2ND SEMESTER EXAM. On Amaechi Vs Jonathan

CHM 215 (THERMODYNAMICS­­ OF POLICTICAL CHEMISTRY)

TIME ALLOWED: 72 Hours.

QUESTION 1.

In a reaction involving 19g of Amaechium sulphate and 16g of Jangline carbonate, 2015g of Forumium Governo acid was produced.

i. Calculate the percentage purity of the product, assuming the reaction took place under JEGA standard condition.

ii. Assuming that 3g of Akpabio Chloride was added using Goodluckium solution, calculate the mass of Amaechium sulphate that would have been needed for the reaction to be endothermic?

iii. What is the colour of Akpabio Chloride before and after the reaction?

iv. Calculate the molecular weight of the reactants and products with respect to their places on the electrochemical­­ series of quality leadership and state which is stronger.

v. Using their age, prove that Jangline is weak and would need more solution of Goodluckium nitrate to be able to precipitate Amaechium from the reaction.

vi. Why is it that the solution produced can't react with APCium Nitrate but would react violently with Turkia PDP (5) Jonite?

Goodluck to you! Your time starts now !!! HAPPY "DEMOCRAZY" oh sorry DEMOCRACY DAY!!!

This paper hard oooo! The time is too short! Can we bring in our materials for assistance?

Who has answered no 2? Who na?

Mod front page pls.. We need more answers to this question

In a reaction involving 19g of Amaechium sulphate and 16g of Jangline carbonate, 2015g of Forumium Governo acid was produced.
i. Calculate the percentage purity of the product, assuming the reaction took placeunder JEGA standard condition.

Product really unpure: 18% impure Jangline Forumium Governate and Unknown/hiding quantity of grumbling Amaechium Forumium Governate.


ii. Assuming that 3g of Akpabio Chloride was added using Goodluckium solution, calculate the mass of Amaechium sulphate that would have been needed for the reaction to be endothermic?


Infinisimally large amount of Amaechium sulphate is needed as Goodluckium solution is a black hole that swallows all matter.



iii. What is the colour of Akpabio Chloride before and after the reaction?


Normal brown colour before the reaction, White, then blue, then after some phone calls became normal brown after the reaction.



iv. Calculate the molecular weight of the reactants and products with respect to their places on the electrochemical ­­ series of quality leadership and state which is stronger.


Amaechium sulphate has a molecular weight of 1 while Jangline carbonate has a molecular weight of 92 or more or more (Veto power)



v. Using their age, prove that Jangline is weak and would need more solution of Goodluckium nitrate to be able to precipitate Amaechium from the reaction.


The solution is the square root of a complex number, does not correlate, if in doubt ask old Mr Fix-it of NPA or young Dimeji Bankole who stole 40Billion and walked.




vi. Why is it that the solution produced can't react with APCium Nitrate but would react violently with Turkia PDP (5) Jonite?


The product can't go near APCium Nitrate because it read the confession of Tunde Bakere. There are no progressive properties in APCium

wao this CHM215 is such an interesting exam that the true result can only be fully determined after the exam.

adebaxton: 2ND SEMESTER EXAM. On Amaechi Vs Jonathan

CHM 215 (THERMODYNAMICS­­ OF POLICTICAL CHEMISTRY)

TIME ALLOWED: 72 Hours.

QUESTION 1.

In a reaction involving 19g of Amaechium sulphate and 16g of Jangline carbonate, 2015g of Forumium Governo acid was produced.

i. Calculate the percentage purity of the product, assuming the reaction took place under JEGA standard condition.

ii. Assuming that 3g of Akpabio Chloride was added using Goodluckium solution, calculate the mass of Amaechium sulphate that would have been needed for the reaction to be endothermic?

iii. What is the colour of Akpabio Chloride before and after the reaction?

iv. Calculate the molecular weight of the reactants and products with respect to their places on the electrochemical­­ series of quality leadership and state which is stronger.

v. Using their age, prove that Jangline is weak and would need more solution of Goodluckium nitrate to be able to precipitate Amaechium from the reaction.

vi. Why is it that the solution produced can't react with APCium Nitrate but would react violently with Turkia PDP (5) Jonite?

Goodluck to you! Your time starts now !!! HAPPY "DEMOCRAZY" oh sorry DEMOCRACY DAY!!!

In a reaction involving 19g of Amaechium sulphate and 16g of Jangline carbonate, 2015g of Forumium Governo acid was produced.

i. Calculate the percentage purity of the product, assuming the reaction took place under JEGA standard condition.

