₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Never mind my guy because only 1 out of 1,000 people knows the value of our book Bible so you're saying the mind of the majority!

yes, even in Nigeria, 1 out of 1,000 don’t because Nigeria has more Muslims than Christians.
So it’s shoukd be 2 in 3 people in Nigeria.

And about 2 in 50 in developed world

Aemmyjah:
Again,they are usually harmful
Besides, I have NEVER visited youtube for creationist ideas. I don't know any creationist page my whole life.
What causes cancers and gene disorders? Can you tell us?

If you read and understood that post you won’t still be asking me whether mutations are usually harmful.
Be ready to learn and change what you know, don’t be incorrigible in ignorance.

Okay, dont take my word for it

Aemmyjah:
I never said there are no beneficial mutations
I know what I said and you have not disprove it till now
Mutations are USUALLY deleterious. A higher percentage goes to it being destructive, then being neutral, a little percentage is beneficial

by percentage, about 95% (I am not sure about this exact figure) mutations are not destructive.

The most common form of mutation occurs during gene replication and this type of mutations are almost always neutral. They only help to create more diversity.

You are still wrong, mutations are not usually destructive.

There’s nothing wrong is being wrong, dropping your wrong notions and accepting facts.

It’s seem that you hardly learn anything new and that’s why you are still a creationist.

Aemmyjah:
A scientist from the best university keeps blabbing without proving his claims. Continue blabbing

I can bet that you didn’t even read what I explained there because you are dull.
Even you did, you cannot understand because you learn science from creationist YouTube pages.

Only extreme illiterates of science think that mutations are usually destructive. What nonsense talk is that?

Aemmyjah:
A scientist from the best university keeps blabbing without proving his claims. Continue blabbing

You are thick.

Just stop spreading junk science about mutations always being harmful when you don’t even know what mutations are.

You keep recycling the jargons you learnt from your creationist YouTube channel

MaxInDHouse:
True Christians knew this all along!

We know that you're not really interested in the evolution madness it's just a convenient way for you to oppose God's word: Bible.

I will even take spider comic more seriously.
What the hell is the Bible?

Aemmyjah:
Lol
Don't forget that mutations are usually harmful
Gene mutations are usually deadly

So, stop assuming and present SCIENTIFIC FACTS

You still have not learnt anything illiterate.

Mutations are not usually harmful.

Everytime you give birth to a baby, that baby must inherit a mutation. Every gas damn time.

Mutations happen everytime, you are an illiterate.

During every step of gene replication, mutations always happens because the enzyme responsible for replication is DNA polymerase, does genes proofreads but the proofreading is not 100% accurate hence a mutation will always occur as a result of little mistakes. This mutation is usually neutral not more harmful, sometimes it could be beneficial. It’s good because it helps the gene pool and makes sure that the genome of the offspring is not exactly 50/50 of that of the parent.

This mutation that develops from replaication is why we cannot seem to wrap our head around HIV, HIV reverse transcriptase enzyme is responsible for replication of its RNA. It’s very bad at proofreading hence creating many mutations, this mutations helps the virus collectively to elude our medicinal approach sufficiently.
So this mutations are on the average always beneficial to them.

You are blunt illiterate who keeps shouting about what he knows nothing about.


There’s no way you didn’t inherit a mutation from your patients, it’s impossible. So for the umpteenth time, mutations are not usually harmful, you don’t just know biology.

Aemmyjah:
I laugh you in Arabic language
If evolution is fact like gravity, are there debates as to whether gravity is fact today or that of cells?

there’s also no debate about evolution, it’s only a debate in religion where people don’t like reality

Scientists are the experts and they do not even agree on the definition of evolution or accept it as basis to the origin of life
Your claims of gravity and cells can be experimented in a lad which is the basis of scientific method. Is that the same of your evolution which you call a fact
When scientists stop arguing on it and have a wide accepted basis and make it passes scientific methods and not on assumption, we will call evolution a fact. The foundation of evolution that Darwin provided is already acknowledged by evolutionary biologist as obsolete. Have you been taught at school, Mr Tel Aviv biochemist?

scientist do not argue evolution itself, they argue the mechanism that led to evolution, they argue about this in every topic and not just evolution. It’s why is science, arguments are welcomed and not religion that cannot change or whatsoever with their lies.

