₦airaland Forum

airmark:
Yesterday, Pochettino temporarily fixed the attack by benching your useless Sterling and he later injected Chukwuemeka and Madueke to boost the attack and boom, we won.

Permanent fix is expected by summer when your useless Sterling is chased away from Cobham and we get a quality finisher.

You go explain tire.

Did Sterling start the Burnley game?

airmark:
The two major things Pochettino did well in the attack yesterday that gave us the win, he benched your Sterling and brought in Chukwuemeka and Madueke to boost the attack. This is a temporary fix until summer when we do a permanent surgical operation on the attack by chasing your useless Sterling away, and get Jackson's upgrade to bang in goals.

For the umpteenth time, you win matches by outscoring your opponents. Kudos to Palmer, Madueke, Chukwuemeka, Mudryk and Pochettino for shaming you, despite the disasters at the back.

Pochettino benched Sterling against Burnley. What happened?

@bolded.... At least you are seeing our defence for what it is now. You have now seen the light. It's not just "fix the attack. Period". Try educate your boy Popizaino too.

airmark:
The two major things Pochettino did well in the attack yesterday that gave us the win, he benched your Sterling and brought in Chukwuemeka and Madueke to boost the attack. This is a temporary fix until summer when we do a permanent surgical operation on the attack by chasing your useless Sterling away, and get Jackson's upgrade to bang in goals.

For the umpteenth time, you win matches by outscoring your opponents. Kudos to Palmer, Madueke, Chukwuemeka, Mudryk and Pochettino for shaming you, despite the disasters at the back.

Pochettino benched Sterling against Burnley. What happened?

Skimpledawg:
Make we set them up na

Na on top Rumuokoro flyover go be venue

iamoyindamola:
All hail King Henbens
The first of it kind

Omor.... I'm speechless

hensben:
This guy nor know say makelele started as a winger in his early days in France.

Oga your take is the shocking one.

When did Makelele played CAM for Chelsea?

The same Makelele that has a position named after him?

hensben:
Caicedo can play DM but doesn’t mean it is his best position was my point that day. He play more like makelele and not Kante. Remember makelele started as CAM and then box to box to fully DM while at Chelsea.

Jesu!

Trevor012:
When Ibime said Caicedo was not a dm hensbrain said he doesn't know anything. Now he is saying dey bought Lavia to sit for his DM. Take hensbrain seriously at your own risk 😂😂

Reciept sharp sharp

Jodera:
Exactly what I told Popi two days ago. You can't be scoring 2 goals per match and you won't even be thinking about Europe.

On the flip side,Man u defence was just useless. An average defence would see that match out. They just switched off for the last two goals.

Especially the last goal.

Even Palmer will be shocked at the kind of space he had for that shot in the last goal. So shocking!

nihilistjnr:
Logically you have a stronger argument but fück all of that -this is Agendaland nigga. We dont do that here.

Airmark won yesterday because he mentioned specific scenarios that literally came to pass.

Your post is like Rodri's post match interview after losing to Morocco (or any time he loses for that matter)

You can argue the better team lost, we played tiki taka, we had 1 billion xG, and 98% possession...yeah brah but you lost. Airmark te si oju e last night.

You should be planning your own victory speech, because your own time WILL definitely come.

Airmark specifically said our attack is shyte. In his words, "fix the attack. Period." Since he made that comment, the attack have been scoring 2 or more goals consistently... Last night the attack scored 4. So logically, the attack have been fixed. Why are we still lamenting here every match day after attack have done their job?

Okay, last night, attack did their job in 20 mins but defence was hell bent on making us cry as usual. But the same attack still bailed us out. So how did airmark win when the attack he is criticising scored 4 goals?

Maybe I would have won if Man Utd won the game like 2-0, abi?

afrodoc2:
Hahaha. No he him I dey talk about o.

Palmer will actually get better when he gets stronger physically and gets a better manager. He also should be moved centrally.

