Tochi3's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Tochi3's Profile › Tochi3's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 (of 287 pages)
[b]and larger chiefdoms, kingdoms, and finally empires that began the rebirth of their long lost civilization . The fiercest wars between the Blacks occurred in the founding and expansion of new kingdoms and empires . For while the core groups were voluntary confederations, expansion of an empire required the conquest of neighboring states, usually small, independent chiefdoms, that preferred to maintain their absolute sovereignty . The repercussions from this forced unity by conquest were to shake the continent from end to end centuries later when European political rule ended . Modern Africans and students of Africa have tended to emphasize the destructive impact of European imperialism in Africa while ignoring the most damaging developments from the Arab impact before the general European takeover in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, a relatively recent period . This point is important. For one of the most remarkable chapters in the history of the Blacks is that dealing with those dauntless leaders and people who, having lost one state after another along with three-fourths of their kinsmen, nevertheless overrode all the forces of destruction and death and began to build, always once again, still another state . From the earliest times the elimination of these states as independent African sovereignties had been an Asian objective, stepped up by Muslim onslaughts after the seventh century A .D . So the reestablished black states were still being conquered and Islamized when Europeans began to arrive in great numbers to impose their rule over both Asians and Africans. The big thing that happened here, to repeat, is generally glossed over, ignored or forgotten . The last being a pretension, since a historical development of this magnitude could hardly be forgotten by serious writers on Africa . For what happened, very simply, was that European imperialism in Africa checked and replaced Arab imperialism . The Arab screams against Western imperialism are the screams of outrage against Western imperialists for checking and subduing Eastern imperialists in the very midst of the Blacks they had conquered . There are still countless thousands of Blacks who are naive enough to believe that the Arabs' bitter attack on Western colonialism show their common cause with Black Africa .[/b] |
[b]It was for reasons of security that so many of these groups, later called tribes or societies, sought the most hidden and isolated areas they could find . This permanent separation from their kinsmen in other groups was generally quite contrary to their hearts' desires . The original splintering off and parting was often done in tears . But breaking up into smaller units seemed to be the only route to survival in a permanent crisis situation-apparently permanent, since the movement of people over the continent had been going on so far beyond the memory of each generation that migrations and temporary settlements were among the most significant facts in the oral tradition of each society . Fragmentation and isolation had two momentous consequences . The first was that the isolation of various groups led to the development of over two thousand different dialects and languages . The second fateful outcome was that the rise of all these tongues widened the gulf between the Blacks that territorial distances had already achieved . One should pause here for reflection if there is any serious attempt to really understand what happened to the African people and why . For even without the aid of Western writers in emphasizing the language differences and the cultural variations and attempting to show how unrelated the Blacks were, they, in time, came to consider themselves unique with each society not only independent of the other but independent of its enemy, if only potentially . Disunity and mutual suspicion became an African way of life . Small chiefdoms sprang up everywhere, often no more than a village of one or two hundred people . Africa, therefore, presented itself to Asia and Europe as the ideal land for exploitation, enslavement and conquest . The history is complex and many-sided, and would be so if we were discussing just one nation and not an entire continent . Ths is why our focus must be on the main lines of development, the African-wide aspects, and the unmistakable common origin and continent-wide sameness of basic institutions which these universal aspects reflect . There were, then, different outcomes for different societies . Some perished even to the last member from disease, starvation or warfare . Others, despairing of ever again being able to have a fixed abode, became nomads . Some, although isolated so long that .they had developed different languages and customs, had nevertheless decided that salvation required a union with other groups. These were the tribes that merged with other tribes, lost their separate identity and languages ; and who evolved from this process a single common language, larger[/b] |
[b]capital cities of Napata and Meroe . From there black civilization spread north, reaching its most spectacular achievements in what became known as "Egyptian Civilization ." The general condition of vast stretches of uninhabited and uninhabitable land over the continent seemed to support the Western thesis that Africans never developed any worthwhile civilization with a notable historic past. The more charitable might add that in the very nature of their situation it could not have been otherwise . Samuel Baker went far in promoting the idea of African innate inferiority even if he had to use the most forbidding area in Africa to do it-the terrible swamplands of the Sudd, an area south of Khartoum, that, in its full extent, is as big as England . No one would claim that any kind of society, civilized or savage, could exist in the Sudd Swamplands, probably the largest in the world . For it was neither all land nor water, but a seemingly endless mass of rotting vegetation, interwoven tree-like vines, steaming heat, swarming man-killing mosquitoes, crocodiles, hippos and other unknown forms of tropical life . The conclusion of Baker and others was that they were in a land where time had stood still since its beginning, where life never advanced and the human species had simply rotated in aimless cycles like the animal life in the Sudd . As late as the 1840s and 50s these explorers, even the most ignorant, should have known that in the same vast continent of wastelands, tropical rain forests and swamplands, there were also areas of arable land and civilized states . But they wrote about what they saw the most of: vast stretches of wasteland and secluded groups of "strange" people . But, as we shall see, some of the great kingdoms and empire-builders in Africa seem not to have known the meaning of failure or to have any ideas about surrendering to fate . Ejected here, they led the people there-and began to build again . Wherever the splintered-off refugee groups found a place where the soil seemed favorable for cultivation, and the land unoccupied by preceding migrants, they settled and began to build villages again . A sense of relative security was a necessary factor in deciding where to begin a new settlement . A crucial question was how many miles had they put between the slave hunters and themselves? For the kind of houses and community buildings they would erect depended directly on the probability of permanent settlement or sudden flight again . In short, they could build large, sturdy and attractive compound homes and temples of worship or easily demolished huts .[/b] |
