₦airaland Forum

Aemmyjah:
Ok, fine, I accept
So how does organic evolution and mutations correlate?
Remember that you said about 95% of mutations are neutral and you know what neutral means

I said that I am not sure about the 95% figure. Stop cherrypick what you like.

How can you be asking me how organic evolution and mutation correlates if these mutations are constantly inherited by offsprings over many generations?

It the answer not obvious?

Aemmyjah:
As a scientist, I won't accept assumptions or pictural illustrations in scientific myths.

Lol

As a what?

Shey you dey whine me ni?





See this Mumu scientist who accepted that Mary gave birth to a baby boy without a Y-chromosome donor

Aemmyjah:
Keep fooling yourself
Do all religion embrace the bible?
Why do you embrace reverse wisdom?!!!!!!!!
Omg?!

Christianity is the major religion in the western world, the western world is the fastest growing irreligious clime in the world. It’s a pointer that people are seeing the fraud in Christianity in that environment.

Christians are the ones who embrace the Bible as the source of their beliefs but you want to use all the religions to claim your lies

so?
How does it change the fact that the Bible is a collection for fraudulent narratives.

Is atheism synonymous with being irreligious? Did you ever had English classes

You are dull person, I am not even an atheist.
I know what I meant by irreligious, I know it doesn’t equate to atheism. I am not an atheist

Go and check stats. Atheists like you make up less than 10% of the world population.

dude, I am not an atheist, are you dunce?
Being irreligious does not make one an atheist,

it means he or she has no religious affiliation. If a man stops going to Church does not mean he's become an atheist.
Keep lying to yourself and fooling yourself with reverse wisdom

lol, you be Mumu

jaephoenix:
You really need a refund from your university.
I posted links explaining how organic evolution worked, from humans losing our tails to East Africans living on rarefied air on the mountains, but you refused to read them because it would disrupt your brain cells

aemmyjah is a quack biologist.

He keeps getting all his lies busted.
He’s not interested in learning anything so whatever you post here, he won’t read it.

He’s only interests in peddling his fraudulent biblical stories.

Aemmyjah:
Hmm
Mostly mutations are neutral as you say but it is you that brought up how mutations favored evolution. You said it was the main factor that favored evolution. Now you said 95% mutations are neutral, have you seen how you are shooting your brains by yourself? Which of the beneficial mutations favored ORGANIC EVOLUTION. What you said is a kind of adaptation and adaptation is normal. It's part of life to adapt. How does 95% neutral mutations develop evolution?
You see how you blind yourself to facts. Picking what you want to believe.
Where mutations are not neutral, they tend to produce more harm than good. As for gene mutation, they are usually very harmful. Mr Liar from Tel Aviv

most mutations are neutral, fixed.

That fixed your lies of saying almost all mutations are harmful.

Stop learning science on YouTube

Aemmyjah:
Lol, the same book is the best seller of all time
Same book is the most translated book
The most attacked book of all time but survived bans, persecution, fires,etc
The most distributed and most accessible book
The book that changes lives
The book that gives comfort to many
Do you know any evolutionary book that has 1 of these things I mentioned? You that claim to have wisdom (reversed Wisdom), have you considered your lifespan with this book?
Like your critics past and present, you will die, go, become history and forever forgotten

Also the same book that is the most rejected in modern world.

Little wonder the population of irreligious people is growing astronomically in civilized climes. People have started seeing all the fraud in the book hence they are dumping it everyday.

The more educated People become, the more ability people see the fraud, the more frequently people dump it

Aemmyjah:
What facts do you chase them away with?
You know they won't come to tickle your ears with lies

1. Humans cannot give birth without fertilization, the virgin birth of Jesus is fraud.

2. Snakes cannot talk, the genesis talking snake is fraud.

3. Objects that with more density than water do not have enough buoyancy to stay on the surface of water, Jesus walking on water is fraud.

4. A small ark, lesser in size than titanic cannot house all terrestrial animals for 1year. Noah’s story is fraud

Etc many frauds that you people swallow because you lack the reasoning power to question them

Aemmyjah:
s

Anyone who went to a good school should have known that only a tiny fraction of mutation is beneficial. How much more a person who claims to have gone to one of the best schools?!
Liar claim DNA can be created
Liar claimed a living cell can be created
Liar claims that the Bible says that Earth is flat

Liar, your pants are on fire

Only a tiny fraction of mutations are also harmful.

I didn’t argue about just tin fraction are beneficial as well. You created that topic by yourself, you can keep arguing it on your creationist YouTube channel

blackpanda:
Once u ask any question they can't answer, they will tag you as enemy. So called OBIdients are highly intolerant empty brains

He already explained this many times in many videos.
Why asking us stupid questions?

MrPresident1:
Are you OK? Millions no longer make billions?

Soponna, the one that will bend your neck if you don't put an end to this idiocy

What stopped you from saying billions ?

You cannot prove a negative. Example: Can you prove dayglow orange wombats with purple mohawks don't exist? Have you looked on EVERY planet in the universe? Every cave? Every burrow? Every zoo? Every private collection? See how impossible that is?

