₦airaland Forum

CaptainMeks:
Just look at the very thin thickness of the road in the first pic.

Chai Abians are being scammed

Oga na cement dey beneath am..

Frankiss44:
How much did you get it?

30k

Chigorkizz:
How Much,bro

30k

Buy pouvoir 2. That's what am currently using. 8.1 3gb ram 5000mah battery 4g

fergie001:
Those who are not from Abia State will not come and read what this young man wrote here.
They will be outside the state pontificating why OUK is the best thing after sliced bread.

The nonsense we get today was birthed by that beast.
Where is Zerock today?

My bro.....you have said every thing....

Nwa Aba

okokkk:


I grew up in the streets of Aba and was already of age at the time OUK ascended the highest political position in Abia State.

At that time, the level of political awareness among locales was very low and the clever OUK rode on this to cripple the state while he made sure its inhabitants smiled weekly to the Eyimba international Stadium to cheer the always-victorious Peoples' Elephant to mind-blowing victories.


As usual, OUK was always present with his commissioners to share in this weekly joy. The people loved him for this magnanimous association. He constructed few quality roads and a plethora of low quality roads, introduced the much needed Bakassi boys to curb the security challenges, and created an unbeatable football monster in Eyimba FC.


It was OUK that made me fall in love with football and its practitioners. Obinna Nwaneri, Ndidi Anumunu, Enyeama, Onyekachi Okoronkwo, Romanus Orjinta(of blessed memory) et al were all beauties to watch and the inhabitants of the city trooped out in thousands to witness these local heroes.

However, for each of his good strides there was a commensurate or worse evil. He made sure all political roads in Abia led to Eziama G.R.A where his sorceress of a mother lived and practiced her political sorcery. It was rumoured that one needed to peel Melon seedlings at the feet of OUK's mother, Odiukonamba, to be considered for a political appointment or to be victorious at state related elections.

OUK sinned against Abians. But when T.A arrived, Abians realised that OUK was rather a saint with a few sinful stains. Ikpeazu like his name connotes has effortlessly dragged Abians backward.

For now, God's own state will remain in the devil's hand until a time when the devil's hands grow weary and unable to carry any longer.

Nwanne iwu nwa Aba!! But on a more serious note, Ikpeazu has tried for Aba than Ouk and T.A. But that does not mean he is excellent. He is just trying ....

helinues:
Would have ignored but let me clear your minds.. We ( Yoruba in generally) have been condemning both FG and state governors ( Obasanjo most especially ) about the dilapidated state of Sango-Ifo road

Obasanjo hill top house is a thank you gift from Julius Berger for awarding same Sango- Ifo road

Sango- Ifo road is now a stale to many of us as the residence who are the most affected also seems not to care because they have both Reps and Senators for years, which they never questioned and keep on voting like zombies

As for Abia, your people will never agreed Abia that anything is wrong with Abia state.. We must let you guys know.

Abia kill u dia lol

I prefer my pouvoir

wth

Boris Johnson’s suspension of the UK Parliament is unlawful, Scotland’s highest civil court has ruled.
A panel of three judges at the Court of Session found in favour of a cross-party group of politicians who were challenging the prime minister's move. The judges said the PM was attempting to prevent Parliament holding the government to account ahead of Brexit .

A UK government appeal against the ruling will be heard by the Supreme Court in London next week. The Court of Session decision overturns an earlier ruling from the court, which said last week that Mr Johnson had not broken the law.

Why is this court ruling significant?

MPs demand Parliament be recalled after court case

Why are MPs being sent home?

The current five week suspension of Parliament, a process known as proroguing, started in the early hours of Tuesday. MPs are not scheduled to return to Parliament until 14 October, when there will be a Queen's Speech outlining Mr Johnson's legislative plans.

The UK is due to leave the EU on 31 October. Opposition parties have called for Parliament to be immediately recalled in the wake of the court judgement, but Downing Street said this would not happen ahead of the Supreme Court's ruling on the case. Downing Street also distanced itself from reports that quoted Number 10 sources as suggesting the Scottish judges were politically biased, and insisted that the prime minister has "absolute respect" for the independence of the judiciary.

What did the Scottish judges say?

Mr Johnson had previously insisted that it was normal practice for a new government to prorogue Parliament, and that it was "nonsense" to suggest he was attempting to undermine democracy. But the Court of Session judges were unanimous in finding that Mr Johnson was motivated by the "improper purpose of stymieing Parliament", and he had effectively misled the Queen in advising her to suspend Parliament.

