₦airaland Forum

Drenimarcus:
You get time to deh go back and forth with such a neophyte in geo-politics .

Asin.....I just waste my time with d ode

railone:
Guy read because I'm tired of your ignorance.

First off is that you don't even know what a Naval blockade is. instead of looking that up and learning first.
You're here trying to say prove how powerful Russia is at sea.
and that's not even the worst, because no matter what I explain, you just want to prove yourself right.

Even if we want to go by sheer number at this point, Russia Naval vessels is infinitesimal to what NATO can pull and that won't even be all of NATO assets.. I mean they can easily pull a 3:1 advantage and you're saying what exactly.

Bro you just dumb, leave am

You're a mumu, what do you enforce a Naval blockade with abi is it mouth you use to blockade

You think Russian navy is infinitesimal then you're obviously ignorant

It will take the whole US navy+Nato with their aircraft carriers to enforce a naval blockade anywhere near st Petersburg.

Kaliningrad house many long range missiles, Hypersonic cruise missiles and ballistic missiles alone to make any attempt at blockade futile not to mention Russian navy headquarters at St Petersburg.

Also, like I said earlier Tallinn and Helsinki is withing range of Hypersonic missile systems in St Petersburg and they will have little or no reaction time

You need to familiarize yourself with the baltic sea area before coming here to type trash.

A simple Google search will do d trick, and if you are on data budget then use operamini free browser. Don't allow pride to make you ignorant, operamini can help with your education

Dunce

railone:
simple reading and understanding would save a lot of you from talking like drunkards on this Seun platform.

First of I said, Russia access to Kalingard can be blockade by sea once Finland and Sweden join NATO.
I repeated it again for clarity but you kept on talking about your imagination.

Anybody worth his onions in military analysis will tell that's the first move NATO will make, securing Kalingard with speed to limit the havoc the enclave can cause the West.

Naval Blockade is not Finland telling Russia they can't use the Baltic since I know you guys don't know the difference. Once there's a Naval blockade on Kalingard, any military Naval vessel departing from St. Petersburg is a target depending on the size of the perimeter set. Do you have any idea the number of individual platform the West have that is dedicated to hunting subs?

Bro you out of your depth here, my problem with you guys is when you don't know instead of admitting you don't know, you will be coming up with imagination takes and stressing somebody.

You're even worse than I thought

How can Finland and Sweden joining Nato translate to blockading Kaliningrad.

Even armchair generals and wannabee military analyst have never had this kind of drug induced imagination

Where are you from mahn?

Your thought process is marveling

This fool even said any military naval vessel departing st Petersburg is a target....you know nothing at all

So Russian naval assets will be sitting duck, docked at St Petersburg waiting to be blockaded

Even all there patrol vessels will go to st Petersburg to wait for your drug imposed blockade

Am wasting my time with you

Go look up Russian Navy Orbat and see where there vessels are currently patrolling, at least those known

ubunja:
definitely not mysterious.
How do women, a gender that can't even hold on to their precious little virginity till wedding day, who lose the virginity to jerks and thugs under the most trifling of cicurmstances, a gender who have the most STIs and are consistently broke and can't leave the house without a ton of make up be "mysterious"? It's just propaganda.

The only thing that has been proven correct is that the more educated a man is, usually the harder it is for him to understand women. We can only conclude the highest levels of education have been made to serve women's agenda. In fact the whole education system has done males no favors. From the word go men are taught the world through a female mind. From preschool the little boy is instructed by a female teacher which carries on in primary school where the first grades are usually taught by old women.Those all-important first steps into the real world it's women who hold a boy's hand showing him how the world works. No wonder most boys grow up to think women are wise above him and know something men don't. The only reason men have a hard time understanding women is because men have been consistently fed bullshiit about women their entire life- fed by women themselves. Even a boy's own mother will never teach him how to get a girlfriend. His own sisters will never help him get women. Never. A man is left to struggle to understand women even while his own home is full of women but who dont see it as their place to give him a helping hand with one or two lectures about female nature. The only time a mans mother and sisters decide to help him with relationship advice you can be sure its going to be trashy advice designed to make women win, cause women are only concerned with watching out for each other and making sure men dont get too smart over women.Men are not exactly learning but rather unlearning bs.

