₦airaland Forum

Testosterone doesn't correlate well with IQ. Unsurprising results.

Kukutente23:
3 people liked this comment!! 3 people who should be banned from thinking as they are dangerous to human advancement!!

Just look at the rubbish he wrote claiming to be smart in his pants. So having an opinion about the state of the nation and expressing it openly is not a civil right?!! How did citizens of north Korea and Iran get access to a Nigerian forum?!!

Kuku my good lad, you are just entertaining yourself with all these ramblings. Do you think you are impressing anyone? Ehn??

As I told one of your colleagues, you have to engage intelligently if you wish to communicate.

Is there any place where I've said anyone should not have an opinion? Do you know the distinction between expressing an official position as an official who led an official visit to the president as the leader (or a recognized leader) of an organization, and a single individual expressing his opinion on his own behalf, even from the pulpit as many others have done? Has anyone of the many preachers who expresses their opinion from the pulpit ever been question over their involvement in state matters? You still can't see the distinction ehn?

Lol. Good of you. Oya shake ya nyash some more.

jude33084:
if they had done the right thing why taking orders from the president to reverse their actions?

Why not? Are they above wise counsel? They have a right to refuse if they want to and a right to agree if they want to.

[quote author=chidiokay post=140266102][/quote]Except that your video does not say the EFCC does not have a Court Order! It merely says "we don't need one for 72 hours." I'm sure you would agree these are not in any way equivalent statements. Or wouldn't you??

And as I've further pointed out to you, when you ask which Court order the President was referring to, the answer is: the one of 5th August 2026. Now, if you want more details, such as the name of the Court, the name of the judge, the venue the Court sat it, I would advise you to leverage your rights under the Freedom of Information Act, by writing to the EFCC or the Presidency, alternatively, to get this info.

Kukutente23:
Lol
That's why I don't watch this TVC. They are usually very dumb. Look at the banner. Should clerics be involved in political matters? Really?
You had a Pastor Osinbajo as your VP
You had a Deacon Adesina as Special adviser
Even now, you've appointed Pastors as Efcc chairman, FIRS chairman, Ministers, etc
Even the Bishop they are interviewing is a political appointee
Governors on your party platform are pastors yet a dumb media outfit is asking if clerics should be involved in political matters
TVC don't even rate their zone Bees

You are mixing simple issues. "Should clerics be involved in political matters in their office as clerics?" is different from "Should clerics be allowed to hold political office as individuals who also happen to be clerics?". The first question examines whether the clerical office itself should intervene in politics. The second asks whether personal religious activities disqualify a person from the exercise of civil rights. I think the distinction is so obvious that you must know this already but merely choose to ignore it.

chidiokay:
For me disappointed is an understatement, if the spokeperson of Effcc admit live on arisetv Efcc act splely on the constititional power they can freeze for 72hrs becos advancing for court order and they still have time on that program

please who is you ?? You are here blowing grammar doing brain gymnastics for what .. between you and efcc spokeman who public suppose listen to ??

i dont get n you are still arguing ...watch the video on arisetv and shut the hellup man ! what effront

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1LbB2SoGim/

LMAO do you think it's by frothing at the lips? No sir, you have to do more than that. Be intelligent in your submissions.

Now, the EFCC chairman has told you they have the power for 72 hours before they need a Court order. Now, if you're thinking logically, it means, the initial unilateral action is just a temporary measure to stop the drainage while they pursue a court order for a longer term effect.

Thus, it is obvious to any right thinking individual that even if the initial freezing was made unilaterally, there must have been a subsequent order seeking a permanent freeze on the account , otherwise, the freezing would be nugatory from the very beginning.

Put on your thinking cap na.

The president even told you the specific date of the court order, being 5th August. So why all this aimless, directionless, lack of understanding driven rantings of yours? Ehn mister man?

Relax and let those who understand give reasonable comments to guide others.

chidiokay:
You are telling us to wait, when the EFCC in the centre of it have admitted on Live Tv dey didnt procure court order .. so what is there to wait

So what did NBA lambast EFCC for ??

Apart from Tinubu, if Efcc have court order will they hide it from public, hide it from Zenith bank c'mon

Nigeruans are not babies naw,

Did EFCC admit anywhere that they don't have a Court order? I would like to see that video - please share sir.

chidiokay:
Oga no be children They here, You don't have to interprete English in English ... we are not babies

The wuestion is which court did the president ask Efcc to vacate ?? simple n direct

which is this question sancrosanct, it is becos none of the parties involve at anytime claimed Court order was involved, not Zenith, not the governor and not the EFCC acting infacr efcc spokeperson that went to Arisetv admitted they are acting without court order

And lets be sincere, an adage says a leaf will not fall from the tree nd god. will not know about it
KnowingNigeria president .... can efcc witchhunt a sittin governor days to election nd president knows nothing about it

can a state commissioner openly disrespect a Governor, no consequence and the presidemt is awarre

Yoruba adage say, where a oppressor is beating somrone. and messiah stand looking kindly know ns him send am

the unfreezing is just to defend Tinubu later on after the rigging .. they will answer critics Tinubu unfreeze osun account that is enough proof he is neutral, infact Tinubu is the 1st democratic president to rescue opposition. nigerians owe him praises for such herioc move.

