₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Ironically a trained christian fully competent and completely equipped with the knowledge from God's word knows better than any lawyer in the world because it's our duty to know all the laws governing our community that's why you'll hardly find JWs being taken to court for going against the constitution of any country!

Please don’t preach JW to me. Thanks

Dtruthspeaker:
Wetin dem dey call university graduate and Mastets holder wey no fit Pass Primary 2 student?

OLODO, OLODO, OLODO RABATA!

OLODO, OLODO, OLODO RABATA!

ILLITERATE, MOO-MOO!

COMPLETE WASTE OF SCHOOL FEES!

I beg make waka before people see say I dey argue with Madman!

Why are you lying that you are lawyer?
I thought Christians don't lie

Dtruthspeaker:
See Frustration and Lamentation and Ad Hominem BECAUSE OF INABILITY TO REASONABLY COUNTER AND USUAL LOSS!

Now madness has fallen upon you because you know Your Score now reads Dtruthspeaker20- workch 0 .

See you at the next 21- 0.

lol, see lawyer.

Lawyer wey Dey reason like primary 2 student. Make I hear say you be lawyer

Dtruthspeaker:
Believe or not, it does not change the fact that you know nothing about evidence.

You don’t have the intellect of a lawyer bro.
I can put my money on it that you aren’t a lawyer. I swear

truespeak:
Can a non lawyer ever be able to judge if one is a Lawyer or not?

Never!

It always takes one to know one or to know that that one is not one!

You have no knowledge to decide one way or the other!

Look at the way you argue, you can’t even identify fallacies.
Whenever you make a point, you are always committing numerous fallacies. You don’t even know because you don’t have the knowledge.

Philosophical reasoning and logic is the basis for law and they teach them proper logic in law schools that includes how to identify and avoid fallacious arguments.

You don’t portray the characteristics of someone that has gone through such training. How can you go through such training and every time you commit fallacy of faulty equivalence by comparing god with maker of Toyota.
You don’t have the intellect of a lawyer abeg

Dtruthspeaker:
Now you have gone beserk and insultiive as you normally do when you see you have nothing reasonable to say.

i don’t have time for your shenanigans

Dtruthspeaker:
You said


"decided by a court" is the issue because I said "it is A Court that determines what is evidence."

And now I have shown you the decided cases, YOU HAVE CHANGED POST.

All it takes for a thing to not be evidence is when The Court has Declared that "it is not Evidence"

And unfortunately for you, you do not know what Evidence is, so how then can you know "Scientific Evidence".

Exactly as a person who does not know what school is cannot know "Boarding School"!

You cannot be a lawyer, it's impossible that someone with this low IQ will be lawyer, if you are truly a lawyer then it's no wonder that the judicial system of the country is struggling.
How can they have people like you as lawyers?

See how you are struggling to grasp basic logic

truespeak:
I have spoken to you before and you did not accuse me of being dtruthspeaker!

But I understand I have been absent for sometime so it is understandable you think that!

Is it not madness that you reply yourself to just want argument?
Get a life bro

Dtruthspeaker:
You said


"decided by a court" is the issue because I said "it is A Court that determines what is evidence."

And now I have shown you the decided cases, YOU HAVE CHANGED POST.

All it takes for a thing to not be evidence is when The Court has Declared that "it is not Evidence"

And unfortunately for you, you do not know what Evidence is, so how then can you know "Scientific Evidence".

Exactly as a person who does not know what school is cannot know "Boarding School"!

I don't believe you are a lawyer. You don't have enough IQ to face any judge. Seriously

truespeak:
Simple!

Why are you quoting yourself with your alternative moniker?
Life doesn’t start and end on nairaland dude

Dtruthspeaker:
As if you have not been seeking opportunity to insult me.

Here are some cases for you to break your head on as if you can (read and understand)

Daubert Vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc.

Google vs Oracle.

General Electric vs Joiner

Kumho Tire Co Vs. Carmichael

Browdens Patents Syndicate Limited vs. Herbert Smith Co.

