₦airaland Forum

A001:
Kyase, why did you ignore my own questions? Like Workch said, Einstein's theory of relativity offers the most accurate explanation of time till date.

Your argument lacks substance and you're sounding like someone ignorant of basic Physics.

i am taking it easy with him, he will keep showing his ignorance the more we engage him.

He's already doing that. He's yet to jusy browse the theory, talking about dunning Kruger syndrome

Kyase:
Oh dear
We are here talking about Quantum Physics and you here talking about basics physics

No wonder you don't understand what I mean by "sun time"

You understanding of time is actually BASIC

theory of relativity is not quantum physics.
The concept of time is not quantum physics, are you sure you know physics?
Everything we have discussing here doesn't concern quantum physics.

There's nothing like sun time in physics, what do you mean by that?

Kyase:
Oh dear
We are here talking about Quantum Physics and you here talking about basics physics

No wonder you don't understand what I mean by "sun time"

You understanding of time is actually BASIC

So what does theory of relativity say if you have read it and you know it?

Kyase:
You don't know me and you are already calling me an illustrate, wow
You based your study on google search and you here arguing and calling someone that actually study the theory of relativity an illustrate.......



Well, I just checked, you are an obedient and that explains it
I thought I was conversing with a science enthusiast or even a scientist but my oh my here we are, but because of next time, you should know this


Thank you

if you know theory of relativity, so tell me, what does it say?

Kyase:
You don't know me and you are already calling me an illustrate, wow
You based your study on google search and you here arguing and calling someone that actually study the theory of relativity an illustrate.......



Well, I just checked, you are an obedient and that explains it
I thought I was conversing with a science enthusiast or even a scientist but my oh my here we are, but because of next time, you should know this


Thank you

you just want unnecessary arguments instead of just reading Albert Einstein theory of relativity to end this.

Kyase:
Its not about typing theory of relativity, I told you I studied the theory and did a project on it back in school....

I still stand by my conviction


Unless you prove to me otherwise

You didn't do anything, you are sonding like someone who doesn't know basic physics.

Go and read it

Kyase:
What we think Time is, doesn't exist.
The moment we can prove time, bro then time travel will be possible....
Particles accelerator project is still ongoing, by the time they are done, we'll know what's up with time, but for now

We should use time to tell season and period

illiterate, time travel is possible and has been done many times.

It's why we are telling you to go and read Albert Einstein theory of relativity, but you are allergic to reading.

It will explain time travel in form of time dilation to you.

Kyase:
Now I understand the time you are talking about

You are taking about the

there's nothing like sun time.

Time is time in physics. Go and read and cure this.

It's not hard to type Albert Einstein theory of relativity on Google. You are just a click away from knowledge

Kyase:
I studied that theory and Einstein himself is a time doubter

You talk about space and time

The reason I asked you to define, Period and seasons without the word time

Lol, have you read the Albert Einstein theory of relativity?

Stop arguing and read it. You are sounding like an abject illiterate now. Please read it

No be everything be argument, go and read that theory to stop sounding this way

Kyase:
Naaah bro
We don't even understand 1/4 of what time is

My next question to you now is, are we real?
Don't be in a hurry to answer this question

Time and space are one continuum, both cannot exist independently.

Read about theory of relativity, it's all explained there.

Kyase:
Naaah bro
We don't even understand 1/4 of what time is

My next question to you now is, are we real?
Don't be in a hurry to answer this question

Time exisy bro, we don't know how much we understand time but we understand it very well enough to predict it.
Please kindly study theory of relativity before replying me again

Kyase:
I believe time doesn't exist or we are yet to understand what time truly means
Define, seasons, and period without the word "Time" then you'll understand what I mean

Time exist, we understand time.

Time is the 4th dimension in the space-time continuum. We understand time very well, maybe not completely. Pleae kindly study theory of relativity, it tells you about all the characteristics of time.

Time is real, however the perception time is relative. Time exist

Kyase:
That time is absolute

what do you mean, please explain

LordReed:
Dude c'mon this is getting embarrassing. Where did I say everything is possible? Wtf is going on with you? LoLz.