You cant provide evidence as to your earlier claims of DNA and cells.

Imagine this, you say the Bible is full of jargons and you quoted the verse and showed all of us here a screenshot to prove your point. You even buried it with your definition of a serpent...

stop talking to me about the Bible, the Bible is a story book

That of DNA, no evidence for us
That of Bible saying earth is flat, no evidence
That of cell, no evidence
Is mutation beneficial? No. It is rarely beneficial and mostly harmful especially to genes. I am quoting facts for you sir

no sane person takes the Bible seriously, you got to realize this

You or the other guy said evolution does not discredit a Creator, that was wrong cos it does not tally with the organic evolution which shows that things were made by itself without outside a designer or outside plan.

evolution doesn’t discredit all creation stories. It obviously discredit that of the Bible.
We have many creation stories outside of the Bible, you are just ignorant of theme

Again, is mutation Always beneficial, OFTEN beneficial or RARELY beneficial according to sciences? The answer is the latter part, mutation is usually destructive. Besides it occurs by errors

is this junk science, mutation is mutation. The environment decides which is beneficial, destructive or neutral.

If you ask me, I would say that mutations are often neutral than destructive or beneficial.

oteneaaron:
I might have made a mistake.

But what you say about Lloyd Pye, have you studied any of his books to just wave him away as a conspiracy theorist?

I know him, he has poor grasp of science and a conspiracy theorist

oteneaaron:
Interesting.

I agree with you.

Altho, the Neanderthals aka Home Erectus are more of our closest relatives than the Primate family.

But indeed, we are all from one super family.

Just to digress, it quite fascinating to note that the story of creation as narrated by the ancient Sumerians, spoke of when Enki in an effort to create modern man - Homo Sapien, he had to do countless experiments by mixing the DNA of existing Primates with the genes of the Annunaki thereby creating the Homo Erectus and eventually, the Homo Sapien.

This book written by Lloyd PYE titled - Everything You Know is Wrong, is quite an eye opener.

In that book, he destroys some Darwinism and connects ancient history to the development of man from Homo Erectus to Homo Sapien.

For added research, here is a link to a video of his:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnRrGKYpnI4

Homo erectus are not Neanderthals, they are two different species. Homo neanderthalensis Aka Neanderthals and not Homo erectus.

Lloyd Pye is a conspiracy theorist that can only confuse anyone with bad science background.

MaxInDHouse:
Well at least we all know that monkeys are the closest families of APES not humans that can talk about invent new things!

Jesus and all humans are apes

Pastsoul:
Then what create the ape how where they form, where they just ape on the planet

Apes evolved from other primates, specifically Apes evolved from catarrhines

MaxInDHouse:
So your own ancestors are monkeys shey?

We have heard you!

dullard, who said anyone evolved from monkeys?

CoronaVirusRelo:
Like I stated, you will be learning a lot in 2023

Learning what?

Tinubu will lose. Deal with it

Moh247:
We shall know about that less than 100 days time

insha Allah

CoronaVirusRelo:
INEC can deploy BVAS, Satellite monitoring systems, Multifactor authentication or any other systems technology has to offer.

It still won’t deter His Excellence, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, from winning.

Some minions need to know that Asiwaju has the resources and brains to make anything work.

2023 will teach many the fundamentals of politics!

if he people don’t vote for him, go and make him the excellence of your village na

Moh247:
Exactly my point

While you and your people would vote Obi, me and my people would vote Tinubu

Yws na, then the final result will determine the winner.

The only difference is that you will not have enough power to rig, if you win, them you should win it fairly

It’s no longer about whether a party is popular anymore, an individual can actually upset the any party structure now.

Thanks to BVAS

Moh247:
Yes it did

Osun people chose who they wanted and not the party they wanted.
Without it, APC would have rigged themselves in


I don’t care if Peter obi contest in birthday party, we will vote for him

Moh247:
Ofcoarse it would work, an it worked in Ekiti and Osun

Yes, it really worked in Osun

If the this electoral reform that brought about BVAS works, which I think will and if it actually works, Peter Obi will win this election, then Buhari is the Hero.