American Cyanamid vs Ethicon Limited

Pfizer,Coca-Cola, Pepsi Inc, Michelliin, Mercedes, Volkswagen, Chrysler, Silicon Valley Cases, Toyota, Johnson-Johnson, Apple, Facebook etc.

All science companies have been in court to PROVE and defend their invention at one time or the other.

And till the end of the world, they would be brought to court.

"Science does not exist in courts ONLY EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE AS DETERMINED BY THE LAW AND THE JUDGE". US Court of Appeals, for the 11th Circuit!

Lol, you don’t have sense.
Name one scientific law or theory that was decided in court.

You can’t even differentiate companies from scientific procedures. Are you sure you are lawyer like this?

Dtruthspeaker:
Throughout the whole world, it is A Court that determines what is evidence. I am certain you do not know that during scientific verifications and confirmations Lawyers are present and the verification are still brought to Lawyers for confirmation.

Which is why every science facility and faculty still has its Legal Department or Attached to a Law Firm what you probably know is called Legal Consultant.

This guy you really do not know anything about how the world operates.

Name one scientific evidence that has been decided by a court?
Give a scientific theory or law that was verified by a court. You better don't say what you don't know else I will bash you this morning

MaxInDHouse:
There are many schools of thought around you and you also belongs to one (ATHEISM) yet you singled out one out of many!
Well in my own opinion your question is not innocent but BIASED!
When it comes to decency can you compare Atheists to any group of Theists?
Below pictures shows how insane people can be without the thought of a god.
These people decided to become what they're today because they won't need to associate with others in a place of worship! Hebrews 10:24-25

it's still an innocent question that has triggered you.

Dtruthspeaker:
Throughout the whole world, it is A Court that determines what is evidence. I am certain you do not know that during scientific verifications and confirmations Lawyers are present and the verification are still brought to Lawyers for confirmation.

Which is why every science facility and faculty still has its Legal Department or Attached to a Law Firm what you probably know is called Legal Consultant.

no sir, the court doesn't determine evidence in science, it's not within the jurisdictions of judges to do that, it's within thr jurisdiction of scientific bodies via peerreview process to do that.

Don't start unnecessary arguments lawyer

MaxInDHouse:
You're all talking about advanced nations not because there is no crime in those places but due to the development and standard of living.
In the same manner Christianity is not to be evaluated by the conduct of individuals or the religious groups claiming Christians, rather it's about knowing which group is PRACTICING Christianity and how orderly and well organized they're.
There are Atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Judaists and Traditionalists everywhere, the same is with true Christians but because of misinformed churchgoers Christians most of you guys failed to find out which group is truly practicing Christianity?
Yet when you're about to criticize RELIGION the only Religion that comes to your mind is "CHRISTIANS"
You guys should come together and ask yourselves why aren't you obsessed with other groups that believe in the existence of God?
Why only Christianity?
Well i'll keep the answer because i know you're not interested in that!

why are you paranoid? I asked an innocent question and now you are defensive

Dtruthspeaker:
Everything in the world comes to court, including contests between professors/scientists, Authentication of professors and scientists, ownership and acquisitions of certain knowledge, priority to register discoveries, contest and acknowledgement of discoveries, inventions, etc EVERY TYPE OF AVAILABLE EVIDENCE IS BROUGHT TO COURT. EVERY TYPE WITH NO EXCEPTION!

So as I said earlier, you do know anything about evidence beyond defining it as per Google or dictionary.

You don't need the court to establish a scientific fact and find evidence for anything in nature.
Court is about arguments and most times ths best argument wins and not thebest evidence.

In some cases, court judgement are riddled with bias, corruption and inconsistencies. The point is, argument is the courts evidence in most cases. No wonder argue and think that can be regarded as evidence

[s]

franklytrue:
You don't know anything spiritual concerning this vaccine. There is something else to this vaccine than the normal infant vaccines. You will believe the government and evil scientists hook, line and sinkers because you think they are always right. You think it is all logic or deception is included?
'...for by your sorceries (pharmakeia) were all nations deceived' - Rev. 18:23
'And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.' - Rev. 12:9
What will the devil not use within his power to deceive the whole world unto destruction?

