₦airaland Forum

smokinloud:
This is just your opinion.
Do you care to check what the constitution says?.

Yes i know, they constitution na rubbish.

The constitution is basically telling us to fight dirty to defend our polling units.
If we do werey reach where INEC dey, them go cancel everything

LegendHero:
Me o, I engage based on how I am being engaged with.

Today on this thread, all of us composed ourselves and I wish it could continue like this.

But on other thread we could all bring the abuse and tribalist comments depending on the kind of engagement from the other side.

Let's hope we can keep this tempo but I doubt it.

lol

LegendHero:
That is what Tinubu always tell his supporters.

Jagaban will always tell you that voting itself is not as important as staying to guard your vote.

I love the way you are engaging us even as a Tinubu supporter. You are mature, we don't need all these name calling and tribal dish that most of Jagaban people do here.

We can disagree on this and still be friends na

JAMO84:
Evidence 1. Nobody can rig against PDP in Ede north and Ede South LGs, it's Adeleke hometown


Evidence 2. PDP won massively in the polling units where over voting were recorded

Nope, I beg to disagree.

You can rig anywhere if you can buy the parry agents or the INEC officials. It's all about pricing

zionstaar75:
if u can spell correctly maybe I'll have engaged u in a sensible argument but I can't even read what you're typing, so I will go and give another party extra votes to win so I can shout overvoting, what if I don't succeed in proving it or the court overlooks it.you should read what you're typing to see if it makes sense we're just in January but this will definitely be a contender for dumbest post of the year surely

it's all typo.

Now how did they know that APC didn't sponsor overvoting?

Answer that or get lost

dustmalik:
BVAS may just be the greatest disaster in our electoral system yet

nope it's not,

There's need for improvement. Just added the names if those who voted to ballot paper so it can tally with what's register on BVAS, the overvoted ballot paper wk be easily detected. It's common sense

yemex04:
May be another litigation sponsored by PDP can unravel the possibilities of that but in this case, APC through their witnesses, exhibits & evidences have been able to establish a ground for the Nullification of the Election that brought in Adeleke.. I believe determining whether APC sponsored the said overvoting was not part of the petition before the Tribunal

then they should get to appeal court.

Who even pass that useless bill?
This country no Wan work

SmartPolician:
TBH, this report is not detailed, so I look forward to seeing the published verdict and reading it word for word.

yes na, APC can even sponsor overvoting in those places

yemex04:
May be another litigation sponsored by PDP can unravel the possibilities of that but in this case, APC through their witnesses, exhibits & evidences have been able to establish a ground for the Nullification of the Election that brought in Adeleke.. I believe determining whether APC sponsored the said overvoting was not part of the petition before the Tribunal

It's a matter of arguments now because there's every possibility that APC can sponsor overvoting there

Shantyken:
APC NO DO ANYTHING
Adeleke no Sabi rig election

do you have evidence that APC didn't sponsor overvoting for this PUs to be cancelled?

zionstaar75:
and u can't see how senseless your argument is?do u know the meaning of overvoting?the people that voted are more than the registered voters.so apc will carry people that are not registered in ede (a pdp stronghold to vote till 7pm and the indigenes will be looking at them?even if its primary 6 that your education ended u shouldn't think like this

Now let's see who's senseless.

Stop all these PDP Strongholds shit, the power of incumbency cs be used to sponsor overvoting in PDP Strongholds if they can properly use thug and induce inec staffs.

Those who will vote will be random people Tha won't be captured by BVAS, can you think?
Yo don't have a working brain?

seunmsg:
It is the duty of the winning party to defend their victory. So, if your argument is correct, PDP should have proved beyond reasonable doubt to the tribunal that APC was responsible for the over voting and it was done deliberately to cause the cancellation of votes in the affected units. PDP fvcking had over 5 months to make all these arguments at the tribunal but they failed to do so.

