Toktee: Let them operate within the constitution and not outside the law thereby trampling on an individual right,what they did was acting the ruling party script,the similar case happened in ekiti and osun,if a judgement like this failed to teach them a lesson,they will nt change.
Let them stop acting like superhuman,the judgement is timely,cos the election is by corner,let them rethnk their action b4 then.

Ngwakwe:

Elrufai is not an opposition to DSS rather a citizen of Nigeria who felt his rights were violated

Learn to debate issues of national importance from citizens perspective rather than party affiliation.

Generally, the citizens are required to protest and lobby the National Assembly to redress and change laws they perceive as anti humanity/anti democracy as opposed to Judges resorting to judicial Activisms thereby taking other organs of the government for a ride.

Ngwakwe:

Don't misunderstand me, I am not against Elrufai in any ramification.

I was trying to reconcile this Court judgement with Laws and Statutes establishing DSS and the implications of this judicial pronouncement on their operational procedures if not appealed.

INSTINCTS: The thing pain them.

amtalkin: If APC had won the election will he had gone to court?
APC kind of policies. Will make you laugh why will a grown man always cry for everything I just pary they won't have heart attack before 2015

Ngwakwe:


Remember, DSS is an Institution of Government and not personal assistant to the ruling party and by Government, I mean Executive, Legislature, Judiciary and the People.

Ngwakwe: When you have Activists and Social Crusaders on the bench, there abound to be misinterpretation of Institutionalised laws and statutes establishing various Agencies of Government, this indulgence is driven by public opinions at a time rather than the content of laws of the country (constitution and acts of National Assembly).

This Judicial overzealousness (judicial talibanism if you like) is defined as "Legislation from the bench" rather than judicial interpretation of various Legislation and the Constitution of the country as required by law from an organ of the Government.

The Judiciary can reprimand an Agency of Government on operational procedures and not challenging their statutory functions.

arresa:


Why was he detained and restricted?

Was the man committing or about to commit a crime?

They based their actions on what info or intelligence?

What facts was produced before the judge to justify their action?


Instead of the usual irrelevant, layman one sided summation, these are the relevant and sensible questions you should be asking..

You are not a judge, the case was not litigated in your presence and you have zero access to tendered before the judge so curtail the unnecessary attack on the judiciary.