₦airaland Forum

GLYCOLYSISS:
Great input bro ..

These is what you should be doing.
I did see your write ups on that USA election thread in politic section, aside your use of cursing words, you were making some interesting counter submission in that thread.
Control that urge to use insulting words, trust me, more persons will be interested in your submissions.

On a side note,that guy is already working really hard to destroy the interest people got in understanding what he proposed to offer in these thread.

First, he started canceling people's write up that he don't agree with and fighting on all fronts.
You can't win or make your points known to interested audience by fighting every submissions that you don't agree with.
You will think that's the right thing to do, but as it has been proven over time, your audience will start questioning your mentality and confidence.
Secondly, insulting the intelligency of some fractions of his audience.
Calling people that got diverging opinions from him sheep.
Even a fool do not want to be called a fool.
Nobody wants his/her intelligency to be insulted, no matter how low IQ they are, it makes them go defensive, trigger raging emotions in them, and make them uninterested in whatever you got to offer or correction you're trying to make, irrespective if they were once interested in your offers.
Learn human nature,it puts you ahead in these game, especially when you're with audience who seek better way to navigate life.
Lastly, introducing religion in these thread is going to be his undoing.
The stuffs we are discussing here don't give a f*ck about your moral codes and religion.
If you want to practise redpill inline with any of your believe system, good for you, but don't come here telling the audience these is the right and wrong to do or not to do.
Redpill is amoral, and you got to understand that, else you're going to have tough time navigating lots of stuffs it teaches.

Exactly, if you continue replying people with arrogance and insults, even if you're right, people will disagree with you and you'll be called the bad egg.

Being calm itself is a superpower. In cases like this, you have to learn to agree to disagree. You can't always be right and wrong too. People won't always agree with you. Sometimes I see posts I don't agree with, instead of stooping low to try and prove what is not, I simply ignore. Even if I should argue, I argue in a way the arguments will die quickly.

So many effeminate men in the society these days. A woman never wants you to need her, only want her. The moment your wants becomes need, she no longer wants you. Visit the RED PILL thread and change your life.

JustforMen:
There is no problem anywhere.
the problem is that "you are the most special among all women on earth" smh and you are assuming we don't understand the trivial concept of exceptions to rules.

now you have the attention you wanted...oya waka go

We don't quote (f) monikers or simps here. Why do we keep forgetting this? Are you new here?

BLOODYSPERM:
I understand where you're coming from, and it's a very reasonable opinion to hold, monk mode is of far greater value than spinning plates, but the message I want to drive is that even when spinning plates which ought to be cyclical with Monk mode , we should not be held to the same societal standards as women, we are polygynous in nature having 10 times testerones than women and it's the hormone responsible for sexual drive in human beings, so women don't have any excuse to be promiscuous , they chose the path of Harlotryy and whoredom because they want to not because they were pressured by men

I understand you Sir. Thanks.

BLOODYSPERM:
Weak men value sex over success
Strong men value success over sex

Some men still don't understand this. Nice one! They equate getting pussy to doing some worthy job.

BLOODYSPERM:
spin plates like a fuvking hypocrite because you're not equal to women, and continue to shame women for their promiscuity, the women that will be virtuous will be virtuous, the ones that will be Hoes will be Hoes, men don't force women to Harlotts

Women and men will be never held to the same societal standards, we are not equals, one gender must be shamed at the expense of another, these a bitter redpill truth

Well as for me I don't support this. I really love these quotes you're positing. Yes I agree everyone has their own choice to make but that needs revisiting.

She wants to use the chameleon way to trap you. You think she's doing all those for free.? Think again. Look into her past and tread safely using your head.

If your wife does that, then you're finished as a Man.

Dpsychologist:
When a man have come in contact with red pill and wish he has seen it earlier. My reply is usually, your simping are forgiven. Go and simp no more.

But sadly, most people don't come in contact with the red pill until they get burnt.

SOME GENERAL MISCONCEPTION EXPLAINED:

Virginity: The issue of virginity on both genders cannot be placed on the same scale. Men are polygamous in nature, so the issue of the man being a virgin only applies on the first wife/woman. This is why male virginity is not much discussed. In a standard society level, the virgin wife is supposed to marry the virgin husband as they are both inexperienced, the probability of having problems of satisfaction will be very low if not eliminated. For the women, the virginity issue is much discussed and very important.

