₦airaland Forum

Abfinest007:
Op where's kaduna

i added it, it’s undecided

This election will be a different kind of election, the people now have more of the power. Even a sitting governor is not sure of winning his own state. BVAS is the game changer.
Anybody banking on governor who can’t even control their people is wasting money and his resource. It’s why politicians need to engage he people more and not the elites.
If the people like you, there’s little the elites can do now, they will only give you little votes but the will of the people will overshadow it. Hence I am making this predictions.





1. Tinubu: Look decisively away from media hypes and focusing on surveys, online reaction from both north and south and opinion polls, I predict that these are the only states that Tinubu will win. He’s consulting northern elites but Atiku and kwankwanso are consulting the people of the north and they are elites in the north themselves. The northern elites are collecting monies from Tinubu but the organic votes seem to be in Favour of ATiku, he’s directly talking to the people.
Tinubu will not win any core northern state when Kwankwanso and ATiku are still in this race.

1. Lagos
2. Ogun
3. Oyo
4. Ondo
5. Ekiti
6. Osun
7. Borno
8. Kwara


2. ATiku
From opinions on Hausa news outlets like BBC Hausa, VOA Hausa, legit NG Hausa etc ATiku seen to be the most preferred candidate in the NW and NE. Followed by kwankwanso in NW.
I was able to get opinions from 1000 people, there even a poll held on VOA Hausa, Atiku won and all of the participants are mainly from NE and NW, with respect to that, ATiku can win the following states.

1. Adamawa
2. Yobe
3. Jigawa
4. Bauchi
5. Sokoto
4. Kebbi
5. Niger
6. Gombe
7. Taraba
8. Katsina
9. Zamfara
10. Jigawa


3. Peter Obi: He very popular in southeast and southsouth with no serious contenders there. The people have chosen him equivocally, irrespective of what the So elites think. He also has massively support in Christian northern communities, mostly in north central. So he has serious organic support than can win him these states. People in southsouth and southeast won’t be voting Muslim-Muslim ticket and a northerner ahead of Peter Obi, sane way northwest and northeast won’t give Peter obi massive votes. It’s the way it is.

1. Abia
2. Anambra
3. Enugu
4. Ebonyi
5. Imo
6. Crossriver
7. Akwa Ibom
8. Bayelsa
9. Delta
10. Rivers
11. Edo
12. Benue
13. FCT
14. Plateau

4. Kwankwanso: while he will get many votes, but his ability to win states still very questionable. Will likely be second behind ATiku in northwest. He may gain more advantage before February, hence I think Kwankwanso can only win

1. Kano


Undecided states
1. Nasarawa
2. Kogi
3. Kaduna

garfield1:
Tinubu will do better in iboland than obi in yorubaland bar lagos

Tinubu cannot get 15% in any state in the east

Who are the people to vote him?

Tinubu will lose all northern states aside kwara

Ogun, Oyo and Ondo

JaeRed:
Dunno. But you haven't answered if the earth has a foundation or not

He won’t answer, he already knows that the Bible is utter nonsense

Aemmyjah:
Lol, I'm not talking about gases or elements
I'm talking about cells and not cars. That one is possible 100%
The only thing you have provided to support your claims since yesterday is the account that a snake talked which you did quoting everything with the translation and the verse for reference though you don't accept the Bible

What about what you said regarding cells and DNA, what happened? You know lies have no foundation but can look like truth

Same car you are talking about are created from elements like metals , just like cells are created from oxygen, hydrogen, phosphorus, carbon.
Yes from scratch, from the scratch.

I know you have poor background and you depend on britacannia to learn basic science.

All you need is to make purines and pyrimidines from oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, phosphorus. (The process are online)

Then arrange them in codons and base pairs, these codons can now be arranged into genes in specific orders depending on the kind of protein you are trying to make (Boooom, you just made a DNA if you make them into base pairs)

Create a ribosome that will read these genes inside a bilayer membrane of nuclues and cell membrane (you can see how to make a bilateral structure online), the ribosome will start making protein that will make the cell function.


Biologist
It’s not that hard if you stayed in class

Aemmyjah:
Shame
I only quoted from encyclopedia Britannica for the sake of all reading the comments on this thread. Should i have used any random biology book? You can't even dispute what it says about organic evolution and mutation

you had bad background dude, it’s why you think all mutations are destructive. You have been educated properly.