[b]The Overview THE LAND OF THE BLACKS WAS A VAST LAND, A BIG WORLD unto itself covering 12,000,000 square miles . From its northernmost point in what is now Tunisia to Cape Aqulhas is approximately 5,000 miles, and in its widest extent from east to west it is 4,600 miles . The whole of this second largest continent was once Bilad as Sudan, "The Land of the Blacks," and not just the southern region to which they had been steadily pushed from the north . After Asian, Greek and Roman occupations, the term "Sudan" came to indicate the areas not yet taken from the Blacks and was co-extensive with the Ethiopian empire . For the Ethiopian empire once extended from the Mediterranean north and southward to the source of the Nile in the country (Abyssinia) which recently reverted to the ancient name of the Ethiopian empire of which in earlier times it formed its southeastern provinces . Even as late as the times of Menes, 3,100 B.C., Ethiopia still included three-fourths of Egypt, or up to twenty-nine degrees North parallel . The Asians held the Delta region, hence "The Two Lands" -well-known to all historians but never fully explained . (To explain the "Two Lands," of course, would blast the myth about the builders of Egyptian Civilization .) It was pointed out that the study of the Blacks must begin in Egypt because most of their indestructible monuments are there ; and, further, because many of the artifacts archaeologists have been uncovering during the past seventy-five years as "Egyptian" are in fact "African ." Yet the very "Heartland of the Race" and the cradle of civilization were actually further south below the First Cataract, centered around the[/b] |
To be continued, |
have shifted the main focus from the history of Arabs and Europeans in Africa to the Africans themselves, a history of the Blacks that is a history lacks . They will be coming back, center stage, into their own history at last But to what end? Will it be just for the intellectual satisfaction of knowing our true history? Knowing it, but so what?The answer is nothing, unless from history we learn what our strengths were and, especially, in what particular aspect we are weak and vulnerable. Our history can then become at once the foundation and guiding light for united efforts in serious planning what we should be about now . |
[b]Ancient China and the Far East, for example, must be a special area of African research . How do we explain such a large population of Blacks in Southern China, powerful enough to form a kingdom of their own? Or the black people of Formosa, Australia, the Malay peninsula, Indo-China, the Andaman and numerous other islands? The heavy concentration of Africans in India, and the evidence that the earliest Aryan chiefs were black (which will make Hitler rise from his grave) open still another interesting field for investigation . Even the "Negroid" finds in early Europe appear not to be as challenging as the black population centers in Asia . For, again, reference is not made to small groups which may have wandered anywhere over the earth ; rather, our concern is with great and dominant populations . These are the Blacks who have so puzzled Western scholars that some theorize that Asia or Europe may be the homeland of Africans after all . The African populations in Palestine, Arabia and Mesopotamia are better known, although the many centuries of black rule over Palestine, South Arabia, and in Mesopotamia should be studied and elaborated in more detail . All of this will call for a new kind of scholarship, a scholarship without any mission other than the discovery of truth, and one that will not tremble with fear when that truth is contrary to what one prefers to believe . Nothing is clearer than the tragic fact that Africa, like the rest of the black world, has only the illusion of being free and independent . It is only about one-third free . It is still as economically enshackled as it ever was, in some respects more so. The study of this period and the conditions it presents will confront the Blacks of the world with the final challenge . The response to that challenge will be the test of the genius of the race . The outcome and, indeed, the whole future of the race depends upon the extent to which we have become intellectually emancipated and decaucasianized enough to pioneer in original thinking . Those who do become free in fact, will no longer readily grab the white man's ideologies and systems whether capitalism, the Western version of democracy, or communism, without a critical review and analysis to determine whether Africa's own traditional system, when updated, may not be truly superior and best fitted to meet the aspirations of the black world . This last period, then, is the time of great decisions . It may well be the black race's last chance for a rebirth and salvation . The division proposed above for a new approach in the research, teaching and study of African history will outrage most Western and Arab scholars, along with their subservient Negro followers, because I [/b] |
[b]How was the art of writing lost by one of the first peoples to invent it? Study the migrations . How and why did a once-great people, with a common origin, splinter off into countless little independent societies and chiefdoms from which 2,000 different languages and dialects developed? Study the migrations . What caused the brother-against- brother internecine wars, hatreds, slavery and mutual suspicion among the various black societies? Again, study the migrations! There would be several subdivisions of great importance . Slavery and the slave trade, for example, would include Africa, Asia and the Americas. This would be the background for later periods covering black history in the United States, South America and the Caribbean areas . The eighth division is the reemergence of African kingdoms and empires, by regions, between the tenth and nineteenth centuries . This was the period during which there were attempts in every region of Africa to restore the glory that was Ethiopia's. It is doubtful if any of these black states realized that they were being slowly but steadily surrounded and hemmed in from all directions by invaders from the seacoasts and across the Sahara . The ultimate fall of the black states, first under Islamic and then under European Christian blows, closed this period with the triumph of colonialism . The final period is the Black Revolution that ended political colonialism with the rise of politically independent states . This would take us from 1950 to the present, and should be subdivided for the developments in Black America, South America, and the "Islands of the Seas ." From the new approach and plan for research, study and development of African history presented above, "periodization," while recognized as highly important, is not allowed to so fragment a great movement or development covering many periods and milleniums that their real significance is lost . Examples are the ethnic transformation of Egypt from black to brown to white, and the long centuries of the great migrations . These defied periodization in any meaningful sense . I'only made passing reference in the work to Blacks scattered outside of Africa over the world, not from the slave trade, but from dispersions that began in prehistory . This fact alone indicates the great tasks of future scholarship on the real history of the race . We are actually just on the threshold, gathering up some important missing fragments . The biggest jobs are still ahead .[/b] |
