Shock's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Shock's Profile › Shock's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 10 pages)
Dhotseal: Dude! Why don't u go make some money and send your kids to the best schools. Why is it your business to worry about the common man? Covenant University isn't for common men.oh shut it with your bloody diatribe already. Sounds like the sort of manure that you are being sold in your schools - to justify the extortion and fleecing. Face it you are no Stephen Hawkings, Che Guevara, Steve Jobs or Micheal Faraday. Chances are, you are just one of the millions of people that leave school for a paid employment. You will never change your world. You will get married, have kids and die in your old age, just like every other person! Nothing makes you special. YOU ARE A COMMON MAN! |
shymexx: Interesting, I must say.I agree on that first point. I think it is likely that American policy makers are aware that there's no chance in hell that the tide of war will ever favor Assad oppositions - so their next best strategy is to call a few radicals by the name "moderate"/"vetted" rebels and provide them with arms till at least Assad comes back to the negotiating table. - The complexities involved are too much. I have just read an article that states that American authorities are actually co-operating with Assad on the ground, despite their public claims that they wouldn't do so! - I wouldn't be too surprised if this news were true. The Obama administration has shown its willingness to do several of such "back-room" deals in the past - from its dealings with Iran, which left Israel in the dark, to exchanging POWs with Talibans, which left several members of congress stunned. It is therefore very likely that America is secretly working with Iran and Syria while publicly denouncing those claims. |
Did not fix the American economy? what rubbish!!!! You must be on some cheap weed! |
shymexx: Firstly, sticking to plan is where it gets tricky because the US is trying to fight ISIS on one hand in Syria, while also trying to arm the "moderate" FSA rebels on the other hand, to overthrow Assad (based on all the statements in the media this week and NATO summit in Wales last week). And that's mission creep right there - with the plausibility of friendly fire against Syrian forces and Hezbollah.Quiet insightful. I agree that the situation in Syria is complicated for different reasons. Here, there is ISIS and then there's the moderate rebels - and the lines are pretty blurred between the two as it appears that it only comes down to labels and definitions - but both of them have a common enemy. Then there's Assad, who common enemies are ISIS and moderate rebels. The there's the US and a host of other countries that support the moderate rebels, but do not support ISIS or Assad. It's all just chaotic! My view is that the US knows that there is no alternative to Assad in Syria - but given how far it has come in criticising Assad and pushing for his exit, it will lose all credibility with its partners if it decides to back pedal on its Syrian policies at this point. What is however unclear is whether or not the US views Assad as a worse alternative than ISIS. If it does, then i think it is likely that the US wouldn't do much in Syria for now except intelligence gathering. My view is that the so called coalition will seek to contain ISIS to Syria in the short to medium term while leaving the options open to strike over the longer term. It is likely the case that the US will focus on recovering as much ground as possible in Iraq. This will include places such as Tirkrit, Mosul and Ramadi. As the Kurdish/Iraq forces become more confident, they are expected to hold on to their territorial gains and force ISIS fighters back over the boarder into Syria. The presence of ISIS in Syria will become heavier and increase pressure on Assad. The US may make one or two strikes, but ultimately will not do any heavy lifting. Obama talked about a "slow and resilient" effort. Syria may become more chaotic, but the US can simply afford to wait things out. |
shymexx: The whole thing looks like mission creep already, with the inclusion of Syria in the folds - without a vote for that at the UN security council. Also, both Obama and David Cameron have declared Assad's government as illegitimate. And that obviously means they can violate Syrian airspace and territorial integrity, without Assad's permission.If the US sticks with its plan to target only ISIS in Syria, the Syrian government may scream publicly about Airspace violation, but privately, it will consider it a welcome development. It is unlikely that Assad may deliberately choose to shoot down a US war plane - since this will only give the US an incentive to degrade the so called sophisticated air defense system. ISIS cannot be defeated without troops on the ground - but as evidence from Iraq as shown so far, the precision strikes by US aircraft has weakened their momentum - more strikes can only mean good thing. |