When did I say All mutation are destructive, require where I said that. I even gave a mathematical probability of the effect of mutation which I said was 70%. I said mutation was USUALLY destructive. You seem to have problem with English. Did they use Aramaic to teach you in Tel Aviv?

I can never say no destructive mutation, I didn’t attend a wack university like you.
You are the person shouting that mutations are destructive before you got schooled.

You want to educate who? There is no evidence, not even a fake one of how scientists have CREATED a cell or even a DNA and you yourself can't prove it

you can open another thread to discuss theory of evolution, I will school you to your marrow.
You that can’t seem to understand the relationship between adaptation and evolution. You are wack

You that had proper lab equipment can't even drop an article to show that cells and DNA were created. Scientists can't even make an egg cell or sperm cell or just any cell, they can't create yeast or bacterial cell

shut up, you don’t understand molecular biology. You can create a DNA and cells from scratch. It’s all over the internet

Why will it hurt me if cells were created? Science and technology have helped in creating some big things that seem to have made life easier. With the help of science, I can communicate with someone in another part of the earth at the same time, we can travel to the moon. What hurts is someone lying against science with no proof

it will hurt you because you want to push your biblical ideas and use that to sell your jargons

You already claim that evolution does not disregard the creator. You said you just don't accept the Bible. Now you deny what you say
Have you seen how insidious lies have been to you, it have affected you so bad, u don't know what you said just yesterday

you also have poor comprehension skill.

If I said evolution doesn’t disprove a creator, does that mean I believe in god?
Are you dumb?

I am agnostic, and yes someone could have started the evolution process (a creator( but we do not know for use and I can’t make shit up like you religious dude do hence why I am agnostic.

Does that mean I believe in your unverified ideas of fallacies?

leketon:
A renowned politician speaking o. Ride on!

Even Tinubu thinks he will win, he’s more renowned than you. But he’s losing

Aemmyjah:
Oh
You now realize mutation can be destructive right?
You're really following my ride
All the examples you mentioned of mutation, you did not acknowledge so

Again, link mutation to organic evolution since you are a evolutionary biologist from Tel Aviv. They say mutation is one of the biggest factors to organic evolution and you know what organic evolution means, if you don't know, I will redefine it for you

Tell me how possible it is to create a cell without creating a genome in form of DNA?

What would be the instructions these cells will use to synthesize proteins?

Did you even enter a biology class at all?

You keep asking evidence for the obvious, because you lack the foundational knowledge


Or maybe you studied zoology, even at that, you are suppose to understand evolution. Shame

I

Aemmyjah:
Oh
You now realize mutation can be destructive right?
You're really following my ride
All the examples you mentioned of mutation, you did not acknowledge so

Again, link mutation to organic evolution since you are a evolutionary biologist from Tel Aviv. They say mutation is one of the biggest factors to organic evolution and you know what organic evolution means, if you don't know, I will redefine it for you

You are the person saying tha mutations are destructive, we have educated you that not all of them are.

That been said, you are getting some proper education now?

Don’t go about shouting mutations are destructive again. no be everybody here go your wack and substandard school
A lot then are beneficial as welll and some neutral

Aemmyjah:
Lol
I hope you know what it means to create?
I did not talk about synthesize
If you can read well, you should distinguish that something was created and not synthesized. That is not creation if you read that article very well. The editor used the word create but if u cross examine it, it is wrong
Cos, cells cannot be made from nonliving matter. Mr Tel Aviv biochemist. Stop being ridiculous. You even cropped out the screenshot that showed Quora answer to the question. DNA, cells have never been created. I don't use create and synthesize synonymously

Dude, you are wack

You can create a full cell from scratch using just carbons, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorus.

You need to go to school.

