taking us to another instance of "defenc/attack".

I responded because you mentioned me earlier. After my response, you went all accusative. Any way Sha...

I maintain a single handle here. Cheers!
Crime / Re: Sexual Molestation Of A Minor. by ibkayee(f): 12:36pm On Jan 05, 2023
nairamaniac:


Okay. You are right about me making conclusions about how the op and husband approached the other family about the issue.

I only got picture based in step by step narrative put in here by the OP.

Maybe the Op should be nice enough to tell us on how they approached the other family as regards the issue.
Were they more of accusative than interrogative?
That’s probably the least of her concerns now given the situation at hand, I hope she overcomes this, whatever happens.
Crime / Re: Sexual Molestation Of A Minor. by nairamaniac: 12:31pm On Jan 05, 2023
ibkayee:

You don’t know the details of the discussion they had. You don’t know the manner in which they asked, or whether or not they outright accused them. All we know is that it was addressed and then there was a fallout after discussion. You don’t know anything about who or how anyone was aggressive during that discussion. We just know that the dad turned his back AFTERWARDS.


Nothing about this quote tells us how the message was relayed, worded or the details of the engagement except that he was angry when he brought it their attention.

Like I said, all we know is that whichever response he got from them caused him to turn his back and ‘shut’ his father up. So I still don’t know how you know they ‘compromised’ anything since the only thing we’re aware of is that they addressed it with their family, there was some sort of engagement that we know absolutely nothing about, the family denied it and then the dad turned his back on them and his shut dad up in response.

Were they not meant to be angry or address it? You aren’t actually privy to the details of the engagement that occurred between the families.


‘Breaking down’ could have manifested in multiple different ways, she did not actually detail what actions they took except addressing it with the family.


I didn’t say you said they were innocent, just that the assumptions you made were conveniently in favour of the family despite your ‘neutrality’ stance.

A truly neutral person would not be filling in gaps he thinks may have happened in the story in favour of anyone at all. E.g. your assumptions on the mum and dad ‘compromising’ the situation despite not having any details on the interactions

Okay. You are right about me making conclusions about how the op and husband approached the other family about the issue.

I only got picture based on step by step narrative put in here by the OP.

Maybe the Op should be nice enough to tell us on how they approached the other family as regards the issue.
Where they more of accusative than interrogative?

MsJackson, kindly tell us how your husband and yourself approached the other family before the part of:
*"I broke down. Hubby had never become so mad at his family to the extent of turning his back on them, to the extent of shutting his dad up, but he did all these because his only child was involved".

We all are sorry for the incident and I don't expect you take it likely.
Romance / Re: Reasons Why Men Marry by theInfinity: 10:35pm On Dec 25, 2022
Maybe this could have been a better statement "Exactly, ladies should pay attention to these before getting married." How about that.
Persephone1:
Perhaps you can explain why the focus of your thread shifted from men to women in an accusative / condemning tune in nano seconds then.
Romance / Re: Reasons Why Men Marry by Nobody: 10:18pm On Dec 25, 2022
theInfinity:
I am not in any way blaming the ladies. We all learn every day and that's why this thread is created.
Perhaps you can explain why the focus of your thread shifted from men to women in an accusative / condemning tune in nano seconds then.

1 Like

Politics / Aregbesola's Self-displacement: "Open Advisory Note To Ex-governor" Revisited by Jimsonjaat96(m): 1:52pm On Mar 03, 2022
Collective wisdom of both the old and the young ones formed the cradle of the Yoruba origin at Ile-Ife, so goes a Yoruba adage. So, as the young grow and socialize via the wisdom of elders, the elderly should not forget their wisdom at the back of their palms by refusing to heed pieces of advice from the young ones.

Exactly a year ago (March 1st, 2021), I wrote an open letter to the former governor titled "Open Advisory Note to Osun ex-governor, Rauf Aregbesola". I considered my humble advice imperative at the time, at least, to allay Ogbeni's apprehension of displacement in the Osun All Progressives Congress party.

However, I got a vicarious exposure to Ogbeni's audacious viral outbursts on February 14, 2022, at Zenabab Hotel, Ilesha, Osun State, where he addressed members of 'The Osun Progressives' (TOP), his self-style-adherent intra-party antagonistic group. I am still none the wiser, as I could not fathom Ogbeni's rationale, in his infinite wisdom, for championing an opposition in his own party, where his leadership, especially in Osun was hitherto well accepted.

As a reminiscence of his viral vituperations at Ilesha, and public intimidation at Osogbo, and of course, the reactionary public condemnation cum vehement criticisms that followed, my humble 'Advisory Note' to the ex-governor is herewith revisited, as fore warned is fore armed!

