₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
LoLz! Dude, I don't give a shit what you feel about me. I don't interfere with how people want to identify themselves and I expect same from others with how I choose to identify myself. It's not your business to police people's identity.

lol 😂

A001:
Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

he's here for the long unnecessarily argument and not for the knowledge

A001:
Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

Stop responding to him, he will continue to repeat whatever he thinks that is correct irrespective of your replies.

Maynman:
God is a title not a person.
The moment an agnostic say they don’t know if any “god” can exist or not, they have already ascertain that a “god” has the ability to exist.

😂😂😂

Otilo, not every atheist is smart o

A001:
Keep embarrassing yourself in public, ode. An agnostic should give you reasons why a god can exist when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.

Better go back to religion. It's where a rètard like you can thrive.

You're a disgrace to atheism, Mr divine light. Lols. An atheist using the word divine is a big fool.

😂😂😂
Seriously a retardd

Hes expecting an agnostic to describe God.

Maynman:
You are the only unintelligent one here.
How did you arrive at a deistic god and his attributes?
Something is unknowable yet you know it doesn’t interfere bwahahahah

you are correct naw 😂😂

LordReed:
LoLz! You do you bro but you don't get to decide how I identify myself capise?

I know, you are now sounding a like theist who says "how I give my tithe is not your business"

Maynman:
We can also use this same logic for marvel characters?

LordReed, you guys should tell your militant to stop harrasing me with unintelligent replies 😂😂😂

LordReed:
LoLz. I already told you I am an agnostic atheist did you forget?

LoLz @ cannot win the deistic argument. What exactly is there to win or loose? You make me laugh. Bwahahahahaha!

the atheist in it is wrong.
It means that you are rejecting it without first disproving it.

Just leave it at agnostic else, na fallacy my guy.

A001:
I can see that clearly now. He's calling basic scientific knowledge "garbage". Empty brain.

It's not every atheist that is smart.

Some are just following the bandwagon while some are sciolists. Some are just doing atheism because they are looking for reasons to justify their "ungodly" bahavoir.

The most scientific approach to the issue of God is Agnosticism.

Maynman:
Lazy deistic god

Bros abeg leave me, I use diestic god beg you 😂😂

LordReed:
LoLz. Like I said in my last response to you, you have quite a bit to learn about me.

Trust me, you don't usually shy away from an argument you know that you can win.

You know that you cannot win the deistic argument and you have realized that. With time, you Wil accept Agnosticism. It's a matter of time before you know.

Agnosticism is the best approach for someone who's considering all possibilities.

LordReed:
LoLz! You think I care what you think is the superior position? Dude you have some things to learn about me.

I know you are smart, sincerely.
I know you will think about this topic carefully after this.


It's not easy to accept that one is wrong, it wasnt easy for me as well to accept that my atheistic ideas were wrong. It took time, no be one day thing

LordReed:
Right. Anybody who doesn't want to discuss with you has cognitive dissonance. LMFAO!

Lol, LordReed my guy.

There's nothing wrong in being wrong. Think about it.

That guy properly followed you everywhere you were running to in the argument. You know that he will nail you patapata if you engage in the deism debate.

Maynman:
Keep running deistic worshipper.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Mosafejo 😂

A001:
My post is based on key scientific facts, and I know as an ignorant person, those facts are garbage to you.

All this is obviously too much for your low IQ, just like calculus is garbage to a 2-year-old.

Before you engage in this sort of discussion and embarrass yourself in public, first read important books on science, especially Physics.

You clearly don't know the meaning of the word "agnostic". Just like a person can be atheistic to a specific god, you can also be agnostic about a specific god or deity or any or all gods.

Stop typing gibberish with confidence. You're embarrassing yourself.

don't argue with a militant Atheist who knows nothing.
He doesn't even under basic science

Maynman:
An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Agnostics are afraid of their former religion gods.

very correct 👍👍

Maynman:
Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.
Tell them to tell us the origin of the meaning of god/deity, they fold

I totally agree with you on this 😂😂

LordReed:
What part of I AM NOT INTERESTED is giving you a problem to understand?

The thing is,

Deism and atheism are superior to religious theism.

Deism and atheism falls flat in the face of Agnosticism.

Agnosticism will use each of them against each other to edge both.

LordReed:
What part of I AM NOT INTERESTED is giving you a problem to understand?

Why do think theists that are fighting cognitive dissonance avoid religious discussions with atheists?

😂

Maynman:
Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.

You CLAIM a god that has all this power to be a creator but doesn’t intefere.
A Sango worshipper CLAIM that sango is the creator and interferes.

Different gods, different characteristics bwahahahah

you are very correct 😂😂

LordReed:
Huh? You have to be kidding me. I should address deist claptrap I am not interested in? Guy, go address that if you wish, I am not interested. LoLz.

I see you portraying cognitive dissonance now.

If not then why running from a deistic argument if it's not superior to yours?

LordReed:
Because it is only Lavosier you mentioned.

Which goalpost is being moved here? You are talking about the history of phlogiston and only mentioning Lavosier as if he was the only one who conducted experiments on it. Lavosier's experiments built on others that came before him.

I have gone through the thread, I think you have been shifting the goalpost a lot.

When he answers this, you leave it and create another one.

Try to exhaust his points, when he addresses one, agree with it before moving to another.

Maynman:
Stop running.
As an agnostic why do you think a god like zeus has the ability to exist?

But I agree with na, what's now the purpose of arguing when we are now on the same page 😂

Maynman:
The agnostic position doesn’t make sense.
They claim they don’t know if any god exist or not?
Why do they think any god has the ability to exist or not?

ok, I totally agree with you.
Can i rest now? 😅

Maynman:
Why do you think a god like zeus has the ability to exist or not?
Why do you think any marvel character has the ability to exist or not.

No one is talking about God of zeus here or marble characters.

See please, I don't have the energy for back and forth

jaephoenix:
Good. You said the proposer of phlogiston based it on logic. Is religion based on logic?

There's nothing absolutely wrong in being wrong. I use to be an atheist myself until I encountered strong argument about deism on quora that revealed the flaws in my reasoning.
Atheism is not correct, Agnosticism is the best approach.

The issue with most atheists is that they cannot handle being disproved. It the same thing that happens to theists. If you were a theist before now and you left, you should also leave atheism when you see a superior argument. It's what I did.
The decision is yours to make

I do not have the energy for long debates anymore, it's why I am not engaging much here.

Maynman:
How did you come up with a thing, that’s that powerful, with all his attributes and also doesn’t interfere?
Using monotheism thoughts?
Then which particular god? Yahweh?

I was an atheist, everyone knows that. After encountering deism, I had no option that to turn to Agnosticism because I change my ideas when I see new development.

I don't argue for argument sake. Until someone proves or disproves a deisric God, atheism remains a flaw

Maynman:
Which of the gods?

deistic god. The one that doesn't interfere

Maynman:
You don’t know what “atheism” means, yea maybe they can help you out.

is good to see you on this thread, being scared of outrightly saying that God doesn't exist because you have seen a superior argument.
🤣🤣🤣

Maynman:
How did you come with a deistic theos?

Why is the question so difficult for you to answer? 😂😂🙂

Maybe unknownunknown, Bacteriologist or LordReed can help out

Same thing I was trying to explain to Maynman yesterday