₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
Why would we not be able to survive a trip through a wormhole?

What part of this is sci fi? I am pointing out a possibility that is based on established science. It conforms to Einstein's relativity equations and even Stephen Hawking theorised that wormholes may potentially exist yet you are calling it sci fi. It was not dreamed up by sci fi authors if that is what you mean. LoLz.

A human will not be able to survive a trip through warmholes.

Secondly, warmholes technically doesn't break the universal speed-limit of light. What it does is that it makes you transverse great distances in a short time, thereby making you travel to the future. You may have traveled faster than light in your own perspective, but universally, you didn't.

Travelling at the speed of a photon means that, time will cease to exist or will stop according to theory of relativity. For a photon, there's no time. A photon is everywhere at the same time from its frame of reference.
The time it takes For a photon to travel from the sun to earth is 8 minutes to us, but from a photo's perspective, it took no time at all. It was in the sun and at the same time on earth.

That's what happens when you travel at the speed of light, warmholes are just hypothetical vaccums in spaces that can help objects transverse great distance withing little time. It technically doesn't break the light speed barrier.

[quote author=LordReed post=120517243][/quote]But humans cannot hypothetical survive a trip through a warmhole assuming it exist.
Do you know about this or should I clarify?

This is why I am urging you to separate sci-fi from reality

LordReed:
LoLz. I no longer argue with liars because even when truth bites their arse they still vomit lies.

I think we already resolved this.

LordReed:
Nope.

So on what ground do you think that we will ever break spacetime barrier or move objects at light speed when the evidence and mathematical proofs says otherwise?

Tinubu will win
Osun
Ogun
Oyo
Ondo
Ekiti
Kwara
Kogi
Borno
Yobe

Where Tinubu will get 25%
Lagos
Niger
Kaduna
Kebbi
Zamfara
Gombe
Katsina
Jigawa

LordReed:
I asked you to quote where I said everything is possible, you couldn't but instead of admitting you are wrong, you doubled down with the lie and said I implied it. Quote where I implied any such thing if you haven't become a shameless liar.

Ok my bad. I take that back.

So clarify me now, is everything ever going to be possible with science?

LordReed:
LoLz. And I have never seen you lying so blatantly. Wtf happened to you man?

sincerely, are we gonna argue to win or argue to establish the truth?

LordReed:
LoLz. And I have never seen you lying so blatantly. Wtf happened to you man?

Where's the lie?

LordReed:
Is that what you call lying now? Wonderful. LoLz.

LordReed my man.
I have never ever seen you so defensive

waldigit:
It depends on scientific strategy that is being used. If you adopt "a friori" approach i.e "cause to effect" you may be right, but if you go "posteriori" i.e. "effect to cause" that may not be true. From the creation, science has established existence of systems in nature. Since every system is designed to achieve a set of objectives, logically the entity behind the systems design can be safely concluded to be God.

concluding without testable evidence is not science.

LordReed:
Right. Carry on then no need to continue a conversation where you are attempting to gaslight yourself. SMH. LoLz.

Do you runaway from every debate you feel like you can't win?

LordReed:
Are you going to admit I never said everything is possible or not? LoLz.

nope I am not. You inferred that everything we cannot achieve today, we may be able to achieve them tomorrow including breaking spacetime barrier to understand how the singularity got there.

Omo, see finishing 🙅‍♂️🙅‍♂️

LordReed:
Dude quote where i said so nah or you have added lying to your repertoire? LMFAO!

Even little things like knowing the exact speed and location of a particle in space at the simultaneously is impossible.

No one can solve it in future.

LordReed:
Dude quote where i said so nah or you have added lying to your repertoire? LMFAO!

are somethings impossible or not?

Bardo:
I am God

the one that created the universe?

LordReed:
LMFAO! Now I know something is wrong with you, yet to figure what though. Bwahahahahaha!

You can't quote where I said everything is possible because I never did. LMAO!

But you said everything is possible.