They added: "The Court will accordingly make an Order declaring that the prime minister's advice to HM the Queen and the prorogation which followed thereon was unlawful and is thus null and of no effect."

The group of more than 70 largely pro-Remain MPs and peers behind the legal challenge were headed by SNP MP Joanna Cherry, who said they felt "utterly vindicated". The parliamentarians appealed to the Inner House of the Court of Session after their original challenge to the suspension of Parliament was dismissed by judge Lord Doherty last week. Lord Doherty said Mr Johnson had not broken the law by proroguing Parliament, and that it was for MPs and the electorate to judge the prime minister's actions rather than the courts. But the three Inner House judges said they disagreed with Lord Doherty's ruling because this particular prorogation had been a "tactic to frustrate Parliament" rather than a legitimate use of the power.

One of the three judges, Lord Brodie, said: "This was an egregious case of a clear failure to comply with generally accepted standards of behaviour of public authorities. "It was to be inferred that the principal reasons for the prorogation were to prevent or impede Parliament holding the executive to account and legislating with regard to Brexit, and to allow the executive to pursue a policy of a no-deal Brexit without further Parliamentary interference."

Lord Drummond Young said that the UK government had failed to show a valid reason for the prorogation, adding: "The circumstances, particularly the length of the prorogation, showed that the purpose was to prevent such scrutiny. "The only inference that could be drawn was that the UK government and the prime minister wished to restrict Parliament."

The High Court in London says that advice given by the prime minister to the Queen to suspend parliament is basically "political" - something the government has argued from the get go - and so it's not a matter the courts should get involved in because there are really no legal standards against which to judge it. Scotland's highest court disagreed, strongly. It ruled that the prime minister's advice could be unlawful if its purpose was to stymie parliamentary scrutiny. That's because parliament's role in scrutinising the government is a central pillar of our constitution, which follows naturally from the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

Two courts, two totally contradictory judgments. They are now both hurtling towards the highest court in the land, the UK Supreme Court, where that contradiction will be resolved. There will be a definitive ruling on whether the prime minister acted unlawfully, or not - and that will determine whether parliament is to be recalled in the lead up to 31 October. And that is how our constitution works. Through what's known as judicial review, independent judges can stop the might of government in its tracks if what ministers have done is unlawful. Because as lawyers like to say: "Be you ever so mighty, the law is above you."

What was the reaction to the ruling?

A spokesman for Number 10 said it was "disappointed" by the decision, and would appeal to the Supreme Court. He added: "The UK government needs to bring forward a strong domestic legislative agenda. Proroguing Parliament is the legal and necessary way of delivering this."

Scotland's first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, said the ruling was of "enormous constitutional significance", and that Parliament should be recalled immediately to allow it to do the "real and substantive work of scrutiny". She added: "The prime minister's behaviour has been outrageous and reckless, and has shown a complete disregard for constitutional rules and norms."

Labour's Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer said Parliament should be recalled as early as this afternoon. He told the BBC: "Most people didn't believe Boris Johnson, but for the courts to find he has unlawfully shut down Parliament and that his motive wasn't the one he said it was? That's very powerful. "I call on him to recall Parliament. Let's get it back open, and sitting this afternoon and tomorrow, so we can debate what happens next and we can debate this judgement."

Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson, who was one of the politicians involved in the case, said: "There is one reason why Boris Johnson has prorogued Parliament and that's because he wants to force through his no-deal Brexit, and he wants to do that without having scrutiny and without having to abide by the normal rules."

And Dominic Grieve, the former Conservative MP and attorney general who now sits as an independent, said the prime minister should "resign very swiftly" if he has misled the Queen.

The Court of Session does not criticise the Queen's decision to prorogue Parliament at Boris Johnson's request; it rules on the advice the Prime Minister gave the Queen. But the ruling raises questions for the Palace and the constitutional role of the Queen. Although the Queen was expected to grant the prorogation - there was precedent for suspending parliament before the Queen's Speech, and she acts on the advice of her ministers - she is not simply a rubber stamp for the government of the day.

How well was the Queen advised?

Should the Palace have pushed Downing Street harder as to the reasons for the prorogation?

The Queen has been drawn into the Brexit mire, and the questions now go to the heart of her constitutional role. If she has no discretion at all over prorogation, what is her constitutional purpose? If she has discretion, when would she use it? Traditionally politicians step very carefully around these issues so as not embarrass the Queen and upset the constitutional order. But these are far from traditional times.