True, there's nothing mysterious in woman

Woman is chaos, plain and simple as that. Man is order

There's nothing mysterious in chaos. The mystery lies in the order we as men use in governing chaos

seunny4lif:
The guy have no idea what is going on.
Even Turkey that controls Russia access to Black Sea can’t block Russia ships unless both nations are at war yet he talking about Naval blockade against Russia Baltic fleets, something that Russia navy wouldn’t even leave St. P and enclave island before destroying any navy fleets on the way

That guy is an absolute Dunce

There is even international waters leading to the wider baltic sea which means that Russia doesn't have any business with anyone in the baltic sea

But the fool is thinking of an imaginary blockade on the baltic sea

Learn they will not learn

railone:
that you have to quote me 3 times on the same issue shows you didn't even know what you were talking about in the first place.

Your map just showed Russia entry point, please bring a larger map next time.

And why the f*ck does none of you lots understand what is meant by Naval blockade.

I mean I try as much as possible to paint the scenario I was referring to as easy to understand as possible.

Go and read what I said and not what you're imagining I said, what I said since you guys don't seem to understand simple sentence is that Kalingard can be blockade by NATO when Finland and Sweden finally join NATO.

here you're saying Russia when I never said Russia. How many Naval vessels do Russia have in the Baltic compared to what NATO can pull for a blockade.

The joke was when you compare the scenario to snake island. Dude Ukraine doesn't have a navy! and you're comparing them with Sweden that operate the quietest and stealthy subs. Jeeez

The scenario you're trying to paint as easy is impossible

You're dumb, and it's very obvious from the simple scenario you're trying to paint

No matter what NATO can pull it won't blockade Russian in the baltic. You say Sweden operate the quietest sub but is it quite enough to put Helsinki at risk? This is why I say you're dumb.
Russian Belgorov sub is deployed in this waters and guess what? The Belgorov is the launch platform for the world deadliest tornado 'the poseidon'

But why try to paint a hypothetical situation that's not even possible. There's international waters in the baltic sea and blockading Russia will mean violating international treaties.

Unless you do not know the implications of blockading international water that must have been the reason why you're painting a dumbass, future impossible scenario

You still have a lot of learning to do son

railone:
If you're implying flying over the Baltic sea, then there's air access... over land, there isn't.

I never said they don't have sea access. I said with Sweden and Finland about to join NATO, a Naval blockade becomes very possible

Also, I will like to add that in case of a military confrontation then two nations capital, Finland Helsinki and Estonia Tallinn which are both situated at the gulf of Finland will come under direct fire. So it's very unwise to blockade Russia in the Baltic sea

Also, there's a narrow strip of international waters in the Baltic gulf of Finland leading directly from St Petersburg. This means that Russia does need to venture into Sweden or Estonian territorial waters

railone:
If you're implying flying over the Baltic sea, then there's air access... over land, there isn't.

I never said they don't have sea access. I said with Sweden and Finland about to join NATO, a Naval blockade becomes very possible

Also, going by your line of thought then it's still going to be a difficult task to blockade Russia in the Gulf of Finland
First, Russian Navy is headquartered at St Petersburg which is a baltic sea port city
Secondly Russian Baltic fleet is headquartered at Kaliningrad.

Russian Baltic fleet alone has been a cause for security concern to Baltic and western nations. It is almost as large as the Russian Pacific fleet if not larger than the Black sea fleet.

So in that scenario it will be extremely difficult or near impossible to naval blockade Russia in the Baltic sea

railone:
If you're implying flying over the Baltic sea, then there's air access... over land, there isn't.