Remember All is fair in politics

I'm surprised you people are so fixated on this Court order of a thing. For an agency like the EFCC, court orders are routine. A mere call to a Judge will get that because it is a routine matter brought on an ex-parte basis which can be heard in chambers if the Court wishes. I bet you before Monday you will have seen the said order. Whether obtained appropriately or inappropriately, you and I will never be able to tell so this makes it a total non-talking point.

MarketDispatch:
People that are saying Polygamy causes problems, this Peter Paul & Jude fighting each other are product of one man one wife

Nobody has ever said monogamous homes don't ever have issues. They've simply said polygamous homes have a higher frequency of certain types of issues.

ddippset:
So much gibberish without any substance.

Question is so simple; Which court order did he ask them to vacate?

Why would you be asking me that? Even ADC are also asking so you will wait like a person with a functioning brain, for the answer. And even if it appears the president was misled, then that's your answer: the president was misled. Doesn't that then end the matter?

Lol. You have lessons to learn but the capacity for learning seems limited.

SeeWahala:
Na we get ball ⚽️

For 9ja and this game, both igbo boys and girls na the AMAKA for inside 😘

Cap. If you take it state by state, Edo state is the most significant producer of high quality products for the Men's National team, followed by Delta. No other state has produced the lineage of stars especially strikers that Edo has contributed, while Delta is the home of midfielders.

ADC is a rookie political party, thus having seized upon a clever observation, undermined it by attempting to milk it dry.

Their statement points out two points that appear complimentary but are actually contradictory:

a. That the president claims these agencies are independent
b. That the president's response is not organic and only flows out of sustained public outrage

Putting these together clearly then means that the president, recognizing the independence of the EFCC refused to act until the matter became a threat to Nigeria's peace and democracy, and in response to the outcry of the public that he serves, stepped in as a last resort to preserve the rule of law. This resolves the matter as a responsible demonstration of restraint and leverage of executive influence only as a last resort.

ADC should also note that when it comes to prosecution, there is no such thing as an independent body. They all are subject to the direction of the Attorney General who has the exclusive and absolute power to discontinue any criminal proceedings without exception.

Hence, much ado about absolutely nothing.

codemaniacs:
that's why there are government ministries... so that the funds allocated to the Agriculture ministry can be used to build agro-facilities for farmers across the country..

a government makes policies so that it can improve both the government and people.. that is the real common sense..

citizens elect who should be the president and the president and other politicians answer to the people.. it is a government of the people, by the people and for the people..

you should be reasonable to know that the government is supposed to regulate its state and fine or arrest this man drying cassava on the road....

Ignoring the rest of your ignorance driven ranting, let me ask, so until police patrol every inch of every road to catch people like him citizens cannot uphold basic principles of good conduct for their own good? Lmao. I just wonder why I'm wasting my precious time with you.

codemaniacs:
it is the government both federal, state and local governments duty to provide for its people

The government has no such duty. The funds of the government belong to all of us, thus a government that makes a policy of providing for some and not all citizens will soon find itself facing demands it cannot meet. This is common sense. However, if you are you unable to agree then at least accept that "duties" are a function of laws and no law says the government must provide you with tools for your business. Finally at least be reasonable enough to understand that the point is not what the government owes or doesn't owe but rather that you have no right to abuse a road that belongs to all of us.

TheGoodJoe:
Why are you people so okay with billions being looted than spent judiciously on the people? What is the collective wealth for if not things like providing in large scales for farmers?

Rather than rant, why not answer the simple question I asked?

A. After providing tools for every single farmer, why should the government stop there? Won't they build factories for you and I to process the agricultural goods? Won't they buy trucks for you and I to operate logistics businesses to transport the goods?

Love to hear your thoughts.

B. And since the government has refused, isn't it a good idea for us to vandalise all available public utilities to solve our individual desires? You can vandalise the roads while I vandalize the street lights to support my iron condemn business. While Seun can take the electric poles as his own share.

Wouldn't you agree?

Don't reply me without answering both questions.

Lithiumite:
Whats wrong with that when the road is not in use.......did the govt provide him with agro processing equipment to dry and grind his cassava........this is a practice that has been in existence since I can remember and it most likely is just about the quantity the poor farmer wants to consume with his family.

Can you apply that reasoning at scale? Okay, the government should provide every farmer with agro processing equipment. From our collective Commonwealth right? Then should it not provide everyone of us with the tools we need for our work as well? And since the government has not provided all of us with the tools we need, why don't we all proceed to vandalise every available public utility for our convenience? Perhaps the dry cleaner too can make use of the road to dry his clothes since the government has not provided him driers.

The black man is truly unlike any other race in thinking patterns.

LagosOrigin:
She's just a baby mama, they aren't married .

