₦airaland Forum

iamoyindamola:
The agreement I know is if the player is not getting playing time or not happy the club will recall him

Yea.

But parent club can add a clause that, if we are in crises in this position, we can recall the player.

airmark:
Sources sauces sauces sources zeh!

iamoyindamola:
Be like you never sign contract before
Both parties must adhere to the agreement

As in!

The thing tire me. But them suppose add this kind of clause for the agreement na. If emergency dey, make I fit take my player back.

To bring your own player back, problem.

Wahala be like wetin again?

Trevor012:
Take a look

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2727317-inside-the-deal-how-man-united-landed-nemanja-matic


One interesting extract from the article

Simon Johnson, Chelsea correspondent for the Evening Standard, believes Matic was also struggling to convince the supporters of his place in the team. "Unlike with other players at Chelsea who had suffered at the end of the Jose Mourinho era, Matic never really regained the support of people at the games. He was one of the players
you'd see targeted for criticism by the fanbase." Chelsea believed they could move on without Matic and, at the age of 29, he could still
command a good fee. Conte was not against the idea either, sources have assured me. Though the manager
perhaps did not expect him to join a direct rival.

Sources sauces sauces sources... No direct quote. Make una rest na.

Airmark gave a direct quote from Conte. Is sauces now more reliable than direct quote?

FBS:
you get time walahi. lol
Ask him if he witnessed it, because according to him he doesn't comment on stuff like that.
What is his business with Roma?

He worships Pep and City and that is a known fact.

My brother, I just tire for the guy. What is my business with Roma? So if I love Mourinho, I will go about worshipping him like he does Pep?

This is a guy that cannot openingly wish for Chelsea to win Pep's City. And he calls himself 100% Chelsea fan. He can deny it, but I am VERY VERY sure he secretly wanted Pep to win Chelsea in that UCL final.

I don tellam say I no go reply am again on that matter.

popizaino:
Have you forgotten when you said only pep Guardiola had the luxury of benching a 100m player and when I told you the amount doesn't matter but the quality?

Is there anywhere in my post that I compare the price of player to his quality? If there is, please I need you to quote it. At least it won't be hard for you, seeing you can dig out a 7 year comment.

My post was very clear: Only Pep have the luxury of benching a 100m player.... I don't see how that statement translates to player price vs player quality.

I am waiting for the quote.

popizaino:
Let me worship the coach of my rival in peace, it doesn't take away my 100% loyalty to Chelsea,I don't need to beat my chest,I love pep and Chelsea and nothing can stop that. If you love mourinho so much to be claiming his failures were due to players sabotaging him then you should be able to defend that because the way you love mourinho is the way some of us love the players you claim were sabotaging him.

You have a problem. A real one.

I am not holding you from worshipping Pep. I have already known which category to place you as a Chelsea fan. Keep deceiving yourself by saying you are 100% a Chelsea fan.

After the comment I made 7 years ago, Mourinho have coached at least 3 clubs till now. It beats me how you all of a sudden out of the blue start questioning that post because AS Roma lost 3-4 to Juventus. For context, look at any 7 year old around you and see how grown a child from the time I made that comment to now that you bring it up. Is this joblessness or what?

So because I claim players you love sabotage Mourinho 7 years ago, you still carry it about in your mind looking for when to bring the matter up? Wow! People dey o. Well, I will tell you again. Those your favorite players sabotaged Mourinho and cost him his job. If e too pain you, I dey my house. Come slap me.

I won't talk about this again. Cheers.

popizaino:
We did .....have you forgotten ?

Remind me.

popizaino:
You are a fan of Mourinho who is the manager of AS Roma .

I am not you that worship the coach of your rival.

You cannot beat your chest and support Chelsea against Pep. That is not me, you hear. I love Mourinho as a coach but anytime he is our opponent, I am 100% for Chelsea.

Your problem is thinking everyone is like you.

nihilistjnr:
I agree with you. Also, if Australia give the guy special dispensation, then they could be legally unable to enforce more covid-related restrictions in future, as a precedent would have been set.

Exactly. You couldn't have said it better.

raumdeuter:
Personally I want Djokovic to play and win the Australian open to beat Nadal and Federer

But on another note, I don't want him to be given an exception for violating health guidelines that they wont give others.