That stupid Russian Midget should be tried for international crimes for his role in the murder of more than 200 people. The Russians are masters at lying and obfuscation. When Putin invaded Crimea, he lied through his teeth that there were no Russian troops on Ukrainian soil. But as soon as the annexation of Crimea became a fait accompli, Putin admits that they were Russian soldiers all along. There's no doubt, that the MH17 was shot down by the thugs backed by Putin. Russia may lie and try to obfuscate the facts, but no one is really getting fooled. |
Looks like you are a mouth piece for the Kremlin midget. There's something called covert invasion, you dumbass! - Here's out it works. 1) Send thousands of your military into a neighbouring country along with Tanks, artillery, howtizers etc. 2) Claim they are only "volunteers"/ Russian soldiers on leave (Who knew that when soldiers go on leave in Russia they take their tanks with them?) 3)If caught, claim that those Soldiers got lost - 60 km into an adversary's territory 4) Lie, then lie some more, say on Repeat "there is no Russian military involvement in Ukraine", say it over and over again, till the mindless Russian populace and their brainless African sympathizers believe it. |
I can only imagine the joy of doing this in a Range or a G wagon |
Well done to the Brits for stoking up debates about the morality of a child beater setting up institutions that cater for children. Us Nigerians are too stuck up in our tooshie to attempt a standing up to - lest we invite the anger of the almighty one upon us for calling out a child beater who did so in the name of the lord. The Brits don't believe in witchcraft and all of that nonsense and neither do they believe that anyone is too important to call to account for their unsociable attitude. Therefore, it is only logical that they refuse to let their society be corrupted by such values. Well done to the Brits. |
Missy89: NATO doesn't have a first use policy. They have a strong conventional force and Russia does not. During the cold war when the conventional forces were pretty much the same, Brezhnev changed the soviet doctrine to a no first use policy as well but it was reversed by Yeltsin since NATO expanded to their border.My point is pretty straightforward - If an aggressor chooses to attack Russia, it wouldn't do so with conventional forces, knowing fully well that Russia will respond with nuclear strike. A potential aggressor is much likely to resort to a devastating first nuclear strike that will only leave its adversary with limited second strike. - National policies of a first or second strike doctrine are pretty useless in my opinion. No country ever truly aim to use their nuclear weapons in a second strike capacity. China has a second strike doctrine, but if China has strong indications that the US may likely launch an attack against it, it is not likely that China will adhere to its policy of second strike doctrine. It's become a common thing to say now that "NATO expanded to Russia's border", but in reality it is the other way round. That is, Russia expanded Nato to their own borders. NATO only promises its members one thing - "An attack on one is an attack on all". Surely if Russia was at peace with its neighbours, then they have absolutely no reason to join NATO. Recent events in Ukraine shows what happens when you trust the Bear a little too much. It is why countries like Lithuania and Estonia remain glad that they made the decision to join NATO when the chance came on. On Friday, Putin said on TV that Kazakhstan is not a really a state!!!! it appears that the Bear has his sights somewhere else once he is done wrecking Ukraine. And people wonder why NATO keeps enlarging? LOL. I disagree that using a WMD is necessarily an act of weakness. America used nuclear strikes against Japan during WW2 - a lot of civillians died in the process, but it brought the war to an end. |
Ukraine will never be allowed into NATO. Same thing with Georgia. All the Baltics states that managed to join NATO back in the 90s were lucky. Now NATO is unlikely to take on new members from "high risk" countries who ironically, needs NATO the most. |
Bluetooth2: Are you serious ? What of the US that organizes military exercises with Japan, South korea and her other allies ?I am not sure what organizing military exercises has to do with bellicose statements by the leader of a nuclear state. It is irresponsible at worst, desperation at best. Those statements are quite as similar to - the Ayotollah's "Wiping Israel out" : Nikita's "We will bury you" : and several variants that you often hear from North Korea. The idea that Crimea and East Ukraine are acceptable buffer zones simply because Ukraine sits next to Russia is plain ridiculous. Russia is the largest country in the world by land mass spanning 9 time zones. Crimea and Eastern Ukraine are of little use to providing guarantees for Russia's security. As a matter of fact, the US/NATO or any potential adversary does not need to be in Ukraine to launch an attack on Russia - So why is Russia tearing Ukraine apart? The Warsaw pact? Are you F**k*** kidding? Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Lativa, Lithuania, Estonia, Albania, Slovakia, Slovenia.... all of these countries that were once members of the Warsaw pact are now the staunchest NATO members. Guess why? Because they all felt threatened by Russia. Why is Georgia & Ukraine after steadfastly pursing NATO membership? Because they both feel threatened by Russia. Why is Finland and Sweden, countries which have maintained a position of neutrality for more than 200 years inching towards NATO? Because they feel threatened by Russia!! |