[b]order to focus on a single issue : The role of invasions and conquests in the destruction of black civilization with the resulting ethnic transformation of Egypt from black to brown (Afro-Asian and Afro-European), to white . This means that the second subdivision would bypass the Restoration period of the great Eleventh and Twelfth Dynasties for the next period of invasion and conquest, the Hebrew (Hyksos) rule, 1645-1567 B.C. Again, bypassing the New Empire, the other subdivisions would study the periods of Assyrian, Persian, Greek, Roman and Arab invasions and the impact of their conquests and rule on the Blacks . The fourth major division would begin with the skipped-over Eleventh and Twelfth Dynasties, 1786-1233 B.C, the great Eighteenth, 1567- 1320, and then continue from the Age of Ramses to the end of the Twenty-fourth Dynasty, 1330-730 . The fifth period should be from the last of the Black pharaohs to the destruction of the remaining southern division of the Ethiopian Empire below the First Cataract, 730 B .C. to the fifth century (A.D .). The sixth period : From the reemergence of successor black states in the fifth century A .D . to their final destruction by the Arabs in the thirteenth century . The seventh period, like the second, should not be a time division of neat and largely irrelevant chronological sequences . It is a study of migrations of the Blacks that covered many centuries, but which became more widespread and desperate after the Arab conquest of the original center of black civilization in the Sudan . The long periods of wandering all over the continent, often aimlessly, comprised the great historic race of the Blacks for survival, a race that tried to outdistance famine, disease, slavery and death . The period that deserves more intense study and critical analysis extends from the thirteenth century to colonialism in the nineteenth . Elsewhere I have posed the most perplexing question : If the Blacks were among the very first builders of civilization and their land the birthplace of civilization, what has happened to them that has left them since then, at the bottom of world society, precisely what happened? The Caucasian answer is simple and well-known : The Blacks have always been at the bottom . This answer is clear even in the histories and other educational material which whites so busily prepare for Blacks . Almost all of the true answers will be found in the study of the causes of the migrations and the tragic results stemming directly from those seemingly endless movements of fragmented peoples .[/b] |
[b]THE NEW APPROACH The first period would begin with "prehistory," primarily because Nowe, one of the oldest cities on earth, was begun by Blacks before recorded history . Another important reason is that the Canaanites and Asians had invaded the Nile Delta and established a stronghold in Lower Egypt (then Northeastern Ethiopia or Chem) in prehistoric times . This early concentration of whites along the seacoasts of the Land of the Blacks is a circumstance of crucial importance in black history"because it was exactly from this development that the achievements of the Blacks were overshadowed by later writers or blotted out entirely . The call is for black specialists for one period in one area . What, for example, was the actual influence of the white Asians, rigidly held back for centuries in the lower one-fourth of the country, upon the Blacks who held the three-fourths that came to be known as Upper Egypt? Review and indepth studies of this period are required . The general historian is out . The best general histories, region by region, can be written only after the work of the specialists is done . The second period might well be from the conquest of Lower Egypt by the Ethiopian leader, Menes, in 3100 B .C. to the end of the Sixth Dynasty, 2181, also the end of the Old Kingdom .' This was the period that gave birth to Egypt, and before which there was no Egypt . It was the period during which black kings united the "Two Lands," started the dynastic (lineage) system, and began the building of the greatest civilization . The greatest in-depth review and concentration of research should be focused on this second period . It was, in fact, the Golden Age in the history of the Blacks, the age in which they reached the pinnacle of a glory so dazzling in achievements that Western and Arab writers felt compelled to erase it by the sheer power of their position, beginning black history over 3,000 years later, and limiting it-such as they allowed, to "Africa South of the Sahara ." The third period of black history in Egypt should begin with the Seventh Dynasty, 2181 B.C ., and subdivided into the tragic periods of internal turmoil and white invasions . The first subdivision would be from 2181 B .C. to 2040 B .C. covering the Seventh Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Dynasties . Thereafter, strict chronology should be ignored in --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes 3 . Earlier dates, such as 4500 B.C ., are also given and accepted by many authorities ; for conflicting dates do appear in ancient records . I do not debate the point .[/b] |
[b]Where it is impossible to deny black achievements, equal to and often above the whites, such achievements were attributed to some kind of Caucasian influence, even if imaginary . Yet, the AHA Publication Number Fifty-six uses the same strategy that makes Western scholarship so very triumphant . The main thrusts of its racist presuppositions are, for the unwary, completely hidden by much highly welcomed factual materials. But what is certain to disarm almost everyone is racism's forthright attacks on racism throughout the publication . I suppose no one is expected to notice the implied incapacity of black historians to deal with African history objectively . They are not referred to as historians, of course, they are " . . . some modern African intellectuals who have tried to show great civilizations in the past, grander than anything that ever existed ." As a direct result of this continued universal enslavement through education, black youth are in revolt . That revolt will become increasingly dangerous as they begin to realize how completely they are blocked from self-realization in the very institutions that should further it ; how difficult it is to find suitable textbooks in black history or even "Negro" teachers who do not limit themselves to the viewpoints of the white masters who trained them . The frustrations become more intolerable as the young find themselves between two fires : The white racists who determine the very nature of their education and the Negro educators who also see the world through the blue eyes of the Saxons . In short, they are forced to turn to their own devices because they find so many of their own race, who should be working with them, in the camps of the "enemy ." Insofar as periodization is concerned, no one should be so naive as to expect a proper division of African history while the field is almost completely preempted by the enemies of that history . A proper division would tend to encourage a more all-inclusive research and a less biased interpretation of the results . Neither will happen until a new generation of black research scholars and historians take to the field, becoming the foremost authorities in their own right-black historians, not a single one of whom will fall in Professor Phillip D . Curtin's category of black intellectuals who try to "show great civilizations in the past, grander than anything that ever existed ." The new research efforts call for black experts not only in the field of history but also in the allied fields from which African history must heavily draw : archaeology, anthropology, linguistics, etc .[/b] |
I hope somebody is reading what I am reading here. In school I was taught that Mr Mungo Park discovered the source of the River Niger for example. What about the so called Lander Brothers, What did they discover again? After reading this book, it became very irrelevant what the white supremacist ever discovered in Africa and as for me it will forever remain so. If I may ask what was/is the essence of teaching black children the escapades of white supremacist in Africa without first teaching them the truths of their own history ( however, the white supremacist had already come to the conclusion that the blacks had no worthwhile history of their own not to talk of its achievement so they could as well be taught the history of the whites in Africa. What a shame.) if not only to create in the minds of these black kids a negative psychological complexities- you can say inferior complexities. Growing up as a kid and not learning about my true history ( only of course histories of war, hunger, cannibalism and hopelessness) but the history of other races indirectly made me see the so called ''whites'' as ''truly God sent''. But I am a grown man and I know better now. Let continue pls, |