The 16-paragraph 'Note' extolled Aregbesola's political bravery, valour and comradeship, as it described him not only as "a vibrant Engineer, but also a dogged fighter, democratic fundamentalist, and even a political revolutionist", given the role he played in wrestling power through a serious litigation cum court pronouncement from the former governor, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) . This description was never sycophantic at all; that was my 'objective' perception of Ogbeni.

Graduating from 'appreciation' School of Thought, I (perhaps erroneously) opined Ogbeni was a don in the same school, thus expected him to be a man of gratitude, and not a wiseacre, over public acceptance of his candidacy in Osun; a governor for eight years, and now a Minister, on the state's slot, despite the fact that he wasn't known in Osun prior to his debut in the state's politics in 2007.

In the 5th paragraph, the 'Advisory Note' states: "Sincerely, you have had it so good! And surely you can have it better and even best, but that's if you take caution and calm down. I like to sincerely advise you sir, to calm down".

However, the recent outbursts and vituperative, disparaging comments about his leaders and especially his successor, obviously show that Ogbeni neither heeded my humble advice, took caution nor 'calmed down'. Liking Ogbeni's impacts in Osun to the indelibility of sculptor's (Onirese) aesthetic designs, according to a Yoruba adage, the 'Advisory Note', in the 6th and 8th paragraphs, states:

"You are a leader in Osun APC. This is a fact, and it's incontrovertible. To allay your fears, as you apprehensively expressed in the media, nobody can displace you in Osun APC, not even Iyiola Omisore, whose recent defection to APC provoked your accusative reactions, nor your successor, governor Adegboyega Oyetola, whose 'silence remains golden".

"However, there's a person who can displace you (Ogbeni), not only in Osun, where your leadership is not in contest, but totally in the APC and of course, from the flocks of the Progressives. The name of that person is Ogbeni Rauf Adesoji Aregbesola. Sir, I'm sure you know him. Of course, it is yourself, who can, and will displace self, like I had earlier advised, if you do not take heed!".

You see! Unless Ogbeni quickly makes amends, he has almost displaced himself, not only in Osun politics, as I had earlier admonished, but also in the APC, as the recent public pronouncement and joyous demonstration of his proclaimed political death in Alimosho-Lagos, his hitherto believed constituency with incontestable political clout, revealed.

Again, I advise the ex-governor and now Minister, to quickly make amends, as he still has a chance to redeem himself and resuscitate his political soul from its obvious demise before his burial. Yes, his misdemeanors are redeeming, not because they are not bad, or highly disappointing, but just because the people Ogbeni is fighting are people of large hearts, who are ingenuously endowed to have envisaged his sins before he comited them and would have forgiven him before he apologized. Engr. Aregbesola knows this fact, and might be reason he's taking them for granted with sheer effrontery.

I perceive Ogbeni as an unrepentant, unapologetic, seemingly-unremorseful and idiosyncratic politician, who hardly accepts defeat and admits errors. I advise him to prove me wrong by eschewing these unwholesome attributes, especially where and when necessary. Conventional wisdom expects him to stop acting as a wiseacre, and jettison his wise-guy and know-all tendencies.

I extend my advice to people who are very close to him to kindly massage his ego and rip the wilderness in him off, so that he would see reasons why he urgently needs to be remorseful and apologetic to the party leaders, intimidated public members, and especially his political benefactors.

March 1st, 2022
Jimoh Olorede is a Doctoral Research Scholar, College don, Public Affair Analyst and Poet. He can be reached via oloredejimoh@gmail.com.
Religion / Re: Is Jesus Christ A God Or A Prophet by haekymbahdx: 9:42pm On Aug 25, 2021
nencounter10:



https://www.nairaland.com/search?q=accusative&search=Search

In case you are unable to follow the link I gave you above, the following should help you.


Just as we have the nominative(subject) case and objective(object) case in English and the form of a word(usually pronouns) changes with cases.For instancd, He is used for the nominative case while 'him' is used for the objective case. Both refers to singular male person. Another example is the word 'they' . They is used In the nominative case while 'them' is used in the objective case. They both refer to plural male person.

Similarly, in Greek, a noun has up to eight cases. Theos is used in one case and theon is used in another case. They bother refer to the noun God.
Am I right if I say this

Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος

En arkhêi ên ho lógos, kaì ho lógos ên pròs tòn theón, kaì theòs ên ho lógos

In the beginning existed the Word, and the Word existed with the God, and a God was the Word.