A virgin women indicates a high quality woman although there are still some other qualities to check apart from this. There are different category of virgins today, you should know what I mean. Although I'm not in support of men sleeping around because chastity should be encouraged for both genders, Monk mode is much better than plate spinning for me. Channel that energy into something fruitful or you can as well marry more than one wife.

AWALT: When people say "All Women Are Like That" (AWALT), what they meant is that there are features present in every woman but not necessarily triggered in the same way. Think of this as responding to stimuli, how we both respond to stimuli is different, but we all respond to stimuli. Take a look at an example of women nature which is hypergamy. Hypergamy is an inbred women nature but how each women responds to this nature is different. How each women respond to hypergamous stimuli is different. Think of it as a scale. Some responds very high to it and some responds very low.

The best women for relationship prospects are those whose these instincts has been kept in check and these can be kept in check depending on the environment she lives, upbringing, laws, beliefs, traditional values etcetera. Finding a woman whose hypergamous instincts is in check in this current generation can be quite difficult but possible. Why this generally cause controversies is because when people say all women cheat, the term "all" in the statement doesn't necessarily mean all women, but all women has the tendency to cheat because of their hypergamous nature. Truly, if men can control their sexual urge and thirst, hypergamous instinct in women can be kept to a bare minimum.

A man that can't control his sexual urge won't go far in Life. Not all pussy is meant to be fvcked.

Well, I think at this point, the best thing I'm gonna do is to just view posts and pass until when all these arguments die down, maybe it will. I have to say, this is not the right way to sort things out. We are Men. We are supposed to be organized.

My suggestion is MrColdsweat should open another thread for this in order to avoid long arguments and getting the thread derailed. Maybe then we can argue and sort things out.

SOZINN:
OK are you saying that those who are spinning plates are at the mercy of women

If you decide to keep spinning plates, that's your own personal decision. Yes, for me, they are still at the mercy of women because they will keep working on their game skills for women to continue being attracted to them.

If you spin plates or spoons or whatever, that's your own personal decision but equating that with success or as a sign of alpha, then you have a problem.

You have absolutely nothing to gain from spinning plates. We know how some of those who think they are gurus in plate spinning ended. I rest my case.

Even simps can decide to spin plates. Anybody can decide to spin plates even spoons. I don't see how it's a sign of masculinity.

So we still have some Men who still equates sex with success. Seems I don't even know what Red Pill means again sef.

Truly, if a Man can't control his sexual urge, he's forever going to be at the mercy of women. He will continue to do things just to get their favour whether directly or indirectly. SMH.

Junnior:
Getting more pussy shows strong masculinity. That's the point.

I'm not interested in arguing.

I'm kinda disappointed you have this mindset. It's fine. Everyone has his life to live.

QuadrilAyinde:
Let's take a quick look at the Nigerian Army and the Case of Female Soldiers and Officers...

Females were not even allowed to apply as an RC (Regular Combatant) Cadet for admission into the Nigerian Defense Academy, Kaduna. But in 2011 September, the Restriction was Lifted and we now have Ladies Enrolling to get admitted into NDA. THIS HAS SHOWN THAT GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IS ALSO A FACTOR RESTRICTING THE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OF FEMALES IN THIS CASE...

Now Let us also look at another Scenario

Just Early Last Month, the Nigerian Army Authorities decided that it's the Female soldiers they want as stand-in-men on the Bandits-Raiding Abuja-Kaduna Express Way, and what happened afterwards, they (Female soldiers) were deployed in Their Numbers... Now be sincere, When was the Last time you heard of Kidnap on that particular Abuja-Kaduna Express Way since the deployment of the Female soldiers to the Express way??

My explanation is just pointing out to the fact that Government regulation(s) is one of the Main reasons while Female are not actively participating in these so-called Hard Labor Works

Well I don't know about Abuja-Kaduna Express Way so I can't say anything on that but where government regulations are not involved women are no where to be found and being deployed to guard a position is different from being deployed for fighting a war. The risks involved in both position is different.

Well my brother, I don tire to dey explain. It's all good

QuadrilAyinde:
Gender roles and the pressures to conform to these roles for women vary across regions, religions and households. One way the pressure to conform manifests itself is through marital status. For instance, in developed and emerging economies, women who have a spouse or a partner are less likely to be employed in a paid job or be actively looking for one.