Like I told you before, you can still join Adeleke’s legal team in pursuing the case at the Appeal Court. You will have the opportunity to prove this your funny argument before the justices of the Appeal Court. Best of luck, buddy.

So now, you agree with me that overvoting can be sponsored?
You see that you are the fool here.

Nice lecturkng you.

The court does not have any evidence that APC didn't sponsor those overvoting.

Pymetrics:
The polling unit of the overvoted votes were declared null and void. It was cancelled totally. So the remaining Poling units across the state won the number for Oyetola.

Be smart next time.

So I can actually sponsor overvoting in your strongholds so it cs be cancelled and I will get an advantage.

So how did the court know they APC didn't sponsor. The court is stupid

yemex04:
They don't have to Target a particular's party's votes they usually will cancel all votes in polling units where over voting is established.. So I guess in this case overvoting was established as per APC's petition in polling Units located in PDPs strongolds

How did they know that APC didn't sponsor those overvoting so the PUs can be cancelled since they are losing there?

BluntCrazeMan:
Think deeply about your plans..

Now, explain to me how your plans would ever be possible..


I am waiting for your analysis.

for example, if I am Hope Uzodinma with Incumbent power in Imo state, I use the power of incumbency, brute force, inducement of inec officials and otherwise to sponsor overvoting in some PUs in Imo state so they can be canceled against LP.

Is it rocket science?

Tareq1105:
The 2022 Electoral Law says that where over voting is established the results of the polling unit should be cancelled. That's what happens and both in fact all the parties were affected. PDP appears to be more affected especially in Ede area where over voting was significantly established.

So I can sponsor overvoting in your strongholds to rig the election?

How did the court know that APC didn't sponsor the overvoting so those PUs can be canceled.
. Shey you guys no dey reason?

IgOga:
typical nairaland illiterate analysis.....700+ PUs....the law doesn't care whether it's apc or pdp or labour....if it is overvoting the law says cancel it.....in 2018 the law says conduct rerun.....but no more rerun

good, now you are getting it.

So I can sponsor overvoting in your strongholds for you to lose?

Who's dumb now? 🤣

That's a stupid law, both you and the law are dumb

kay1one:
The question is how will the over voting be done with bvas and PVCs?

So only people with PVC registered in a polling unit can vote. Can there be double voting? If not, then they should know the votes which appeared twice.

If I send thugs to a polling unit to over vote, the bvas should say that I've voted somewhere already and disallow me from voting.

the overvoting will not be captured by BVAS. They will jusy thumbprint ballot papers, that's all.

Is that not stupid? And INEC go cancel am

nedu666:
The tribunal should have ordered a rerun not delve to determining which party did the over voting. Apc did not score zero in the wards where there was over voting so how did tribunal determine that since pdp won in those pu, it must be their over voting. This is a repeat of imo state all over. Courts should not award results

yes, a rerun should have been the logic.

Which one is cancel, what rubbish?

BluntCrazeMan:
The Tribunal accepted the BVAS Accreditation report which APC presented.
Thus, all those 1,700+plus polling-units where it was established that there was over-voting were totally cancelled., And thus, the whole of the other remaining polling-units were re-calculated.

So I can sponsor overvoting in opposition stronghold and INEC will jusy cancel it.

Ridiculous 😂

seunmsg:
If you are smart, you should know by now that the court never said PDP was responsible for the over voting. It is not the business of the court to decide on which party was responsible for the over voting or not. The business of the court is to decide whether over voting took place or not and the evidence before the court showed clearly that there was over voting. That’s why all the vote cast in the affected polling units were voided. PDP, APC, LP, ADC, SDP etc votes were all voided and not just PDP votes alone.

I hope I have rescued you from your ignorance.

Yes, you get it by little, I know you re not that stupid.

So if in polling unit X, you are winning, I can sponsor overvoting there, knowing fully well that it will be canceled? Right and you become the outright loser

Learn to think, no be everything be noise for nairaland

Patrotism:
Wrong analysis,
The actual thing is that the total areas where over-vote was ascertained were totally cancelled and deducted from the total vote cast, thereby denying all contestants votes from those areas and benefits of crime.

good, so I can sponsor overvoting in your strongholds to make you lose. Because inec will eventually cancel them.