Note: there is difference between the God and or a god (a God)

ton theon - The God (definite) NOUN

Kai theos.- and God (indefinite) ADJECTIVE

The meaning of the Greek article
The meaning of the Greek article is slightly different, which can make it difficult for English speakers to grasp.

"The primary function of the [Greek] article is not to make a word definite.

When the article is present, it is emphasizing identity

When the article is not present, it is generally emphasizing the quality of the substantive."

-Mounce, BBG, p. 334
Religion / Re: Is Jesus Christ A God Or A Prophet by nencounter10: 7:58pm On Aug 25, 2021
haekymbahdx:
sorry for quoting you do you mean just like God and god are different forms of the same noun (GOD) but has different meanings and interpretation.

I was only wondering why the author of John 1:1 didn't use the same words either Theon or Theos in the same sentence.


https://www.nairaland.com/search?q=accusative&search=Search

In case you are unable to follow the link I gave you above, the following should help you.


Just as we have the nominative(subject) case and objective(object) case in English and the form of a word(usually pronouns) changes with cases.For instancd, He is used for the nominative case while 'him' is used for the objective case. Both refers to singular male person. Another example is the word 'they' . They is used In the nominative case while 'them' is used in the objective case. They both refer to plural male person.

Similarly, in Greek, a noun has up to eight cases. Theos is used in one case and theon is used in another case. They bother refer to the noun God.
Religion / Re: Is Jesus Christ A God Or A Prophet by nencounter10: 7:36pm On Aug 25, 2021
haekymbahdx:
sorry for quoting you do you mean just like God and god are different forms of the same noun (GOD) but has different meanings and interpretation.

I was only wondering why the author of John 1:1 didn't use the same words either Theon or Theos in the same sentence.


Both words mean God, but the form changes with usage .


Follow the link below for more info

https://www.nairaland.com/search?q=accusative&search=Search
Religion / Re: Who Is Melchizedek? - Jesus Christ? by Janosky: 8:06pm On Aug 11, 2021
sagenaija:
[size=6pt][/size]
Context!!, janosky, Context!!!
Greek John 1:1, "the word was towards the God."

the
ὁ (ho)
Strong's 3588: The, the definite article.

Word
Λόγος (Logos)
Noun -
Strong's 3056:.

was
ἦν (ēn)
Verb - Imperfect Indicative Active - 3rd Person Singular
Strong's 1510: exist.

with
πρὸς (pros)
Preposition
Strong's 4314: To, towards, with.

the
ὁ (ho)
Strong's 3588: The, the definite article.


God,
Θεόν (Theon)
Noun - accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's 2316: A deity,

Bros, @ Greek John 1:1, does Greek 3588 2316 refers to "the word"?
@ Greek John 1:1,is g3588 2316 "the word "?
@ John 1:1 , who is Greek 3588 2316?
According to Jesus Christ @ John 14:1, who is Greek 3588 2316?
According to apostle John @ Greek John 1:1 & John 14:1, who is Greek 3588 2316 "the God"?
@ Greek Ephesians 1:3, John 1:1, 2 Corinthians11:31, who is Greek 3588 2316?
Bros, no dey DECEIVE yourself jare. grin grin grin

Romance / Re: Obi Cubana Don Use Him Mama Renew, Now E Dey Throw Lavish Party To Appease D God by Depressed101: 5:25pm On Jul 16, 2021
Aliyu007:
If you think the events of the last few days in the so called OBa for anambra is normal then you need to rethink.

I pity you if you step your foot into that place. Many girls will have their destiny stolen. The super natural is real, it's not a matter of superstition. There are so many things out there without logical reasoning. Be careful.
oga oh... Shut up, and don't be jealous of another man's wealth... If you say vanity I go hear you, but why the accusative finger... If them arrest you now for defamation of character, how you go do am, hope say you get money to bail yourself... Abeg make everybody hold themselves dey watch, last last we go know who be who. Stop the accusations and double your hustle, who knows you might become richer than him, and people will say you use your mama for wealth
Religion / Re: ⚫⚫⚫⚫ Just Like God, Satan Also Has His Own Trinity Of Evil by Janosky: 10:18pm On Jul 09, 2021
Bishopkingsley:


The apparent differences in spelling between the word ‘God’ in the phrase ‘and the Word was God’ (‘theos’) and in other places, (even in the previous phrase, ‘and the Word was with God’ (‘theon’)) is due to inflection in the Greek language.

Each Greek noun normally has 8 or 9 forms (cases & number) in which it can appear. (). In the first instance in John 1:1 it is the object of preposition and thus is in the accusative case. In the phrase in question,

it is in the nominative case (indicating the subject or predicate nominative - equal to the subject). But it is the same word for ‘God’, and in both phrases here indicates the One and Only True God.