[b]as ruthless and aggressive in their scholarly pursuits on races as their copartners in seizing and controlling the wealth and peoples of other lands . Having established strong national and international "African" associations and journals that attempt to control research activities on Africa, they proceeded to flood the world with hastily thrown together African "histories," pamphlets, and publications on just about every subject that could stand a "Black" title . 4. From their all-powerful "position of strength" they continue to arrange and rearrange the world as it pleases them, naming and classifying people, places and things as they will . In the United States, whites known to have any amount of "Negro blood," no matter how small, are classified as Negroes ; in Africa, North Africa in particular, they do the very opposite . Blacks with any amount of "Caucasian blood" are classified as "white ." This scheme was rigorously applied in the history of Egypt, for example, where even unmixed black pharaohs became "white" and the original black population was never referred to as Egyptian at all! The black kings who founded and 'ruled from the First Dynasty are disguised as such, while the Saite kings (white) of the small areas of Lower Egypt are presented as the Pharaohs of all Egypt even when African pharaohs were on the throne of Upper Egypt . Blotting the Blacks out of history included replacing African names of persons, place and things with Arabic and European names. One wave of the masters' magic hand, and Black Hamites and even Cushites, like their early Egyptian brothers, are no longer Africans! 5.Their periodization of African history is carefully arranged in such a way that the history becomes the history of Arabs and Europeans in Africa, and not the history of Africans . In African History, a recent publication of the American Historical Association as a guide to teaching, their purpose becomes clear in the arrangement itself: First period is, from the fall of the Roman Empire to 700 (A .D .), the Arab invasions ; the second period of African history is the period of "Islamic" civilization, 700 (A.D .) to the coming of the Europeans in 1500 ; the European Period from 1500 to 1960 is subdivided at 1880 to mark the period colonialism . There is no period of Black civilization in Black Africa . Such is the Caucasian viewpoint that is almost a religion . Their very first period eliminates 4,000 years of Black Civilization and the very greatest periods of African achievements ; their second period is devoted to the Arabs and Berbers in Africa ; and in their third period the focus is on European civilization . And it is all done under the heading of African history .[/b] |
[b]Western scholars, know all about the authentic early and modern sources. They simply ignore and refuse to publish any facts of African history that upset or even tend to upset their racial philosophy that rest so solidly on premises sanctified by time that they no longer need to be openly proclaimed . 2. They are, unwittingly, promoting the steady march toward a world conflict between the races . Yet they are doing what they feel they must do, in faithful obedience to their Caucasian culture, the racial pattern of which emerged in the 17th century . The steady conquest and enslavement of a whole people made it imperative to create both a religious and a "scientific" doctrine to assuage the white conscience . Their phenomenal success in the industrial world at once supports and justifies their philosophy, the supremacy of the fittest . The danger now arises from an entirely new and unexpected development: A sleeping and submissive non-white world, while all this white power was being amassed, is no longer either sleeping or submissive . 3. Even the African revolt against colonialism and the world-wide challenge to white domination of the entire earth, even these signals of change do not disturb these scholars of imperialism . They represent the Lords of the Earth, controlling all levels of education, science and research . They control the education of Blacks throughout the world . Therefore, they see no need, even in the 1980s, to take a new look at the history of Blacks from its beginning and start the work of restoring the pages they had either deleted or ignored . They are doing the very opposite . Their histories and other "scientific" studies of the Blacks are presented just as they have been for three hundred years . With the rise and spread of independent African states and the Black Revolution in the United States, these scholarly representatives of white supremacy quickly reformed their techniques of mind control . They set up in Europe and America highly financed African studies associations, societies, institutes, history journals and "African" periodicals of various kinds, all under complete white control and direction . Their African studies programs were pushed in the colleges and universities far ahead of the general demand by black youth for black studies . As the latter demands developed, black youth discovered that white professors not only had the field occupied, but were still teaching their traditional viewpoint on "race ." In the continuing crusade to control the minds of Blacks through the nature of their education, American and British scholars lead . They are[/b] |
[b]whom Western writers dwell, was exactly the same as that of patron saints in the Christian world . I advance further the theory that the early wandering Hebrews, so numerous in Africa, received many of their religious ideas in Africa, for there it was that Abraham sojourned, Moses was born, Joseph lived, and some of the early years of Jesus Christ were spent . There is no question that even centuries after mulattoes and Asians emerged as the only Egyptians, they still regarded Black Africa as the chief source of the spiritual-"The Land of the Gods" or "The Land of the Spirits ." 9 Notwithstanding the remarkable civilization they developed even milleniums before Christ, and the amazing rebuilding of empires in spite of the great dispersions, notwithstanding all of this, African people fell far behind in the forward march of the rest of mankind because, in addition to the destructive forces of nature on the continent and the hostile force from without, they, the African people, further enshackled themselves with their own hands through certain aspects of their social institutions and beliefs that stood as roadblocks to progress even where conditions where favorable . THE SCHOLARS' WAR ON THE BLACKS This work begins where the history of the Blacks began, in Egypt (Northern Ethiopia) and the Sudan (Southern Ethiopia) . Thus, at the very outset, I clash head-on with the Caucasian version of African history . My focus, then, is on the great issues in the history of the Blacks that emerge from this confrontation with white scholarship ; for while I have covered much of the same ground explored by scholars before me, I have generally reached different conclusions than theirs, and from the same body of facts . Let us pause for a moment at this point . I have made a blanket indictment of white Western scholarship on Africa . If it cannot be sustained, it should never have been made . They are brought under fire at various points throughout this work-the kind of work, as I also had stated, should be absolutely needless in the closing years of the 20th century . The case against Western "Africanists" is rather fully set forth in the work itself, but may be outlined here as follows : l. First of all, they are not ignorant of the true history of the Blacks, including their achievements as builders of one of the first great civilizations on this earth (ancient writers say it was the very first) ; and they, the[/b] |