Same way you can create a car from scratch using all primary materials


Get some education

Aemmyjah:
Did I say ALL mutations are destructive? Shame on you
You are a liar regarding every knowledge you know in biology
I'm surprised to see someone claim mutation is not destructive.
The chances of mutation is this - 70% destructive, 15% neutral and 15% beneficial. Gene mutation is more destructive. How can something destructive bring about something beneficial?
Shame

dude has started coming to terms with reality after gettin proper education
But you said all mutations are destructive before now
[quote m]You have zero knowledge of biology
You came here to lie about what you studied and where you studied
You should be ashamed[/quote]coming from someone who doesn’t understand evolution

I have dropped evidence for all to see, quoting from authoritative sources that they can relate which is the encyclopedia Britannica
Science is not bad, I am not anti science. Bible is not against proved science

this is what happens when you refuse to pay attention in class

Go and sleep
You are yet to disprove my definition of organic evolution I dropped

lol

You are yet to disprove what I said about mutation which I also quoted from Britannica
Yes, I'm a 3rd world biologist. I accept that
You claim to be from one of the best schools you never attended and studied.

Lol, instead of learning biology in class, you are not learning it from britannica, shame

DNA can NEVER be created.

it can, you are just a quack biologist who doesn’t know his onion

That is not a challenge but a fact. You said there are over a million experiment of them, show us right now, even a fake experiment and I will acknowledge on this forum that I am wrong

it’s okay because you schooled in the quack university without proper lab equipment

From my definition of organic evolution, explain how mutation can be a factor

Show us where the Bible said or promote a flat earth

You don’t understand evolution, calm down and let’s educate you

Show us ONE, 1 instance of a created living cells by science. You should be sharing videos or articles, others in the group will be able to see it and know who is talking fact. Either me, a third world biologist without O levels or you that claim yo have studied i n the best in Israel
Soon, you'll claim that there are experiment where animals have been created in the lab

well, cells have been created. It doesn’t matter if it hurts you or not but that’s the case

I agree with you completely that there is an account of a snake speaking in the Bible. 100% agreement as you mentioned the verse in the Bible Genesis 3:1-5

the Bible is a useless book of comic and comedy. No adult should take it seriously

As for that of bubonic plague and HIV, seems credible though but I'll do more research. At least you dropped an article

Okay

You claim to believe in God but you are arguing in a thread that claim to make science more powerful than God.
If truly there is a Creator, and he made you and I, he will surely have some records to help us know him if he wants to

where did I claim that I believe in god?

You want to fight that record

If you drop one, one fake experiment that a DNA was created, I will be convinced that there is no Creator. I can believe that a child can make a spaceship but the most intelligent scientists with all the resources in the right environment can NEVER, EVER make a DNA or a living cell. You have zero knowledge of biology. With all these, how will I even believe you went to Tel Aviv or studied anything bio?

DNA has been created since 1950, you cannot created a cell without creating a genome for it.

Are you dumb?

Aemmyjah:
So that is the DNA right?

How can you even make cell’s without making DNA first?

Product of a Failed educational system

Is the genome not suppose to be what programs the cell to function?

You are getting schooled today

Aemmyjah:
Did you even read the article?!!!
Omg
Is that what you call creation of something
Omg
I did not say synthesized, I said created
This is the same thing u did when u mentioned DNA
U have been making me laugh hard
Mr Tel Aviv biochemist. Why are you making a fool out of yourself
Hahaha

Yes I did, you can create cells from scratch.

Yes you can. Deal with it and get educated

Aemmyjah:
Did I say ALL mutations are destructive? Shame on you
You are a liar regarding every knowledge you know in biology
I'm surprised to see someone claim mutation is not destructive.

I see you are just interested in winning arguments. Where did I say there are not destructive mutations?
Are you dumb?

The chances of mutation is this - 70% destructive, 15% neutral and 15% beneficial. Gene mutation is more destructive. How can something destructive bring about something beneficial?
Shame
You have zero knowledge of biology
You came here to lie about what you studied and where you studied
You should be ashamed
I have dropped evidence for all to see, quoting from authoritative sources that they can relate which is the encyclopedia Britannica
Science is not bad, I am not anti science. Bible is not against proved science
Go and sleep
You are yet to disprove my definition of organic evolution I dropped
You are yet to disprove what I said about mutation which I also quoted from Britannica
Yes, I'm a 3rd world biologist. I accept that
You claim to be from one of the best schools you never attended and studied.