So the apparent difference is spelling is not because ‘theos’ is a different word than ‘theon’, but is a different form of the identical word.

Whether there is inflection, that is not the point.

@ John 1:1 the word is ho Logos.
Greek 3588 ho ...(the)
Ho Logos-the word was with ho theos-the God.
@ John 14:1, John 17:3 , John 1:1 & John 20:17, Bishop,in your own Bible lexicon, who did John and Jesus call "ho theos -the God"?

grin grin grin grin grin
Religion / Re: ⚫⚫⚫⚫ Just Like God, Satan Also Has His Own Trinity Of Evil by Bishopkingsley(m): 10:05pm On Jul 09, 2021
Janosky:


Greek lexicon 1513 2316 = was a god.
Proof : Acts 28:6 & John 1:1.
Greek 2316 theos ,2nd meaning is "a god".
In John 1:1, first theos - 'ho theos' the Father.
In John 1:1 "the word,2nd theos means "a god"
IYKYK.


People also ask
What does the verse John 1 1 mean?
[It] is clear that in the translation "the Word was God", the term God is being used to denote his nature or essence, and not his person. ... This verse is echoed in the Nicene Creed: "God (qualitative or derivative) from God (personal, the Father), Light from Light, True God from True God… homoousion with the Father."

John 1:1 "the word was divine/a god.

The word is Not ho theos -the God, his Father.

grin

The apparent differences in spelling between the word ‘God’ in the phrase ‘and the Word was God’ (‘theos’) and in other places, (even in the previous phrase, ‘and the Word was with God’ (‘theon’)) is due to inflection in the Greek language.

Each Greek noun normally has 8 or 9 forms (cases & number) in which it can appear. (). In the first instance in John 1:1 it is the object of preposition and thus is in the accusative case. In the phrase in question,

it is in the nominative case (indicating the subject or predicate nominative - equal to the subject). But it is the same word for ‘God’, and in both phrases here indicates the One and Only True God.

So the apparent difference is spelling is not because ‘theos’ is a different word than ‘theon’, but is a different form of the identical word.
Literature / Common Grammatical Errors In Writing by umoh461(m): 12:07pm On Jun 02, 2021
Even seasoned writers can slip up on grammatical tenets with ever-tightening deadlines, burdensome workloads, and looming burnout.
Here are five to refresh your memory:

1. Parallel construction.

These days you can’t swing a dead albatross without hitting this construction:

He bought peanuts, Cracker Jack and went to the ballgame.

The series is shown to be flawed by removing the first two elements:

He bought peanuts, Cracker Jack and went to the ballgame.

He bought went to the ballgame. Really?

Better to recast it:

He bought peanuts and Cracker Jack and went to the ballgame.

In all likelihood, he opted to root, root, root for the home team, as well.

2. Nominative versus accusative case.

Nominative pronouns (I, we, he, she, they) are subjects of verbs; accusative pronouns (me, us, him, her, them) are direct objects of verbs. The latter forms are also used as objects of prepositions.

So instead of this:

Him and her should contact we and they.

Go with:

He and she should contact us and them.

For some reason, this gaffe is more commonly seen when there is a first-person singular pronoun (I, me) and a person’s first name.

Me and Reva are going out.

Be sure to tell Gwendolyn and I when you’re ready.

Instead, make it:

Reva and I are going out.

Be sure to tell Gwendolyn and me when you’re ready.

When in doubt, toss Gwendolyn out. Then you can see whether I or me should be used.

Following that approach, we see it should be:

Be sure to tell Gwendolyn and me when you’re ready.

And not:

Be sure to tell Gwendolyn and I when you’re ready.

3. Whomever

This is usually used incorrectly.

Whomever leads the committee will have a difficult task.

Give this to whomever leads the committee.

In both cases, it should be whoever.

First, the technical reason and then a handy hint:

In each case, whoever is heading the committee is a noun clause; grammatically, it’s a solid block. Within that solid block, the grammar holds: The verb leads requires a subject (nominative case, which here would be whoever, not the object whomever).

OK, now for the handy hint: Sub in “the person who/whom” and see which works better.

The person whom leads the committee will have a difficult task.

No. Instead go with:

The person who leads the committee will have a difficult task.

Likewise not:

Give this to the person whom leads the committee.

But rather:

Give this to the person who leads the committee.

4. Subject-verb agreement.

This sort of thing is ubiquitous these days:

Planning your podcast and measuring its effectiveness is essential for success.