Lol, this election na fraud.
How are you sure APC did not deliberately sponsor overvoting?

LegendHero:
It is not that easy like you are making it seem.

I think what Adeleke played on was that BVAS was still at the initial stage then so they are not able to fully understand the gravity of that overvoting.

What politicians that sabi the game are doing is more of vote buying rather than actually tempting BVAS with overvoting.

it's very easy to induce inec staffs to cause overvoting.

What are you saying?

Unless you stand there until results are transmitted. Who says they cannot do it in some of this hinterlands.

It's very easy

Peacecore:
Jesus! Which kain mumu thinking be dis one

APC can still overvote without winning. It's common sense

Total accredited voters 3000
APC 150
PDP 200

Toral vote cast 350.

On what ground would you say that the overvoting must have came from PDP?

Is this not why we should start printing allowing people to write the names on their voters card on their ballot paper before voting?

LegendHero:
It is a simple logic.

Why should Oyetola go and sponsor overvoting in the region where Adeleke is strong to his own detriment? You mean Oyetola will agree that people should overvote in Ede in support of Adeleke?

It's very possible, there's nothing money cannot achieve. This election is fraud.

I can sponsor overvoting in your polling unit for it to be cancelled 😂😂☺️

Shit men. It Means that we have to be extremely vigilant. Very vigilant

Johnnyessence:
you are very right bro

for example if am APC and I know that PDP has won x polling unit, I can just do overvoting there for that polling unit to be canceled.


This election is very rigable

OlujobaSamuel:
The total votes cast in areas of over voting will be cancelled.
The reason why it favors a party A compared to B is that A is likely to challenge results from B stronghold which will play a significant role in B total result while the result of A to be deducted is insignificant to have any impact

So it means that, if I am losing in a polling unit, I can sponsor overvoting, so that polling unit can be canceled?

Am I right?
This process is shit after all

Patrotism:
It is because the tribunal cannot ascertain which group actually over-voted that they simply cancelled the over votes and deducted them from the total vote cast. After the deduction and recounting, Oyetola emerged the winner.
This is similar to Edo State in the case of Oshiomhole

So it mens that APC cs deliberately overvote in their blind spots to sabotage the process.
Do you now see the issue with the process?

It's not credible

BluntCrazeMan:
The Electoral Law stated that all those Polling-units should be totally cancelled..

So, they cancelled all those Polling-units.

Both PDP and APC were affected.

Guy be smart.

Total accredited voters 3000
APC 150
PDP 200

Toral vote cast 350.

On what ground would you say that the overvoting must have came from PDP?

How would you know the overvoting figures that each parties contributed to make 50 if voters don't write their names of ballot paper?

Educate me

BluntCrazeMan:
The Electoral Law stated that all those Polling-units should be totally cancelled..

So, they cancelled all those Polling-units.

Both PDP and APC were affected.

How did they know the figure combination?

How?

Gandrova:
Sniper is just hundred naira

Na you go drink am, if Oyetola was sacked by tribunal but he was still governor for 4 Years, same as Ikpeazu. E dey play

Since the names of voters are not captured on ballot papers to be able to cross check with the BVAS register on whom they voted for. How did they know which party overvoted.

For example:
APC can still overvote without winning. It's common sense

Total accredited voters 300
APC 150
PDP 200

Toral vote cast 350.

On what ground will tribunal the ay that the overvoting must have came from PDP and APC wasn't involved?

Is this not why we should start printing people to write the names on their voters card on the ballot paper before voting?

How did they know how many figures PDP added and APC did? How can they just cancel all when it's possible that APC sponsored the overvoting to disqualify those polling units? Since they are already losing there.


This constitution is basically telling us to fight and kill ourselves to defend our polling units.