What happened at the High Court in London? High Court judges in London have given their reasons why a similar legal challenge by businesswoman Gina Miller was dismissed last week. They said they rejected her claim because the suspension of Parliament was a "purely political" move and was therefore "not a matter for the courts". Ms Miller's case was deemed "non justiciable" - not capable of being determined by the courts - in a written summary of the reasoning behind the judgment .

Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, Master of the Rolls Sir Terence Etherton and President of the Queen's Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp said their conclusion was based on "well-established and conventional grounds". They said the speed with which Parliament passed a bill to prevent a no-deal Brexit highlighted a flaw in Ms Miller's argument. "The ability of Parliament to move with speed when it chooses to do so undermines the underlying premise of the case for the claimant that prorogation would deny Parliament the opportunity to do precisely what it has now done," the judges said.

Ms Miller is appealing the decision in the Supreme Court at the hearing which will take place on 17 September.

Oam4j
mynd44
lalasticlala






https://https-www-bbc-com./news/uk-scotland-49661855?iorg_service_id_internal=624173547714020%3BAfra8HzjeKP0Uqtf

Kylie Jenner turned up the heat on Instagram by sharing a naked photo of herself with her baby daddy, Travis Scott who showed off his underwear in a sagged blue jeans.
The mother of one bared her ass in the photo she shared while also hinting on a collaboration with PlayBoy Magazine, an American men's lifestyle and entertainment magazine.
The photo with a Playboy logo which Kylie shared, came with the caption "When Houston meets LA .. @playboy #ComingSoon"



https://www.lindaikejisblog.com/2019/9/kylie-jenner-poses-naked-as-her-man-travis-scott-holds-on-to-her.html



missyb3
fynestboi
Lalasticlala

Wetin he need salary for?
There is always d Ganduje way

AJohnnasa:
STFU

I don't remember quoting ur imbecilic ass. Do yourself a favor and refrain from quoting me in the near future. Have a f*cked up day a**hole

Yes, most of those infrastructures were under T.A Orji and finished under Ikpeazu. But 99 percent of those roads were constructed by Ikpeazu. Truly, Ikpeazu is failing hands since his second tenure but he has done more than T.A and KALU joined together.

The aboki entered bike to the okada man's residence and shot him maka 100naira he declined giving hom before. The people of Abala burnt a police van (so I heard). But as at now the area is in total chaos. I think they wanna go on rampage.

'Chikwunka' is an Igbo name. Yet the men in the picture are all northerners. They said he is the ring leader yet they can't give him private photoshoot. They arrested 17 and got only two Ak47s. They arrested criminals yet they looking like pupils lining up for school photograph. Yeye the smell. Anyways thumbs up to NA.

#MyOpinion

op your current. those pics are not doctored. I will try and get faulks rd and pH rd along with Aba-owerri rd

Dacronym:
You want to Oppress me abi

Lol... no harm done bro

Samsung and iPhone crew lets gather here

This plot of land is not 4 sale




































.

Do u mean 2 tell me dat me wey say ordinary 'god punish u' go share d same hell fire with this man?
Abeg God make u give hell fire level o.







But ehmmmm...........Taiwo no b Afonja again?

godwinnd:
my friend go and sit-down if you don't know what to say

Afonja spotted......

If you like avert the strike o,stop the strike o.What we know is that the lifeless one will be relocating to Daura this febuary.Shikena

Its a pity that The Nigerian Army cannot give the right figure of KIA's and MIA's after a battle.The only way Nigerians can find out the true number of casualties on the NA's side is by multiplying any figure they pass out by 5.Anyways,if the president was not such a dullard i bet they would have better in their calculations.
#Back2Daura

Old pics.OP try again later,thank you. (That is if that pix is even that of Aba)

Has anyone noticed that there has been an influx in strange actions in our country?
(Yahoo boys,suicides,paedophiles,rapes and now this rampant killing of ones family?)
In as much as things are very hard it does not justify this man's gruesome actions.RIP to the kids though....

#MyOpinion

Jombom:
50 billion of your dead forefather, your generation n your unborn generation till Jesus return will not smell the Nigeria presidency in 2023 even if Igbo provide all its vote to the APC. my opinion.

I understand your frustration.Truth is bitter right? Your an illiterate and you will be the last of your generation if you continue like this.Bitter unemployed slowpoke.
Do try and have a nice day.

Mbaka hold yourself.You are no longer acting like a priest.Your more like a politician now...

How will this news send Bubu back 2 Daura

What the h3ck is wrong with muslims in Nigeria?
Miyetti Allah will talk,ISWAP will talk and now MURIC is also talking.
Isoryt

#MyOpinion
#Back2Daura