Missy89: Since 2000, Russia military doctrine stated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons "in response to a large-scale conventional aggression.The logic here assumes that a "large scale conventional aggression" against Russia will leave Russia with enough capabilities to strike the aggressor with a huge catastrophe - But surely it makes sense that an aggressor will aim to strike as hard as possible with every nuclear options at its disposal to ensure that even if Russia chooses to retaliate the damages to it will be minimal? E.g - why will an aggressor strike Moscow with conventional bombs when he or she has the capabilities to destroy the whole of Russia in a single strike? - |
The statement shows more of weakness than strength. It is the sort of things you would have expected from North Korean Leaders. No reasonable countries "boast" publicly of their nuclear deterrent except when they are really desperate to show their relevance. |
mystikal: Impressive work mehn> Thats major work right there people. Even the sides of the road after the barriers remade as well. |
@OP Just out of curiosity, what exactly was your purpose of creating this thread? Were you just looking for people who will agree with you? I don't get it. You created a thread to have a discussion on a global issue. People came in here, presented their arguments without insulting you and the best way you could respond is with insults? If you already have strong opinions and will rather not engage anyone with a differing opinion, why put up a thread? I suggest people should just stop responding to this poster and let this thread die a natural death. |
PeterKbaba: You need to understand that acting in most Nigeria movies take on a month or 2, most of them act about 5 movies at the same time. Multiply 5 movies a month by 500k and you know the pay is not bad. What do you expect from an industry not been supported by the Gov.You mean the government is meant to pay them for acting? Incredible. |
Now i know why actors like Jim Iyke took to swindling people. |
^^ OP's thread is clearly a poor miscalculated attempt at self glorification and gloating. I'm not sure how it's possible to see it in any other manner. His reference to "some big boys of those days who now earn less than he does" infers that he's now getting highly paid and will like to poke fun at people who are not as lucky as him. Sometimes, threads like this works finely on Nairaland, and other times, it doesn't. This time, it's not working, and the OP has simply attempted a damaged control by screaming "You are all getting me wrong". He sounds like Mitt Romney to me. |
tanimola22: House rent (2-bedroom or 1 bedroom): 20K (max) on the mainlanda few questions for your sugar and how did you arrive at 93 from your calculations? why the exact figure? why is x not 95 or 92 or 90? does your calculation take into account prevailing inflation rates? does your calculation take into account energy prices and the trend in consumer spending patterns? does your calculation take into account the average productivity of labor? how does your calculation differ from the current minimum wage and why, if any, is there such a dispersion? Last but not the least, is your calculation completely useless? i.e, you could have just pulled out a random number from the start rather pulling than the dramatic scene of x + y ![]() |
chei!!! this life don end! Boys be careful where you stick your sticks. Condom no dey catch magun o |
Orikinla: This article is not about CHARITY you [size=28pt]id-io-ts[/size].Have you in all honesty or your parents, or your grandparents or the friends of your family, for once opened a business because you feel that's what "Your people" needed the most? or are you not part of this "Private Sector"? Dangote's money is not public money. He earned his money, by his own sweat. If you, by yourself, are not investing in schools and hospitals, then you have absolutely no right to scream blood because an individual decide to throw his money where he prefers to. Dangote is NOT the federal government, Dangote is a businessman, he shouldn't have to carry the cross of his people because he was unfortunate enough to be rich! It's probably not enough that his companies combined already pay massive tax to the federal government and employs many thousands of Nigerians, now you want to hold him responsible for underdevelopment in his own state again? Tell me, what exactly is the job of the government then? |
Kobojunkie:Thanks. Does this really take Genius for anyone to understand? |
kingoflag:How old are you again? NO, see . . . . lol . . , we have actually had some come in to claim that ALL poor kids hawk and bring in about ~Naira 80 on average a day from the trade. How one goes about responding to such GOOF-BRAINED supposition, I have no clue.Just a quick question, and just maybe the rabid dog around here may realize how by how much he's fooled himself, what exactly do you make of @violent's post on the NYSC thing? does it actually imply someone who's being boastful or is @kingoflag really being foolish? |