Final wish: Djokovic to be bounced from Australia for refusing vaccine while Nadal fails to win

I'm not much of tennis fan. But Nadal have been my favorite from the big 3.

I'm with Nadal in Australia.

popizaino:
@tim.bros.....what do you have to say?

I don't understand why you mention me in this post. Have we had any discussion about player transfers?

popizaino:
Yes exactly why I ask you if As Roma players were sabotaging mourinho now because you still harbour the believe that my favourite players then sabotaged mourinho for the performance in the season you made that comment.

And I ask you again, what is my concern with what goes on in AS Roma? Am I a fan of AS Roma?

What do you guys think of Djokovic's issue in Australia?

Although he won the appeal, it seems Australia Government want to explore another option to deport him. And that will basically mean he can't take part in the next 3 Australian Opens.

Personal opinion: Djokovic should vaccinate or be kicked out. He is human like every other who is refused entry into Australia because of the tight immigration policy there. This is not about sports. It's about health.

popizaino:
In a nutshell, going forward we shouldn't take your comment for it right ?

I don't know what your problem is.

Did I say anything today to contradict the comment of 7 years ago which you quoted?

popizaino:
Which Roma player are you going to blame if Jose mourinho get the sack ?

What is my concern with Roma? I love Mourinho doesn't mean I worship him like you do Pep.

Don't ask me unnecessary question again. How do you even have the time to dig out a specific post I made some 7 years ago because Mourinho lost to Juventus? Guy, you get time o.

La Cobham

Yes, I go hype am o. If I no hype am, na who I go hype? You?

Unlimited22:
I think he means that they've offered ve%y little attacking threat thus far

Oh... Me sef no read the post well. I saw "test" as "rest"... Na my mistake

Babamide:
Team like Chesterfield, they should atleast test Bettinelli.
Hall has had a good confident game.
I think Pulisic is ill or something. I've only seen him touch the ball twice this first half.

Are you watching the game? Who dey post?

Edith: I misread your comment. I read "rest Bettinelli" instead of "test Bettinelli"...

donjazet:
I tire for that guy. All 3 European finals jorginho has been to, he made the team of the year and the guy is still talking rubbish. Europa league, champions league and Euros.

I came online this morning to see numerous mentions on this Jorginho matter. I decided I'm done with the debate but this Pkasso comment just off me..... I can't help quoting it even though I don comot mouth for the matter.

Things we read here.

pkasso:
I only pointed that out to show being world class doesn't mean you are perfect and can't make mistakes. Are these the only world class coaches in the world? What if we find other world class coaches who don't rate Jorginho highly as they do? It's a matter of opinion.You don't expect me to accept Jorginho is world class because Mourinho, Sarri and Tuchel said so. What do i have my eyes and brain for then?

When a supposed world class player is derided by majority of his club fans season in season out, then you know something is wrong. Rival fans are not even intimidated or triggered by his quality. That's Jorginho for you.

Of course, i know all the 7 finals Jorginho played for his teams. My emphasis on the word LEAD. How many of those finals did he play a key role in getting to or winning? Only the Euros. I couldn't care any less about his records in the Serie A. Even the much maligned Bundesliga better pass that snail league. It's no wonder that when he moved to a top league, he was found out and his weaknesses were laid bare. Elite no be by dominating Cagliari, Palermo and Crotone oh.

Really? wow! Just wow!

I wish I know your definition of LEAD.

Ibime:
It is well known that Tuchel wanted Tchouameni and Lampard wanted Rice but the board priotised other signings. Let me give you a clue, those managers were not coveting those players to come and sit on bench for Jogginghoe.

If Chelsea could keep Mikel and Ramires as ourmidfield options for 4 years, you should know that signing DM does not excite Chelsea board. The head of recruitment even wrote an article about it which nateevs shared many moons ago on how their strategy is to sign young exciting forwards as they make more money from the sell on. This is a team that kept 10 wingers, chased away Salah, DeBruyne, kept buying Marin, Moses, Cuadrado, Pato, Kenedy, couldn't utilise Piazon to add to Hazard, Mata, Oscar, Willian, Schurrle they bought. . . . and they left Mikel, Ramires and a 35 year old Lampard to man the midfield. Jogginghoe sticking around this long is not due to those managers ideal wish.