I never said they don't have sea access. I said with Sweden and Finland about to join NATO, a Naval blockade becomes very possible

It's not possible even with Sweden and Finland joining Nato

Really, look at map again, get a bigger one

Russia has access to the baltic sea

Ust Luga, St Petersburg and Kaliningrad

Even the gulf of Finland can't be blockaded.....it's not a strait like Hellespont (Dardanelles) or Bosphorus or a closed waterway

In event of a military confrontation, all the baltic and Nordic states combined with Poland doesn't have the Naval assets or weaponry to blockade the baltic rather they fear a possible Russian blockade and the seizure of Swedens Gotland which can be used for an effective blockade of the baltic sea, cutting of the 3 baltics nations.
Just like taking the snake island was used to blockade Ukraine

railone:
Read before you jump on your anti-west bandwagon...
NATO sky is restricted for Russian airplanes, never said Russian airlines don't fly.

Bro look at the map first before talking, there's no way to get to Kalingard without entering unfriendly nations sky.
After Belarus, we have Poland and Lithuania. Going by the North, you have Finland, Latvia, Estonia.. Circumventing those ones bring you to Sweden and Norway.

so US is now NATO, never knew. Any small thing you guys try to change it to US vs Russia like Russia is in the same league has America. That's laughable..

America isn't ready to risk any city yen yen yen, we have heard that a thousand times now. Yet it's the small Eastern European countries that are actually in Russia face and they can't do anything. Shey America won't risk any city, let Russia try their luck.. E go dey you like Blue film, no cap

At the bolded

That's not true

Russian has air and sea access to Kaliningrad

Get a bigger map of the baltic sea area

railone:
they aren't acting unilaterally. Read their official statement. They only put the restrictions in place after consultation with the EU.

The EU envoy has clarified that a blockade on Kaliningrad is out of the question, asking begging Russia to resolve it by diplomatic means

Russia is blowing hot on the issue. A Putin ally and the secretary of the Russian security council is currently in Kaliningrad

Meanwhile Lithuanian President is saying Vilnius have no intentions to escalate and their are currently talks to lift the criminal ban on goods transit to Kaliningrad

Lithuania is on it's own in this matter

joyandfaith:
Categorise the casualty figures according to nationalities in USSR.

Just to avoid the back and forth with you

joyandfaith:
Categorise the casualty figures according to nationalities in USSR.

By Nationality, by Ethnicity

Have you done that?

Now tell us who has the most casualty

joyandfaith:
Kaliningrad used to be a german city for 200 years until 1945. USSR expelled all Germans after ww2. The city was repopulated with Soviet citizens mostly Russians.
The same thing USSR did in crimea. All crimean tartans were expelled to Turkey and region was russified after ww2. Many Crimeans returned to their native lands afer collapse ussr.

USSR is all about Russia. Other nationalities are slaves in ussr. They even used them as cannon fodders against Nazi Germany.

Cannon fodder?

Yet among the USSR, ethnic Russians suffered the most casualties in the world war

Before you reply me, I would suggest you look up the casualties figure of the second world war

Drenimarcus:
Lithuania is believing in article 5. This stupid country wants to escalate things. No one will come to her aid.

Lithuanian will remove the ban on transit of goods to Kaliningrad

I did a little reading on it. The ban has serious consequences and violates a lot of treaties and Lithuanian is seriously looking for how to justify their actions but they are alone in this.

