₦airaland Forum

Maynman:
The start of this argument is you using that logic, then let’s start afresh, it seems you don’t even believe the logic, you cherrypick it when you need it

So you have no evidence of Darwin using fossils as evidence.

I am right when say that Atheism is not really different from theism. But have no evidence for anything they claim

Maynman:
According to your logic too
You see how amusing the logic is?

So hawking didn't provide evidence for hwaking radiation.

Good to know that we are on the same page

Maynman:
I’m using your logic, is it only meant for theists?

Then use your logic to give me evidence that hawking provided evidence for hwaking radiation since you made the claim and he did.

Maynman:
Which of the gods?

atleast one of these Gods can exist since an absence of evidence is not evidence for absence according to you.
😂😂

Maynman:
Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

I really cannot believe that an atheist would be force to say this 😂

Maynman:
Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

Dude, you shot yourself here 😂😂

Maynman:
Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

does this also apply to God?

Maynman:
Atheism is the opposite of theism, you don’t know? Bwahahahah

of the same coin

Maynman:
So, He just woke up one day and made a blank statement, i see.

If that's not the case, then show me evidence of him providing evidence

Maynman:
Show me that he did not, absence of evidence is not evidence of absent abi

does that also apply to God?

Maynman:
You said nothing, Philosopher means lover of wisdow. He was a physicists.

He just woke up one day and made a blank statement, i see.

So show me the evidence Hawking provided for hawking radiation.

I am still waiting

Maynman:
Exactly 😁

So if you say Darwin provided fossil evidence, show me that he did.

Maynman:
Show me where he did not.

you see why I said atheist are theists are different sides of same coin?
😂

Maynman:
Show me where he did not.

you are sounding like a theist now 😂

Maynman:
I thought he was a physicists not a philosopher

Well, I surprise you don't know that theoretical physicists are scientific philosophers.

Is that not why you cannot provide any evidence he himsldf provided. You would have seen it on thr internet iif it is available

Maynman:
yes.

show me where he provided fossil evidence in his paper, origin of species 😂😂😂

Maynman:
What year?
What about the other evidence written there?

So Darwin provided fossil evidence in his paper. Right 😂😂

I am done with you.

Maynman:
He formulated base on philosophical reasoning bwahahahah

I think so, you can prove me wrong by showing me his evidence

Maynman:
You mean he woke up one day and made a blank statement?

So Darwin knew about fossils? Lol 😂

Maynman:
You mean hawking woke up one day and claim there is “Hawking radiation”, and went back to bed, that’s all he did?
No definition? No workings just blank statement is what is called “hypothesis” bwahahahah

I think, I think he woke and formulated it based on his philosophical reasoning because he didn't provide evidence.

Why is it difficult for you to show me the evidence he provided?

Maynman:
How did he arrive at the hypothesis by making a blank statement like you did?

I don't know, that's why I am asking.

It seems that you know.

So tell us his evidence and his experiments.

Maynman:
Answer my question first, You mean hawking woke up one day and claim there is “Hawking radiation”, and went back to bed, that’s all he did?
He just made a blank statement like you did? No workings of how he arrived at it?

That’s how hypothesis work?

what evidence did hwaking provide for hawking radiation and what experiment did he perform to reach the conclusion?

Tell me

LordReed:
It's not an analogy. Scientists can demonstrate that the idea of causality can be disrupted at the quantum level. If as is being surmised the big bang was a result of a disturbance in the quantum foam then it is possible there was no cause since the chain of cause and effect can be shown to be different from what we are familiar with. Now I am not saying that is what happened I am just saying that is a possibility we might need to get our heads around.

I don't also think Harbour the idea of casualty because it creates a huge problem but my point is that no one know what actually happened, no one should reach a conclusion.
No one can know what happened then.

Maynman:
Answer my question first, You mean hawking woke up one day and claim there is “Hawking radiation”, and went back to bed, that’s all he did?
He just made a blank statement like you did? No workings of how he arrived at it?

tell em the evidence that hawking provided.

I am willing to learn.

Also tell me the evidence that Einstein provided for his ideas of relativity.

Maynman:
Darwin provided evidence for his hypothesis, he even cited other people’s work. He didn’t wake one day and make a blank statement like you did.

Evolution by natural selection was a hypothesis until 1950 when all evidence gathered by many scientist has been analyzed, not until then it was made a theory.
This is 78 years after the death of Darwin

Maynman:
You mean hawking woke up one day and claim there is “Hawking radiation”, and went back to bed, that’s all he did?

You tell me the evidence that he provide for it.

Also tell me the evidence that Einstein provide for relativity.

I am waiting

Maynman:
He provided tons of evidence, darwin didn’t wake up one day and make a blank statement like you did.

ok,

What evidence did hawking provide for hawking radiation when he proposed it? Tell me

Maynman:
Darwin was not to first to work on evolution, he didn’t wake up one day and claim there’s evolution.

do you even know what an experiment is?

Darwin did not test his ideas. He never did, he didn't know how to.

Other scientists did it and natural selection proven when he had died

Maynman:
Didn’t he work on animals, travelling round the globe? And documenting his evidence.
He didn’t make a blank statement telling people to disprove it, he showed workings of how he arrived at it!

His documentation are his observations and the proposal.

He never provide evidence for us to test. Other scientists after him designed experiments to test his proposal. Some passed, some failed.

Darwin never tested evolution in any lab. He never called any speicmen that was analyzed in a lab and repeated tested. Others did it

Maynman:
Darwin provided tons of evidence, it was those evidence that other scientists work on.
He didn’t wake up one day and say evolution exist without explaining how he arrive at it.

Darwin provided tons of observations. No evidence.

He wasn't even a scientists, he doesn't know much about experimental methods. It's fact

Maynman:
He provided mass of evidence for his work, he didn’t make a blank statement telling people to disprove it.

Darwin ideas was not proven in one day, it took years of gathering evidence. It was finally a scientific theory when he died.

Maynman:
He provided mass of evidence for his work, he didn’t make a blank statement telling people to disprove it.

Ok, let me ask you a question.
What experiment did darwin design?
Tell me

In science, do you reach conclusions without an experiment?

If you go ot the other cksms about Einstein and Hawking, you will discover that those guys made claims that other proved