₦airaland Forum

Na DG dey contest?
Is question doesn't make sense

Eriokanmi:
TBH, Pele remains the king of soccer. Those calling rolando or Messi goat should please get all the recorded videos of matches in which Pele the great had played actively before they were born. He won the world cup back to back, winning 3 world cups in total, the only one to have ever done so

Messi has more goals than Pele, more trophies, more assist and more medals.

Messi is the GOAT, Ronaldo is not in the top 5

LesbianBoy:
E pain am

Only a Ronaldo fan is nuturing pain now tbh

No world cup, no GOAT debate.

The 3 GOATs are Pele, Messi and Maradona.

Cristiano is in the league of Cryuff, Figo and Gerd Muller. Messi Don pass am

I will rather vote for a dog than vote for Tinubu or Atiku

1.Those currently in the GOAT debate.
Pele
MARADONA
Messi

2. Elite players who are not in the GOAT debate
Cristiano Ronaldo
Gerd Muller
Johan Cryuff
Delima Ronaldo
Ronaldinho
Romario
Zidane

3. Future possible GOATs
Mbappe
Halaand
Alvarez
Pedri
Musiala


Fair list

Nbote:
Story.. Will they be in far north remote areas to monitor if bvas was used? Bought pvcs aren't for urban or general polling units. It's for those isolated units where violence will be threatened and officials will have no choice but to comply for their own safety

you need serious education on how BVAS works

traihit:
Why call it "miracle" if you can put it under experiment?

By its very nature, miracle means something you can't logically explain. How do you prove that which can't be logically explained.

I'm not sure religious people are still going about seeking to give evidence to atheists and agnostic.

Spiritual journey is longer and far more adventurous than that. If you're in it, you're in it. If you're not in it, keep exploring agnosticism.

Perhaps those new to their spiritual walks can try convincing you but a lot of spiritual folks simply don't care anymore. They can "pray" for you in their corners though.

This is why miracles are not real.
Anything that cannot be tested is not real yet, just like Unicorns

Dtruthspeaker:
Testimonies are what is called "Oral Evidence" subject to many tests before they can be taken as True and Proof of Truth!

Testimonies, especially those in churches are still claims that need to be verified.

Because you said it doesn't mean it's true

Dtruthspeaker:
Testimonies are what is called "Oral Evidence" subject to many tests before they can be taken as True and Proof of Truth!

testimonies are claims. Especially church testimonies

FullBlastLight:
CR7 is stil d best at least in personal records!

And wit dt, he remains d Goatest GOAT!

shut up. You are sounding stupid

PoliteActivist:
The problem with your thesis is that you fail to see that everything in our reality is an assumption - we have NO WAY of proving that reality exist as we experience it

this is strawman.
The issue here is not to prove reality, the issue here to to prove the potency of miracle using controlled method just the same way you can prove that levofloxacin can cure typhoid fever.

Whether or not reality can be proven, it wont affect the result

Religion is a set of assumptions that has never been proven. Religion defies logic in the sense that, it doesn't need evidence to make a claim. It makes such claims and then starts looking for evidence to justify them.
Religious people do not even know what should be regarded as evidence for any phenomenon, they create insane and baseless ideas and then battle whatever evidence against it or start making up more claims to back it up.

When you ask a religious person to provide evidence for miracles; he tells you that he has experienced miracles and he expects you to accept that as an evidence. I can as well tell you that I am typing this from Mars, I do not think that you are stupid enough to take my word for it.
Evidence is testable and the result of the test will be reproducible.

For example, if a Christian makes a claim of miracles, whether or not you have experienced it in your life isn't enough evidence to say miracles are real because we cannot test that evidence, that's not even any evidence to start with. How do you propose that we test it?

In any situation, there are variables, in the case if your miracle claims, we have many variables that can affect outcome, variables like; probabilities and natural explanations. It is why we need a control to ascertain your miracle claim.
When conducting an experiment, a control is an element that remains unchanged or unaffected by other variables. It's used as a benchmark or a point of comparison against which other test results are measured.