DNA can NEVER be created. That is not a challenge but a fact. You said there are over a million experiment of them, show us right now, even a fake experiment and I will acknowledge on this forum that I am wrong

From my definition of organic evolution, explain how mutation can be a factor

Show us where the Bible said or promote a flat earth

Show us ONE, 1 instance of a created living cells by science. You should be sharing videos or articles, others in the group will be able to see it and know who is talking fact. Either me, a third world biologist without O levels or you that claim yo have studied i n the best in Israel
Soon, you'll claim that there are experiment where animals have been created in the lab

I agree with you completely that there is an account of a snake speaking in the Bible. 100% agreement as you mentioned the verse in the Bible Genesis 3:1-5
As for that of bubonic plague and HIV, seems credible though but I'll do more research. At least you dropped an article

You claim to believe in God but you are arguing in a thread that claim to make science more powerful than God.
If truly there is a Creator, and he made you and I, he will surely have some records to help us know him if he wants to

You want to fight that record

If you drop one, one fake experiment that a DNA was created, I will be convinced that there is no Creator. I can believe that a child can make a spaceship but the most intelligent scientists with all the resources in the right environment can NEVER, EVER make a DNA or a living cell. You have zero knowledge of biology. With all these, how will I even believe you went to Tel Aviv or studied anything bio?

lol
You are getting schooled

NigeriaIsGreat:
Keep wailing on social media Nwanne

February go clear your doubt very soon no worry

I have a well paying jobs dude, na your likes go suffer

leketon:
A renowned politician speaking o. Ride on!

You don’t know what will hit APC

NigeriaIsGreat:
I finally got a job after some months of job hunting.

Sincerely it's not being easy out there for every average Nigerians irrespective of tribes, religion, ethnicity or political affiliates

Although the job isn't something magnificent or worthwhile. Perhaps, it's just to keep soul and body together for the time being

Nonetheless, like the saying; despise not the days of little beginning. These are my days of little beginning

As a full fledged BAT Disciples, you guys are my new family, hope and last resort

I need your financial support as a means of transportation fare

I'd also undergo two weeks online trainning which will commence tomorrow.

Honestly, i don't even have the data luxury for the training. I wasn't given any upfront stipend

Salary and training allowance will be paid at the end of the month

I'd have loved to post my appointment letter as evidence but for security reason

However, if paradventure you think otherwise, feel free to send me a DM to see the appointment letter yourself

Please BAT DISCIPLES come to my aid. I wouldn't want to lose this opportunity.

All of these is to see BOLA AHMED TINUBU (BAT) JAGABAN OF BORGU, THE GREATEST POLITICIAN OF OUR TIME SUCCEED MUHAMMAD BUHARI


Thanks in anticipation.


7012213603
Palmpay

APC is making you suffer like this and you till rooting for them.
Your joblessness was as a result for APC’s ineptness.

Dude, you must be a cursed person

Aemmyjah:
Lol, artificial cell? I'm sure it has all the components of the living cell but it was DNA I am particularly interested in
I'll look into the article you dropped
That's what I was waiting for

What do you have to say with my definition of organic evolution?
Does it point to a creator?
I'm surprised you say you believe in a creator

You don’t know that we have artificial cells?

You think we have been joking in the lab or something?

I didn’t ask you not to pay attention in classes dude

Aemmyjah:
You earlier gave credit to mutation, now you are talking about natural selection and genetic drift
Did mutation made them resistant?

jesus
I am going to be patient with you.

I will explain it like I am talking to an extreme idiot

Now, if you have 100 bacteria in a Pedri dish, 50 has mutant gene for levofloxacin while 50 doesn’t?
If you introduce levofloxacin, what do you think will happen?
50 will die, or will remain 50?

The environment just selected a suitable gene to survive a levofloxacin induced environment, that’s natural selection.

Natural selection cannot happen if mutations don’t exist. It is the mutation that creates many options in the gene pool that enables the environment to select which survives and which doesn’t.

That’s why it’s funny to me when you said all mutations are destructive. No, without mutations, we will all be extinct in no time.

Mutations cause variations which drives natural selection.

Our education in Nigeria is so poor that a biologist doesn’t know this

Many people who blab against evolution do not understand it.

Aemmyjah:
Organic evolution is the theory that the first living organism developed from lifeless matter. Then, as it reproduced, it is said, it changed into different kinds of living things, ultimately producing all forms of plant and animal life that have ever existed on this earth

How does the idea of a creator comes in here?
Has organic evolution met SCIENTIFIC METHODS to be established as fact and theory?


