ThiagoKid's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ThiagoKid's Profile › ThiagoKid's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (of 49 pages)
Bodmum:i will look into those. Thanks, comrade. |
StreetFight:True The same white pigs that brought Christianity to usI beg to differ on this, though. But continue. are the one telling us that Sex is the ultimate goal in life. They start teaching their children how to satisfy each other right from primary school. They are even forcing nations to legalize homosexualism. Useless instruments of Satan.@bolded can you imagine? |
MickzyDonald:Everyone is now eating from the forbidden fruit. |
I remember back in the 70's, 80's, and in the 90's when it was very rare to find a broken home/marriage. Divorce/separation wasn't a day-to-day affair. I think i can say with conviction that the marriage institution was sacred and unadulterated; which was what made marriage appealing. In the past, before a man can think of giving his commitment to a lady, virginity was, mostly; the prerequisite, and all other things shall be added unto it. And, if the said intending married man sees nothing wrong in his woman not being a virgin, his family won't wholeheartedly accept, not talk of welcoming the said non-virgin lady into their home. Some parents will, as a matter of fact, return the lady back to her parents. A thing of shame! Rape or ravish was an uncommon incident. Our society was safe. Men were virgins, women were virgins. Heaven is the goal; but, in this scenario: chastity is the goal. And then, there was nothing like a lady requesting or demanding money from men. There was this level of contentment and self discipline/control. Virginity, i will say, reflect one's character, upbringing, uprightness, level of chastity, etc. What is marriage when the bed is defiled? And, of the truth, virginity can not alone uphold a marriage. Who doesn't know that? Now, in this so called liberal time, having sex before ejaculation last than marriage where you can get married today, divorce/separate tomorrow -- such is the state of today's marriage crisis. But, what change? It was never like this in time past. When i think deeply into this, the ONLY thing that change was...was...virginity! It ALL boils down to virginity. Okay, you just said characters and upbringing defers. Fine! But i beseech you, pray tell, if characters is what uphold marriage, why then has separations/divorces skyrocketed in this liberal times, but the same cannot be said in the past? In the time past, men and women were virgins = sacred marriage structure Liberal times, men and women threw virginity out the window = collapsed marriage structure. This is the only written way i can verbalize/convey my thoughts. |
I remember back in the 70's, 80's, and in the 90's when it was very rare to find a broken home/marriage. Divorce/separation wasn't a day-to-day affair. I think i can say with conviction that the marriage institution was sacred and unadulterated; which was what made marriage appealing. In the past, before a man can think of giving his commitment to a lady, virginity was, mostly; the prerequisite, and all other things shall be added unto it. And, if the said intending married man sees nothing wrong in his woman not being a virgin, his family won't wholeheartedly accept, not talk of welcoming the said non-virgin lady into their home. Some parents will, as a matter of fact, return the lady back to her parents. A thing of shame! Rape or ravish was an uncommon incident. Our society was safe. Men were virgins, women were virgins. Heaven is the goal; but, in this scenario: chastity is the goal. And then, there was nothing like a lady requesting or demanding money from men. There was this level of contentment and self discipline/control. Virginity, i will say, reflect one's character, upbringing, uprightness, level of chastity, etc. What is marriage when the bed is defiled? And, of the truth, virginity can not alone uphold a marriage. Who doesn't know that? Now, in this so called liberal time, having sex before ejaculation last than marriage where you can get married today, divorce/separate tomorrow -- such is the state of today's marriage crisis. But, what change? It was never like this in time past. When i think deeply into this, the ONLY thing that change was...was...virginity! It ALL boils down to virginity. Okay, you just said characters and upbringing defers. Fine! But i beseech you, pray tell, if characters is what uphold marriage, why then has separations/divorces skyrocketed in this liberal times, but the same cannot be said in the past? In the time past, men and women were virgins = sacred marriage structure Liberal times, men and women threw virginity out the window = collapsed marriage structure. This is the only written way i can verbalize/convey my thoughts. |
Hello all, Any Redmi phone i can get to buy for the abovementioned price tag? Thanks, |
So, Anita just sent me her invite on whatsApp, which is coming up in two (2) months time. |
She is my only hope. But the P is silent. ![]() |
Anita was telling me how she would not, and never marry a broke guy. This wasn't the first time i will be hearing such from her; as it has always been her anthem and life mantra. But, what left me gobsmacked was her declaration that, even, if her husband was once rich, but along the line--lost his source(s) of income, she would either dumped him or cheat on him with a rich dude. I was perplexed. "I want the best for my kids and myself", was her reply when i query why she would utter such derogatory and despicable statement. I was left dumbfounded. Then, i let my thoughts wander, and came up with this: if a woman can want the best for herself and kids (which is not bad), why can't men also want the best for themselves and kids by making sure to walk down the aisle with a virgin bride? Women have standards, why can't men have? Anita will be getting married to a governor's son next year, while Kunle has decided to privatise a public enterprise -- he will be wifing up a street hoe with abortions scar in the next few weeks. I think Kunle is a real man for not even putting his future kids, and his wife past into considering. He told me privately that if his to-be-wife had committed 20 abortions in the past, her past belongs to the past. Beside, who doesn't have a past?, he concluded. I grinned, and then proceeded to reply, "i would be the last person to tell you not to get married to the love of your life, Kunle. If the marriage fail, you would learn to be a philosopher, if it doesn't, you would become a great dad. Either ways; it is a win-win situation for you, bro." What a nice guy. |