But let's even talk about this. What do you mean by the same space? If I put 2 non reactive gases in a single cylinder are they not occupying the same space?

it's not, you made a claim that everything is possible.

Can two matter occupy the same space?
Answer it

Kyase:
When you talk about time, what do you mean

The concept of time doesn't make sense

what do you understand by time?

LordReed:
LoLz. Strawman? Oh c'mon, it can't be that bad. Bwahahahahaha!

As in you can't find anything to critise you have to make a strawman. Wow! LMFAO!

lol, it's not, can two matter accommodate the same space?

Since everything is possible

LordReed:
LoLz. You are like the people who thought blackholes were science fiction because no evidence had yet been found. We are talking about possibilities based on scientific theories and here you are shutting your mind to it.

I get the feeling you really closed your mind off even more since you say you dropped atheism. I think that is unfortunate but then if that's how you wanna look at things that's up to you. All I'll do is present the ideas.

you also like the person who thinks matter find same space with another matter

LordReed:
LoLz. The wormhole doesn't require you to accelerate to lightspeed!

There's no evidence for warm holes, you like science fictions

LordReed:
LoLz. How is it not? How is transversing billions of light years in an instant not an overcoming of the lightspeed problem?

it's impossible to do that because the matter will even shatter into weightless pieces before attaining that speed. There is also no energy to do it

Maynman:
Is the prosecutor not the theist that’s suppose to provide evidence against atheist, the defendants?

But In Nigeria, it's the other way.

The defendant is suppose to defend himself by providing evidence against the prosecutor's claims.

He will practically defend himself

jaephoenix:
What if there's no evidence for it, would you remain skeptic?

yes

jaephoenix:
There you go. Struck out based on lack of evidence
Same way I'm striking off deism based on lack of evidence

lack of evidence for or against.

Stop cherrypicking.

In the United States Court, the prosecutor is always required to provide evidence against the defendant

jaephoenix:
As a follow-up to my question, what if I insist I flew to work. And proceed to write a book how I grew wings and flew…

If there is evidence for or against it, then I will think that you are probably drunk or you need to visit the psychiatrist.

However if there no evidence for or against, I will remain skeptical about it.

jaephoenix:
Neither is there evidence for it.
In the law court, they would have struck out your argument ages ago, because no evidence for it. They don't look out for 'evidence against'

law court is not science.

Even in the law court, you are always required to provide evidence for or against else the case will be struck out based on lack of evidence

jaephoenix:
Yes. Carbon dioxide is 96% of the air! Meanwhile, Mars has almost no oxygen; it's only one-tenth of one percent of the air, not nearly enough for humans to survive. If you tried to breathe on the surface of Mars without a spacesuit supplying your oxygen – bad idea – you would die in an instant.

you see why I will not accept it again.


So is there evidence against a deistic god?

jaephoenix:
Yes

So it's why I won't accept it myself.

There's evidence against it

jaephoenix:
Yes. Gravity!

good, you have answer your own question.

To add to it, there's also no gene to code for wings in humans.

Do you see why I won't believe it as well?

There are evidence against it

Maynman:
Who cares, you are cherrypicking which question you’ll answer.

We are talking about YOU making the claim, explain how you got to mars without spacesuit.
Why are you changing it now?

Does a human have the ability to survive on Mars?

Maynman:
we are not talking about that.

We are talking about YOU making the claim, explain how you got to mars without spacesuit.

answer it or I Wil stop replying you.

Are there evidence against a human's ability to live on Mars?

LordReed:
Good. Then it is a possibility to overcome the light speed problem.

there's a mathematical proof that it's not possible for the light problem just same as the one you showed me for the existence of wormholes.

There's no single probability that the light problem can be solved. Not 1

jaephoenix:
Im asking you bro. Why throw question back to me

is there evidence against a flying human?

jaephoenix:
No I dont.
There you go
Why? Because it has been found out you can't survive without one out there

So there's evidence against it right?