Her privileges against him are limited

She's claiming he has abandoned his child. Their marital status is not relevant in respect of duties to offspring

She's not telling the truth because in that society the law will never permit a father to get away with such.

AMINDA:
This will be remembered as one of Tinubu's legacies. He used federal resources and might, including declaring a state of emergency in Rivers, just to grab Rivers by all means. He subsequently denied Fubara a return ticket. According to his lackeys, Fubara is a betrayal just like Osinbajo, but Uba Sani is a hero. Posterity will not be on their sides.

Betrayal is the act of having betrayed someone. Betrayer is the person who committed the act. Please stop writing nonsense.

flokii:
I don't know why.. but something compels me to believe Atiku's side of the story.
The Former Vice-President might have his shortcomings, but I don't think he is as bad as his former principal wants us to believe.

He definitely is as bad as Obasanjo states but Obasanjo is just as bad if not much worse.

Emmolap:



If na so authorship dey work that means every producer is automatically an author of every song they produce.

I'm not a producer and I don't know anything about music. If you're a producer enlighten us and verify this.

Na so the carpenter, bricklayer ... go automatically claim co-ownership of my house after I don pay dem.

This is more like an argument between an architect who drew up the designs, and the developer who supervised the day to day building.

CodeTemplar:
Hmmm. Caught. Thee is no law prohibiting such and thus no offense here.

There's no law prohibiting you from adding substances into someone's food? Lmao. Try it and see.

I like this guy. He has bright ideas.

Ironfaceman:
I knew those tales were hand work of mischievous elements

Bent on giving a dog a bad name to hang it.

Abacha was far better than the people that where campaigning against him.

Abacha was one man one woman kind of person.

Today I now see why Abacha was dealing rootlessly with NADECO

Since NADECO took power life is unbearable.

Even the write up here states he indeed received two Filipino lady guests that night but one can always trust Obidients to make nonsense contributions. Well done.

Greyworld:
Abi o... It’s not tomorrow History will change and some people will claim to have fought for democracy.

Who ever wants to call out the government should kindly do so in clean and clear terms.

What is unclear about the terms in which he has called out the government?

He must not necessarily support your candidate for him to be seen to have called out the government.

Funny people!

TGreatGatsby:
One phrase “youthful exorbitance”

Don't create distracting posts with: ALL WORDS BOLD / huge font sizes / ALL CAPS / distracting imagesspaces

Exuberance please.

Sirseedorf:
Lamentation 101

Loser= it was rigged, it was manipulated, I lost hope in this country and the will of the people where hijacked

Winner= it was efficient and smooth, our voting process is improving, the will of the people have been done.


That's what we have in Nigeria

You are right to some extent, however in this we are talking of an electoral process where the platform for voting was changed on the morning of the elections due to an alleged cyber attack.

Where is that acceptable?

OpSystem:
Governor Mutfwang also disclosed that his administration had paid compensation for a property that was seized by the government in the aftermath of the civil war

At bolded, how is the governor able to identify the real victims of the seized properties?


Sheun!!! Where is my package as the FTC?

A property. It means a single property. It does not mean multiple properties.

Richtaiwo:
Calling someone a Yahoo boy is an allegation that requires proof. Selling one's property, whether openly or secretly, is not a crime unless it is linked to illegal activity. Until you can prove involvement in internet fraud, it's best to mind your own business. Secretly selling his property is certainly not your business.

Have you asked her how she knows he is a yahoo boy? You jumped to the conclusion that she was jumping to her own conclusion. And it's not a crime anyone to tell a story without mentioning names. And it's not a crime not to mind her business either but in any case, since the story directly involves her and conversation she was directly involved in, it is indeed her business. Free her let the evil doers be exposed.

davidtemi:
Yes it is, because the 4 squares doesn't have same size

Three of them are obviously exactly the same size. Between those three one simply does not have a border. The area of the square is still exactly the same. These are obvious things. You can paste into chat for precise measurements if still in doubt.

davidtemi:
Look beyond the size.
We have 4 square, and 1 round shape in that picture, the round is already separated from others. Now let's work on the 4 square shapes...
The 4 squares are different in size, so what makes one unique from another??
Look deeper pls

Is it logical to look beyond the size? Why mislead yourself just to argue?

davidtemi:
Shape 2 is the only large red square with a black border (setting the standard baseline).
Shape 3 is the only shape without a black border.
Shape 4 is the only green shape.
Shape 5 is the only circle.

Shapes 2, 3, 4, and 5 all have a special, single feature that makes them stand out.

Shape 1 shares features with all of them (it is red, it is a square, it has a black border) but lacks any single rule-breaking trait of its own. Being completely "ordinary" makes it the true odd one out.

Partially sound reasoning with a wrong conclusion.

Figure 1 is clearly smaller than every other shape measured vertically. Goes without saying that this makes it odd.

Figure 2 is the only one that is not odd by any of the rules.

Note that you are making a category error when you compare large red squares alone. You are to compare on the basis of rules that apply to all the figures at once.