Blocking off land route to Kaliningrad is a recipe for Disaster

baralatie:
This is doubtful
This is because the artillery gun in question cannnt hit 100km
So it is either the ukraines shot their own ammo to conceal something or it is the other way round

The warehouse in question was close to the Frontline. This news is also in Russian telegram groups

I think it's a retaliation for the missile attack on Dnepropetrovsk that killed over 50 senior officers, General staffs were also killed during a meeting

Russia claim over 50 generals and officers

Uprightness100:
Russia is taking advantage of the war in Ukraine to sell the weapons it manufactures, having reached a historic low of sales. In this context, the Deputy Prime Minister of Russia, revealed that the fifth-generation Russian plane, Sukhoi 57 (the Russians claim to be an a stealth plane), is active in Ukraine (pictured). This aircraft, which is supposed to replace the MiG 29 and Sukhoi 27, is having serious manufacturing problems.

(Guy Bechor)

Russia should forget about 5th generation fighters

No one wants to buy expensive aircrafts when they can be easily shot down by advance ADS. It's a waste of money

Drenimarcus:
Burevestnik will be tested very soon. And the West will even shit their pants more . Fear Russia abeg.

Mahn! Aswear, Burevestnik is a terrifying weapon. Although there's little information about it on the net but reading western analysts and armchair Generals comment will make you laugh. The West is bleeping scared of Russia ryt now

It seems they fear this Burevestnik and Poseidon more than Rs 28 Sarmat and Khinzal and Co

Drenimarcus:
Very beautiful news. Guess it is due to extensive shelling of Donesk.

Yes
Recent shelling killed 7 in Donesk

HIT on Decision making centres
Kalibr missile attacked on the command post of Ukrainian troops in the Dnepropetrovsk region killed over 50 generals and officers - Russian Defense Ministry

Cc Drenimarcus

seunny4lif:
Russia already have nukes there but Finland case is that they supported Hilter against USSR before meaning they joining NATO now is no different.
Finland want all its territories captured by USSR doing WW2 back but since does land have only Russian speakers not Finnish speakers then it’s gone forever.

Estonia, Lithuanian and Latvia have large Russian speakers and they are loyal to Mother Russia meaning just small civil disorder will bring in Russia, no matter the cost.
USA will never risk any USA cities because of Baltic state just like UK and France declared war on German from afar because of Poland but they never show until German attacked UK and France.

I dont think Russia has nukes in the baltics as that will complicate Europe security architecture. Deploying nukes to the heavily fortified Russian exclave in Kaliningrad will mean drawing the whole of western Europe and UK into direct line of Niclear fire with very little reaction time, remember the Kalibr missile in Kaliningrad range is more than enough to reach any western country's capital in Europe.

Likewise USA will not deploy nukes to Poland. These guys are very careful with their moves ooh despite their antagonism towards each other.

This is another reason why I think Finland will not join NATO because of the management of that very long border could lead to escalation. Even small military exercises that would have been otherwise ignored by the Russians before now.
If Finland joins Nato, The Russians will increase the force composition of the western and Northern military districts, add more BTG and deploy them to the Finnish border, and with the military doctrines there's no way Russian and Nato or Finnish troops will not have a misunderstanding.
This will not be the case of violating airspace, in this scenario humans and heavy machines deployed to the border area will be involved and one mistake could trigger a whole different spell for European and world security.

Remember that Nato troops even in Estonia and Latvia avoids the eastern part of their countries that share borders with Russia to avoid a misunderstanding

How do they want to fight the war? Over the air?

They should not turn Iraq and Syria into a battlefield those countries have suffered enough

Btw: why should Iran be threatening Israelis in Turkey

If Israel and Iran wants to fight they should pick a battlefield, probably in Antarctica, give themselves date and go over there to fight

Drenimarcus:
Ukrops lose control of one checkpoint of the Azot Industrial zone of Severodonetsk — subsequently, civilians are leaving under Russian escort.

If it is possible, Russia should encircle Azot plant and move on to Lisichansk

Creamypie:
e clear say dem born u as from 1991 up... U are not up to 30 yrs. Una brain dey very flat with no knowledge of the world before 1989. Indomie pikin. Flat brain

So someone born 1991 is not upto 30yrs

Ur brain dey very flat with no knowledge

RUSSIA is protected by GOD