₦airaland Forum

Gucciboy:
Chelsea for dey top 4 If Jackson manage score 20 epl goals yet he dey complain about lewandowski.

Liverpool literally won the league with Nunez on the bench.

Salah 46GA
Diaz 18GA
Gakpo 13GA
Jota 9GA
Szobozlai 12GA

Nunez 7GA

How many of Madueke/Sancho/Neto posted such stat above? Or they are not also responsible to take us to top 4?

airmark:
Yamal - 8 goals in 33 league matches

Madueke 7 goals in 30 league matches


Why are Barca fans not blaming Yamal for not scoring goals? Oh, Lewandowski has 25 league goals.

Now, you should understand why I am blaming your wasteful Jackson our own Lewandowski, with paltry 10 goals and the worst conversion rate in the league.

If you have shame, you won't even engage me on Jackson again.

Clown left Madueke's fellow RW in EPL where Madueke and Chelsea plays and run to Spain

At least you got 3 mentions from me today. Be grateful.

airmark:
After arguing foolishly defending Jackson, you wouldn't ignore ke? Exactly the same way you lost your voice after Morata was sent away after defending him. Shame on you and all of you that wanted Jackson to remain our main striker.



So, Maresca should have given Jackson the highest quality seat belt instead of allowing him to ruin our season with no goal in 12 consecutive league matches, right?

Your brain finally works after 2 years on this Jackson issue. Congrats.

Yes, he should have benched Jackson if your Madueke and other support cast stepped up their game like Salah and Co did in Liverpool.

But how will he bench Jackson when people like you defend Madueke for NOT scoring goals?

Gucciboy:
Is that you airmark?

What sort of evul is this?

airmark:
The highest scoring teams won the league titles in England, France, Germany, *Spain*, this season.

We got rid of Sterling, but his partner in crime in Jackson did the damage on us this season with worst conversion rate in the league. A better striker would have got us over the line.

Concentrate more on attack next season, as our defence did way better than last season without following Timbros suggestions.

This guy is just unbelievable Even women never seek attention like you. Damn! ....... I don't know if it's what keeps you going because I don't understand why the consistent mentions even when I keep ignoring you.

Well make I give you small dose of attention. You really need it.

The current champion of EPL, Liverpool, didn't need a better striker to conquer the league.

Liverpool have a Jackson twin brother in Nunez. What did Slot do? He gave Nunez a special place on his bench, with the highest quality seat belt. They used their own Madueke (Salah), their own Sancho (Diaz), their own Neto (Jota/Gakpo), their own Enzo (McAllister), their own Palmer (Szobozlai) to win the league.

How many shiny new number 9 toy does Slot need to win EPL since his number 9 is so terrible?

Your boy Madueke scored a hattrick against Wolves and switched off for the season. Is it not a RW like him that led Liverpool to the title? But no, you are here, in this very thread, defending Madueke for wasting an open goal that should have been an assist for Jackson.

How many points did Chelsea gather when Jackson was out injured? That should tell you that, in as much as Jackson is so terrible in front of goal, he is not THE reason we are where we are.

I know that you hate Jackson so much for whatever reason. But while hating on him, use your brain.

Na Seun mess up. He just wasted a feature on this site. If he had given us unlike button instead of blocking, you would have seen how ridiculous your takes are here. Maybe, just maybe, by then, you will start making more intelligent inputs here.

Ibime:
Allow me breeve and enjoy my W

airmark:
Comprehending simple English words is the reason you are arguing blindly always. Who was my preferred striker (singular)?

I can dig out multiple posts where I mentioned Gyokeres as my preferred choice. Rest and enjoy your L from your disgraceful Jackson.

**ignored**

airmark:
Mikel Obi on Nicolas Jackson:

“I played with Drogba. You gave him the ball, you celebrated. With Jackson, you give him the ball… and start praying. I don’t know if he’s a striker or a social experiment."


Timbros, Nateevs, Lordfalcao, Kimbeast, Singapore1

**ignored**

airmark:
At least you were brilliant not mentioning my main candidates, Gyokeres and Guirassy.

airmark:
As at today:

Jackson - 10 goals in 30 league matches

Guirassy - 20 goals in 29 league matches

Despite Guirassy not being my preferred striker, like I advised you to wait till May, he dusted your elbow-merchant striker as expected.

What says you now?

Even when you try your best to ignore this attention seeker, he will constantly push you to knock his head with spatula

Too much cho cho cho upandan... Nateevs was right after all. You get too much time on your hands that's why you MUST type and type and type and reply each and every post you see, so I'm not surprised.

