Vooks's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Vooks's Profile › Vooks's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 (of 212 pages)
unphilaz:Welcome and stay blessed |
How come nobody caught an apparition of TB Joshua today? 4 months missing #BringBackTBJoshua |
Did Oyaks pray for his marriage? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z3oKe_KZlg In this clip he clearly suggests he as a man of God would never seek divorce because God hates divorce. But they are now separated and probably divorced. Methinks Oyaks does not know how to pray the 'New Testament way' OR God ordained the strained relationship for him. But there is another option; Oyaks is still praying for his marriage so we should not test his theory yet. This is a self-fulfilling prophecy; whatever you won't receive in prayer, you will explain it away as 'work in progress' or praying the wrong way, while whatever you will receive, you will claim you received because of praying the 'new Testament way'. You can never go wrong with this garbage. Cc MuttleyLaff |
unphilaz:Hello there I have uploaded the book to GoogleDrive Here is the link; https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxrT0F-mwJf1NWdGelk3enMzZ2M |
Goshen360:God bless you Goshen360, If you attend a church that flagrantly flouts Holy Spirit operational manual for His gifts, the best way is to repent and stop, not to defend your errors with fickle arguments. It is to God we stand or fall not out General Overseer |
sportsmaster:http://www.wayoflife.org/free_ebooks/17_reasons.php |
sportsmaster:Agreed. Unless they never had the real deal in the first place. The author never stopped speaking in tongues, he critiques the Tongues Movement exposing some serious errors. Please give it a read. Thank you |
|
kilokeys:That Islam's 'holiest' places routinely double as altars for human sacrifices is interesting to say the least |
kilokeys:Why is this mosque called holy,holiest? |
Imagine a Negro who has a phobia for thinking |
allgoodlight:Call him and find out |
easydone:Hw have I demeaned the dead? |
tartar9:Who? |
shyna01:Scriptures |
Jeromejnr:Am saying I may not understand fully Romans 8:26 but that don't mean I will latch onto any interpretation of the same. I can outrightly rule out some You see why I said you can't understand something if you don't experience it.Sounds logical except Christianity is a walk and life of faith not sight. Have you been to heaven? Have you met Jesus yet? Must we meet Jesus to 'understand' Christianity? Vooks leave me alone o. If you like don't speak in tongues its your own salvation. Everybody has his own.Am sorry I offended you sir. Thank you for your time , much appreciated that you took your time and shared your faith sir. May the Lord increase you and in you. |
Jeromejnr:It is pointless getting carnal over spiritual matters. Why the personal jabs? If you do, how come you don't know what groaning is? Have you heard of groaning in the Spirit Im intercession before?Romans says they are UNUTTERABLE. an uttered groan is by definition the opposite of UNUTTERABLE Why don't you explain that scripture for us let's understand it better.I don't claim to understand all scriptures but I lack anything linking Romans to tongues and I find abundant evidence that it can't be tongues for the reasons I have shared above namely; the groans are unutterable while tongues are utterable. Study Romans 8:26 under ANY translation and tell me if you won't arrive at UNUTTERABLE How comes the 'prayer language' of Pentecost was utterable and readily understood by the Diasporan Jews? Either it was not 'prayer language' but 'ministry gift' or your definitions and distinctions are baseless |
Jeromejnr:Distinguish the two from scriptures. Thank you Second statement: please explain to us how the Spirit groans for us in helping our imfrmities since you are more enlightened.Am not more enlightened sir, am a lover of God and the truth. The bible says groans that can't be uttered. How comes prayer in tongues are audible? And secondly, how comes Paul says we should interpret the prayers in tongues ('groans') as well? 1 Corinthians 14:13-15 (KJV) Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret. 14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. 15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: Recall too you claim that Pentecost was 'prayer language'. This was a literal language understood by the Diasporan Jews. Does it qualify as unutterable groans? Third statement: The manifestation is for the person receiving the gift not for you a passerby.It is very clear tongues are for unbelievers. That's Holy Spirit speaking sir. Here, 1 Corinthians 14:22 (KJV) Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe |
Over 60 dead and counting http://www.rt.com/news/315082-crane-collapses-mecca-mosque/ Did TB Joshua predict this?