There will no more fake dump prints and inflation of votes.

Voting figures now depends on accredited voters and not registered voters, accrediting voters is not totally dependent on cloud server which is not easy to compromise. We will know the actual voting strength of every region. Votes will count.

If it actually works then we should give it to Buhari.


Vote wisely, Vote Peter Obi

MaxInDHouse:
No challenge Mr APE!

Good then, worship your ape god in peace

Redomi:
I said God and not god.

Its the same, only Christians think that the capital G should go for their god. Anyways, the Christian god is part of the arrays of gods

MaxInDHouse:
I've told your brother why it's hazardous to challenge a naked person because he/she will like both of you to appear the same way.

So i've heard you Mr Ape it's only difficult for me to figure out how a descendant of ape now reason and talks but disputing what an old book says that snakes and donkeys once talked.

Abeg what makes you dispute the Bible's Author if you now believe APES can talk?

Jesus was an Ape.
The evidence is why Jesus was an Ape.

Redomi:
Children are from God. If you went to beg for a child from Satan and you got one, believe me you have been predestined to have such child, just that you couldn't wait for God's time

children are not from god.
Children are from their parents

MaxInDHouse:
I've heard you loud and clear because i know that a naked person can't see any reason why others put on clothes.
So your ancestors were monkeys it's OK Sir!

Jesus also was an Ape.
You are also an ape

MaxInDHouse:
Each person has the right to talk about his own ancestors, you've presented yours and i never disputed it.

The evidence says that Jesus was an ape

MaxInDHouse:
Well apes aren't CREATORS (INVENTORS) of anything Sir. So your discovery is flawed!

Jesus na Ape, he has nails and fingerprints

He’s a mere monkey

MaxInDHouse:
Naaaaaaaaaaaaa the Creator created all things in different forms {Genesis 1:21-25} that's why you can't find any creature inventing something new apart from the one and only creature made in the image of the Creator Himself: GOD!

The creator is also an ape.
That’s what we discovered

MaxInDHouse:
Apes aren't CREATORS (INVENTORS) Sir!

JESUS created himself in he image of an ape

MaxInDHouse:
I'm sure you will agree with this brother of yours as he proved that his own ancestors were monkeys:



In the same manner my own God (JEHOVAH) created a creator (JESUS) who also created a creator (ADAM) who gave birth to so many creators (Inventors of all kinds of things we have today)

So if your own ancestors were monkeys my own were creatures made in the image (likeness) of the grand inventor who made life possible on planet earth!

It means that Jesus is also an ape. He has fingerprints.

Goldbw122:
Sound and clear? This will just be like COVID-19 for sure.

Its not how it works.
The chance that a virus discovered in permafrost will be able to infect humans is very slim.
It could infect other species anyways

It is an anatomical fact that we are a modern ape species, part of a series of humanoid apes species.

We accept that the first such species evolved about 2 million years ago, while the latest, Homo sapiens (that’s us), first appeared about 300,000 years ago. This is because we find fossils that can be dated, and we can see how the skeletal structure has gradually evolved from one form to another.

We thus have a working model of which species evolved into which, and this model is being continually refined as we discover more and more fossil remains.
The ape species in existence today are humans, Gorillas, Chimpanzees, Bonobos and Orangutans are great Apes, while 16 species of Gibbons are lesser apes.

What are the characteristics of Apes?
1. All apes usually have fingernails instead of claws. Though they're made of the same substance, keratin, biologists distinguish between claws and nails. Both grow from the ends of digits (fingers and toes), but claws are curved and pointed, where nails are flat and dull.

2. Opposable thumbs: a thumb, that is to say, that is capable of being moved freely and independently. Only apes have this ability even monkeys don’t.

3. padded digits with fingerprints: only apes have fingerprints. Koalas also have fingerprints however do not meet other criteria to be classified as Apes.

4. Unlike other primates, Apes do not have tails.

So humans have all the characteristics of a primate which has fallen within a superfamily called Hominoidea (Ape)