Wesley80's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Wesley80's Profile › Wesley80's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 (of 136 pages)
yommy2sure: dont know abt the original arguement but no be uche act onome...its kate henshaw...abeg check againLike I said, its easy to see why She was confused for Kate Henshaw. Uche Obi Osotule acted Onome - You can take that to the bank! |
Thundebaba: can some1 remind me the title of that jaguar drama,dat man with white beard.my belle o my head o...Was there another title besides "Jaguar"? |
edit |
mrs lecturer: The lagos fry-over was not played by Kate Henshaw. It was played by Uche Osotule.Yeah Uche Obi Osotule aka Onome. Easy to see why she was confused with the former. |
edit |
Kobojunkie: You have a committee setup to essentially[b]JUDGE [/b]the involvement of oil marketers in defrauding Nigerians. This one is trying to offer up brain-fart-filled arguments from all sides of his mouth and you come in to say I made a U-turn?Been responding to you decently assuming you're a normal human being and not the bloviating mor0n most around here have concluded you are - I guess I was wrong. You want to be treated like the pesky troll u are? No problem. |
bayooooooo: Anyone reading your comment above would assume Aig is a thoroughbred Auditor with a solid professional background to safeguard what is in your opinion a threat to self interest. That begs the question. Like the example I cited, Judges are equally professionally trained to be fair and objective. But they don't rely on self applying tools of safeguards to wriggle out of conflict of interest encounters. They simply recuse themselves. Conflict of interest either in law or auditing is the same. Conflict of interest is conflict of interest. There is no difference.Well thought out response and I commend you for it but lets face the facts. Comparing Judges to auditors is like comparing apples and oranges (I'd luv to hear you try) there are few meeting points even though on the surface they both seem to have same task. What you call "conflict of interest" in law is what is merely called "threat to auditors independence" in auditing. While it seems to be the major determinant of fairness in law, it isn't so in auditing - it is very important you understand this. Auditing isn't a one man show where your "no" or "yes" determines everything, there are various stages b4 arriving at a "conclusion" and one of those is the "Peer Review" stage where your conclusion and the critical information used in arriving at that conclusion are reviewed by an independent body/individual - relate that to the current 7day review taking place. Its more like a democracy with everyone having a say and the closest thing to it in the judiciary I believe is the Supreme court. I do understand the fears expressed and more so in a society as ours riddled with brazen corruption. An old saying says wopu aka enwe ni ofe ni oyini aka nmadu (leave out the hand of a monkey from your soup cos it looks like the hand of a human) Why? because someone might see it in your soup and conclude you're a cannibal! On that ground maybe Aig should've rejected the appointment afterall Auditing must'nt just be fair but should also appear to be fair! THat said, must we always be led by negativity and pessimism? Why should we always conclude the fruit is rotten even before it has a chance to ripen? I don't know abt you guys but I'm sick of all the negativity. Aig has got a couple more days to submit his report, lets review it b4 we shoot him down! |
![]() |
Oh dear, here goes our nuclear power plant! |
micklplus: I was a victim once and I don't pray to be a victim again. I was given a toyota corolla in the office on friday and the car was stolen sunday morning!(Oct 2011) Funny enough, I saw the car 6:30am and by 7:45am, the car was gone! So sad but then I got other car and I am still paying for the car till today. ![]() |
^ Correct me if I'm wrong |
bayooooooo: It does not matter if a judge has had a century old history of impartiality or objectivity, it does not feel right adjudicating on a matter involving your relations. Such a judge would simply be asked to recuse himself. Did the Aig Snr give detailed disclosure before his appointment to chair the committee?My broda, Aig isn't acting as a judge he's the Chairman of a committee looking into possible infractions that may or may not lead to litigation. In this case, he's only playing the role of an auditor. The rules are clear in auditing, when there's a threat be it self interest or familiarity, the resolution is insituting safeguards but if the safeguards appear inadequate or the role played by the individual from which the threat arose is pervasive, then and only then would stepping down be considered. It isn't a matter of "feeling" its one of "best practice". |
bayooooooo: Nevertheless, there is conflict of interest.Conflict of interest in auditing parlance in this case = familiarity threat. Resolution = insititute adequate safeguards. The jury's out on whether Aig has done a proper job or not, I guess we'll call them in when we see his report. Till then y'all r free to SPECULATE. |
edit |
In contrast to the Lawan-led committee of the House, the Aig-Imoukhuede committee conducted its investigation with professional restraint and was devoid of the public shenanigans that charactersised the House probe on the same subject. It entailed the sequestering, for weeks, at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja, a retinue of Central Bank of Nigeria examiners, experienced bank auditors and chief compliance officers of banks who scoured through piles and piles of documents before arriving at their conclusions.thisdaylive.com/articles/grasping-at-straws/119610/ |