Take heed that no man deceive you. The elect shall not be deceived. Many shall run to and fro and knowledge shall be increased. The wicked shall do wickedly and none of the wicked shall understand but the wise shall understand. (Matt. 24:4-24, Daniel 12:4-10)

You don't even know the one world agenda of the devil in the pipeline, but like the tower of Babel, it shall not be established, only God's kingdom shall be established. Revelation 11:15 - "And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever."

[/s] I don't condone nitwits

[s]

franklytrue:
'Paul in his epistle to the Galatians enumerated a concise list of the works of the flesh. Contained in that list is the Greek word, pharmakeia. The King James scholar translated pharmakeia as "witchcraft" but a more probable rendering is that of "sorcery" and is so given by the American Standard Version. Sorcery is far closer to the meaning of the term.

Pharmakeia (sorcery) is a form of the Greek root from which we get our English words pharmacy, pharmacist, and pharmaceutical. Pharmakeia (sorcery) fundamentally has to do with drugs or medicine. Originally the word was used only in the sense of medicine. Plato talked about the different kinds of medicinal treatment: cautery, incision, the use of drugs (pharmakeia), and even starvation. (Plato, Protagorus 354a). In the beginning, pharmakeia was a medical term; it had to do with the proper use of drugs.

Later pharmakeia took on an entirely different meaning. The learned William Barclay says that pharmakeia began "to denote the misuse of drugs, that is, the use of drugs to poison and not to cure. So we read about the law regarding poisoning (Plato, Laws 933 B), and Demosthenes accuses a bad man of poisoning and all kinds of villainy (Demosthenes 40.57). This is the beginning of the bad use of the word" (Flesh And Spirit, p. 36)

In the New Testament, pharmakeia carried with it the idea of sorcery, occultism, and black magic. It is in this sense that Paul used the term in Galatians 5.20. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia clearly points out that "since the ideas we attach to 'witch' and 'witchcraft' were unknown in Bible times, the words (witch and witchcraft) have no right place in our' Eng. Bible..." (p. 3097). When Paul spoke of pharmakeia (witchcraft KJV) he certainly did not have in mind witches on broomsticks, black cats, and silly superstitions. The Apostle was speaking of sorcery -- the evil abuse of drugs...'
- http://www.truthmagazine.com/archives/volume15/TM015091.html

[/s]

EMILO2STAY:
mumu, are you daft!? I said don't quote me again.

A scientifically illiterate calling someone daft. Funny

franklytrue:
These covid vaccines are not ordinary. There is more to it than meets the eye. They are end time tools of destruction.

Lol, you still don’t know that BCG vaccine is given during immunization of a child after birth.
Works with same principles as covid19 vaccine. You lot don’t know anything.

Look at the society, do you think a typical Christian can be said to be worthy of emulations when it comes to moral decency and lack of corruption?

EMILO2STAY:
your a waste of time, you should have told me your a kid. don't quote me again.

You are ignorant because you hate reading

franklytrue:
Herd immunity you say?

But heed already accepted mandatory vaccinate during birth. This is not logical

Dtruthspeaker:
You obviously forget that I am a Lawyer and many other related skills. And our Work is To PLAY WITH EVIDENCE.

so you do not know anything about evidence besides googles definition of it neither would you see it, even if it was put on your table in front of you.

You think things you guys do in the court are evidence?
No wonder you think your logic are evidence.

MangekyoAlt:
Of course you'd like how foolish I am seeing how you'd gladly swap yours for mine.
You are extremely foolish mate. I am nowhere near you in terms of foolishness and stupidity too....

It's foolish to deny science using internet and phone.
You are a foolish person

EMILO2STAY:
what a waste of time. you lack comprehension. something I just proved to be a hoax. what an empty barrel am done with you.

it's not my fault if you can't read

MangekyoAlt:
~
This proves that clowns actually exists

I am 100% sure you don't live in that mud house located in zamfara, but rather another one in borno state.

But because your IP address says you do live In it, even though you're actually not physically in zamfara, you chose to believe it since you believe science is 100% authentic

I didn't even drop any fact to back my claim and you bought it. This is exactly what scientist like your father do all the time.

