Wednesday, 25 September 2013 11:01

As the crisis in Syria drags on with no end in sight, the double-standard policies of the claimants of human rights and democracy are becoming further exposed to the world every passing day. In a classic example of hypocrisy, the western regimes, who have supplied their terrorist operatives in Syria with internationally banned chemical weapons, are instead alleging that it was the government of President Bashar al-Assad that used toxics to gas to death people in Ghouta suburb of Damascus.

In a bid to justify their intervention in Syria the media horns of the West are indulging in a massive disinformation campaign, while at the same time they are ignoring the inhuman crimes of the Salafis and other al-Qaeda affiliates against the Syrian people. If only one single citizen of a western country was to be subjected to the crimes the Salafi terrorists are committing against the hapless people of Syria, the propaganda machines of the West would have resorted to a hue and cry on a grand scale. It is worth recalling that during the American occupation of Iraq when a few nationals of certain western countries were taken hostage by the Salafis who heinously killed some of them, the US resorted to a massive propaganda tirade against the perpetrators.

Now the Salafis in Syria are committing acts of terrorism, far greater in magnitude than what they did in Iraq, but the western media is simply ignoring these atrocities. In view of these facts, US president, Barak Obama’s address at the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, regarding his tirade against the government of Syria, was nothing but trash.

Two main reasons could be citied for the double-standard policies of the self-styled defenders of human rights and democracy. The first is the colonial tendency of dominating others, and the second is the fear of the dynamism of Islam, which is attracting people in the West itself. Over the past two decades, the western world led by the US has interfered in various countries under the guise of humanitarian operations.

On the pretext of the ill-defined war against terror, Afghanistan was mercilessly pounded and occupied. Iraq was subjected to the same measures on the false charge of possessing weapons of mass destruction. Almost on a daily basis, drones are raining down death and destruction of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen on the pretext of fighting terrorist groups. The plot is to portray the Godless terrorists as ‘Islamists’ in a bid to tarnish the image of Islam, so that people develop a negative attitude towards Muslims and Islam. In Syria, the hapless people have become the targets of both the Salafi terrorists and certain western regimes.

It is obvious for all that while claiming to rescue the Syrian people from the government of Bashar al-Assad, western regimes, despite their pretension to democracy and human rights are turning a blind eye to the most inhuman crimes being committed by the Salafis in Syria.

The irony is that the western regimes are providing all sorts of support to the terrorists, including political, financial and military. Without the support of western regimes and their regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the Salafis could not have fought the Syrian army for the past two and a half years. It is also an undeniable fact that most of those fighting the Syrian government are mercenaries assembled from various countries of the world and trained in camps in Turkey and Jordan by the western regimes themselves for killing the innocent people of Syria.

In view of this reality, isn’t it hypocrisy for the US and the West to support these inhuman Salafi terrorists, while pretending to sympathize with the Syrian people by accusing the Syrian government of the use of chemical weapons? The questions that arise here are: Are the Salafis really Muslims? Does their behavior tally with the teachings of Islam? What kind of jihad is this, when their victims are fellow Muslims while their backers are the archenemies of Islam? The answers are obvious, and it is clear that the Salafis have nothing to do with Islam. They are nothing but the creation of the US and the Zionists.

The Messenger of Mercy, Prophet Mohammad (SAWA) told Muslims be kind and compassionate, not just each other, but towards non-Muslims as well. AS the Prophet of peace, he strove for social justice and practically taught us how to behave even towards captives. Imam Ali (AS) the 1st Infallible Heir of Prophet Mohammad (SAWA), in the last moments of his blissful life, after being struck on the head by the poisonous sword of a renegade, advices his family and followers to treat his assassin in a just manner.

How could Islam with such leaders who are the symbol of mercy, kindness and forgiveness, be an advocate of violence, including the decapitation or the burning alive of persons, and the tearing out of their bodily organs for eating them raw? How can a Muslim hang infants and adolescents as a form of vengeance against the parents? History bears witness that among the reasons behind the rapid spread of Islam was the exemplary behaviour of the Prophet towards one and all, including his opponents. In the initial years of his mission in Mecca, he was exposed to severe harassment.

For instance, there was a Jew who used to throw trash at the Prophet whenever he happened to pass by his house. One day, while passing by the Jew’s house, when nothing was thrown at him, the Prophet enquired the reason and was told that the Jew was sick and bedridden. The Prophet promptly decided to visit the Jew to enquire about his health. When the Jew saw such a kind behavior on the part of the part of the Prophet, he decided to embrace the truth of Islam.

Islamic history is full of such cases which speak volume of the humanitarian aspects of Islam and Muslims. This means that the Islam to which the Salafis lay claim is a completely distorted cult. When Islam never permits Muslims to call the opponents as infidels or to harass them, how could it endorse the killing of fellow Muslims? Jihad in Islam has been permitted only when the religion, territory and honor of Muslims are exposed to aggression.