If introspection wasn't too much of a luxury to you, I'm sure by now you would've realized just how little you actually know abt this deal. In shooting it down and dismissing it off as a fraud what have been your reasons? They'd only handled smaller contracts in the past? - well they just landed a biggie!, That Kobo couldn't locate their NY address? like since when did Kobo become a Private Investigator? Ok so their org seems to have been confused with Paul Allens Vulcan a number of times- well so what? as long as they r involved in legitimate biz of their own. They got involved in a bad deal in Sokoto - So why's the Sokoto state govt quiet over this? Why haven't they instituted some sort of action against the company? why are the whistle blowers a bunch of folks that do not know jack abt the contract? And oh, that fellow Mansfield doesn't seem to be a very nice person, to think he hates Nigerians and allows his dog in heat to plod around staining his home with blood! - yeah, so what should we sue him for, un-niceness? And yes oh yes, refineries aren't a goldmine, it is actually a low-profit-yielding business - True, that's if you expect to break-even in a year or two and expect to cash your total ROI in same period. The vagaries of the petroleum industry are well documented, a huge profit margin could narrow the next day and none is immune. Refineries are huge capital projects with considerable gestation periods but its yield is a given and more so for a new refinery with lesser cost of maintenance. Perhaps I shouldve called it a "money-mine″ instead. So at the end what do you have driving your negativity? Simple disgusting mischievous Pessimism! Of course guided optimism won't be out of place - what with our chequered history of failed and questionable deals- I know my optimism is cautious even the dude that signed the deal expressed some sort of cautious optimism. But to dismiss this as a fraud without cogent but merely simplistic arguments while trudging from post to post brandishing your credentials in all verbosity as "the man who invented grammar" is just sad. |
texazzpete: PLease someone should tell that wesley80 clown that contrary to what the laptop wielding GEJ apologists will tell you, refineries are most often a low profit margin business that many reputable oil companies are fleeing from. Anyone who says building a refinery in Nigeria is a 'goldmine' is in urgent need of psychiatric evaluation. There's a reason why the likes of Shell, Total, Mobil, Chevron et al will not touch refineries with a 10 foot pole.Safe to assume the 20 or so companies that scrambled for refining licences in anticipation of total deregulation of the downstream sector did so cos somewhere in Texazzpete's grandma thot me logic, they all desire lesser profit. Come to think of it, Shell, Total, Mobil et al are involved in numerous biz lines in Ngr just like they are in other countries aroun the world cos of the super profit they make. Not so, genius? |
[quote author=Billyonaire Nigeria, needs a courageous President, someone with the smile of GEJ, the fearlessness of OBJ, the doggedness of IBB and the philanthropy of MKO to; Decentralize powers of the Federal Government, and make each State, autonomous, with 100% taxable resource control. When the Centre is less attractive, every region of Nigeria, will man their oars, and strive to discover their hidden talents, resources, skills and etc, for the good of the people of her regions and States. So help us God.[/quote]Yeah perhaps. The problem with that is with 100% power with the states, we risk having 36 incompetent bufoons at the same time ala Uduaghan, Orji, Aregbesola and co. The risk seems to be greater with devolution of power. |
debosky: Again, if you refrained from copying and pasting things from the net without taking time to understand the context then you wouldn't keep showing up your lack of understanding.Your rants are nothing but futile attempts to appear objective while being spurred on by pure mischief. You keep leaning on inanities while completely ignoring the core issues which you claim to be a master in. I touched on the possibility of refining crude for export only after you made it look like any entry into the downstream sector was a guaranteed one way ticket to marketing products locally in a regulated mkt, my reference was merely to highlight other opportunities in the sector. Funny it is on this that you've chosen to base your entire sardonic rant on, one wldav thot you'lld use this opportunity to enlighten us on the futility of a private enterprise building a refinery in a country nearly completely dependent on imports for her petroleum needs. But of course this is just about bad-mouthing the man at the centre and not necessarily borne out of any genuine concern. |
ow11: 'Vulcan f**kever' is not a genuine investor shikena! The fraudsters can't even get a bloody identity; cowering behind Paul Allen's company name to decieve unsuspecting people and attract fraudulent bedfellows like themselves.No they arent. I admit I got it muddled up initially no thanks to the goading of you-know-who but those behind this venture are quite clear. Forget the name controversy for a sec and focus on the individuals involved. We know of Jim Mansfield an associate of both Mr Ford and Kevin Davies and their country rep in Ngr and he stood in during the ceremonies. Mr Ford and Mr Davies are respected members of the Vulcan group with interests across the world and unless any of you can prove that neither of these men or their Group has anything to do with this deal, I see no reason to be overly suspicious of the deal. |
debosky: I'm not going to get into a lengthy exchange with you. When bland comparisons are made between telephony (in which there were smaller private operators existing) in a deregulated market and refinery development in a price-controlled environment, the individual's abysmal grasp of the fundamentals involved is made plain.You CANNOT get into any lengthy argument with me cos you don't know jackshit abt the workings of Nigeria's downstream petroleum sector or what translates to "viability" for an investor in that sector. I hate to do you this favour but do you really believe that all that translates to profit and viabilty is our local mkt? Did you even stop to think before posturing? Did you consider this; Alternatively, if the terms of the M.O.U. allowed for total export of their refined products, subsidy would be inapplicable, as the owners of the refineries would be free to export their output at more profitable international benchmark prices. Although such a scenario may be perfect for investors, it may not resolve our challenges of constant fuel availability, if subsidy remains in petrol pricing structure.Opportunities abound I tell you, the problem is people like you are either to proud to look beyond your noses or too daft to recognize them. |
