₦airaland Forum

Ifeann:
so u are now giving google the title of shiek..
An invention of kaffirs and what u would call infidels yet u give it an islamic title when ur quran orders u to fight them..u are shameless like ur false prophet mohammad aka moharmMAD

He will surely be hanged if he call google sheik in saudi arabia.

Empiree:
Typo error . MOSSAB i wanted to type

Ok what organization is MOSSAB and what their aims and objective?

All I see is that you are just mentioning names randomly without any understanding of what you are talking about. What is MOSSAB if I may ask?

Empiree:
MOSSAD is christian terrorist group not a tribe.

MOSSAD, like the CIA, is an Israeli intelligence group, it is not a chritians organization. It is an organized govt security agency of the Israeli govt. In Nigeria, MOSSAD is like SSS.

Stop using al-taqiyya foolishly hence further exposing Islamic deceit.

Abuamam:
According to mainstream media (and the majority of xtians), "Islamic-terrorism" is a compound word that can only be used as is.
Neither of the 2 words can be used seperately from the other.

Op committed a faux-pas by isolating one of the parts and using it in an unapproved fashion.

He deserves to be berated by the linguists and xtian theologists on this thread.

Besides, those gentlemen that committed the minor crimes posted by the Op must have had mental disability, probably due to not attending church service regularly. So they cannot properly be referred to; either as xtians or as terrorists.

Quran 3:151: We will cast TERROR into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.

allahh (aka mohammed) says he will cast terror....So the followers of allahh (aka mohammed) or muslims will also cast terror into the heart of non-muslims. So Islamically and quranically, terror is permitted against non-muslims. So the word 'Islamic-terror' is not an insult to Islam but a statement of fact, according to the quran.

The Islamic terror can be suicide bombing, beheading of infidels and apostates, or killing whoever insult allahh and\or his apostle (mohammed).

The op is attempting to tell us that terror is not a monopoly of Islam by drawing a parallel of violence comitted by 'christians', but he failed to mention where Jesus, unlike mohammed, sanctioned terror as a religious obligation.
"Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are harsh to the unbelievers but merciful to one another" Quran 48:29

Abuamam:
I did not say that Allah could not preserve the Taurat and Injeel. I said He had no wish to protect them from corruption.

My Imam at my mosque? I have no mosque. I pray wherever I find myself. Also, imams serve merely to lead the prayer. I obey only Allah and His prophet (saw). No charismatic man-of-god worship in Islam.

On the contrary, the Qur'an is beautiful in content, it moves grown men to cry. You do not understand Arabic, so would not understand the richness of its words, and the greatness of the delivery. The hadith merely expantiate on the circumstances behind the revelation and the correct application of the laws. Their preservation has been the result of an incomparable system of transmission and authentication. In fact, were we to apply that system to the authentication of the new and old testaments, the weakest hadith would be more authentic than either of them.

The Qur'an has been so exhaustively verified, through writing and massive oral transmission; that we are 100% sure that what we recite today is the Qur'an revealed to the prophet (saw).

A product can be declared fake due to the standards of its contents; the original need not be presented. We all know that God does not err, or contradict Himself... just as examples. We also all know that the authors of the Bible commit all these. Therefore God could not have revealed all of it. We do agree that parts of it could be from that which was originally revealed, but such parts are impossible to filter out today, so the whole is set aside. We do not condemn it to justify our Book. Your bible historians and scholars are the foremost authorities in denying much of its authenticity... so much so that even the normally conservative catholics are championing 'allegorical' reading of the bible. The mere presence of different versions with expunged verses and whole chapters, as well as conflicting readings should prove that it is not in its original state.

http://www.mycatholiccds.com/how-to-read-the-bible.php

I do not know how you arrived at your conclusion that God deceived us by not protecting the Taurah and Injeel. He revealed them and He permitted their corruption; so as to replace them with an eternal message. He has Power over all of His creation.

I hope you are now clear.

Qur’an 2:106—Whatever verse we shall abrogate, or cause [thee] to forget, we will bring a better than it, or one like unto it. Dost thou not know that God is almighty?

Qur’an 16:101—When We substitute one revelation for another—and God knows best what He reveals (in stages)—they say, “Thou art but a forger”: but most of them understand not.

The preservation you are talking about does it also include the abrogation and cancellation of some verses by allahh or mohammed? If allahh is so preserving, why must he continously abrogate his revelations making him an unstable god.

Your remark that allahh does not wish to preserve the torah and the injil but was willing to preserve the quran is both dishonest and disingenios. How do you come to that conclusion? Is that what your muslim apologist asked you to tell us? If quran is well preserve, as you made us believe, where is there so many contradictions and inconsistencies in the quran? Please tell that to your gullible co-religionist.

Can you please quote me a verse in the quran that moves men to tears. So these verses move you to tears:
Qur’an 5:51—O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Qur’an 9:30—And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away.

Qur’an 98:6—Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein. They (the christians and the Jews) are the worst of creatures. The evil quran says christians and the Jews are the worst of creatures. So these verses move you to tears as you just claimed? You are not serious.

Empiree:
Is The Quran Incomplete Without Hadith?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-4jC5iAl8E

You and Dr. Naik are commedians. Dr naik said and I qoute 'the quran itself is complete but you need to read the commentary of the quran to understand it. And hadith is the commentary of the quran'. And the illiterate and gullible audience, who came to watch the showmanship of the charllatan doctor, clapped.

If the quran is complete, you dont need to use any commentary to understand it, that means a primary school pupil can read it and comprehend ASAP. But in the issue of the quran, it is not so. The literary work in the quran is zero, you can hardly join a consecutive verse of 10 and make any meaning out of it (you can proove me wrong).

For the Doctor to make such a contraditory assertion and you still post the video, i begin to wonder the thought pattern of some people. If the quran is self explanatory, you do not need any external source to explain its text, thats a simple logic.

Since the quran is not complete, you need hadith to make-up for where quran is deficient. And even the hadith, like the quran, is grossly contraditory. The hadith used by the sunni is quite different from the ones used by the shia muslims, hence both sects will have contraditory beliefs in some writings of the quran.

So spare us the garbage that quran is complete. Tell that to your willing audience this coming friday, who are always waiting for your next lies and dogmas.

Abuamam:
The message of Islam however, was carefully preserved by the practice of mass memorisation of the Qur'an... to the letter; as well as the development of a comprehensive system of authentication and verification of every word/ action performed by the prophet (saw) during his lifetime, with chains of narrators up to the present day.

You are a commedian bro. allahh preserved the quran while he couldnt preserve the torah and the injil, who told you that? Your imam at your central mosque?

Does this include all your hadith, most of which you guys claim to be fabricated? You and i know that the quran alone does not make any common sense without the hadith. You know that you cannnot read 10 to 20 verses of any part of the quran and come up with any common sense explanation, not at all. If any hadith can be fabricated, what gives you impression that the quran is not a fabrication?

Since you muslims claim the torah and injel had been corrupted (as against what the quran said), can you please provide the original document? If i told you a product is fake, that means that i can provide the original product, and this what muslims all over the world have failed to do. They condemn the bible in order to give credibilty to a plagarized and fake document, that is the quran.

If allahh cannot preserve the torah and the injil (the quran said allahh preserved them), that is a further evidence that allahh is fake god and a deciever (quran said allahh is a great deceiver).

pupsyd:
Uhn... No Killing Or Terror Act Attached To This Pic, Assuming It Was About That Pedophile The Story Would Have Been Change,

Are you trying to insult mohammed (piss on him)?