Claim humans evolved from this, claim the earth is one billion years old without any actual fact backing their trash.
Gullible clowns like would agree without asking for proof lmfao

Jokes on you mate. It doesn't take much to recognize whose been brainwashed by science here. Keep living in delusion

You downloaded that picture that was snapped by a scientific product and sent it through scientific internet product.

I am liking how foolish you are

MangekyoAlt:
I just tracked your location using your IP address. Thanks to science. I am 100% convinced that this is your actual location and that mid house in the Pic below is your father's mansion. science is 100% factual hence I have no reason to doubt it.

Young man, expect my pigeon in the next 2 years. I live in Lagos while you live in zamfara village. It would take my pigeon months to get to the location yoir ip claims you're in.

ok I’m waiting.

Did the pigeon also tell you my IP? Let me guess, IP is also a scientific invention

The good thing about science is that it works as illiterates also use it

Jokes on you

EMILO2STAY:
I am not a dunce like you I was asking you to show proof of how you did it so I can engage you ,but it is obvious you have not and cannot do it why? because what your saying is simply specs in paper and is not real. let met inform you: 1. there are no reflectors placed on the moon by any astronaut in1969 because no one landed on the moon and i can prove that.

2. the moon is said to be orbiting the earth at 2,300m/h and the earth is moving at 100m/h so even if there are reflectors on the moon the laser reflectors will not throw back the the light on the same spot from were the came from therefore proving this whole laser beam measurement a big hoax and a lie. which is why I asked you initially if you have done it your and also show me how you did it but instead you keep telling me to read it. I don't need to read any thing I already know what you are talking about but know you cannot prove it. the laser beam nonsense is only specs on paper and not practical in real life.

The proof is laser ranging measurement.
Go read it

MangekyoAlt:
Alrigjt, what is the number written on the mud house you live in, in zamfara state?

I can't give you that information using a scientific means as well.

Since science is myth

Shebi you think you are stupid abi

MangekyoAlt:
You are dumb, very very dumb
I am sensible enough to believe some aspect of science because I see them, I see the proof glaring at me e.g the case of using a phone.. I have no problem with scientific creations.

Now you came barking to me like a wild dog that I doubted the nonsense written on this thread, even saying I am rejecting knowledge.

From the way you pumped on me like he goat, I actually thought you were had knowledge in that your coconut head reason I asked you to share your knowledge with me.

Since you claim I am a clown for not believing or doubting the facts that are actually not there in the post on this thread, why don't you drop a few proofs to back the post up?. I want you to clear my doubt.

Man, how do you not realize you're just a gullible clown who just believe whatever a village scientist like your father wakes up one day, writes and publish, and ditch out to clowns like you without any actual fact in it?

You know whats bad? What's bad is the fact that you actually believe you're scientist

I asked you a simple question and instead of you reply me with lies as a real scientist would do, you're here rebutting me....and avoiding the direct question
. Just answer the dam question man...

i am also gonna try to find a pigeon to send my reply

MangekyoAlt:
You are dumb, very very dumb
I am sensible enough to believe some aspect of science because I see them, I see the proof glaring at me e.g the case of using a phone.. I have no problem with scientific creations.

Now you came barking to me like a wild dog that I doubted the nonsense written on this thread, even saying I am rejecting knowledge.

From the way you pumped on me like he goat, I actually thought you were had knowledge in that your coconut head reason I asked you to share your knowledge with me.

Since you claim I am a clown for not believing or doubting the facts that are actually not there in the post on this thread, why don't you drop a few proofs to back the post up?. I want you to clear my doubt.

Man, how do you not realize you're just a gullible clown who just believe whatever a village scientist like your father wakes up one day, writes and publish, and ditch out to clowns like you without any actual fact in it?

You know whats bad? What's bad is the fact that you actually believe you're scientist

I asked you a simple question and instead of you reply me with lies as a real scientist would do, you're here rebutting me....and avoiding the direct question
. Just answer the dam question man...

I will answer your question about antiscience when you send it through a non-scientific means.
Many scientists have worked hard and are still working hard to make sure you replies get to me in light speed. I’m not gonna take their efforts for granted.

So send this via pigeon