But you CAN prove they DO exist…with one simple picture or testable example.

This is why we cannot prove gods don't exist. But we can prove gods DO exist by providing evidence. So where is the evidence?

It's safe to say they don't exist or not believe they exist until evidence is provided indicating otherwise.

MrPresident1:
God created everything over the course of millions of years. Stop propagating idiocy

The earth is 4.6billion years, so he couldn’t have created it in millions.

So which of the gods are you talking about?

Aemmyjah:
One bad thing about lies is that the liar can't remember his lies
Keep fooling yourself
Check past comments

1. Statement 1; evolution is fact and theory of evolution is debatable

2. Statement 2: creationism is not fact, it doesn’t have any theory to debate.

How does these statements mean that Evolution disproves creation?

Educate me

Aemmyjah:
Lol, the same evil tactics you use on my brother, Max
I have never visited Youtube to learn sciences
You are a malicious liar
I only visit youtube to gain more understanding on animal behavior, fomation and development of embryo, how organs and system works and cooperate. These are things that books do not fully convince

No one who properly learnt science in class will say that all mutations are harmful.

Those things usually come from creationist YouTube channels

Aemmyjah:
Would you appreciate it if they come to you in army uniforms and weapons?

Ignorance is a bigger weapon.

Whenever they come, I chase them away with facts.
The same way you cannot preach the Bible to me now unless you want me to reduce your holy book to nothing.

Aemmyjah:
See who is making a fool of himself
You earlier said that evolution does not dispute creation
Now you say creation is not fact
How then does evolution not dispute creation?

do you have comprehension problem?

Where in that post says evolution disproves creation?

It’s like your schooling was a total waste of effort

MaxInDHouse:
YES!
You!
If a gorilla suddenly knows how to talk surely it will insist on his opinion just as you're doing now. You know your ancestors that's why you feel we share the same ancestors simply because you can talk like me!

How about the gorillas going about with laptop bags trying to change my opinion all in the name of Jehovah witness?

Aemmyjah:
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I laugh you in arabic spanish.
Are you familiar with these or you just copy and paste from the internet?
Are these natural or artificial mutations?
You're making me laugh real hard
Pls try again
I'm sure you've not even heard just one of these things you dropped. You should thank me for helping you learn more about mutations than you were taught in Israel
Or lemme say, you've won. I concede cos I can't mention ABCD and the eloquent mutation or WXYZ and the exquisite variant but I'm not saying you are wrong
Congratulations
Hahahaha

Dude, I am not an half baked graduate like you who learn science from creationist YouTube page

Aemmyjah:
Have you not said evolution is facts?

Yes, evolution is fact, theory of evolution is debatable.

Gravity is fact, theory of gravity is debatable

Atom is fact, atomic theory is debatable

Cell is fact, cell theory is debatable


Creation is not fact, there is even no theory to debate here

MaxInDHouse:
Now you're behaving like your ancestors!

Humans don't force their opinion on others!

Ofcourse, have you ever seen a gorilla forcing his opinion on you?

Even Jesus, who’s an ape tried forcing his opinion on all. It’s why you People go about preaching about your Ape god

Aemmyjah:
I now agree that most mutations are neutral
What about you who have been claiming that they are beneficial?

Yes na, some mutations are beneficial, while some are harmful.

No one really knows the percentage. Deal with it dude.

You assertion that most mutations are harmful is wrong.

Aemmyjah:
Right
Let's go!!!!

Hope you know that every time gene replication occurs, a mutation will happen that is not harmful, going by that we have 8billion in the world with mutations that are not harmful, you will have to provide 1billion harmful mutations to match that figure

Aemmyjah:
Examples of harmful mutations
1. Angelman syndrom
2. Canavan disease
3. color blindness
4. cri-du-chat syndrome
5. cystic fibrosis
6. Down syndrome
7. Duchenne muscular dystrophy,
8. haemochromatosis
9. haemophilia
10. Klinefelter syndrome
11. phenylketonuria
12. Prader–Willi syndrome
13. Tay–Sachs disease
14. Turner syndrome

I now accept that most mutations are neutral but if 'non-neutral', they tend to be more harmful than beneficial. Mr Tell Aviv biochemist. I may go to a third world school but I will give you FACTS.

more beneficial mutations

1. ACTN3 and the super-sprinter variant
2. hDEC2 and the super-sleeper mutation
3. TAS2R38 and the supertaster variant
4. LRP5 and the unbreakable mutation
5. CETP and the low-cholesterol mutation
6. BDNF and SLC6A4 and the super coffee-drinker variants
7. ALDH2*2: The super-flusher variant

Aemmyjah:
Shame on you
Is that too difficult to comprehend for you?
Ok, let's agree that mutations are shown to be mostly neutral
Now, the ones that are not neutral tend to be more deleterious than harmless and I think you should know what deleterious mean if you passed English in school.

for every one harmful mutations you mention, I will mention 8 non-harmful mutations.