Whoever you are talking about, airmark is worst.

swiz123:
And faultless defence has conceded 50. It almost feels as if our attacks major opposition is our defence, and not opponents.

If we rate our defenders contribution by number of clean sheets, we will resort to donating their salaries to charity.

Truer words can never be said!

lajid:
In as much as I understand what Airmark is saying, to be honest, defense is our issue.

We can’t be conceding 2 goals and more every damn match. You aren’t always going to score 3-4 goals every match just like when we drew 2-2 against burnley I think.

Truth is, the defense has declined massively, but then our attack has grown and is causing opposition problems. In summary, as it stands defense is our problem

Airmark and Popizaino will disagree completely with you, not because you are not making sense, but because their ego is at stake.

If this boys brain correct, we can actually push for European place.

If we can win our outstanding match, we will shoot up to 7th place, 2 points behind Man Utd and take it up from there.... But no, they will take 3 steps back after this one step forward.

afrodoc2:
I like it ice cold.

I deserve it for the great job I did SCOUTING him for you guys. Unlike some other scouts that we won’t mention. 😄

You won’t hear any Palmer slander from me. I always knew he was him.

Airmark can you please come forward?

swiz123:
He is not smart at all. He makes argument against him so easy. Saying rubbish as if Palmer was suspended against that infamous Burnley game.

The same Sterling and Jackson he is deflecting the argument towards, are Chelsea's top 3 goal contributors this season, including Palmer.


Palmer 24 GA
Jackson 12 GA
Sterling 10 GA

But no, they are Chelsea's problem in an attack that is on 53 goals so far.

If this is not a massive improvement in attack and massive decline in defence, I don't know what else can prove it.

The 2 screenshot below are league tables of last season and this season so far.

After scoring a paltry 38 goals in 38 matches last season, we have scored 53 goals in just 29 games this season. But look at the defence... Just look at it. Conceded 47 goals after 38 games last season, which is woeful for a "big 6" club. What do we have this season? We have conceded 50 goals currently. There are still 9 games to go!

If the defence improved on the figures of last season the way attack improved, there is no damn way we will be in the position we are right now. No way!

But but attack is our problem...

afrodoc2:
I said it on this forum about 3 years ago that Palmer is a terrorist. Wetin the guy use academy team's eyes see na crime against womanity.
And because he is a Man Utd fan he always reserved his best performances against us. He has now carried it to the senior team.

Bolded na mistake be dat abi you type am intentionally?

All this players sef, they will fan a club and be playing academy for their direct rivals... I think Sancho is a United fan also, abi?

Ballzproblem2:
you are in UK typing shit lol , come ph first, that's not a leveled playing field.

@ibeme near ph first then can talk ,if community boys no drill you.

Who wan drill Ibime wey be town boy?

Dey play

Ibeme:
Drop your location make we test your PH level

Na Mile 1 Diobu Iloabuchi boy be that o

popizaino:
Well put on the emboldened for men of better football understanding.


Great teams after conceding have the attacking prowess to come back. That's why timbros for the past 72hours cannot point to one match that Chelsea has had to come back from 2-0 down and win.


Pep guardiola unexpectedly conceded 2goals to Aston villa on the last day of the season two seasons ago and still came back to win 3 -2 and was crown champion. Until timbros is able to give me just 3matches were Chelsea has been able to come back from 2goals to win in the last 7 seasons then all his talks of defence whatsoever is rubbish.

Why are we even in a comeback discussion? You have been talking of comeback since the Burnley game and it's so ridiculous.

Was there suppose to be a comeback from Chelsea against Burnley? Do you do a comeback in a match you kept leading? Bruddah, is everything alright? Why not go and rewatch the Burnley match before you come to analyse?

popizaino:
You didn't ask him the right question bro.

He just shot himself in the foot with that his useless comeback.

Before you use a word, try and check your dictionary.