When i was a serving Youth Corper in Ibadan, my "allawee" was 9500 naira and the secondary school i was employed paid an additional 2000 naira on a monthly basis, a total income of 11500.People are dumb sha. which part of the post above implies that the writer is boasting? Even the slowest learner should know that the post implies someone who showed how he managed to survive on a very a tight budget, how come some dull people can't get that? |
kingoflag:I think you got him totally wrong. He was explaining to those who claimed it's impossible for anyone to survive with less than 2 dollars a day by citing an example using his own experience during his NYSC. If you read his post from the beginning, you'd see you are both saying the same thing. |
rx steve:I don't think it's actually as complex as it sounds. Most people just like to make themselves feel good and appear bright simply because they had a degree in Maths. Many topics in Mathematics can be self studied, you can't achieve the same with Physics or chemical engineering. |
When you say All this noise can easily be fixed the sooner you give him to life to see wassup.. are you implying that she does nothing and simply wait till the dude realizes what an agabaya he's become? not minding things may be too late for all parties concerned to do anything about? I understand and respect the principle of each individual to his own life, but one must question the sanity of spending 24 years bringing up a man and then leaving them to become social misfits, all because you want life to teach them lessons. I have met those who got taught by "life" and whose lives changed negatively forever for that. Any reasonable parent will continue to explore all means possible to bring out the best in their children, babies or grown men. Take your parental pride out of it. All that should leave your mouth any further is "My dear, It's your life". Nothing else, because there is nothing new you want to tell him that he doesn't already know.Easy to say you don't you think? Put it how you like, but if the children you've raised are social misfits, then you've failed. There's absolutely no pride in watching 24 years of work touting away in the streets or spending the rest of his life, merely getting by. I don't know what y'all mean by don't give up on him. How is giving someone space to grow and leaving them to feel the effect of their choices "giving up"?Like it or not, the dude knows fully well the likely effect of his choices. He has likely thought about it many a dozen times--- he likely knows he's wasted his life----he likely knows he's disappointed his parents----i doubt if he's throwing parties as we speak----he's likely contemplate his future. The problem of course is that he's got no clue where to begin from or how to begin , if anything, i doubt if "giving him space to grow" will bring by any positive result for anyone |
Outstrip:So the OP opened up a thread saying "My son has a problem, we are very disturbed, how can we fix things". and the best response anyone could mutter is "He's an adult, let him face the consequence of his own actions". if they leave him to his fate, he will lose out and they will lose out, is that the sort of consequences you are talking about? How exactly will leaving him to face the consequence bring a positive result? Since when does one fix a wrong with a wrong? So you haven't raised a 24 year old, and you'd like to teach parenting to someone who has raised four 24 year olds? How about you teach me how to fly a space ship? I know my parents will be doing exactly what she's doing--->looking for people's advise and opinion,--- not contrary to what you and many others have opined earlier, locking me out to face my own problems alone. And since when does seeking for advise translate to "cuddling him" and "bad parenting"? what exactly will you do differently? tell him to go fix his own life outside of yours? do you have kids at all? If someone has raised 3 kids up till a graduate level, and the fourth of her seven children towed the wrong line, does that still make them bad parents? From where in the original post did you assert that the dude's problem was mostly compounded by his mum's effort or the lack of it?---> I suspect this is probably just the typical African way of thinking, when a child has gone off the mark, the mum is to blame, how about the dad? |
He did not fight against Nigeria. He fought against the issues which Nigeria is facing today. Example is the massacre and killing going on in Jos, Gowons hometownHe did not fight against Nigeria, he just didn't want to be a part of it, and would fight tooth and blood to have his own "personal" country, his own flag, his own currencies, his own armies. Now we are being encouraged to salute his courage, and lower the Nigerian flag, how nice. We have a sticker for him here on nairaland---- https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-811678.0.html ----- I am sure that should do. |