debosky: I'm not going to get into a lengthy exchange with you. When bland comparisons are made between telephony (in which there were smaller private operators existing) in a deregulated market and refinery development in a price-controlled environment, the individual's abysmal grasp of the fundamentals involved is made plain.You CANNOT get into any lengthy argument with me cos you don't know jackshit abt the workings of Nigeria's downstream petroleum sector or what translates to "viability" for an investor in that sector. |
Kobojunkie:You bet! I'm sure its no more viable than Nigerian GSM license was to AT&T in 2001 is it? And the solution? Continue importing till your mkt becomes viable! Great speech genius. To think you actually believe this, SMH. |
debosky: If it is such a 'goldmine', how come established O&G companies with operations in Nigeria such as Shell, Exxon and others are NOT interested in building refineries in Nigeria? Ponder that for a few moments.Same reason that at one time Nigeria had only about 400,000 phone lines yet no reputable coy. was knocking to enter the Nigerian mkt. Most considered Nigeria a goldmine but only for adventurous investors - little has changed. debosky: One more to ponder - how come the over 20 private refinery licensees are yet to take off despite this 'goldmine' status?Simply cos they are waiting for conditions to be Perfect. Total deregulation of the downstream sector, Unbundling of the NNPC to guarantee free and competitive mkt etc. Venture Capitalism isn't just a fancy name, theres a reason for the word "venture" Debosky; I do not have sufficient understanding of the basic workings of the refined products/downstream sector of Nigeria's oil industry to be making such generalised comments.FIXED |
Kobojunkie: I discussed this with someone here yesterday and was told there was probably a Nigerian behind all this.Of course there's a Nigerian involved and he's come out to say so. Edozie Njoku, chairman of the Nigerian partner, said Tuesday that all the funding for the project would come from outside the country. He said they opted for modular refineries because there are many local challenges to building a refinery from scratch. Each refinery will be built in the U.S., disassembled for shipping and reassembled in Nigeria, he said. |
Gbawe: My brothers reasonable folks are left with no other conclusion.Here comes Gbawe with another truck load of drivel. If you pause to think for a moment I'm sure you'll realize that a refinery in the country would be a goldmine for any investor considering the fact that a nation with ready raw materials and of a hundred and fifty million people still has to import fuel from as far away as the UK. Just the transportation cost that would be eliminated is enough profit to keep any company afloat. What is even more ridiculous is your continued description of Vulcan as a "Private Equity" concern when you know absolutely noffin abt their biz. Why don't you google those behind the "supposed" vulcan group and see how little you actually b4 you start infecting folks around here with your naivety. |
Demdem: Aig is stained likewise his miserable report. Its meant for the bin.Like I didn't know this is all this whole storm in a tea cup is all about. Try harder loosers! |
^^ He is just the Chairman of a committee, he's not working in isolation and even so, his report is being subjected to further scrutiny! Don't jump the gun, lets wait till we see the content of his report and how the high and mighty have all been exonerated b4 we place him on the guillotine. |
^^ If you knew jack about auditing you wld recognize there are safeguards guarding against instances of self interest as is possible in this case. The article I posted above highlighted the thoroughness of the Aig committee so what on earth are you going on about? |
Gbawe: Vulcan Capital Management , founded in 1997 by Ford Graham and Kevin Davis, has absolutely nothing to do with Vulcan Inc founded in 1986 by Paul Allen !!! Indeed, Wikipedia makes this crystal clear:Granted. Now what's this whole thread about? That Ford Graham and Kevin Davis' Vulcan group are incapable of delivering 6 new refineries in Nigeria cos they had a bad deal in Sokoto and that Vulcan could actually be phoney right? The opening piece portrayed both men as conmen and their country chair as a hater of everything Nigerian which could be true for all I care, but what really are the questions over this deal? Capacity, competence or pedigree? Tell me why Ford Graham and Kevin Davis's Vulcan should be bad news to Nigeria - Ok I get it now; Sokoto! |
eGuerrilla: You are more than capable of setting out your stall, by responding directly to some of the concerns raised on this thread.Yeah thanks. Sorry it took this long - had to do the needful. I actually was thinking about the Enron barge power project a deal that completely went sour and which AES had a major hand in as a partner to now liquidated Enron. My point? One bad deal/project doesn't necessarily translate to complete incompetence. Why would anyone ignore an investor that has on its own promised to pour in billions of dollars into your economy simply cos it has a failed project somewhere in your country? |
thegoodjoehunt:So how did u arrive at the conclusion that this isn't being done right? Have you seen the report? When discredit a report you've not seen simply cos it was devoid of the showmanship that Farouk and his gang favored? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 (of 136 pages)