Note that we have two distinct subjects in this example: (1) planning your podcast and (2) measuring its effectiveness. Yet often—exceedingly often—a writer will use a singular verb form, in this case, is. In such instances, use are or the plural form of whatever verb applies.

For clarity:

Planning your podcast and measuring its effectiveness are essential for success.

Some compound subjects—those that depict a monolithic entity—can be treated as a single item:

Mergers and acquisitions was a major trend in banking in the 1990s.

5. Dangling modifiers

Rushing into the kitchen, Olga’s dinner was spewing smoke.

This suggests that the dinner itself was rushing into the kitchen. (It must have been fast food.)

The introductory phrase modifies what follows. Therefore, try:

Rushing into the kitchen, Olga saw her dinner was spewing smoke.

Source: https://www.jabborro.com/2021/05/common-grammatical-errors-in-writing.html
Islam for Muslims / Re: New Muslim Doesn't Know Ruling On Not Completing Al-fatiha With Imam by Lukgaf(m): 6:47pm On Apr 22, 2021
"Praise be to Allah.

1 – Reciting Soorat al-Faatihah is a pillar or essential part of prayer – according to the correct scholarly view – and it is obligatory upon the imam who leads the prayer, the one who prays behind an imam and the one who prays on his own.

It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever offers a prayer in which he does not recite Umm al-Kitaab (i.e., al-Faatihah), it is defective” – and he said it three times. It was said to Abu Hurayrah, (What if) we are behind the imam? He said, Recite it to yourself, for I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say, “Allah said: I have divided prayer between Myself and My slave into two halves, and My slave shall have what he has asked for. When the slave says: Al-hamdu lillahi rabbi l-alamin (All the praises and thanks be to Allaah, the Lord of the ‘Aalameen (mankind, jinn and all that exists), Allah says: My slave has praised Me.

And when he says: Ar-Rahmaan ir-Raheem (The Most Gracious, the Most Merciful), Allah (mighty and sublime be He) says: My slave has extolled Me

and when he says: Maaliki yawm id-deen (The Only Owner (and the Only Ruling Judge) of the Day of Recompense (i.e. the Day of Resurrection)), Allah says: My slave has glorified Me - and on one occasion He said: My slave has submitted to My power.

And when he says: Iyyaaka na’budu wa iyyaaka nasta’een (You (Alone) we worship, and You (Alone) we ask for help (for each and everything)), He says: This is between Me and My slave, and My slave shall have what he is asking for.

And when he says: Ihdina’s-siraata’l- mustaqeem, siraat alladheena an’amta alayhim ghayril-maghdoobi alayhim wa la’ d-daalleen (Guide us to the Straight Way. The way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger, nor of those who went astray), He says: This is for My slave, and My slave shall have what he has asked for.”

(Narrated by Muslim)

So the worshipper must recite it properly in Arabic, because we are commanded to read and recite the Qur’aan as it was revealed.

2 – Whoever is unable to pronounce it properly because of some defect in his tongue or because he is not an Arabic-speaker must learn to correct his pronunciation as much as he can.

If he cannot, then he is relieved of this obligation, because Allaah does not burden people with more than they are able to bear.

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Allaah burdens not a person beyond his scope”

[al-Baqarah 2:286]

3 – If a person is unable to recite al-Faatihah at all or is unable to learn it, or he has just become Muslim and the time for prayer has come and there is not enough time for him to learn it, then he is given a way out in the following hadeeth:

It was narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Abi Awfa said: A man came to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and said: “O Messenger of Allaah, teach me something of the Qur’aan that will suffice me, for I cannot read.” He said, “Say: Subhaan-Allaah wa’l-hamdu Lillaah wa laa ilaaha ill-Allaah wa Allaahu akbar wa laa hawla wa la quwwata illa Billaah (Glory be to Allaah, praise be to Allaah, there is no god except Allaah and Allaah is Most great, there is no god except Allaah and there is no power and no strength except with Allaah).” The man made a grabbing gesture with his hand (indicating that he had learned a lot) and said, “This is for my Lord, what is there for me?” He said, “Say: Allaahumma ighfir li warhamni wahdini warzuqni wa ‘aafini (O Allaah, forgive me, have mercy on me, guide me, and grant me provision and good health).” He made another grabbing gesture with his other hand and stood up.