[b]THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Over the years of studying African history, certain propositions and theories evolved quite naturally as guiding headlights in the explorations . A few of them are set forth here, some previously stated or implied : 1 . That Africa, all Africa, is the native homeland of the Blacks,' and that the Asiatic peoples who occupy North and Eastern Africa, even though they may have been there for centuries, are no more native Africans than are the Dutch and British who likewise occupy and control the southern regions of th continent . The question of where the homelands are from which all of these invaders came is not debatable; 2 . Blacks were among the very earliest builders of a great civilization on this planet, including the development of writing, sciences, engineering, medicine., architecture, religion and the fine arts . 3. The story of how such an advanced civilization was lost is one of the greatest and most tragic in the hisory of mankind and should be the main focus of research studies in African history . 4 . Asian imperialism, though rarely ever mentioned, was, and still is even more devastating for the African people than that of either Europe or America . The Arabs' white superiority complex is not one white less than that of Europe or America, although their strategy of "brotherhood" deceives naive Blacks . 5 The forces behind the continuous splintering of small groups and even the breaking up of kingdoms and empires, followed by the equally endless migrations, including the steadily increasing death of the soil and the advance of the deserts, the drying up of lakes and rivers, along with the attending change of the climate and the always certain internal strife-all combined with invasions and famine to become a way of life. 6 . The strength and greatness of the African people can be measured by how, in the face of what at times seemed to be all the forces of hell, they fought through it all to survive and rebuild kingdoms and empires, some of which endured a thousand year . 7. Within the framework of even the smallest surviving states, the basic principles of the traditional African constitution were adhered to and kept alive throughout all the paving centuries as the fundamental elements of ancient democratic, social, political and economic systems all over the continent. 8. Africa was the cradle of a religious civilization based on the conception of one Supreme God, Creator of the Universe . This belief in one Supreme Being out-dated that of the Jews by several thousand years before Abraham, and the role of the numerous sub-deities --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes 2 . An important fact that should be well known is that Africans are not jet black all unmixed . For while the great majority are black skinned, countless thousands who lived for centuries in cool areas have lighter complexion-and no "Caucasian blood" at all . [/b] |
^^ Thank you very much. Chancellor Williams works as detailed in his book is for our own benefit. Keep reading bro. |
^^ I would have but lets try another approach to this subject. Please those who are interested to read, read and continue reading as I post one after the other so we can all discuss this issues here and together. Your opinion counts. Thanks. |
To be continued, |
[b]in relatively small numbers was sufficient to identify them as the leaders and achievers of whatever attracted the attention of the world . Another trick-the very opposite of the American law and practice was to classify Africans with "Caucasian blood" as Caucasians . If any of those so classified turned out to be notorious characters, pro-African or anti-white, they were loudly proclaimed and contemptuously called "half-breeds." The millions of early Blacks who were forced either by circumstances or expediency to replace their own names with Asian and European names only added to the problems of historical identification . Far from becoming baffled and discouraged by the more painstaking basic research required, the student of African history must accept the challenge as a twentieth century mandate that is essential to the salvation of the race in the most literal sense . They will need the active support of black governments and predominantly black institutions of learning . These should be actively sponsoring (1) comprehensive, basic research programs ; (2) research teams for field studies, especially in history and archaeology ; and (3) a thorough-going teacher-training program for history and other related disciplines . What, indeed, are black institutions of learning waiting for? The young people to show the way? The simple truth is that what is needed first is active pioneering initiative . Financial assistance would then be forthcoming even from unexpected sources . Black inertia is the main problem, there is still too much dependence on white scholars to do our work for us . I have written elsewhere that as long as we rely on white historians to write black history for us, we should keep silent about what they produce . They write from the Caucasian viewpoint, and we are naive, indeed, if we expect them to do otherwise, all the ballyhoo about their "scientific objectivity" to the contrary, notwithstanding.[/b] |
[b]councillors who had been summoned-some from distant provinces-to pass on their request to explore . They were the direct representatives of the people . The voice of the king was in fact the voice of the people, without which he could not act on any matter of importance, or even talk alone with strangers . It should be clear, therefore, that our guidelines for research must lead to a critical analysis of all sources, whether original, secondary or oral . In particular, we should seek out those works with the special mission to "prove" the superiority of "whites" by "proving" the inferiority of Blacks-all in language so subtle, scholarly and scientific, that to the uncritical mind their "truths" seem selfevident . But it is also noteworthy that while the most hostile racist writers usually prove the very opposite of what they intended, their works inevitably contain useful factual data that must be accepted . Indeed, it is doubtful whether anyone, even a devil, could write a book completely devoid of truth . Research in African history is more tedious, laborious, and time-consuming than that in other unsuppressed fields . For in developing the "underdeveloped" history of the Blacks, one has to explore the most unlikely sources for a fragment here and a fragment there, and in works in no way concerned with African history, and, just as often, without any kind of history . Sometimes it is a paragraph or two in an explorer's account; at other times significant items may be found in the numerous missionary reports to the home office, explaining the mission's tasks, but also the native institutions to be overcome . All of these may be valuable and most valid sources precisely because they were not intended to be such at all . The writers were detailing bigger European interests . Any references to Africans were merely incidental to larger purposes . Just piecing all these fragments together could be a research field by itself . In my work in European and American history, I ran into no such problems and the research tasks were easier . In Egyptian history, to give a final example of Caucasian roadblocks to be overcome, one has the extra, time-consuming job of identifying the numerous Black giants of history who have been classified and effectively disguised as Caucasians over the centuries . First of all . one must know the various names that referred exclusively to Blacks and by which they were known throughout the ancient world . For in addition to the more widely used "African" and "Ethiopian," they were also known as Thebans, Libyans, Thinites, Nubians, Cushites, Memphites, Numidians, etc . Even before white Asians gained the ascendency in any of these areas, their very presence[/b] |