This can often arise from the economic stability of a partner’s income that can reinforce the “male breadwinner” bias in some marital arrangements.

In developing countries the reverse is true: the economic necessity in the region gives all women little choice but to work despite their marital status.

I get your point, it is a quite easier for women to branch swing to masculine jobs but for Men doing feminine jobs and leaving masculine jobs is not as easy as it seems. Even the so called masculine jobs some women are found in, most are not participating where extreme energy and power is needed. They still need masculine attention in fields where women are. There's a reason for that.

If what MrColdsweat meant by modifying masculinity is Men taking women's job and still doing masculine jobs then it's fine but if it meant Men leaving their jobs to take feminine dominated jobs then I won't agree because there's a reason why Men are mostly found in superior positions in the first place. Men are to lead not follow.

ichidodo:
[color=#1980BC] The scale of Idealism this Mrcoldsweat be spewing is not only confusing but impracticable and if researched very well isn't even redpill...As a brand new simp coming into redpill for the first time, if came across his write up, I would just choose being a simp...Even Ubunja himself wasn't that confusing when preaching the goodnews....You want to modify masculinity? Why don't you bury the ocean? Or better still fight the wind?...[/color]

I'm still trying to decipher his points on what he truly meant on modifying masculinity

MrColdsweat:
Have you seen me attack anybody on this thread?

I didn't say you attacked. Don't get me wrong.

So @MrColdsweat, why are women not found in jobs where extreme labour and critical thinking is required? Why are they not found where the probability of losing one's life in the line of duty is very high?

MrColdsweat, no one is perfect. You may be right and you may be wrong. I don't condone abuses either. We can't fully agree with each other. Just because someone goes against your views doesn't make one dogmatic.

MrColdsweat:
MODIFY MASCULINITY OR LOSE OUT

Women are collectively abandoning the traditional definition of femininity. They now have a new motto: You have one life, pursue happiness and goals within the confines of society. They have broken their limits. They encourage each other by going against gender norms. Whether they're happier or not, is still in contention. But we can recognize significant progress made by the female gender. We have more women joining the tech companies, NASA and the military, we have more women in participative and active politics, we have more female entrepreneurs, and we have more female making names in the scientific field.

Of all the baby steps, one seem to be of concern: The massive influx of women in the STEM fields whilst monopolizing the field of humanities and education. The enrollment rate of women in the field of mathematics, building technology, physics and engineering is taking an upward trend. More and more women are encouraged to break the norms by entering the fields dominated by men.

While this happens, the male enrollment rate in the universities is slightly declining. A small portion of men are losing interest in schools for diverse reasons.

Comparing the trends i.e looking at the female enrollment rate in the STEM and the reduced interest in schooling by men, women are projected to monopolize the STEM fields in the next 50years. This will likely result in a competition of jobs between men and women in the field of physics, mathematics and engineering. This is not good for men because women have monopolized the biological and chemical sciences, the field of psychology and nursing. While women aggressively instream the fields dominated by men, only very few men consider enrolling in the fields dominated by women.


Traditional masculinity has it's ingrained apportionment of jobs. There are fields and jobs that are tagged unmanly. Fields like nursing and midwifery, child education, and Jobs involving the the care, beautification and fashion of infants and women.

Men who deal in beautification and sales of female wares complain of being stigmatized by fellow men. This is due to the demanding nature of masculinity. A man must always be a man and must never involve in anything unmanly.

Because of this, men are losing at risk of losing out. Some men would rather be unemployed than be seen working in, or running a beauty saloon. Some men would rather be unemployed than work in a daycare, tending to children.

While women work towards taking the jobs of men, men blatantly refuse taking the jobs of women.

The choice before men is simple. Modify masculinity so that men will unashamedly influx the female dominated fields and take the jobs of women, or remain rigid and lose your jobs to women.


Modify masculinity or lose out.

On this particular explanation, I concur.

Dapcity247:
Hypergamy is not just the Alpha Bleep(AF) but also the Beta Bucks (BB), you must as a redpiller have both in equal and balanced ratio, except you are a pick up artist whose just spinning plates,that's how Hypergamy works and is optimized

Junnior ,Soulrebel2 just focus on AF alone which is a big mistake for Redpillers

I understand your point, for a Man to be able to fully maintain dominance especially for those planning to build a home or family, the Man has to be higher than the woman in terms of wealth and status. In homes where the woman is the breadwinner, the man is usually emasculated.