You agree?

MaxInDHouse:
Naaaaaaaaaaaaa!

You're the one who said your ancestors were APES remember?
You don't speak for others Sir!

Even JESUS’s ancestors were apes.

Aemmyjah:
My God!
When did I ever say there are no beneficial mutations?!
Liar!
You want to hide your embarrassment to make me look stupid in this forum
Are you not the one preaching that mutations are beneficial?
If mutations are 95% neutral as you said. Then tell us, how many percent is harmful and how many is beneficial?

Whos keeping the record of how many percentage is harmful or beneficial?

You argument is that most mutations are harmful and that’s a lie. Deal with it.

Love and bring another creationist lie for us to dismantle

Aemmyjah:
For it's definition and laws, gravity is a fact. Science is progressive. What are the scientific methods in establishing organic evolution as fact? We know that of gravity?

another poor science grasp, so since we have atomic theory and not atomic law, atoms are not facts.
Since we have cell theory and not law, cells are not facts. You are laughably ignorant

I gave you an example where a theory superseded a law, you still came up with this jargons. The Newtonian law of gravity is stale, the theory of general relativity superseded it.

If you know, why do humans wear clothes since we are all animals and all animals are exposed to all kinds of weather. Why do we feel ashamed of exposing our unclothedness. What has evolution said?

this question is strawman and has nothing to do with what we are discussing.
Face the topic and exhausted it before loading me with irrelevant questions.
You are yet to understand what we are discussing and you keep bringing more distractions

MaxInDHouse:
OK APE man no challenge!

Ape JESUS is your lord and savior

Aemmyjah:
Lol.
You were shouting that mutations ARE beneficial and mentioning some beneficial mutations. Now, you say that mutations - about 95% are neutral. Are you making sense at all?
Okay, I now accept I was wrong but which should I accept. Mutations are usually beneficial or neutral?
You seem to be the one adjusting your understanding of scientific facts. You're yet to thank me for that

Some beneficial mutations in humans

1. Lactose tolerance mutation
2. HIV resistance mutation
3. Increase bone density mutation
4. Malaria resistance mutation
5. Tetrachromatic vision mutation


What are you talking about that there’s no beneficial mutations?

All mutations are not harmful

Aemmyjah:
Lemme drop mine too
Maybe I was wrong in saying mutations are usually harmful. I am not like you that won't accept correction
From that shot, mutations tend to be more harmful than harmless if not neutral.
You were not taught at school

“Most non-neutral”
“Most non-neural”

Did you fail English in school too?

MaxInDHouse:
You don't get it my friend, this is not ATHEISM where you only trust what you can see, we talk based on what you can't see yet affecting your very existence.
Only 1 out of 1,000 people on planet earth takes our book (Bible) seriously that's why wars hasn't cease.
According to the Author among those taking the Bible seriously wars will cease! Isaiah 2:4; Psalms 46:9

So know today that only 1 out of 1,000 believe (trust) in the Bible!

Its 2 in 3.
Our of the 2, 1 don’t even know the Bible properly

Aemmyjah:
Well, you say evolution is fact like gravity. What arguments are there as to gravity?

you are very poor in science, there are many arguments about gravity. The most recent one was having Albert Einstein theory of general relativity replace Isaac Newton laws of gravity in early 1900 as the best model that explains how gravity works because Newtonian law breaks down while approaching the speed of light. Today, we have a lot of arguments about Albert Einstein theory of gravity because it seem not to be working at quantum state, so we need to work hard to develop a more encompassing model that will build upon this . This doesn’t mean that gravity is false, it only means that we don’t understand gravity enough, same applies to evolution. It’s the beauty of science, we keep arguing and in the process, we learn more.

It’s not religion that is not willing to change anything

There are heavy debates on evolution- from the factuality of it to the definition and others as well. What is reality about organic evolution? Even some atheists question some concept of organic evolution and some who were atheists later said they were brainwashed that evolution should not be questioned. Why should people especially scientist not question it? That will make it a scientific philosophy

There are arguments about everything in science, even about cells.
Why is that if evolution giving you so much concern?

Listen, I have a fellow biologist who is an atheist and always try to ask questions to make me say things against the Bible but never succeeded. One day, it was my turn. I asked him why humans wear clothes. He gave several reasons and the last was that, humans wear clothes to cover their shame. I gave him that grin. He understood what I did. If the bible is myth, can scientists explain why we put on clothes or undergarments to cover our shame. We are exposed to weather conditions as other animals but they are naked and they are not ashamed. Males flock with males. You can put a male and female goat in a pen. Humans, including little children tend to shy or hide or be embarrassed when they are seen naked. Infact, we consider those who expose their unclothedness as obscene. The Bible mentions why humans hide their shame. What has evolution said about that subject?

If you want to talk about the Bible then bring it on, I will dissect it, tear it into shreds and make it worthless in front of you.

Advice you just avoid that discussion, because the Bible to me is just junk and nonsense stories by Bronze Age nomads who didn’t have any bit of idea how the universe works