|
kilokeys:I never brought it down sir, take it up with your god |
Jeromejnr:Bro, what went down at Pentecost, 'ministry gift' or 'praying in the language'? "Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words."Very comforting verse. I don't know how one hops from this to praying in tongues The witness is not for you but for the person.Sorry I don't understand |
Breaking News: Probable casualties Allah is on honeymoon
|
Jeromejnr:The fact that scriptures tells you not all speak in tongues nor interpret should qualify your assumptions. You have 4 or so instances of baptism of the Holy Spirit with t least three clearly telling you they spoke in tongues. Should you assume that ALL MUST SPEAK IN TONGUES or should you not rather follow the clear voice of the Holy Spirit here; 1 Corinthians 12:30 (AMP) 30 Do all possess extraordinary powers of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? And being born again has evidence. The inner witness of the Spirit that bears witness that we are sons of God.The point is that 'inner witness' need not be visible to me to make it true. Likewise, your baptism of the Holy Spirit need not be witnessed by me. |
misreal:Am not here to argue, I shared a book. Please read it and thank God for impressing tha author to share it for free. Iron sharpens iron. Am glad he has the grace to share his faith with me just as I have with him. You should esteem God's word above all traditions and whatever they teach you at your church, you should like Bereans be noble enough to search it for yourself. if you needed the truth,you would taken his advice..Am a lover of God and the truth. if you love the truth, endavor to back everything you believe in by the Word and discard what does not line up with scriptures. That's my prayer my brother you need to know God yourself and stop saying the things your pastor told you..Who told you my pastor told me to say anything? Please stop false allegations. That's so unChristian if my pastor says things that are not in line with the spirit of God,I always knowHow do you 'know'? Testing everything against scriptures and not 'gut feelings' ..press into God and ask him to reveal himself to you instead of swallowing everything your priest tells you..You too bro, cherish and treasure scriptures above all traditions of men I have talked enough sir,I rest my case.God bless you man of God Sola Scriptura |
Jeromejnr:This verse tells us the Jews perceived the Gentiles had received the baptism because they heard them speak in tongues. But please note a few things Acts 10:46 (KJV) For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. 1. The Jews heard them MAGNIFY GOD. So they heard what they Gentiles were saying. 2. While this means they received the baptism and spoke in tongues, and baptism was evidenced by tongues,nowhere is it said that baptism MUST be evidenced by tongues. There are other aspects of salvation more important than baptism such as forgiveness of sins, being born again which have no evidence. Why? Because they are received by faith. Also:Again, baptism followed by tongues but who said tongues MUST evidence baptism? Also:Where is it written that baptism MUST be evidenced by tongues? The fact that in Corinthians we are taught not all speak in tongues means so many who received the baptism NEVER spoke in tongues |
misreal:If there are no scriptures to support your belief, what are they based on? Traditions of men? |
Jeromejnr:I have one scripture for you 2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV) All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. The scriptures are sufficient in and of themselves, may WE not be found resisting Holy Spirit by upholding lawlessness and traditions of men |
Jeromejnr:My brother 1 Corinthians 14:13- 17 (KJV) Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret. 14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. 15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. 16 Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest? 17 For thou verily givest thanks well, but the other is not edified.. 1. Pray 2. Sing 3. Bless All these 3 MUST be interpreted so others may be edified and say amen. Otherwise why would Paul use the examples specifically in the context of interpretation of tongues? When Christians were constantly praying for Peter in prison, how do you think they prayed together? Was it English? Were they saying, "Lord deliver Peter" over and over repeatedly?We are not told what language they used but whenever their prayers are recorded, it was in a language others understood. For instance Acts 4:24 (KJV) And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them Why should we speculate that they prayed in tongues? Please let's not 'help' Holy Spirit with inspiration, let's stick to what is revealed This thing is not hard to understand.True, no uninterpreted tongues in public worship |
misreal:Scriptures please. |
Jeromejnr:EVERYONE means entire church. How different is everyone in the church having a tongue and the whole church bubbling in tongues simultaneously? It didn't say don't speak In tongues at all in church. Or as a prayer group.Agreed but the reason it never said that is because church is where 2 or three are gathered. The point is simply no uninterpreted tongues PUBLICLY. Church in apostolic times were usually held in homes. See here 1 Corinthians 16:19 (KJV) The churches of Asia salute you. Aquila and Priscilla salute you much in the Lord, with the church that is in their house. Notice the last line. "Keep silence in church and speak to himself and God" Still in church. But not In front of the congregation to minister to them.Bro we are splitting hairs. Whether somebody is at the front or back, ain't they both IN CHURCH? |
misreal:First, there is no scripture that says one needs evidence of baptism of Holy Spirit much less that the evidence being tongues. That is doctrines of men that make the word of God of non-effect. What evidence do you have that you are born again? What about evidence that your name is written in the book of life? Or better, that your sins are forgiven? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 (of 212 pages)