When Prophet Mohammad (SAWA) returned to his hometown Mecca eight years after migration, he declared general amnesty for all, including those that had plotted against his life and warred against him. He proclaimed as a place of refuge, the house of his archenemy Abu Sufian, who had imposed the battles of Badr, Ohad, and Khandaq upon him. Even Hend the wicked wife of Abu Sufian was granted amnesty despite her heinous act on the Day of Ohad in chewing raw the liver of the Prophet’s uncle Hamza whose body was savagely cut on her orders by her slave Wahshi.

It is thus clear that the Salafis do not follow the instructions of Prophet Mohammad (SAWA), but are followers of the pagan Arabs, as is evident from their barbarism in Syria. This is all part of the devilish designs of Global Arrogance to distort the image of Islam, through their mercenaries the Salafis, who are igniting sectarian conflicts and desecrating the shrines of the Ahl al-Bayt, in order to promote American and Zionist interests.

http://english.irib.ir/radioislam/top-stories/articles/item/164394-salafi-crimes-and-the-west’s-double-standards

The wahhabi have effectively cheated the west that they are moderates and need support. We call that taqqiya. But say why do Shia kill Sunni in Iraq. Which the Main stream media report as sectarian strife? Why are Shia killing Sunnis in the whole of the Arab world? Revenge? So if its for revenge does the holy book justify killing innocents in another part of the world just because say the Burmese muslims are being killed by buddhists for instance?

basilico: The wahhabi have effectively cheated the west that they are moderates and need support. We call that taqqiya. But say why do Shia kill Sunni in Iraq. Which the Main stream media report as sectarian strife? Why are Shia killing Sunnis in the whole of the Arab world? Revenge? So if its for revenge does the holy book justify killing innocents in another part of the world just because say the Burmese muslims are being killed by buddhists for instance?

Hello basilico. Do u still remember me on your thread in Aug,that was hidden?

Salaam LagosShia. These salafis are muslims right?, then if your report is true where do they get their teachings from? I mean no where does Qur'an ask us go shedding blood. And saudi arabia having a hand in the whole conspiracy rings a bell. I learn't majority of saudi arabia is covered by sunnis

basilico: The wahhabi have effectively cheated the west that they are moderates and need support. We call that taqqiya. But say why do Shia kill Sunni in Iraq. Which the Main stream media report as sectarian strife? Why are Shia killing Sunnis in the whole of the Arab world? Revenge? So if its for revenge does the holy book justify killing innocents in another part of the world just because say the Burmese muslims are being killed by buddhists for instance?

you must be very silly,uninformed or ignorant for you to say it is the Shia killing Sunnis in Shia majority Iraq.

have you never seen the thread below or you are just trying to be a nuisance? :

A Timeline Of Sectarian Terrorism Against Shia Muslims
https://www.nairaland.com/961495/timeline-sectarian-terrorism-against-shia

usermane: Salaam LagosShia. These salafis are muslims right?, then if your report is true where do they get their teachings from? I mean no where does Qur'an ask us go shedding blood. And saudi arabia having a hand in the whole conspiracy rings a bell. I learn't majority of saudi arabia is covered by sunnis

Salafists/Wahhabis claim to be part of Ahlus-Sunnah Wal Jama'ah (popularly referred to as Sunnis),thus you see the name of "boko haram" is "Jama'ah Ahlus-Sunnah lid'dawati wal jihad" (meaning "sunni people for propagation and jihad" ).the Wahhabi school of thought is prevalent in Saudi Arabia and it is a salafist group.as for where they got their teachings,they got those lethal teachings from the teachings of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdul-Wahab.

IBN TAYMIYYAH:

First Ibn Taimiyah’s Fatwa - Those that reject Allah (swt)’s sitting on a throne should be executed

Ibn Taimiyah cascades the following teachings in his esteemed book Majmo’a al-Fatawa, Volume 5, page 391:
"Imam Aba Bakr Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Khuzaima said: ‘Whoever does not admit that Allah is sitting on a throne above the seventh sky, is a Kafir and his blood must be shed. He must be made to repent. Otherwise his neck must be struck and thrown into the garbage.’'


Second Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa - Those that reject that Allah (swt) will be seen in the next world should be executed

We read in Majmo’a al-Fatawa, Volume 6 page 500:
"Aba Abdillah said: ‘Whoever claims that Allah cannot be seen (by eye sight) in the hereafter, is a Kafir and has rejected Quran and replied Allah (sw). He must be made to repent. Otherwise he should be killed".

Third Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa - Those that recite Niya loudly during Salat should be executed

Majmo’a al-Fatawa, Volume 22 page 236:
"To recite the intention (niya) loudly is not permissible according to the Muslim scholars, nor did the Prophet (s), Caliphs or Sahaba, Salaf or Imams perform it. Whoever claims it is Wajib, he must be taught the law and then to repent from that opinion. If he insists on it then he must be killed".


Fourth Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa – You can kill or enslave your opponents

We read in Al-Seyasa al-Shari'a by ibn Taimiyah, page 159:
"Therefore the "Shari'a" ("divine law" ) made the killing of the disbelievers obligatory, but didn’t make obligatory the killing of those who are captured during fights or other than fights such as falling from a ship or getting lost or kidnapped. Thus, the imam decided that the best option is to be killed or enslaved".