I am telling you that many thing are impossible, including traveling at light speed and breaking the barrier of time.

It's even impossible to get swallowed by a pythob and surviving its digestive juice. Should we also wait a while, maybe someone can disprove this in future?

sukkot:
downloads from my higher self

lol OK

sukkot:
so people dont understand that we exist multidimensionally meaning while an aspect of you exists in this 3 dimensional reality flesh another aspect of you exists out in the ethers and that aspect of you that exists out in the ethers hates the aspect of you that is 3 dimensional flesh and is always looking for a reason to delete you and take you out so that it can exist alone unencumbered. that aspect of you that exist in the ethers is always looking for every opportunity to take you out. the question is will you give it the opportunity to take you out ? or will you appease it so that it becomes at peace with you and nourishes and protects you ?

where do you guys get all these things from?

LordReed, everything is possible. Can a human survive the event horizon of a blackhole that will enable him/her stop time?

It should be possible, let's wait another 2million years 😂

We cannot totally overrule it

Kyase:
Please go to YouTube and search on string theory by Dr Michio kaku then we can have this conversation when everybody is on board

you can as well share the evidence for string theory that you got from YouTube here. But I advice you to stop learning science there.

You will learn so much jargons

Kyase:
Please go to YouTube and search on string theory by Dr Michio kaku then we can have this conversation when everybody is on board

I don't learn science From YouTube sir, it's where many conspiracy theories and junk science like you re spewing now are spread.
I learnt science in school and from reading papers from renowned and trusted scientific journals.

Kyase:
Show me evidence of time travel

can you show us evidence for string theory now?

Kyase:
Good, now go back to my first two or three comments about time

What did I say about time there and then compare it with what you just wrote

you said time doesn't exist in your first comment sir.


We said it's relative. Time on the surface of the earth is relative to the time in the centre. Time exist sir

Kyase:
Show me evidence of time travel

What do you understand by time travel?

Because the scientific is different from the layman understanding

Kyase:
Nobody is wrong in science
As long as you can prove it

Even the theory of relativity you guys keep hammering, is yet to be fully proved
It's still a theory, workch said string theory has no evidence, same thing with E=mc^2 when Einstein postulate it

Just like I said
I find more sense in the string theory than your "Time exist" theory

Remember, theory of relativity is not a prove that time exist

Remember, he said we can bend time

sorry sir, people can be wrong in science.

Albert Einstein theory of relativity is what we use to operate GPS and run the international space station, what can you use string theory for?

Kyase:
If you tell me why time is slower at the centre of the earth then we can start talking about Einstein theory of relativity, while at that include why gravity have effects on time

can you show me evidence for string theory now?

Kyase:
If you tell me why time is slower at the centre of the earth then we can start talking about Einstein theory of relativity, while at that include why gravity have effects on time

Time is slower at the center of the earth because time is relative, a body in space bends the fabric of spacetime, in the process it exerts gravity and then slows time around it, the more the mass of the object, the more its ability to bend spectime. The closer you move to the object, the more it bends spacetime and the more it slows time. It's why at the center of earth where spacetime is more bent than the surface, time is slower than the surface.

All these are actually explained in the theory of relativity we have been asking you to read. It's called time dilation under general theory of relativity.

Kyase:
And string theory is false ?

there's no evidence for it... It's a mere hypothesis.

Show me one evidence for it

Kyase:
Explain quantum mechanics for me bro

you first explain theory it relativity. We have been asking that since page 1.
Explain it and I will answer you

Kyase:
N

Okay
So you are after google and wiki definition of time

Please try and read this and you will understand my point and maybe after we can create a thread for this discussion as science lovers and scientists

But because of next time, there's nothing like "you are wrong in science" the reason why I never told you, you are wrong, rather I bring my argument for you to disprove it with your
Not like what that bro did up there


https: //scitechdaily. com/time-might-not-exist-according-to-physicists/

your article is using string theory to suggest that time doesn't may not exist.

Is there evidence for string theory?