Guy, you get issue.

airmark:
Yes, you deserve more than muds splattered on your face.. That's how you did for Morata, supporting rubbish and mentioning me when he was scoring goals sparsely and when he was bundled out you sauntered away. You lots should stop supporting and defending useless players.

**ignored**

iamoyindamola:
See paper tiger excuse🤣🤣

Imagine

Ibime:
I've been unlucky with bad draws in the regular season

So it's overdue for luck to shine my way in Playoffss

See excuse

Who have been unlucky more than me? I dey top 73k overall ranking like dis, but I struggle to survive relegation for h2h..

Paper tiger excuse

Ibime:
Unless Ola Aina scores 8 points tomorrow, I am through to the semifinal

And he is here bragging about it

Person go read the above comment think say like 92points dey down already

airmark:
Number one on the list of those to be banished from Chelsea with Jackson, is this Chelsea hater.

You are so childish!

Na me go dey engage you again after I cancel you. No vex.

Paper tigers everywhere...

Imagine Ibime winning with paltry 37 points.

Tueh!

diggz:
Jackson can stay, but not as our first-choice striker. As for the rest—Sanchez, Sancho, Madueke, Enzo 1, Enzo 2, Fofana, and Gusto—they can all getat!

Enzo 1, Enzo 2

I took a -4 to bring in KDB and Cap him!

airmark:
Is attack the problem?

You are shameless.

Continue making my point for me

LOL

airmark:
You are a dirty liar. I remember how you and Nateevs were dancing, tagging me to your posts when Jackson wasn't replaced by a better striker at the beginning of the season and scoring cheap goals.



Now, you are claiming to be strongly in support of a new striker. So why this post at the beginning of the season? You are shameless.

Continue making my point for me..

LOL.

airmark:
You are shameless, always 'changing mouth'. What's this rhetorical question for?

Continue making my point for me.

LOL.

nateevs:
Two things could be true at the same time. You generally have more time than most people to repeat your stance. It doesn't really mean that people kept quiet. It probably means they don't have as much time as you do.

Second point. I can tell you confidently, nobody in here kicked against replacing Jackson. Not one single soul.

You know, the misinterpretation here is mind blowing. Once your opinion differ from Airmark's, he will relentlessly push the agenda that you are 100 percent at the other end of the spectrum.

We support and back the striker we have now means we don't want another striker in CFC.

It's pathetic.

Thazard:
You mean one of the multiple post you 'changed mouth'?



Actually I do think with mine. You are supposed to be telling yourself that because it's only those don't use theirs makes one wonder if they have any at all. Please don't make us insult each other.

I challenge you to quote ANY of my post where I specifically said we ONLY need to fix the defence and NOT touch the attack. And later change mouth.

I challenge you to pull out such posts.

Below is airmark going pro attack 100 percent. No balance, no defence, just fix attack. Period.

airmark:
You don't need any balancing rim, fix the attack. Period.

I challenge you to bring out any of my post like this. Pro defence 100 percent. No balance, no attack, just fix defence. Period.

Dig it out.

airmark:
You wanted a new CB, despite having Tosin joining and wanted Jackson to continue to play loads and loads of games this season as his wastefulness didn't bother you. You were also against signing a LWF when Sancho was rumoured to be joining.

That's your own composition of finding a balance, which was foolish and I was against.

This is the exact reason why I stop responding to you - the lies and misinterpretations.

1. Telling you to be ready to watch loads and loads of Jackson this season doesn't mean I am against signing another striker. I want to help you pull out of that your fantasy and come back to reality. But here you are, either deliberately misinterpreting me or too dull to understand that being realistic does not mean I support entirely what is going on.

2. Does being bothered about Jackson wastefulness change anything? All your "bother", what has it changed? Has it made the board change their strategy of running the club? Maybe they will rush and sign 4 strikers if they find out one Nairaland user named airmark is bothered that Jackson is too wasteful.

3. I was against signing another LWF after we already signed Neto. The reason is simple: that will be a luxury signing. Is it necessary when the squad is already bloated and we are literally hawking players all over the world to reduce the squad?

If you like, argue from now till eternity, a successful team is always always balance. Score more and concede less. Go hug transformer if you disagree with this.

Thazard:
What is the bolded supposed to mean?


I'm not blind,I look at the both sides before I made final judgement. Because I support airmark most times doesn't mean I agree with everything he says. I think before I make a judgement bro.


Should we say those that agree with you doesn't think for themselves? That they are blind followers?


I've been here since the beginning of the defence vs attack brouhaha. Your major stance has always been to upgrade the defenders. Only when the attack fvcks up too much you tilt towards a balance team. Even airmark sometimes agree with a balance team but his major stance is upgrading the attack.


So make nobody change mouth.



