The Bible uses an individual name/person to mask a whole multitude of people.

Daniel, Job and Noah are not individual men, They are just names used to call the Elect. They are depicted as individual men but in actuality, they are a number of individuals that have set themselves apart unto God. They are code names for Righteous Men.

[b]Ezekiel 14:13-18
Son of man, when the land sinneth against me by trespassing grievously, then will I stretch out mine hand upon it, and will break the staff of the bread thereof, and will send famine upon it, and will cut off man and beast from it:
14 Though these three men, Noah, Daniel, and Job, were in it, they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the Lord God.
15 If I cause noisome beasts to pass through the land, and they spoil it, so that it be desolate, that no man may pass through because of the beasts:
16 Though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord God, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters; they only shall be delivered, but the land shall be desolate.
17 Or if I bring a sword upon that land, and say, Sword, go through the land; so that I cut off man and beast from it:
18 Though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord God, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters, but they only shall be delivered themselves.[/b]

If Lot is not a single individual, it stands to reason that Abraham is also not a single individual (Gen 12:5), and it stands to reason, also, that Melchizedek is not a single individual too.

It stands to reason that any tracing of genealogy or ancestry or any relationships whatsoever, of singular men from Abraham is actually not referring to singular men.

By logical deduction, Adam, Isaac, Jacob, Esau, David, Solomon, etc etc, all the men mentioned in the Bible as having descended or who trace their ancestry from Abraham are not singular men but a multitude of God-fearing people. The Elect.

A. Any man traced from or related with Abraham (or Lot or Noah) in any way is not a single individual!
B. A above renders the stories of these men as story purely allegorical!
C. B above opens an even deeper dimension of understanding to the Bible!

We must note that as important as King David is to Israel, till date, the Jewish people have never been able to locate the actual site of his palace. There is also an ongoing debate on the authenticity of an historical Jesus

In Luke 3:34, The ancestry of Jesus Christ was traced from Abraham.
Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,

'Christ' is a title.

Revelations 7:4
And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

These is (are) the Christ(s) the world is expecting.

My head aches.

Manhunter™:
My head aches.

Lol

It's not that difficult.

The part I don't get is the David part.


Secondly, is Jesus one of the Christs or THE CHRIST?

Tgirl4real: The part I don't get is the David part.


Secondly, is Jesus one of the Christs or THE CHRIST?

David is a cover name for a multitude of kings. The Elect. The righteous men. This is why an actual palace will never be found. There is no historical David.

Yashua is a cover name for the elect. 144,000 Yashuas all represented as one man.

*In obadaiah's voice* tell them brah...

Mindblowing tinz

Mr President:

David is a cover name for a multitude of kings. The Elect. The righteous men. This is why an actual palace will never be found. There is no historical David.

Yashua is a cover name for the elect. 144,000 Yashuas all represented as one man.

So, who is the messiah that was crucified?

And who is the messiah that is being expected that will deliver the Jews from their oppressors?

And how does angel Michael come in here? Not long ago, you said he was Yeshua.

Which Jesus spoke to Saul in Acts 9?

This new year comedy is hilarious. ..

this is a devil engineered discourse. brethren, stay away!

Mr President come and readdress this issue. Most people wont understand this

so you are saying Jesus wasnt a literal man in the bible? Asin, he existed as many people.

Or

are you talking about the title 'Christ' which means Messiah, Saviour.

In Conclusion.....

Are you saying there are many Messiahs

just answer for the sake of curious minds

shallom brother.

MEILYN: Mr President come and readdress this issue. Most people wont understand this

so you are saying Jesus wasnt a literal man in the bible? Asin, he existed as many people.

Or

are you talking about the title 'Christ' which means Messiah, Saviour.

In Conclusion.....

Are you saying there are many Messiahs

just answer for the sake of curious minds

shallom brother.

I know say you sabi something small but sometimes, over sabi dey worry YOU.

Jesus is not the same as CHRIST. You sabi something my fewd but no let over sabi worry you again mehn.

@ Mr President,

Continue deceiving yourself you hear!

Soloter: this is a devil engineered discourse. brethren, stay away!

"For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil. " (Luke 7:33).

Christ was also called a devil

"The people answered and said, Thou hast a devil: who goeth about to kill thee?" (John 7:20).<< its not new to us bro

Goshen360:

I know say you sabi something small but sometimes, over sabi dey worry YOU.

Jesus is not the same as CHRIST. You sabi something my fewd but no let over sabi worry you again mehn.

Christ is a title, its not a name ....

MEILYN: Christ is a title, its not a name ....

I said you sabi something. He was already called\named Jesus at birth but "thou art CHRIST, the Son of the Living God" is a revelation not confirmed by flesh and blood but by the Father. Are you still confused?

Goshen360:

I said you sabi something. He was already called\named Jesus at birth but "thou art CHRIST, the Son of the Living God" is a revelation not confirmed by flesh and blood but by the Father. Are you still confused?

I am to tell you the truth














Nah Blessed art thou Simon Barjona

In my own opinion, there cant be many Christs.....

There is a reason they call him Jesus the Christ and not Jesus a Christ

one Christ, which is Jesus

my 2 cents.

Waiting...

Tgirl4real: Waiting...

Tgirl long time sis. Where did you go?

My bad... Christ means anointed one.

Anointed ones right.

I now get the point

you are correct.

Hmmmmmm... This verse.

"The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ." (Acts 4:26). and that verse was gotten from here.

"The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying," (Psalm 2:2).

"Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut;" (Isaiah 45:1).

not only Jesus is the anointed. There are other anointed men of Israel, which makes them Christ?

Oh.... Bitter truth to the unlearned