The Encyclopedia Americana : “The fact that most mutations are damaging to the organism seems hard to reconcile with the view that mutation is the source of raw materials for evolution. Indeed, mutants illustrated in biology textbooks are a collection of freaks and monstrosities and mutation seems to be a destructive rather than a constructive process.”—(1977), Vol. 10, p. 742.

U lie a lot
You been lying since
Lied about DNA creation
Lied about everything
Lied that the Bible promotes a flat earth theory
You lie big time

As for what you said about HIV and black death, I'll do my research. I love learning though. I remember how small pox helps fight against some kind of sickness or boosts the immune system against some future sickness. I get facts and I am not gullible to fall for your lie that DNA can be created

Dude, you are still talking about creating DNA when we have created the first artificial cell.

You must be stuck in Stone Age.


https://www.news-medical.net/amp/life-sciences/History-of-Genomics.aspx

This might help you dude.

Aemmyjah:
Liar tried to deceive a third world biologist that DNA can be created. Still waiting for proofs
You can't prove anything against what the Bible says about the earth

The Bible writer, Moses, wrote about 3500 years ago that the earth was hanging on nothing. How did he know? People would have laughed at the idea that the earth is like a hanging ball.
It was only during Isaac Newton time that people began to accept such but they did not give credit to the Bible

About 2700 years ago, Isaiah wrote that the earth is a circle. How did he know? Did he have spacecraft or aerial photographs or telescope to tell him? No

Only about 300 years ago did people begin to believe that the earth is a circle and it is now fact.
Again, Bible gains no credit

Are we still talking about DNA been created?

We have been doing that since 1950. Why can’t you check your Wikipedia?

Biologist my foot

Aemmyjah:
I checked
Why are you bringing up black plague
Again, your claim on Scandinavian is a lie
Why do you like lying
It's not anywhere in the internet, you see you were wrong and jumped to black plague
Shame

good, welcome to biology class which you refused to pay attention to in school.

Black Plague cause by yersinia pestis bacterium is the reason why 10# of scandavians are resistant to HIV.

During the Black Plague, some people had resistant Gene to the bacteria hence couldn’t be infected. The Plague killed many of those who didn’t have this gene then left many of those who had it (this is natural selection), because of this the population of those who Yersinia pestis resistant gene increased in the gene pool, this is the genetic drift I was talking about. The pool drifted by killing of people by natural selection.

These gene has been passed and been circulating in Europe most especially in Scandinavian countries until data and somehow the same gene give protect against HIV.

Even if we can’t prevent HIV today, it can’t kill everyone because of this and many other forms of resistant genes developed and passed down by our ancestors.


Get a pen and paper dude

Aemmyjah:
Liar tried to deceive a third world biologist that DNA can be created. Still waiting for proofs
You can't prove anything against what the Bible says about the earth

The Bible writer, Moses, wrote about 3500 years ago that the earth was hanging on nothing. How did he know? People would have laughed at the idea that the earth is like a hanging ball.
It was only during Isaac Newton time that people began to accept such but they did not give credit to the Bible

About 2700 years ago, Isaiah wrote that the earth is a circle. How did he know? Did he have spacecraft or aerial photographs or telescope to tell him? No

Only about 300 years ago did people begin to believe that the earth is a circle and it is now fact.
Again, Bible gains no credit

Evolution does not mean that a creator does not exist.
You are so unintelligent

It only means that the Bible is jargons Which you have also agreed to.

Because I don’t think you believe that a snake actually spoke to a woman. Do you?

G

Aemmyjah:
Lol,
You're not getting my point
Evolution or adaptation or evolutionary adapted may bring about changes but it does not change the form of the organism towards another species entirely or make them produce another offspring of another species. Whether a man has blue eyes, long nose or dwarf or tall or larger forehead. He still is human, he did not start to evolve parts like a tail or horns. He still remains unique as human.
Though there is no such record of giraffe with shorter necks as Lamarck said, a giraffe is still a giraffe even with a short neck, we won't see it develop into another animals. It will continue to be a giraffe for the next 1 million years

Lol, you need help .