[b]same thing : A Black . This, of course, was before the Caucasians began to reorder the earth to suit themselves and found it necessary to stake their birthright over the Land of the Blacks also . In line with this, some Western historians have recently wondered where the Africans came from! The reasons given for beginning formal studies of Africa at Oxford implied much more than was stated . Reference was made to studying the "Caucasian mind," for therein may be found many clues that lead to a better understanding of the history of Blacks and how the systematic blackout of significant portions of that history occurred . That is why I urge those students who intend to accept the great challenge of basic research in this discipline to go into "enemy territory," linger there, study and critically analyze their lectures and their "scholarly" writings, for they are some of the most rewarding sources for African history, precisely because in shrewdly attempting to delete, disguise or belittle the role of Blacks in world history, they often reveal the opposite of what was intended . They are fruitful sources of unconscious evidence, supplying the very evidence they thought to suppress or recording facts the significance of which they were totally ignorant . A fairly good example is the written account of a European explorer in East Africa . He was outraged because he and his party had to wait two weeks to present a request to explore the country to the African king . The black autocrat, the account went on, had the presumption to keep white men waiting (italics mine) in order to show his people how high and mighty he was . The whites were denied even a brief audience, while the king would quickly receive any Black that wandered in from the countryside . Now the explorer, without knowing it, was actually reporting how African democracy worked, and how it had been working before there was an Athens or Greece (where Westerners think democracy was born) . The explorer would have been surprised to know that (1) "king" in Africa meant something entirely different from what it meant in Europe and Asia ; (2) that this black king, far from "putting on airs," did not have the right to receive them, even socially, without the presence of at least three senior Elders ; (3) that to consider a petition to conduct explorations in the country, the full Council of State had to be called, and that this could not be done by the king without the advice of the First Minister (who happened to be on tour when the explorers arrived to the capital) ; (4) and that the "old Blacks" they saw "wandering in from the countryside" and immediately given audience, were the[/b] |
[b]headline coverage of my mission . The (her surprise was an invitation for TV and radio broadcasts to the nation . Our Zimbabwe friends were somewhat suspicious of the motives behind all this red carpet treatment for a Black American, especially when it continued after my uncompromising replies to questions on a TV )broadcast panel session . The Ministry of the Interior had an interpreter flown 300 miles to join me when I visited his particular language group, the Ndebele . The only objectionable incidents occurred when on two different occasions in different places, two district officers offered to attend my meetings with Chiefs and the Council of Elders . I objected, and the matter was closed . Finally, South Africa . The situation in this country is so ridiculous that, far from allowing myself to be incensed with rage, amusing I found it . The unremitting brutality of these whites against the Blacks leaves them in a state of permanent fear. They seem to consider every black man not a potential, but an actual threat . And what they are occupied with every hour is unbelievable(until you are actually in South Africa . My passport was a "mistake made somewhere ." I, of course, had no intention to do field work in South Africa, but had to pass through it to reach the surrounded countries then under British rule . No one at all was supposed to be barred from passage into and from these countries . But it required the action of the U .S. Ambassador at Pretoria and an angry American Consul General at Johannesburg to free me from the airport room where I was held and checked on every thirty minutes . Even when the Consul General arrived in person, the authorities insisted that I must not enter the city, but be taken under guard to the train for Swaziland . Mr . Riley (the C.G .then decided to defy South Africa by not only driving me leisurely through Johannesburg, but 200 miles around the country, stopping at different towns, and finally on to Swaziland . What I referred to above as amusing were incidents such as excited policemen rushing to flag down the big Cadillac because they could so quickly spot a black face before they saw the seal of the United States emblazoned on the sides of the car with the American flag flying from the hood . An African is a member of the black race, and from times immemorial he was known as such by all peoples of the world . Throughout this work the term refers to Blacks only . It should be noted also that I write about the African people-not African peoples as Western writers do . I am dealing here with essentially one people, one "race," if you please, the African race . In ancient times "African"and "Ethiopian" meant the[/b] |
[b]arrival . And they maintained a strictly hands-off policy after my arrival . I, therefore, prepared to leave at once, but announced that I did not beg to study anywhere, and that they would learn that this was the only "African state" where an African scholar was barred . The Ministry of the Interior reacted swiftly . Not only was permission quickly granted to do field work in the South, but all the necessary arrangements were made with dispatch . This included establishing my southern headquarters at Malakal . The simple fact was that while they were quite familiar with European research people roaming freely all over the country, a Black doing field studies in the Sudan was a phenomenon indeed! Ethiopia (the new name for Abyssinia), like the Republic of the Sudan, is also ruled by a people of mixed blood who not only do not consider themselves African by race, but who maintain a privileged class society based upon color . To them, all black-skinned Africans are "Bantu ." To these they feel superior by reason of "white blood," and their discriminatory practices are just as subtle and real as those of the whites. And although the enslavement of black-skinned Africans continues in both countries even in our times, both the Sudan and the new Ethiopia have adopted the "Brotherhood Front" since the sudden rise of so many independent African states . This enables the Sudan to serve as the "bridge" between the Arab world and the new black states, and thus control or influence their international policies through the United Nations ; and Ethiopia is able to control, more directly, or influence Black Africa through Western backing in establishing the headquarters of the Organization of African Unity in Addis Ababa and pushing Haile Selassie into the key role . of continent-wide leadership, thus blocking the "dangerous" influence of Kwame Nkrumah . (It is because of my steadfast refusal to either skip or gloss over these aspects of the historical record that I am criticized by many "Negroes"-and I know exactly when to use this term!) And now southward to the full white-ruled lands where hostility to a black face was fully expected : Rhodesia and South Africa . Long before reaching Southern Africa I was told that I might as well skip Rhodesia, and that even if I was admitted into South Africa I would not be permitted to work . But Rhodesia, to the surprise of just about everyone, pulled out all stops as though it had resolved to outmatch all the black states in amenities and various kinds of assistance beyond all expectations or needs . There was the usual press conference, followed by front page[/b] |