If you make a miracle claim that a man was healed of HIV, what are the questions you should ask before accepting it?

1. Does this man have a reliable test result? If yes or no, you still have to redo the HIV test by yourself to say for sure that he had HIV.

2. If he had HIV, how do we know that it was miraculously healed and not a factor of some other variables that we don't know?

3. Can this pastor repeat this miracle on other HIV patients? This is the only way to know for sure that miracles can actually heal HIV.
By doing this, we will present for example 100 HIV patients to him, he has to heal 95% of them to attain a statistical significance, the remaining 5% can be regarded as margin of error. Healing 95 out of 100 validates the reproducibility of the tested evidence.

4. We will have control samples of HIV patients, he will then compare the result of the experiment with the control. The control in this case are those patient who will not have encounter with the pastor, if some of them get healed then it means that maybe some other variables and not the prayers of the pastor is responsible for the healing. If none of the control is healed then it's clear evidence that the pastor can heal HIV.


This is how to make evidence, you don't just make claims and then boom, you expect us to believe it. It has to be tested. Testimonies are never evidence. It's more and more claims

Misterone:
how many flyover did Obi build? If you like cry for net. Asiwaju just won the elections

obi built 2 flyovers. Tinubu built many touts

West1side:
No governor of Lagos before Tinubu built a flyover n no governor among the set of 1999 - 2007 built one, nonetheless he lead laid the foundation for the enormous wealth is proteges in Fashola used in building the most Iconic bridge in Nigeria till date the link bridge in Lekki. Pls note no Igbo state as a single bridge that can be compared to this only iconic bridge comparable is the 3 step bridge Ganduje just completed.

no matter how often you tell a lie, it cant become a truth.

Misterone:
werey! Lagos is built on a master plan championed by Asiwaju, not you build your flyover and I build mine

same masterplan that built more than 80% of the flyovers in lagos today that exist before tinubu became governor. Urchins are pathological liars.

tiger28:
Flyover

That's an accomplishment?

Eko atlantic??Lekki free trade zone? That's accomplishment.

Illiterate!!!

show me evidence that eko atlantic was built by tinubu and funded by lagos state. Lies wont help you. Repent

Misterone:
werey! Lagos is built on a master plan championed by Asiwaju, not you build your flyover and I build mine

blueprint kill you there. More than 80% of flyovers in lagos were there before tinubu became governor

Ofunaofu:
Urchins will invade this thread with the usual tales that the fly overs built by other governors were his blue print

its coincidence that every governor before and after him built flyovers

Ogbuefi2020:
He was busy packing money into bullion van

the thief was busy building his drug cartel instead of building lagos

Lagos has more than 50 flyovers, none was built by tinubu. Every other governor built atleast one flyover. Tinubu built lagos my foot

Omoapena:
No be by displaying your PVC, shey on that election day, you go come out vote?

so na only druggie supporters go vote abi? Tinubu supporters get low iq, no wonder u support a disaster

I usually laugh wen they say we dont have pvc. Lessons will be learnt

Jostoman:
;Dl

e choke

Even me go fill this stadium to capacity if I do crusade

Jagabandit has been rejected

They can't even fill a stadium even after mobilizing from 7 states

Failure party

More

tinsel:
I will advise Obi to concentrate in the southern states to avoid this kind of disgrace. As he campaigns up north, it will be worse.

the picture is a propaganda. It was taking before the begining of the rally.

Believe APC at your peril

caduli:
Why were people circulating empty stadium

it's APC propaganda, they always go and snap empty stadia before the start of rally and then circulate them as the real rally.

It doesn't mean that we will not send them packing in 2023 though

More pictures

Argentina for the title

We need the GOAT debate to be over.

Messi is Better But we need to shut Ronaldo fans up