See how speciation works;

A goat will not give birth to a dog or a cat to a monkey. It’s so stupid that you think it how biology says it works

Evolution cannot occur in one organism, it has to be within a population and group of organism with diverse genetic pool, it’s why a goat cannot birth a monkey. I can’t believe that I am about teaching a biologist this


This is evolution with example

First generation of Population of organism
(Many mutations happens over 10,000 years)

Several generations emerges(few loooks changes but can still mate with first generation)

(Another 10,000 of mutation and variations)
Another several generations emerge (loooks will also change but can still mate with first and second generation)

(Another 10,000 year of variations and mutations)

Another another generation emerges (looks similar to first 3 but cannot mate with the first generation however can mate with 2nd and 3rd to produce fertile offspring) a new species is about to emerge here.

Because of this we cannot say that the last generation is the same species with the first because they cannot mate. They are not reproductively compatible.

As this happens for billions of years, it will create chains and branches of organism that are not sexually compatible hence cannot be regarded as the same species even to the level of not being in the same genus, family and kingdom.


Very easy, you were busy attending fellowships instead of paying attention in biology class.

Aemmyjah:
Lol,
You're not getting my point
Evolution or adaptation or evolutionary adapted may bring about changes but it does not change the form of the organism towards another species entirely or make them produce another offspring of another species.

and he said he is biologist

Does evolution say that a dog will give birth to goat?
If you don’t understand how speciation works, why can’t you ask your Wikipedia for help?

Whether a man has blue eyes, long nose or dwarf or tall or larger forehead. He still is human, he did not start to evolve parts like a tail or horns. He still remains unique as human.

see what a biologist is saying?
Jesus

Though there is no such record of giraffe with shorter necks as Lamarck said, a giraffe is still a giraffe even with a short neck, we won't see it develop into another animals. It will continue to be a giraffe for the next 1 million years

shut up and ask Wikipedia about speciation and how it works

Aemmyjah:
Now
Show us proofs of your claim of mutation and HIV with 10% of Scandinavian

Why not ask the same Wikipedia?

It’s you who has been browsing Wikipedia, you can confirm if I am lying or not.

Also ask how the Black Plague created HIV resistance to help your dull biologist brain grasp the concept of mutation

Aemmyjah:
Why not ask Wikipedia
Why not do proper research
Mutation is usually, I repeat, usually destructive, Mr Biochemist from Tel Aviv

I don’t need to ask Wikipedia I’d mutations are destructive or not when I understand the basic concept.

It’s you who can’t grasp the basics that will ask.

Mutations are not always destructive. A lot of them are beneficial and I will have given you many examples but you are thick, it won’t penetrate

Aemmyjah:
Gene mutation is usually destructive
Did you not see the images I dropped earlier
If not, visit Wikipedia

Nope it’s not usually destructive.
Many times, they are beneficial illiterate.

Whether or not it will be beneficial, inconsequential or destructive depends on natural selection by environment.


I can never believe that you did O’level biology, not to talk of university

Aemmyjah:
I said mutation is usually destructive
I know what I say
It is a known fact
Or maybe it has not yet become fact in tel Aviv or you missed the class on evolution
Unlike you, I drop evidence

You lied that DNA can be created and that there are million experiment of DNA being created, you lied thinking I don't know anything about DNA or will back off. Who is the liar now

You lied that the Bible said the earth is flat. As if I dont read Bible, seeing that I did not swallow your lie. You asked me why the Bible said the earth has four corners and a dome. Show us where the Bible teaches a flat earth

As we converse, I'll expose more of your lies
Maybe your claim of where you had your tertiary education is actually a lie. You been lying since on nairaland

And he keeps repeating the jargons.
Mutations are not usually destructive. There are many beneficial mutations. Like uncountable. Don’t talk science if you don’t know science

Just stop saying that you know nothing about.
wack biologist, how can you expose anyone when you don’t understand basic biological terms

Aemmyjah:
I said Mutation is usually destructive. I did not say always
Are you slapping yourself?

You say there are over 1 million instance where DNA was created. Again, in this forum and in the presence of all. Give us one, just one

You can’t stop recycling your jargons.

Does a mutation that allows adult humans to digest milk without having lactose intolerance destructive?

Why did you say you studied again?

Aemmyjah:
Did I say the Bible does not mention such account of snakes talking? At least, you cited a verse

You said the Bible said the earth is flat, I'm really interested. Show me

If snake can talk in your Bible, why should we take such book seriously?