(Narrated by al-Nasaa’i, 924; Abu Dawood, 832. Its isnaad was classed as jayyid by al-Mundhiri in al-Targheeb wa’l-Tarheeb, 2/430. al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar indicated that it is hasan in al-Talkhees al-Habeer, 1/236)

Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

If a person does not know any Qur’aan, and he cannot learn it before the time for prayer is over, then he must say Subhaan-Allaah wa’l-hamdu Lillaah wa laa ilaaha ill-Allaah wa Allaahu akbar wa laa hawla wa la quwwata illa Billaah (Glory be to Allaah, praise be to Allaah, there is no god except Allaah, Allaah is Most great and there is no power and no strength except with Allaah), because Abu Dawood narrated that a man came to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and said, “I am not able to learn anything of the Qur’aan, so teach me something that will suffice me.” He said, “Say, Subhaan-Allaah wa’l-hamdu Lillaah wa laa ilaaha ill-Allaah wa Allaahu akbar wa laa hawla wa la quwwata illa Billaah.” The man said, “This is for my Lord, what is there for me?” He said, “Say: Allaahumma ighfir li warhamni warzuqni wahdini wa ‘aafini (O Allaah, forgive me, have mercy on me, grant me provision, guide me, and give me good health).” But he does not have to do more than say the first five phrases, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) only said that, and he only told him more when he asked for more.

(end of Ibn Qudaamah’s words)

But if a person is able to recite part of al-Faatihah only, he should recite that which he is able to recite. And he has to repeat what he can recite well (i.e., so that the total number of what he recites will be seven verses, equivalent to the number of verses in al-Faatihah).

Ibn Qudaamah said:

It may be sufficient for him to say alhamdu-Lillaah (praise be to Allaah), laa ilaaha ill-Allaah (there is no god but Allaah) and Allaahu akbar (Allaah is most great), because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whatever you know of Qur’aan, recite it, otherwise praise Allaah, proclaim His Oneness and magnify Him.” (Narrated by Abu Dawood)

(al-Mughni, 1/289, 290)

What you have read about the prayer being invalid if the worshipper mispronounces a single letter of al-Faatihah cannot be taken as general in meaning. Not every mistake in al-Faatihah invalidates the prayer; rather it cannot be invalidated unless something is omitted from al-Faatihah, or the pronunciation is changed in a way that distorts the meaning. Moreover, this ruling on the prayer becoming invalid applies to those who are able to recite al-Faatihah correctly or who are able to learn it but do not.

As for those who are unable to do so, they should recite it as best as they can, and that does not affect them, because Allaah does not burden a soul beyond its scope. One of the basic principles established by the scholars is that nothing is obligatory when a person is unable to do it. See al-Mughni, 2/154.

In this case a person should recite al-Faatihah as best as he is able, and then glorify Allaah, praise Him, magnify Him and proclaim His Oneness (by saying Subhaan-Allaah wa’l-hamdu Lillaah wa Allaahu akbar wa laa ilaaha ill-Allaah), so that this will make up for whatever he has missed out of al-Faatihah.

See al-Majmoo’, 3/375.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked:

Is the prayer of one who mispronounces al-Faatihah valid or not?

He replied:

If a person mispronounces al-Faatihah in a way that does not distort the meaning, his prayer is valid, whether he is leading others in prayer or is praying alone.

But with regard to the kind of mispronunciation that distorts the meaning, if the person knows the meaning, such as if he says ‘Siraat allaadheena an’amtu ‘alayhim [meaning “The way of those on whom I have bestowed my grace”, instead of the correct version an’amta (The way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace)], and he knows that this verbal form is wrong, then the prayer is not valid. But if he does not know that he is distorting the meaning, and he thinks that this form is second person singular rather than first person, then there is a difference of scholarly opinion on this point. And Allaah knows best.

Majmoo’ al-Fataawam 22/443

He was also asked about when a person ends a word with –i that should end in –a when praying (or renders it genitive when it should be accusative).

He replied:

If he is aware of what he is doing and he does it deliberately, then his prayer is invalid, because he is playing about in his prayer. But if he is unaware of that, then his prayer is not invalid, according to one of the two scholarly views.

Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 22/444

So you must try hard and keep practising it. You can do this by reciting it to another Muslim sister who can recite it well, and by listening to soorahs recited by skilled reciters on tapes or broadcasts.

There is no need to feel nervous and anxious, because Allaah knows what is in people’s hearts, and He knows who is trying hard and making the effort, and who is lazy and heedless.

The difficulty that you find in reciting Qur’aan will increase your hasanaat (good deeds) and rewards. It was narrated that ‘Aaishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The one who is skilled in reciting Qur’aan will be with the noble and obedient scribes (i.e., angels) and the one who reads the Qur’aan and struggles with it because it is difficult for him will have two rewards.”

(Narrated by Muslim, 798)

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

The one who struggles with it is the one who is hesitant in his recitation because he is not able to memorize it well. He will have two rewards: the reward for reciting it and the reward for his efforts in reciting it.