[b]reference to all the individuals and groups that actually worked on various parts of the study. However, I had to decline the services of many highly recommended Africans because of their "upper class" attitudes toward the common people . For I had learned quite early that the people in the interior can spot the arrogant and "superior" African just as easily as they recognize the arrogant and "superior" white investigator . They will give answers to questions readily enough, but not the right anwers . I therefore selected only those whose heartbeats seemed to be tuned to the heartbeats of the great common people from whom all of us came . The interpreters were generally assistants who spoke two or three languages of the country . An entirely new kind of assistant was the verifying interpreter . They were used to double-check the interpreters who sometimes would not precisely convey your question or interpret the exact reply . There were training sessions before and during the field work. In those fortunate cases where we had four or five competent assistants, one of the interpreters remained with me, while the others worked on special assignments in different places in the area . The documentary research in the United States which preceded the other preliminaries was not done entirely alone . Some of the most important areas of my study of ancient sources were rechecked in independent studies by a select group of graduate students in history . Their assistance in reappraising such early sources as Manetho, Herodotus, Josephus, Strabo, Abu Salih, et . al ., was invaluable . Foremost among these was the Reverend Carleton J . Hayden . In concluding my remarks on the field studies in Africa, some comments of four of the countries visited are in order . In the Sudan the authorities did not want me to work in or even visit the all-black southern provinces . Their fifteen years of rebellion against the "Arab" North had caused the whole vast area to be officially "sensitive," and, therefore, barred to outsiders . The suggestion was that I confine my studies to the Northern Sudan . This I refused because I had been previously assured that the rebellion had been "completely crushed," and that "peace and quiet" prevailed everywhere . Besides, I could only find Islamic institutions in the North-institutions of which I already had full knowledge from years of special study and teaching . As indicated above, the American embassy in Khartoum did none of the preparatory work about which I give the other U .S. African embassies so much praise, although it had six months' notice before my[/b] |
[b]for the more ancient tradition of Africa itself . So vast and untapped is the real history of the African race that I, myself, have only scratched the surface of what is yet to be done . Some of the areas to be explored by future historians are set forth in pages which follow this chapter . A major research project should not be undertaken by a single individual . That was my mistake-hence, the sixteen years of work that a research team of eight or ten persons might have completed in three or four . The kind of well-organized research teams required for in-depth studies may be difficult to promote because of our pitiful go-it-alone individualism. A research project such as mine should have had a team of highly trained experts from the fields of history, archaeology, anthropology, medicine, linguistics, tropical agriculture, political science, etc . The widely ranging scope of the study minus a team was possible only because of the interest and active support of certain African governments and the unforgettable help of the people in every region and country . For all kinds of help was needed . As indicated above, much had been pre-arranged . The United States Department of State had notified the American embassy in each country that I was coming, requesting our ambassadors to give any requested assistance . Excepting the Sudan, where embassy officials appeared to be under some kind of fear, the embassies, everywhere, went all out to be helpful . The embassies had the very important work of making the advance arrangements for trips into the interior through the appropriate ministries in each country . These in turn, had to contact the various provincial governors or district commissioners who had to make living and conference arrangements with village chiefs, elders, the keepers of oral traditions and other specified groups . The amount of time all this advance work saved for the study itself is obvious . But volunteer work of our African brothers who accompanied me into the field was what I referred to above as "unforgettable ." Some of them were teachers who, as in the case of my previous field work (1956- 57), had secured leave for the purpose without any trouble at all . Indeed, even the people we call "illiterate" had that storehouse of wisdom which made it easy for them to understand that I was working not for myself, but, for them, for the whole black race . I am trying to make it clear here that, although I did not have the kind of research team referred to above, many people, some 128 in number, participated in this work and made the outcome possible . So, when at various places I say "we," it is not the editorial or royal "we," but[/b] |
[b]rule Africans in view of their "wild and most primitive system of democracy ." For just as fast as African kings or chiefs undertook to carry out British laws (which displeased the people), "the people would remove them from office," therefore, this "primitive African democracy had to be destroyed" before the British system of Indirect Rule could be effective . The point here is that these sneering remarks by an eminent British historian revealed to me an entirely new field of research . That lecture led me into the study of one of the most significant developments in the entire history of the black race: an ancient system of democracy (existing before Greece) evolved from a continent-wide constitution that governed the whole African people as a single race . This all-important finding was arrived at by comparative studies of African customary laws in every region of the continent . The Europeans were confronted with a real social domocracy that existed long before the terms "socialism" and "democracy" were invented in the west . For Dr . Madden it was "savage" because the people were the real rulers, in fact, and not merely in theory . THE FIELD STUDIES Insofar as the study of African history is concerned, I regard direct investigation in the field, in Africa, as of the highest importance . This field work should be undertaken only after thoroughgoing research in written and other documentary sources . The study of available written sources, their evaluation, and the mounting archaeological records are all the first major phase of African research and, I would say, a prerequisite for field-work . The field work was mainly concerned with oral history . I had noted in my study of sources of noted historians that many who decried oral tradition as "unreliable" never failed to use it themselves to supplement or give added validity to their work . The fact is that neither written nor unwritten records should be accepted as true without verification . Although two years were devoted to the field work, the ground covered was possible only because of careful advance planning and the scheduling of areas and groups in each country months ahead of my arrival . These had to be in the hinterland, or "Bush Country," generally far away from the Westernized urban centers . For our quest was not for the long-standing tradition of either Islam or Christianity in Africa, but[/b] |