samuel051: ![]() |
6ixT8:Yes. Somewhat sha. |
" You're an animal." "You should be in jail." "Seun, moderators, does nairaland have an IP address so that we can track this RAPIST?" "You're a danger to the society ." The abovementioned were the derogatory and inflammatory comments i can still recall vividly on that pitiful and toxic thread--about a guy attempting to rape his girlfriend. If you think i'm in support of his inhuman actions, it's your own headache. But, what i found astonishing, or rather put this way: appalling, was the way and manner people came for the Op head and two balls. Perhaps, he did deserve that, but, remember, it was only an ATTEMPT. Oh yes! You'd me right. An attempt which deserve or warrant a jail term, all things being equal. Don't let us go too far; let's choose Natasha H. Okpoti. The devil angel, sorry, i meant the woman who wanted to frame up, and tarnish Reno Omokri's unparalleled...image, i should say. Briefly, i shall give you a recap of what transpired, in case you never came across it. A lady asked Reno Omokri to be her sugar daddy online, but, he savagely declined I think Natasha saw the post, or something; she, then decided to cry more than the bereaved--sisterhood. And, don't think it was just a mere coincidence, if you know... Natasha called out Reno: firstly, calling his reply to the said lady misogynist, secondly; alleging that Reno made a pass at her in a ceremony function in aso-villa, and that, he requested for her number, but she declined him. I would have love to bring her posts and video here, but she deleted them with immediate alacrity when Reno came for her The evidence he was posting in bits was what trapped Natasha, as details of his evidence were sketchy. Not until she was trapped in between the lips of her labia, did he nail her coffin finally by posting every details of his evidence. Now, where am i getting at? It was VERY obvious Natasha FALSELY accused Reno, but people never came for her head. Probably because she is a woman...the weaker vessel...the oppressed. People were even praising and flattering her. Well, maybe it was the give-away she 'intended' to give to followers if only they will report Reno's evidence post--so that facebook can bring it down. Just a meagre 10k give-away, and people sold their Soul, conscience, and even; intestine to the devil! But, alas, Reno triumphed! Now, relate this to the Op's own. Juxtapose. Place them side by side. Okay, you can say the abovementioned was not an attempted rape. But, what about in instances were ladies falsely accuse guys of rape. Will she be jailed if it came out that she just wanted to implicate the guy, and that she was lying? Your guesses are good as mine. You're welcome, |
WinnerAutomatic, an acclaimed redpiller, is a disgrace to this thread. |
Thedarkgamer. Hello, |
AlphaAlex:Of course, we know these before, right? |
AlphaAlex:So, what should we do, then? |
Jerkychan, good afternoon bro. |
Ishilove:K |
Ishilove:says a gal who was almost responsible for the downfall of nairaland forum, back then. |
neyoohhh:She is not to be blamed for this. Men have repeatedly made it clear they don't a virgin;and, would in it stead opt for a h0e with "good character" even, if she has a thousand heavenly body counts, or ten thousand earthly body. In this case, what do you want a fellow virgin gal to do when she knows men don't value virginity any more? Do you expect her to remain a virgin when she has the ability to h0e, and still pick a high value man for her pension settlement.? Or, do you expect her to remain a virgin, when, it's still the same set of men who will demonize her for keeping her virginity? And yet, myriad of men keep kvetching, complaining of women sexual exploits. Men are really cheap! Men have really gone low. I think men are the real definition of lowlifes and scums. If men can set the bar high; even, making virginity a prerequisites, I think a lot of women, ladies, gals will sit down, and have a rethink. |
One reason I like the females is because of their self-centered nature. Solipsism> Self investment. Women rip men of their hard earned money/resources, and invest the proceeds in/on themselves via embellishment and other paraphernalia just to attract other high value men. But you see men? Men will never do so! Men will never invest in themselves, but in it stead; they are willing to pay "5k, 10k" and the likes, even calling it stipends. Asif investing in one's self is always to much. ![]() |
azammi: |
InfinityFabric:100% If men can start rising the bar high, virginity as a perquisites, the gals gonna sit tight. |
Kingvitalisdiho:I can give you one or two |
chatinent:while a h0e can also make a good wife. I dig you, bro Thanks. |
Bennysam: ![]() Even at that, how many gals go make attempt to kneel in this present time? |
chatinent:Using this your logic bro, you're implying that a h0e would make a good wife, in it stead? |
solaniumgel:Find my response in the red text. |
chatinent:@embolden, this is what we will be saying until virgins go into extinction. I think when men start placing the bar high, with virginity as a prerequisite, the gals gonna have a rethink. |
jaeyking:Count me out of court marriage. I won't like to get the govt involve in my marital life. Please, pinpoint where it's written that we do have sex. Awaiting your response, sir. |
solaniumgel:No. |