There is no need to repeat verses more than once, because this is not what the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did or taught. Rather that opens the door to waswaas (whispers from the Shaytaan), detracts from the prayer, makes you lose your focus, distracts you from pondering the meaning of the verses and makes the Shaytaan happy, because from that he can find a way to make you suffer so that you will ultimately give up praying. But Allaah is Most Gracious and Most Merciful, and He is more merciful towards us than we are to ourselves, and He does not burden us with more than we can bear ."
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/5410/a-new-muslim-finding-it-difficult-to-recite-al-faatihah
Romance / Re: My Brother And The Wife Had Sex In My Room, Why Won't She Wash The Sheets? by bukatyne(f): 11:38am On Feb 15, 2021
JLM:
I am glad you said the "couple". Op only holds his sister in-law as the guilty one. Whereas two people had sex there. He didn't say one accusative word at all against his brother. Please every statement he has made depicts only hatred for that lady. It's so obvious.

A new bedsheet is therefore not the solution to this at all.


His SIL is not relative by blood, his brother is.

Just how if it was flipped, he would be disgusted that his BIL had sex on his bed and not his sister.

With the part of the thread I read, if they changed the sheets before his arrival, he would not have known.

And even if he did, the changed/washed sheets would suffice.
Romance / Re: My Brother And The Wife Had Sex In My Room, Why Won't She Wash The Sheets? by JLM(f): 11:30am On Feb 15, 2021
I am glad you said the "couple". Op only holds his sister in-law as the guilty one. Whereas two people had sex there. He didn't say one accusative word at all against his brother. Please every statement he has made depicts only hatred for that lady. It's so obvious.

A new bedsheet is therefore not the solution to this at all.

bukatyne:
Very very funny thread grin

The couple was wrong to have sex in the room the OP is staying in and doubly wrong for not cleaning up after themselves.

I can not process having sex with my husband in a room not mine and not cleaning up.

I can't imagine sleeping on a bed people had sex in and not cleaned up.

We all know what is right by decorum and courtesy.

Let's not let our 'disagreement' with the OP's outlook towards life change that.

He also stated somewhere that he expects his brother's wife to wash the sheets because she is the stranger to him and would require same from his sister's husband. (Well!)

The OP is obviously one who believes in traditional spirituality and has OCD hence his disgust for women (fluids, periods, pregnancy, childbirth etc) and rigidity. Some do not share a bed with their wives when during her periods. Some don't eat her food then and other crazy stuff. Some do not even share bedrooms or bathrooms with their wives. Such men are also very 'traditional' to the point of misogyny.

If the OP sieves through the thread, he has been given enough counsel. He should also ensure he marries a lady who has same outlook towards life like him.

2 Likes

Religion / Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Image123(m): 12:35am On Feb 08, 2021
Janosky:

I should ask you:
Does Almighty God have wife in heaven?
Which chapter/verse did you read in your Bible that Jesus have a mother in heaven?


* Servant
Παῖδα (Paida)
Noun - accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's Greek 3816: Perhaps from paio; a boy, or, a girl, and a child; specially, a slave or servant."

Bros, what is mesmerizing about the meaning of Strong's Greek 3816 at Acts 3:13 ?


How does that info I gave you to research, now translate to "inability to think"?

Bros, please quote Matthew 12:15-18 on this thread.. use your church mind do the needful....
grin cheesy grin cheesy
"

Here's the question again, don't be distracted ehn.
Is Adam in Heaven? Who is Jesus' mother in Heaven then? How is He Son and servant together? Is your son or daughter your servant?

Since you seem fazed as to why i ask. Lemme help you again. You said that Jesus is Son in Heaven too. If you understand that well, then you can explain who His mother is in Heaven. Your reference to Adam begat my asking where Adam is, to which you and your cohort crookedly replied that Adam is not in Heaven. Good, so don't compare apples and tomatoes fa.
After that, you have these personal questions to answer. Your answer should enable you think instead of copy&paste. Here again.
2. How is Jesus Son and servant together?
3. Is your son or daughter(if you have children) your servant?