Have you watched the Chelsea vs Burnley match? If you have and you also watch Chelsea vs Man Utd, you will know when to use the word comeback

airmark:
In case you have night blindness as I assume you are at night, nihilist has helped with crayon and black pen, to highlight the culprits (Sterling and Jackson, who fired blanks today). Sterling wasn't started, and we were 2 goals up. Madueke later helped us to get the equalizer.

Pochettino benched Sterling, and later injected Chukwuemeka and Madueke to add life to the dying attack, the rest is history, as we outscored them unlike against them at Manchester.

Even before December, I had already called Palmer, the best Chelsea attacker and he rescued us. Imagine having more attackers of Palmer's quality upfront as a top striker and wingers, our opponents will be dead before half time.

Pochettino, got it right with the changes he made in the attack and we outscored Scummies and won, despite having disasters at the back. Bury your head in shame.

Shut up man! Just sit this one out.

Don't even try to narrow your argument to specific players. Your argument all along have been Chelsea attack. Have Sterling and Jackson not been part of the attack that have been scoring 2 or more goals consistently? You are a clown! The same Sterling that came in against Burnley and drop an assist sharp sharp and your okay defence spoilt his harwork?

All the "attack vs defence" that is littering this thread, why haven't you corrected everyone that it's Sterling and Jackson that is your problem not Chelsea attack? Should I show you all your "Fix the attack. Period." comments? You don't know we have Palmer all this while when you are maligning Chelsea attack?

You are a clown, I swear.

SMH

Airmark no dey shame.

Attack that is the problem keep scoring but the defence that is very okay keep conceding. You will not quietly enjoy your team's win today.

6 straight matches now the attack have been scoring 2 or more goals but they are the problem. While the defence have been conceding at least 2 goals consistently for 6 straight matches, and you get mind dey type nonsense.

The same attack you are maligning scored 4 tonight to cover up your stupid defence uselessness.

Conceding repeatedly against the worst attack in EPL is not enough for you, you went on to concede 3 times after the attack suffer to go 2 goals up. If the same attack you are critisicing did not dig deep and win this match, by now you would have been narrating chances missed.

Airmark respect yourself and just celebrate our first league victory over Man Utd since 2017 in peace.

raumdeuter:
Saka dropped Haaland benched, KdB benched Ake injured

See you all next season modafockas!!

You of all people should know that triple City is a dangerous path to tow..

Suicide mission.

Mason Mount scoring on his return to Stamford Bridge

They always score against us...

Lampard, KDB, Salah, Lukaku, Hasselbaink, Gallas, Scott Parker, Glenn Johnson, Borini, Sturridge etc etc etc....

They always score against us...

airmark:
We have more disasters upfront.

It's a sure bet that as usual, our attackers will miss big chances today.

The stats say otherwise.

Upfront have consistently scored two or more goals recently but the disaster behind have equally conceded 2 goals consistently.

I know who to believe between airmark and stats.

@bolded... Your surer bet is defenders conceding at least 2 goals.

airmark:
I hate defending and I was all out for VVD, even when you didn't see anything special in his defensive ability. His aerial prowess that I also highlighted then, and you downplayed, is what you are crying for in our defenders now.

You are always against sensible upgrade of our team, I don't know why.

The jokes on you.

You claim to know quality defenders but is okay with disasters we parade as defenders. See your life?

airmark:
You love useless attackers, I don't know why.

I don't know why you hate defending.

iykmora:
Timbros iamoyindamola na who dey disguise abi person don kolobi another person quote 🤔

No be Ibime be dis

airmark:
These Sterling and Jackson wouldn't have made the bench in that period

Sterling and Jackson have been giving us 2 goals or more consistently.. Why don't we see zero in opponents side of the score?

airmark:

Attack is still the best form of defence. I won't want him to be missing big chances like Morata.

Thanks to everyone for the wishes.

The period in our history that we hauled the most trophies with the best coach in our history is known for defensive reliability.

Our 1-0 wins during that period is uncountable.