So it's now the board forcing Jorginho on the coaches? Interesting.

Ibime:
Italy barely edged possession against an England and Belgium that set up with a defensive 3-4-3 which does not prioritise possession. The only big game we saw Jogginghoe matched up against 3 midfielders with an AM on him, he turned to Bakayoko

"barely edge" na that kind 51-49 or 53-47. E no even pass 55-45..... But 61-39? Haba...

Ibime:
If Jogginghoe is good, Chelsea would have been begging to offer him new contract since. They wanted to sell him but no takers, Tim.bros say it's because he was valued. Maybe he's valued like Martial at Man Utd

Do you have evidence that there is no offer on the table yet? Has there been any report that Chelsea doesn't want to renew Jorginho's contract?

nihilistjnr:
Sarri bought Jorginho. Of course he will play him. He had problem with Kepa, but board forced him to play him. Kepa turned out to be a liability

Lampard faced transfer ban, so he was forced to manage Jorginho. Kepa was a bigger problem, so he bought Mendy. Tammy too was an issue, so he brought Werner.
As soon as Lampard left, Jorginho came out to abuse Lampard, and Lampard implied the beef was because he didn't play Jorginho often.

Lampard was sacked. Tuchel landed. The biggest liability he met was Werner, followed by Havertz. He immediately entered the market for a Striker and got Lukaku. He then got Saul on loan as a temporary midfield solution, which unfortunately hasn't worked.

Don't for a second try to to sell a dream that Jorginho has been at Chelsea because he's that good. He's just be fortunate enough that there have been other fires for managers to fight.

Let's wait till next season to see how many more tweaks Tuchel will make to the team. Jorginho has only one year left on his contract, and the club aren't in a rush to renew our Balon d'Or holder, whilst 37 year old Thiago Silva's contract has already been renewed.

Just look at excuses upon excuses.

Kepa was a problem, Mendy came in.
Tammy was a problem, Werner came in.
Werner was a problem, Lukaku came in.
Jorginho was a problem, who came in?

So you want to tell me that while Chelsea was signing Mendy, Werner etc, they can sign a Jorginho replacement at the same time?

So we should wait till next season before Jorginho replacement will come.

Make una continue dey make excuses why Jorginho dey start Chelsea games.

Oh.... Saul is Jorginho's replacement

BTW, provide your reliable source for the bolded.

Once upon a time in Malaga...

popizaino:
Italooo shirt.

After Spinazzola injury? Who dash Emerson Italo shirt?

nihilistjnr:
Why did he play for Italy at all? Does Italy not have any other striker to make the squad?

Imagine.

SMH.

nihilistjnr:
How did Sarri tweak his formation formation to accommodate Jorginho? Abi what kind of yarns is this?

Jorginho was Sarri's main man in Napoli. He was literally Sarri's first signing. You can't be serious if you're suggesting Sarri had to endure Jorginho

This is what you said



What I asked you sir, is why did Sarri not bench Kepa? Sarri did not like Kepa. Kepa publicly humiliated Sarri on national TV.

Why did Sarri continue to accomodate Kepa even as the fool continued to drink goals? Would it not have been easier to drop him to the bench?

Bros if you read that my comment finish and feel that I am in the camp of "any coach tweak his team to accommodate Jorginho" then I have absolutely nothing to say to you.

I no get the time for this kind convo.

popizaino:
All this we are in nairalaind doesn't mean shishi, ........i will not like to go into details but I will tell you this things means nada .

It means everything.

How can you know something 3 or 4 different coaches doesn't know about Jorginho?

I don't know your line of business but what do you think about a complete novice pointing out a 'correction' on something that you and your colleagues, who have been actively practising this business for donkey years, have been doing a particular way.

Lampard, Sarri, Tuchel, Mancini have all been actively participating in professional football for many years. They all feature Jorginho prominently in their teams even when they had other options. Somehow all of them don't know that Jorginho is useless and won't improve. But Popizaino and other NL analysts clearly is seeing how useless Jorginho is.

popizaino:
Alonso saw Spanish shirt for the first time because he still with us, same as Emerson and Italy but it is one outlier you want to use to discredit multiple evidence before you.

Emerson saw which shirt?