Every normal/average Christian denomination knows God as many things or "faces". Same way they know Jesus Christ as many things or "faces". It is not news that God is Elohim or Adonai or Jehovah or Father and many thousand things we call Him. It is Jwickedness that have a problem with that, you believe He is only Jehovah nothing else really.
Same way it is not news that Jesus is Son or Servant or God or King or Door or Shepherd or Bishop or Savior or Branch and many thousand things we call Him. It is still Jwickedness that have problem with that, you believe He is servant not God or really Son in the sense. You quoting 20 passages that He is servant is irrelevant to the discussion. We know that and teach it too. It's like me quoting many passages that Jesus is Light. That's basic knowledge to me so quit missing the point. Your shallow attempt to mesmerize was very clear. Acts 3v13 is translated as servant in your new world translation. It is translated servant also in many other Bible versions. So it was pointless playing to the gallery telling me about Greek and son and servant. You supposed i don't know this and will probably use a KJV and be wowed in some way that you knew "this revelation that Jesus is a servant but they are selling Him as a Son to me". But thank God for superior Jwickedness Bible Study, they open my eyes to see Jesus is servant. So when i call you guys clowns, take it seriously you are.
No need continued attempt to prove that Jesus is Servant, we know. The point is that He is not only servant. Open your eyes and see that. Answer the question now if you can. i hope you are humble enough to answer, your elders might command you instead to put your tail in between and run along. Don't be a slave, pun not intended.
Religion / Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 10:35pm On Feb 07, 2021
Image123:


Oh, you later edited this. Who passed it to you na? i understand the reputation for inability to think as an individual. What is all this theatrics and drama. The person that dictated this to you should be aware of the several verses where Jesus is called and known as the Son of God, even the evil spirits know it. The same book of Acts clearly call Him the Son of God. So this futile attempt to mesmerize me instead of answer my question is for the gullible. Answer the question clearly and directly. [/b]Explain, don't give me jokes. At least, you pride yourselves as the only ones that know God and His Word.
Who's His mother in Heaven then? [b]How is He Son and servant together? Is your son or daughter your servant?
Na question i ask oh, no come with insult or joke
I should ask you:
Does Almighty God have wife in heaven?
Which chapter/verse did you read in your Bible that Jesus have a mother in heaven?


* Servant
Παῖδα (Paida)
Noun - accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's Greek 3816: Perhaps from paio; a boy, or, a girl, and a child; specially, a slave or servant."

Bros, what is mesmerizing about the meaning of Strong's Greek 3816 at Acts 3:13 ?


How does that info I gave you to research, now translate to "inability to think"?

Bros, please quote Matthew 12:15-18 on this thread.. use your church mind do the needful....
grin cheesy grin cheesy
"
Religion / Re: Since Jehovah's Witnesses Are Not Christians..what Do We Call Them? by bixton(m): 11:19pm On Jan 13, 2021
Janosky:

Jesus is not Almighty God.. in your opinion, wrong.
Jesus is son of God, right.
God Almighty is son of God... Contradiction..

The contradiction occurred because you gave an interpretation of what I did not say

And I do not think I did a typo error.

Your argument is Jesus is not God.

To emphasize your point you said Jesus is not the Almighty God.

Such is used for our understanding since the original language needed to be interpreted into english.

The names of God:

YHWH.
El.
Eloah.
Elohim.
Elohai.
El Shaddai.
Tzevaot.
Jah.

It is from this Hebrew words that we get our translation into english.



God is God. The God Almighty. The LORD GOD Almighty. The LORD GOD. The Alpha and Omega.
The I AM. The Lord of hosts.



Acts 3:13.. the same Greek word means "son/servant". Yes a word can have 2 meaning but depending on the context of the sentence it finds itself. It cannot never be interchanged in the same sentence.

servant
Παῖδα (Paida)
Noun - accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's Greek 3816: Perhaps from paio; a boy, or, a girl, and a child; specially, a slave or servant

Matthew 12:15-18. Isaiah 42:1.. Jesus Christ is Jehovah's Servant.
Religion / Re: Since Jehovah's Witnesses Are Not Christians..what Do We Call Them? by Janosky: 10:23pm On Jan 13, 2021
bixton:





Please point to where the contradiction lies......

God Almighty....noted.
The opinion that gets entitled is that which corresponds to the word of God.

A son cannot be a servant of his father except he is illegitimate.

Matt.3.17 - And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."

If the Father referred to Jesus as His son and not his servant who am I to say differently.

We should try to understand the context of words as used in the Scripture.

Thanks.
God's blessing.


Jesus is not Almighty God.. in your opinion, wrong.
Jesus is son of God, right.
God Almighty is son of God... Contradiction..

Acts 3:13.. the same Greek word means "son/servant".

servant
Παῖδα (Paida)
Noun - accusative Masculine Singular
Strong's Greek 3816: Perhaps from paio; a boy, or, a girl, and a child; specially, a slave or servant

Matthew 12:15-18. Isaiah 42:1.. Jesus Christ is Jehovah's Servant.
Not Satisfied? Click Here To Try Google Search!

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (of 9 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 196
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.