Soul's view also on that is possible but quite difficult.

Dapcity247, You can make your views heard without abusing anyone, please. You know sometimes how we grow up and the environment we lived sometimes affect how everyone reasons. We can't reason the same way. It's not possible. Let's all agree to disagree.

I understand Dapcity views also, to maintain frame while your woman earns more than you will be quite difficult but possible because her hypergamous antennas will be on alert.

I think what Dapcity meant was that, it's not that the lady in question will be totally dependent on the man, but will still be dependent on other areas for the man to be in control and be able to maintain frame.

By relating Dapcity and Soul's views, Soul said the way to still maintain frame while your woman is getting more independent is by being bettering yourself and while at it, you keep maintaining frame and dominance. Both of you are right but with different perspective. No wrong answers.

Junnior:
I agree with all you've said, except the emboldened. "The more successful your wife is, the more diminished you are as a man." This is a fallacy of hasty conclusion. Are you lazy? If your woman gets richer, you should hustle to get richer as well. And while you're at it, you should maintain frame. Even if she becomes richer, so long as you don't go broke and you keep working to improve yourself in all areas, you won't be diminished or degraded.

In your previous post, you said, in other words, that you shouldn't allow your woman to be fully financially independent because of hypergamy. You said it would ruin you. I don't agree to this and the emboldened here at all. And whether you admit it or not, you're being insecure. You're looking at another person's success when you should be focusing on yours. You're more likely to be an oppressor, not even an authoritarian.
The redpill teaches one to focus on oneself, not on others. You shouldn't be trying to hinder your woman from achieving financial independence. Instead, you should work on yourself to become the alpha male every woman would want.
By the way, it's not always about money. She can be richer and still stay in line because of your alpha status -- true alpha status, not wannabe alpha. If you achieve this, it would be highly unlikely that she leaves you for a richer simp. Only a better alpha can have her, and this would be highly unlikely because alphas hardly accept leftovers.

If you have to bring someone else down or hinder them from progressing so that you can maintain power, you're weak. What you should do is continually better yourself so that as others get better, you get better as well. This way, if you were in charge, you'll remain in charge.

I concur with this post. I guess that's what he meant too but not enough explanation. Anyways, agree to disagree.

Red Pill should be a compulsory course to be studied in the university. So many asslickers and effeminate men nowadays.

Wow! When I saw the arguments was getting exaggerated, I didn't bother to read long posts again. So he really said those things CaveAdullam highlighted? SMH. We shouldn't argue with that guy again. He made point with his first post but the consecutive ones was out of it.

mattbass:
Mehn something funny happened yesterday evening and I couldn't help but laugh and at the same time think deep about it.

I had a missed call and without checking the number properly I called back and the person didn't actually picked.
Few minutes later, the person called, immediately I just called out one of my friend name, I thought he was the one calling, because the number tends to look similar, though I didn't save his contact.
But the person just said no am the one (a female tone), I calmed down to decode the voice and lo and behold it was one of my ex voice.
I replied oh how are you doing I missed your call, she said no she missed mine. I said no it was her missed call that warranted me to call her. She then said she wanted asking me something but she never knew she has already dialled my number and at the same time she had changed her mind regarding what she wanted asking.
Before she go even end the conversation self, I just cut the call.

Now this lady,I don't have her contact neither do we even chat because I have blocked her on all social media platforms including WhatsApp.

What keeps pondering my mind is why is she still keeping my contact??
What was she thinking when she dialled my number?
What does she actually need from me?

In the past she did some terrible things to me which I don't want to even recall but am happy that I ended the call even before she did.

It was a shit test and you passed. She wanted you to ask what she had in mind when she called but you didn't bother to ask. Nice one. Just ignore her bro. Be good. Just free your mind and you don't need to ponder on anything. She wanted to play mind tricks on you. Just move on.

ObinnaValentine:
everything coldsweat posted e be hardcore truth except the equality bullshit..which I know isn't worth debating because we know the rationale behind the agitation..equality they want is for the pros not the cons..so that one no follow at all..cos I posted this shii on my whatsapp except the equality part..can't have this females think they can actually stand on same pedestal as we

Please, let's agree to disagree. Let's end the arguments. MrColdsweat, Dapcity247, SOZIN, please let's end it.