Timbros - The defence is our problem

Airmark - The attack is our problem


Nobody should come here and say he has been pro - balance. EOD.


Balance ko, balanciaga ni.

You are lying to yourself in that bolded. Kimbeast literally posted my stance from the very beginning of this debate.... Was there any attack that messed up before I made that "balance" post?

Again, think for yourself. You have a brain. Make use of it.

airmark:
Balderdash as usual.

To you, Jackson wasn't our problem. Just tell us the reason you hate me and Chelsea this much.

Have you seen loads and loads and loads of Jackson or not?

That comment was made June 2024. Almost a year ago. Can you count how much of Jackson you have watched since then?

Continue living in fantasy while reality stares you in the face.

I told you you will see more of Jackson this season and you did. I don't know your problem with that post

Gucciboy:
Liverpool women to give Chelsea Women guard of honour after which they would collect another round of beating from the reigning champions

Do me I do you

Thazard:
Oga timbros especially was talking from both sides of his mouth.


Sometimes ( in fact,most times ) he argued that the defense is the problem some other times (when the attackers foolishness got him bewildered) he stands on balance.

You do know that there is something called major problem and minor problem and that a balanced team fixes both part of the problems?

Read my comment again that Kimbeast posted. That has been my stand from day one. Infact click the link he posted to see the genesis of this debate.

Airmark knows exactly what a balanced team looks like but he never want to admit our defence has the major issue. He wants people like you to believe that anyone who argues against him is completely on the opposite side. Since he is pro attack 100 percent, anyone who has a different opinion is 100 percent pro defence. Does that make sense?

Statistics proved that our attack from last season massively improved from 2 seasons ago. But the defence from 2 seasons ago became more worst last season... So where does the major problem lie? An improved attack or a defence getting worst?

If I ask you for proof is speaking from both side of my mouth now, you will start running from pillar to post.

Think for yourself. Use your own brain. Stop allowing people do your thinking for you.

Kimbeast:
These are the comments that started the discussion last year January. You can all see the argument was about improving our defensive play just like how our attack improved when compared to the previous season and striking a balance. Popi is trying to gaslight newbies into thinking that was never part of the discussion.

https://www.nairaland.com/920248/official-chelsea-fan-thread-champions/18599

Thank you.

I just read Popizaino post and SMH.... I no go even bother to reply am.

BlueRayDick:
He knows what he’s doing na .

Barca Dey tear everybody basket of goals lost to a more balanced team , he still wan Dey shalaye on top attack . The good thing is Inter is not known for their attacking prowess

You get him time ah swear..

airmark:


What was your suggestion for a balanced team that i mocked?

Your suggestion to stick to your wasteful Jackson misleading the line, and we saw how it has ended. We saw how you and Nateevs became quiet when your Jackson has become that major item of ridicule in our team. Even Blueraydick didn't want to talk about him. That's your definition of balance

I don't have time for your ridiculous takes. But let me give you just 2 minutes of attention and answer that you question above..

See my suggestion made on 18th January 2024....

timbros:
We just need to strike a balance between this attack and defense thing.

If you score 5 goals in a match and concede 6, will you praise your attack for scoring 5 in a match or will you blame you defense for conceding 6?

Conversely,if you concede just 1 goal but scored zero, will you praise your defense for being tight enough to concede "just" 1 goal or will you blame your attack for not being able to score any?

While our attack need massive improvement to convert chances created, our defense also need to tighten up. Individual errors in defense have cost us a lot this season. So yes, defense is also our problem.

In 2004/05 when Mourinho broke the record of least goals conceded in the league, we scored 72 goals. Arsenal in second scored 87..... The amount of 1-0 matches we played that season was uncountable.

2020/21 when Tuchel won us UCL, we conceded just 4 goals all campaign. 4 goals in 13 matches!

Make una no dey underrate the importance of defense in football.

Again that same day...

timbros:
Once more, you are looking at this from a biased pov that's why you keep making reference to Spurs.

How about you look at it this other way... We have scored more goals (35) than Man Utd (24) and West ham (33) but they are higher in the table than us. If just scoring goals is the answer, then they should be below us because statistically, our attack is better.

While scoring more goals is important, conceding less is also important. There is no major or minor in both. Balance it out and we are good to go.

You can't go into a match believing you will win when your defenders make individual errors all over the place and you concede needless goals everywhere.

This was your shameless response mocking my take..

airmark:
You don't need any balancing rim, fix the attack. Period.

Now run along... Your 2 minutes have expired.

AirBere:
@Agendaland, 7:6 AET when it's not cricket simply means ....

No.

Inter actually "Outdefend" Barca.... And they are in the final now.