Answers:
The product is not only impure, but unstable radioactive substance, which quickly decomposes to a more stable Jang Forumium, releasing a colourless, pungent Amaechium monoxide. The instability in the reaction makes it even more difficulty to calculate the percentage (im)purity.

ii. Assuming that 3g of Akpabio Chloride was added using Goodluckium solution, calculate the mass of Amaechium sulphate that would have been needed for the reaction to be endothermic?

Akpabio Chloride and Goodluckium solution induce endothermic reaction when used as reactants or catalysts. Same cannot be said of Amaechium sulphate, which is known for its very combustive exothermic reactions. It's preferably to use a different compound/element i.e. Shemaline Solution or Isagen. To answer the question, only 0g of Amaechium sulphate will ensure an endothermic reaction.

iii. What is the colour of Akpabio Chloride before and after the reaction?

As a catalyst, Akpabio Chloride transitioned from cool blue, to red hot, colourless, and finally to brown.

iv. Calculate the molecular weight of the reactants and products with respect to their places on the electrochemical­­ series of quality leadership and state which is stronger.

Due to the highly exothermic nature of the the reaction, and the radioactive, and gaseous nature of the product, it is safe to conclude that even though the reactants were physically transformed, Jang Forumium is heavier than the initial Jangline Carbonate. The gaseous Amaechium monoxide lost more weight compared to the initial Amaechium sulphate. Going further, Akpabio Chloride, a catalyst lost color, but not substance. Goodluckium solution appears to have weathered the reaction, especially by being remotely involved, and being higher up in the electrochemical series.

v. Using their age, prove that Jangline is weak and would need more solution of Goodluckium nitrate to be able to precipitate Amaechium from the reaction.

Jangline carbonate is weak; but the radioactive product - Jang Forumium, is in much better position to react positively with other reactants. Nevertheless, a generous dose of Goodluckium nitrate will ensure further release of the inert, colourless, but pungent Amaechium monoxide from the product.

vi. Why is it that the solution produced can't react with APCium Nitrate but would react violently with Turkia PDP (5) Jonite?

APCium Nitrate generally attracts loose, unstable, and weak electrons or ions, forming unstable but convenient bonds with such. APCium Nitrate, though an inorganic compound, is however known to react with both organic and inorganic compounds simply to increase it's mass and power, and aid it up the reactivity series. It would not react with the PRO PDP product of the reaction, unless it can lash on to unstable ions, electrons, or atoms, such as the now colourless, pungent smelling, inert, gaseous Amaechium monoxide!

Now, 'Develop your marking scheme, and mark us!

PointB:




In a reaction involving 19g of Amaechium sulphate and 16g of Jangline carbonate, 2015g of Forumium Governo acid was produced.



Answers:
The product is not only impure, but unstable radioactive substance, which quickly decomposes to a more stable Jang Forumium, releasing a colourless, pungent Amaechium monoxide. The instability in the reaction makes it even more difficulty to calculate the percentage (im)purity.





Akpabio Chloride and Goodluckium solution induce endothermic reaction when used as reactants or catalysts. Same cannot be said of Amaechium sulphate, which is known for its very combustive exothermic reactions. It's preferably to use a different compound/element i.e. Shemaline Solution or Isagen. To answer the question, only 0g of Amaechium sulphate will ensure an endothermic reaction.


As a catalyst, Akpabio Chloride transitioned from cool blue, to red hot, colourless, and finally to brown.



Due to the highly exothermic nature of the the reaction, and the radioactive, and gaseous nature of the product, It is safe to conclude that even though the reactants were physically transform, Jang Forumium is heavier that the initial Jangline Carbonate. The gaseous Amaechium monoxide lost more weight compared to the initial Amaechium sulphate. Going further, Akpabio Chloride, a catalyst lost color, but not substance. Goodluckium solution appears to have weathered the reaction, especially by being remotely involved, and being higher up in the electrochemical series.



Jangline carbonate is weak; but the radioactive product - Jang Forumium, is in much better position to react positively with other reactants. Nevertheless, a generous dose of Goodluckium nitrate will ensure further release of the inert, colourless, but pungent Amaechium monoxide from the product.



APCium Nitrate generally attracts loose, unstable, and weak electrons or ions, forming unstable but convenient bond with such. APCium Nitrate, though an inorganic compound, is however known to react with both organic and inorganic compounds simply to increase it's mass and power, and aid it up the reactivity series. It would not react with the PRO PDP product of the reaction, unless it can lash on to unstable ions, electrons, or atoms, such as the now colourless, pungent smelling, inert, gaseous Amaechium monoxide!

Now, 'Develop your marking scheme, and mark us!

This was rigged

ogb5:

This was rigged

lol. Sure?