₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
LoLz. You are like the people who thought blackholes were science fiction because no evidence had yet been found. We are talking about possibilities based on scientific theories and here you are shutting your mind to it.

I get the feeling you really closed your mind off even more since you say you dropped atheism. I think that is unfortunate but then if that's how you wanna look at things that's up to you. All I'll do is present the ideas.

you also like the person who thinks matter find same space with another matter

LordReed:
LoLz. The wormhole doesn't require you to accelerate to lightspeed!

There's no evidence for warm holes, you like science fictions

LordReed:
LoLz. How is it not? How is transversing billions of light years in an instant not an overcoming of the lightspeed problem?

it's impossible to do that because the matter will even shatter into weightless pieces before attaining that speed. There is also no energy to do it

Maynman:
Is the prosecutor not the theist that’s suppose to provide evidence against atheist, the defendants?

But In Nigeria, it's the other way.

The defendant is suppose to defend himself by providing evidence against the prosecutor's claims.

He will practically defend himself

jaephoenix:
What if there's no evidence for it, would you remain skeptic?

yes

jaephoenix:
There you go. Struck out based on lack of evidence
Same way I'm striking off deism based on lack of evidence

lack of evidence for or against.

Stop cherrypicking.

In the United States Court, the prosecutor is always required to provide evidence against the defendant

jaephoenix:
As a follow-up to my question, what if I insist I flew to work. And proceed to write a book how I grew wings and flew…

If there is evidence for or against it, then I will think that you are probably drunk or you need to visit the psychiatrist.

However if there no evidence for or against, I will remain skeptical about it.

jaephoenix:
Neither is there evidence for it.
In the law court, they would have struck out your argument ages ago, because no evidence for it. They don't look out for 'evidence against'

law court is not science.

Even in the law court, you are always required to provide evidence for or against else the case will be struck out based on lack of evidence

jaephoenix:
Yes. Carbon dioxide is 96% of the air! Meanwhile, Mars has almost no oxygen; it's only one-tenth of one percent of the air, not nearly enough for humans to survive. If you tried to breathe on the surface of Mars without a spacesuit supplying your oxygen – bad idea – you would die in an instant.

you see why I will not accept it again.


So is there evidence against a deistic god?

jaephoenix:
Yes

So it's why I won't accept it myself.

There's evidence against it

jaephoenix:
Yes. Gravity!

good, you have answer your own question.

To add to it, there's also no gene to code for wings in humans.

Do you see why I won't believe it as well?

There are evidence against it

Maynman:
Who cares, you are cherrypicking which question you’ll answer.

We are talking about YOU making the claim, explain how you got to mars without spacesuit.
Why are you changing it now?

Does a human have the ability to survive on Mars?

Maynman:
we are not talking about that.

We are talking about YOU making the claim, explain how you got to mars without spacesuit.

answer it or I Wil stop replying you.

Are there evidence against a human's ability to live on Mars?

LordReed:
Good. Then it is a possibility to overcome the light speed problem.

there's a mathematical proof that it's not possible for the light problem just same as the one you showed me for the existence of wormholes.

There's no single probability that the light problem can be solved. Not 1

jaephoenix:
Im asking you bro. Why throw question back to me

is there evidence against a flying human?

jaephoenix:
No I dont.
There you go
Why? Because it has been found out you can't survive without one out there

So there's evidence against it right?

Maynman:
You made a wild claim and You provided no evidence.
Even if you don’t prove your claim, like in science explain how you arrive at mars without spacesuit, then I’ll use your explanation to carry out experiments to approve or disprove it.

You just made a blank statement.

Are there evidence against a human ability to live on Mars?

jaephoenix:
To start with, the book seemingly inspired by yahweh has been found to be a big fraud, and never happened

I am not talking about yahweh, I know there are evidence against yahweh.

There's no evidence against deistic god

Strawman fallacy

LordReed:
So? Are you saying definitely that they don't exist because we have no evidence right now?

nope, I am saying that they might exisy
But there's no evidence that they do for now

There's a probability for it

Maynman:
Is i do not believe your claim different from I disbelieve?

Why do you disbelieve it?

LordReed:
LMAO! Did you become some how more close minded?

I didn't say wormholes cannot exist, I saying that there no evidence that they do.

There's only mathematical proof, blackholes aslo had mathematical proofs before their existence had evidence.

Do you know the difference between no evidence and cannot exist?

Maynman:
I don’t believe your claim.

So you disbelieve it? Yes or no?

Maynman:
I don’t believe you.

So you disbelieve it right?

Maynman:
I can only believe what I don’t know.
You can make me believe, but I’ll never know because I’m not there.

do you disbelieve it?

Maynman:
What’s the evidence for or against yahweh?
What’s the evidence for or against a deistic god?

I don't know, tell me the evidence against them before you rejected it.

Maynman:
So if your kid came and meet you this is what you’ll say?

do you believe that I am typing from Mars now, without a spacesuit?

Maynman:
So if your kid came and meet you this is what you’ll say?

I will find evidence for or against it from everywhere before I believe or disbelieve it.

jaephoenix:
Good.
Do you believe I flew to work in my wings this morning?

is there evidence for or against it?

yrhuhfy113:
ITS NOT FICTION BRO....

The saddest truth in the universe is.... WHATEVER YOU BELIEVE OR CHOOSE NOT TO BELIEVE, THERE WILL ALWAYS BE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YOU.


As long as you can believe that INTELLIGENT LIFE FORMS CAN BE CREATED WITHOUT AN INTELLIGENT BEING.... shows how intelligent you are.

I can't take someone who thinks evidence for warm holes exist seriously

yrhuhfy113:
GOD IS NOT RELIGIOUS, HIS PROOF IS EVERYWHERE.... WE ARE HIS PROOF. INTELLIGENT LIFE CAN NOT BE CREATED WITHOUT AN INTELLIGENCE. TILL NOW APES HAVE NOT EVOLVED INTO HUMAN. SO QURAN OR BIBLE WILL NEVER BE SUFFICIENT.

lol OK 😂😂

jaephoenix:
Just oblige me. You would understand my point
Yes or no

is there evidence for or against unicorns?

jaephoenix:
Lol. Does science believe blue unicorns exist?

We are talking about God and not unicorn.

Strawman fallacy