Illuminatus: What are you writing on? What is the topic of your project? What exactly do you need? Have you drafted out a Table of Contents?

DutchesSsS:



Yes, I have..

Left ventricular echocardiogram of subjects that consumes alcoholic beverages...

Illuminatus:
Aha. That sounds huge. I'm not a science student, but I'm a fairly good writer and I know how find things.
I suggest you read up on your project topic and all the contents. Go to the best Library in your area and read everything and anything you can find there. The internet is another great tool. You can find lots of stuff online. If you need help hunting things down online, ask and I could help.
Don't force yourself to write. Take a few hours rest doing other things and inspiration might strike you.
Finally, what exactly is the problem? Why did you stop Chapter 3? You didn't know what to write? Or you didn't know how to write it?

DutchesSsS:

Please, I don't know how to write a literature review and how exactly do I get materials online..I'm still on chapter 2. I don't know what to write and how to write it.....I'm really not close to any library at the moment..

DutchesSsS:



Please, I don't know how to write a literaturre review and how exactly do I get materials online..I'm still on chapter 2. I don't know what to write andd how to write it.....I'm really not close to any library at the moment..

Illuminatus:
What is the chapter two about?

tbaba1234:

What you trying to do in a literature review is to look for research that have been written related to the subject and state how your work adds to that body of knowledge.

The first thing, you need to do is to create a list of research papers you intend to use. . You can find useful research on Google. Read the abstract to get an idea of the conclusions. You can also scan through body of the document if it is available or you can buy.

Example:

"Renewable portfolio standards have effects on the carbon emissions, electricity cost and in the development of renewable energy. Palmer and Burtaw [2005], in their study on the cost of the renewable portfolio standard concluded that renewable portfolio standards increased electricity costs and reduced gas-fired generation. The study compared the effectiveness of renewable portfolio standards and renewable energy production tax credits in reducing carbon emissions and concluded the renewable portfolio standards are more cost- effective in reducing carbon emissions since renewable portfolio standards do a better job of reducing emissions without imposing costs on federal tax-payers. Another study on the renewable portfolio standards concluded that the projected increase in the electricity cost is modest; Chen et al [2007] looked at 28 RPS cost studies in 18 states and found out that electricity costs are expected to increase by less than 1% in 70% of the studies looked at. Hurlbut [2008] suggests in his study that the success of a renewable portfolio standard is dependent on knowing where the most cost-effective renewable sources are. Based on this, an understanding of where the most cost-effective wind sources in PJM could influence the success of renewable portfolio standards in the zone."

This is from my thesis... All the best..