₦airaland Forum

taurus25:
THIS IS LAUGHABLE

YOUR ALMIGHTY GOD GIVES A LAW

YOUR ALMIGHTY GOD STATES THAT HIS LAWS SHOULD LAST FOREVER

YOUR ALMIGHTY GOD THEN COMES TO THEN COMES TO THE WORLD TO RENDER SOME HIS EVERLASTIG LAWS OBSOLETE

BRO, YOUR GOD IS VERY VERY CONFUSED

LET ME HELP YOU OUT

contradiction - /kɒntrəˈdɪkʃ(ə)n/
noun
1. a combination of statements, ideas, or features which are opposed to one another.

EG IF YOUR LORD GOD SAYS YOU ARE TO OBSERVE THIS LAW FOREVER

THEN YOUR LORD GOD COMES BACK AND SAYS STOP OBSERVING THAT LAW

YOUR LORD GOD HAS SUCCESSFULLY CONTRADICTED HIMSELF

They fail to understand that a council was held to choose whether gentiles should observe the mosaic laws ( book of acts).

April is too far

johnydon22:
[b] I think you already have done better..

The thing is you have said it all.. Haven't you noticed that "God" always bears the characteristics that reflects the ideas of the society and culture that presents it?

It is clearly shown in all the varying doctrines and distinct characters of God interpreted even from same book.

Like the guy above mentioned. "An omnipotent should know better"

we would expect an omnipotent God who allegedly cannot make mistakes to give law perfect as it is.

For God to dim the law unsatisfactory and needs to be abandoned reveals an imperfect law giver, and for the fact that Gods inclination towards the same law he gave changes shows God even recognized his first laws were nonsensical and so needs changing..

Did the unchanging God change or the people who speak for God change?

Surely enough you know the answer....

If a law was given by a perfect, unchanging and omnipotent God you would expect such laws to be unchanging, perfect but this is not the case.

God had to change his mind and nullify his initial laws to buttress a newer one (Imperfection)

Naaaah i think the societal expectations of the people who bring out what God "allegedly said" changed ..

Furthermore the change of the Law is just a Christian thing championed by the epistles of Paul.. The first Council of Jerusalem recorded in Acts showed that there was an argument on whether the gentiles should adopt the law or not.

The law was excluded only for the gentiles then Christianity was just a jewish Cult of people who believed a man jesus to be the messiah.

But with time the law was totally scrapped from the fabrics of the newly emerged religious idea. (We call that cherrypicking)

Judaism till today does not for sure buy the idea, they are still practising their own religion which is centered on mosaic charges and rabanic teachings.

Surely enough Yahweh changed his mind

They are worshipping Yahweh Version 1.2 while Christians have varying versions from version 2.0 to almost version 10.0 ... all the ideas of God championed by these varying doctrines and theologies all have varying characters.

Doesn't this show these are just men laying out their ideas and portray the deity the way they want?.

I want you to consider this..

Going by origin and similarities, it is evidently clear that Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Mormonism worship the same God but funny enough it tells them all different things..

Its either God is confused and have Character disorder or these are just men of distinct cultural and societal settings with varying ideas championing their egoistic ideas to be true.. [/b]

Gods always behave like the people who make
them . - Zora

johnydon22:
[b] I think you already have done better..

The thing is you have said it all.. Haven't you noticed that "God" always bears the characteristics that reflects the ideas of the society and culture that presents it?

It is clearly shown in all the varying doctrines and distinct characters of God interpreted even from same book.

Like the guy above mentioned. "An omnipotent should know better"

we would expect an omnipotent God who allegedly cannot make mistakes to give law perfect as it is.

For God to dim the law unsatisfactory and needs to be abandoned reveals an imperfect law giver, and for the fact that Gods inclination towards the same law he gave changes shows God even recognized his first laws were nonsensical and so needs changing..

Did the unchanging God change or the people who speak for God change?

Surely enough you know the answer....

If a law was given by a perfect, unchanging and omnipotent God you would expect such laws to be unchanging, perfect but this is not the case.

God had to change his mind and nullify his initial laws to buttress a newer one (Imperfection)

Naaaah i think the societal expectations of the people who bring out what God "allegedly said" changed ..

Furthermore the change of the Law is just a Christian thing championed by the epistles of Paul.. The first Council of Jerusalem recorded in Acts showed that there was an argument on whether the gentiles should adopt the law or not.

The law was excluded only for the gentiles then Christianity was just a jewish Cult of people who believed a man jesus to be the messiah.

But with time the law was totally scrapped from the fabrics of the newly emerged religious idea. (We call that cherrypicking)

Judaism till today does not for sure buy the idea, they are still practising their own religion which is centered on mosaic charges and rabanic teachings.

Surely enough Yahweh changed his mind

They are worshipping Yahweh Version 1.2 while Christians have varying versions from version 2.0 to almost version 10.0 ... all the ideas of God championed by these varying doctrines and theologies all have varying characters.

Doesn't this show these are just men laying out their ideas and portray the deity the way they want?.

I want you to consider this..

Going by origin and similarities, it is evidently clear that Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Mormonism worship the same God but funny enough it tells them all different things..

Its either God is confused and have Character disorder or these are just men of distinct cultural and societal settings with varying ideas championing their egoistic ideas to be true.. [/b]

Don't mind my stupid question but why do you always write in italics

johnydon22:
You can imagine the hilarious idiocy.. A car fails to work and the person who made the car blames the car instead and not himself who made the car.

Epic blame..

We must all question the idea of a God who creates faulty humans and blames them for it's own mistakes..