[b]have nothing in common now, you know ." This British (and European) philosophy of education fitted in ideally with those Africans from the continent and elsewhere who, unlike J .L., came to Europe from the privileged class at home. Some of those studying in England became more British than the British, just as many from what was French West Africa became more "French" than the Frenchmen. The first tragedy to note about the effects of this class education on Blacks is that it further reinforced colonialism's policy of perpetual disunity in Africa and elsewhere . The line dividing these black "upper" and "middle" classes from the black masses and their basic aspirations is more rigidly drawn . And this superior class mentality, becoming even more crystalized since independence, is an almost certain guarantee of future uprisings on a scale never seen . The second great tragedy is in the nature of what is called "education .' It is mainly rote learning, the ability to memorize phrases, concepts and other required data . Thinking is neither required nor expected . Critical analysis and evaluation of subject matter are not required . But the ability to absorb and recall is required . The brilliant scholar, then, is one who can readily quote authorities and remember well his bibliographical sources. So we have a generation of black scholars who continue to amaze students by mouthing the doctrines and viewpoints of their white teachers-like so many robots without minds of their own . Yet study under white teachers and professors should be most rewarding, and it can be if you do not enter white institutions with a head like an empty pitcher going to a fountain to be filled . I was safe and richly rewarded during my studies in white universities only because I happened not to be so naive that I expected the viewpoints of the conquerors to be the same as those of the conquered on matters relating to our place in the world . Elsewhere I have emphasized, by repetition, that some of the most fruitful sources for study came quite unintentionally from white scholars . A case in point was at Oxford . The course was "The History of Colonialism in Africa ." The presence of two or three Blacks in the class, while obviously uncomfortable to some, was generally ignored . For African studies were of long standing an integral part of the imperial system . They were not planned for Africans at all, but for the future administrators of the Empire in Africa . So Professor Madden -was pointing out in his lecture how difficult , and even impossible, it was to[/b] |
[b]THE EUROPEAN JOURNEY I arrived in England in the fall of 1953 to begin formal studies at Oxford University, primarily through the Institute of Colonial Studies and at Rhodes House (which might be more properly called Africa House) . In addition to the study of documentary sources on Africa, I had other objectives : (l) I wanted a more direct, close-up view of the European mind, its real attitude toward the black world . I sought to study both (2) the extent to which European wealth and power were derived directly from Africa and (3) the nature and philosophy of a European education that was shaping and determining the mentality of Africans . I was already fully aware of the disastrous effects of the white American education system on Black Americans who, not having any other frame of reference, had to adopt the ideologies and viewpoints of whites in order to survive, even when those viewpoints were against them. This meant visiting various classrooms in elementary and secondary schools, teacher-training institutes, and classrooms of lecturers and professors in a selected number of colleges in the universities . These were not "look-in-and-leave" visits, but all-day studies at the schools, remaining throughout the period in the classrooms, and talking with students, teachers and principals thereafter. In such a study one learns very quickly that the textbooks and other works describing education do not tell the same story as the schools in action tell . (4) Finally I wanted to know, and again from direct study, exactly what made Oxford probably the greatest university in the world . What were the specific elements of that greatness? Was great teaching a factor, and, if so, who were the great teachers and what made them great teachers? From just the foregoing aims of the study it must be obvious that I was still examining various aspects of the probable reasons why whites became the masters of the globe . In both France and England I found that the system of education fostered a new kind of aristocracy-an aristocracy of the "educated ." College graduates constituted new upper classes . The son of a carpenter or railroad conductor became estranged from his family and former friends upon receiving his university degree . A case in point was J.L., a young Englishman in my College at Oxford (Lincoln) who was one of my close friends there . He refused to go home during any of the long vacation breaks because, to quote him, "I can no longer associate with my family and old friends . I wouldn't know how to talk to them . We[/b] |
^^ Overwhelming findings by Chancellor Williams. Keep subscribing bro. |
[b]THE "WHITE" ARABS The relentless searchlights of history were turned on the roles played by both Islam and Christianity in the subjugation of the Blacks . This confused many and outraged those who did not pause to distinguish evil men who use religion to disguise their real aims . The unthinking Muslim or Christian would likely believe that his religion is being attacked rather than those conquerors and enslavers who disgraced it in covering their drive for wealth and world domination . Blacks in the United States seem to be more mixed up and confused over the search for racial identity than anywhere else . Hence, many are dropping their white western slavemasters' names and adopting, not African, but their Arab and Berber slavemasters' names! The confusion will continue, however, as long as the fact that millions of mulattoes in Arab countries are considered "white" is ignored along with the other fact that countless unmixed, sun-baked desert-dwelling Arabs are not only brown but some are very dark in color (all this darkening of the skin in spite of the ages-old tradition of the thick cloth covering the face from the scorching sun) . Indeed, not only did mulattoes consider themselves 100 percent Arab, but jet-black Africans, whose forebears were in Arabia for generations, speak Arabic and call themselves "Arabs," just as Black Americans speak English and call themselves "Americans ." In both cases neither the Black Arab nor Black American thinks he is "white."' To repeat, then,'Blacks are in Arabia for precisely the same reasons Blacks are in the United States, South America, and the Caribbean Islands-through capture and enslavement . In studying the actual records in the history of the race, therefore, the role of "white" Arabs must not be obscured either by their Islamic religion or by the presence of the Africans and Afro-Arabs among them any more than we should permit white Europeans and white Americans to use Christianity to cover their drive for power and control over the lives of other people . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes 1 . The term "black" was given a rebirth by the black youth revolt . As reborn, it does not refer to the particular color of any particular person, but to the attitude of pride and devotion to the race whose homeland from times immemorial was called "The Land of the Blacks ." Almost overnight our youngsters made "black" coequal with "white in respectability, and challenged the anti-black Negroes to decide on which side they stood . This was no problem for many who are light or even nearwhite in complexion, for they themselves were among the first to proclaim with pride, "call me black!" Those who hate the term but hold the majority of leadership positions, feel compelled to use it to protect their leadership roles .[/b] |
@ezeagu, You would have not said that if you had actually read the book. Jokes apart. It explains a lot of the present situation of all blacks in the world today. For those who can lay their hands on a copy and read it will see that what happened to the blacks since the beginning of the first dynasty is still happening in the present. The blacks made a lot of mistakes then which eventually led to the destruction of the civilization they built. This same mistakes are been made by the blacks of today. The consequences of our past mistakes we are reaping today and the implications of doing thesame mistakes in the present will in the future put the black race in a process of self extermination, naturally with the combination of other avoidable factors. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 (of 287 pages)