Fifth Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa – Those that don’t believe that Allah (swt) physically spoke to Musa (as) and Jibril (as) should be executed

Majmo’a al-Fatawa, Volume 12 page 502:
Sheikh al-Islam, may Allah's mercy be upon him was asked:
"A man says that Allah didn’t talk to Musa by Himself but He created a voice from the tree’s side and Musa (as) heard from the tree not from Allah and also Allah didn’t talk to Gabriel by the Quran, but he (Gabriel) took it from the Guarded Tablet. Is he right or not?

He answered:
Praise to Allah, he is not right, nay, he is misguided and a liar according to the agreement of Salaf and the Imams. Nay he is a Kafir and must repent or otherwise be killed".

Sixth Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa – Those that believe that a traveler can perform the complete Salat should be executed

Majmo’a al-Fatawa, Volume 22 page 31:
"Who ever said that the traveler has to pray four raka, hence he is as the one who say that the traveler has to fast in Ramadhan, both of these (opinions) are misguidance, and contrary to the ijma of Muslims, the one who say it must to repent, if he doesn’t he must be killed".

Seventh Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa – Those that believe that Qur’an is created should be executed

"Nay it is known from the Salaf Imams that Takfir be issued against anyone that says that Quran is created he must repent or otherwise be killed".

Eighth Ibn Taimiyah Fatwa – Those that believe in adherence to a particular Imam should be executed

“Anyone who believes that the people have to follow one particular Imam amongst those Imams not the others, must made to repent otherwise be killed”

Nineth Ibn Taimiyah actually killed those who disagreed with him

"We read in Al-Uqood al-Duria by Ibn Abdulhadi al-Maqdisi, Volume 1 page 197:
Sheikh Taqi al-Deen may Allah be pleased with him marched to Kerwanin in the beginning of Dulhujja in year 704 H and in his company was the prince Qaraqush.

Prince Jamal al-Deen al-Afram the deputy of the kingdom marched with the rest of soldiers of Damascus in the month of Muharam, in the year 705 H to invade them and exterminate them, and before he marched, there were some troops which had marched before him.

Thursday in 17th of Dulhujja, the deputy and soldiers arrived at Damascus after Allah granted them victory over the error party of Rafidah, Nusairia and those who held false beliefs. And Allah exterminated them from that lands, praise to Allah the Lord of worlds".


And say: The truth is from your Lord, so let him who please believe, and let him who please disbelieve (Holy Quran 18:29)

There is no compulsion in religion; truly the right way has become clearly distinct from error; (Holy Quran 2:256)

Contrary to this, ibn Taimiyah authored a single volume book "al-Sarem al-Maslool" comprising of 438 pages wherein he used:

-The word (kill) 978 times

-The word 'kafir' 56 times

-The word 'tourture' 48 times

-The word 'murtad' (apostate) 34 times

-The words 'his blood must be shed' 14 times

-The word 'behead' 8 times

-The word 'war' 7 times

IBN ABDUL-WAHAB:

“Regarding the one that says: ‘I do not declare enmity towards the disbelievers (Musrikeen)' or who declares enmity towards them but did not perform Takfir on them, or the one who says: 'I do not have conflict with people of La Ilaha lallah even if they committed Kufr, Shirk and opposed the religion of Allah' or who says: 'I do not object to the shrines’ this is not a Muslim”! (Majmuatu’l-Tawhid, Risalat Bayyan al-Najat Wal Fikak)

Redefining the meaning of La ilaha illallah and declaring the blood and wealth to be halaal of those who do not accept the new definition (Kitaab ut-Tawhid, ch. 5, pp. 19-21 Eng.; 12-14 of the Arabic).

Ibn `Abdul Wahhaab's statement in Kitaab ut-Tawhid (Arabic version printed by Daar ul-Iftaa, pp. 48-49; the English version translated by Ismaa'il al-Faruqi, Ch. 33, pp. 72-76):

'the kuffar who know their kufr are better in guidance than the believers,'


It is reported that Ibn 'Umar narrated: The Prophet said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." The Prophet again said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and Yemen." They said again, "Our Najd as well." On that the Prophet said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head of Satan." (Sahihul Bukhari Vol. 2, B. 17, No. 147)

Note: Ibn Abdul Wahab,the founder of Wahhabism is from Najd.

Ok, another sunni sect responsible for havoc and mischief? God willing, i will dig further to verify this, hard to believe they had a hand in Afghanista and Iraq 's fall. If it is so, how come we have been kept in the dark and all we know is the american government alone r responsible?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FZCptJvKK0

The problem we have here is convoluted. Saudi guys in so many ways are piloting islamic affairs world wide. Talk of hajj for instance. And what this video summarises is that a lot of things may have been kept hidden from muslims. This could just be a drop of the bucket. Well it is good u came up with the original post, we should be aware of the calibre of people we learn from, most particularly when it comes to islam. It might be too soon to draw conclusion, but jack, in every rumour, traces of truth could still be found. Got to investigate.