And more importantly he knows there would be faulty. He makes them faulty and throws them into hell for being faulty. And he is omnipotent so he has the power to make them perfect but he makes them faulty

KingEbukasBlog:
Bro JackBizzle , you know what to do #JackBizzleProvideThatVideo

Wetin dis one dey talk

folksync:
So would I threaten my car with destruction if it doesn't move? Would it be the car's fault if it doesn't work as it should? You see how your analogy fails? We are supposed to be beings with thoughts not robots like cars.

My question remains unanswered. Why should I thank him for a life I didn't beg him for? Shouldn't it be for his own glory (as the bible likes to say)? If he created me merely to serve/worship him, then he must be so starved of praise so much that he threatens me with hell for refusing to worship him. Even if I lived a righteous life (helping the needy, not killing) and refused to be zombied into believing that Jesus is the son of God, he would throw me into hell.

Why did God create man? Can any Christian really answer this even by using the bible?

For if the car fails to work it is the car manufacturers fault.

elveco:
Psalms 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

Actually my point is that a God may or may not exist but a Christian God doesn't exist. Never.

Reyginus:
Lol. Another word they don't even understand in the same light you do. How many Christians even know who a satanist really is, to begin with? Nigerians do not really care about Atheists. I don't see any of their rights being taken away from them. Mind you, for this discourse the term 'Nigerians' simply stand for the opinion of the majority.

The truth is, Nigerians do not really give Atheism that much attention. Who even cares about an Atheist in this country talk more labelling them immoral and adding miserable and Satanist to it? If you tell a Nigerian you are an atheist he or she will simply call you a fool or see you as a person in need of help and nothing more than that.

Which side of the country do you reside at. Just curious.

Baba. Atheism = immoral rebel. Take it or leave it

Reyginus:
No, we are not. I am not really interested in the suffering of the individual but the so-called discrimination Jack claims Atheists face.

In summary in Africa most especially nigeria

Atheist = immoral miserable satanist

CoolUsername:
Everyone knows the moon landing was staged!
/s

Everyone also knows that Genesis is right about stars that are way way bigger than the sun being just tiny dots of light in the sky. It's so obvious.


Everyone knows that it is logical that it takes God 3 days to make the earth. While it takes merely the ending of a day to create the octillons of stars. That is billions of galaxies each with its billions of stars

CoolUsername:
Everyone knows the moon landing was staged! /s

Abi o.

How do you rationalise God or Satan ( depending on what Bible version of the story you believe in) making David carry out the census and then punishing the isrealites for it.

How do you rationalise Jacob tricking his father and God rewarding him by blessing him.

Annunaki:
I condemn it in all it's entirety.

How do you rationalise God ordering the isrealites to kill men. Women. Babies and pregnant women.

Amberon:
the only dark Lord is Satan who put you in your current situation.

Names of yahweh

The dark lord

The sky fairy

The sky daddy

The omnipotent God who is powerless against iron chariot

The one who has unicorn stength

The one who created the universe in 6 days but takes a month to chisel some stones. Ten commandments

The insecure one.

The Omega tantrum thrower.

To be continued

ifenes:
I won't,but actually the "Holy books" were mostly describing the star wars. Talk about the wars in heaven(Orion war)

Lol. You can also call the Bible WWE like. Remember God vs Jacob. Middle East smack down.

fuckerholic:
Angels ars sexless..they are neither male nor female..so is it in every spirit being.. Anything sex exists only here in gross material world (earth/physical) for the purpose of procreation

And yet they were able to sleep with women and conceive children

Annunaki:
How do you rationalise a 54year old pervert getting married to a six year old baby girl and molesting her at the age of nine Before you apply al taquiya in attempting this question, ask yourself if you allow your six year old daughter to marry a 54 year old pervert?

How do you rationalize lot wanting to have his two already engaged daughters gang raped.

icybeth:
have ever gone to the sky or above it. Remember that the writers of the bible are inspired by Almighty God to write it.

The writers of enuma elish are inspired also if the Bible is inspired.

CoolUsername:
Let me get this straight, do you believe that there's water above the sky?

The water is not above the sky it's above a mysterious solid structure called the firmament. The book of job says it is as hard as a mirror. I wonder how Nasa managed to get to the moon.

Nawa o. Muslims to dey join criticise Bible errors even wen Quranic errors dey yapa

UyiIredia:
And so. build universities, do charity, run successful businesses etc

Muslim Hindus Buddhist atheist etc do all the above

Amberon:
I think you're referring to Satan, your father.

No. I am referring to the mythological dark Lord yahweh

Amberon:
I think you're referring to Satan, your father.

No. I am referring to the mythical dark Lord yahweh

ifenes:
I only observe,read and understand the holy books are mere Star wars-like-books.

How dare you say the Holy books are star wars like. Don't ever put star wars down to the level of the Holy books. At least star wars has characters which possibly exist ( aliens) .

ifenes:
What does that mean? I am not in any box

Then what is your theological position

Amberon:
bless you! only fools say there is no God.

Then your God must be a fool for saying he has no God.

ifenes:
There was never a god. The real gods are the ones we see and interacts with everyday which are humans,plants,animals,tables,chairs etc

You must be a pantheist. I guess

Annunaki:
This is what you get when a religion is so unsure of itself. The apotasy laws is enough to make any right thinking muslim know that islam is fake.

Your religion promises apostasy with hell. It's not any better and Pls stop being a hypocrite

Truly. There is no such thing as Islamic extremism for Islam is extremism itself